Beggers’ banquet opens the UN Climate Summit

The United Nations’ 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) began today in the city of Baku on the Caspian Sea in the nation of Azerbaijan, a former republic of the defunct Union Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).

The President of the UN Climate Summit this year is Mukhtar Babayev, who is the Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources of Azerbaijan. He opened the summit on a very dark and ominous note, about which he wants every nation to do more.

From CFACT

By Peter Murphy

The United Nations’ 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) began today in the city of Baku on the Caspian Sea in the nation of Azerbaijan, a former republic of the defunct Union Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).

The President of the UN Climate Summit this year is Mukhtar Babayev, who is the Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources of Azerbaijan. He opened the summit on a very dark and ominous note, about which he wants every nation to do more.

“Colleagues, we are on a road to ruin. But these are not future problems. Climate change is already here,” he said.

Indeed, it is. I would add that climate change has been “here” for millennia and more so for hundreds of millions of years, which seems never to occur to climate summit attendees.

“Whether you see them or not, people are suffering in the shadows. They are dying in the dark and they need more than compassion, more than prayers and paperwork,” Mr. Babayev continued. “They are crying out for leadership and action. COP29 is the unmissable moment to chart a new path forward for everyone.”

Such a statement easily could have been made (and was) three decades ago when the global climate summits began. Instead, by every favorable measure in the last 30 years, the world’s population has been made better off, even as carbon emissions have increased. Global poverty has sharply declined, living standards have increased, and public health has improved but for slight drop in some categories during Covid.

But Mr. Babayev was just getting warmed up. “COP29 is a moment of truth for the Paris [Climate] Agreement. It will test our commitment to the multilateral climate system. We must now demonstrate that we are prepared to meet the goals we have set ourselves.”

Ah, “goals.” They are only as good as those willing to meet them, which is basically nobody, including China, Russia, India, the United States and Europe. Meanwhile, the American public just re-elected someone—Donald Trump—who, on the eve of COP29, made sure to convey the U.S. was about pull out of the Paris Agreement.

The kicker from Mr. Babayev was this: “We need much more from all of you.”

As in cold hard cash, ranging from $187 billion to $359 billion annually, according to the UN Environment Programme Adaptation Gap Report 2024. Only $28 billion was provided in 2022.

It’s always about the money, and it’s never enough for the climate summiteers, three decades on.

The United Nation’s climate chief Simon Stiell minced no words in claiming that climate change was all about global redistribution of wealth, and that increasing financial commitments is the central goal of COP29. Not to worry, he assured, more developed, wealthier nations are not really giving away their citizens’ money because it is for their own good as well.

“Here in Baku, we must agree a new global climate finance goal. If at least two thirds of the world’s nations cannot afford to cut emissions quickly, then every nation pays a brutal price,” Mr. Stiell said (emphasis mine). “So, let’s dispense with the idea that climate finance is charity. An ambitious new climate finance goal is entirely in the self-interest of every nation, including the largest and wealthiest.”

Under the Biden-Harris administration, now defeated in the election and heading for the exits, the climate change agenda and financial support reached its peak. According to the State Department, U.S. international public climate finance increased during its first full year by 286% to $5.8 billion in 2022, with the administration committed to more than $11 billion annually by 2024. Alas, only $1 billion in annual climate finance was subsequently approved since the U.S. Congress, half of which by 2023 was controlled by Republicans, refused to pay more for this gravy train. Last year at COP28, Vice President Kamala Harris also pledged $3 billion for the Green Climate Fund, which has not materialized.

In other words, what is said at the UN Climate Summit and what transpires from others who actually make the financial decisions reside in separate realities, and now much more so, following the U.S. election outcome.

With the incoming Trump administration and his Republican Party controlling both houses of Congress, from which new money is appropriated, climate finance for other nations may well be zeroed out. President-elect Trump has long held that money is better spent at home and he and his party are committed to Americans keeping more of their own earnings and controlling debt-fueled government spending.

Still, the UN mendicant COP29 speakers will persist.

Last year’s climate summit president, Sultan Al Jaber of the oil-rich United Arab Emirates, today drove home the rhetorical point of the whole COP29 song and dance: “Let actions speak louder than words. Let results outlast the rhetoric. And remember, we are what we do, not what we say.”

Good luck with all that.

Gas Boilers Banned in New Homes From 2027

Gas boilers are to be banned in most new homes by 2027 as part of legislation being brought forward by the Government.

From The Daily Sceptic

By Will Jones

Gas boilers are to be banned in most new homes by 2027 as part of legislation being brought forward by the Government. The Telegraph has the story.

Under the so-called Future Homes Standard, which aims to slash carbon emissions across households, developers must ensure that new-builds are only fitted out with electric heat pumps or non-gas alternatives.

Rules regarding the gas boiler ban are expected to be announced as early as May next year, although they are unlikely to be enforced until the relevant legislation takes effect in 2026.

That would be followed by a 12-month delay to ensure housebuilders are prepared for the switchover, as first reported by the Financial Times.

The proposed ban comes after the previous Tory Government launched a consultation on the Future Homes Standard policy last year.

The new legislation aims to reduce carbon emissions across all new homes by up to 80%.

However, the decision to outlaw gas boilers has raised concerns over whether the heat pump supply chain can grow quickly enough to match Sir Keir Starmer’s bid to build 300,000 new homes a year.

Worth reading in full.

Currently only about 35,000 heat pumps are installed each year. Boosting that to 300,000 a year, nearly 10 times more, in three years seems like a stretch. The bigger problem of course is that people don’t like heat pumps because they don’t heat the house or water very well and, with electricity prices high, are not cheap to run.

To stop Spanish Floods, should we add more solar panels or more dams?

More than 219 people have drowned and another 80 are still missing after the devastating floods in Valencia, Spain. The UN expert climate scientists say that shutting coal plants and building windmills is the best way to stop floods.

Matt Ridley is wondering if removing 133 dams had anything to do with it, or if perhaps they should have built the big dam that was approved in 2001 but stopped by the Socialists in 2004

From JoNova

By Jo Nova

@PGuillermoSerra

Oh the Dilemma?

More than 219 people have drowned and another 80 are still missing after the devastating floods in Valencia, Spain. The UN expert climate scientists say that shutting coal plants and building windmills is the best way to stop floods.

Matt Ridley is wondering if removing 133 dams had anything to do with it, or if perhaps they should have built the big dam that was approved in 2001 but stopped by the Socialists in 2004:

Dam shame: what really caused Valencia’s floods?

Matt Ridley, The Spectator

… Valencia had a similarly terrible flood in 1957, in which 81 people died, long before climate change became the go-to excuse for any bad weather. After that flood, to prevent a recurrence, the Spanish government built a string of dams in the hills to hold back water and diverted the Turia river away from the city. For more than six decades the system worked well. Why did it fail this year? Because the unusually warm sea made for an unusually bad storm, say some. Yet charts of rainfall in Spain show no trend towards a higher frequency of more extreme downpours…

Indeed, 24 hour torrential rainfall records back to 1940 don’t sing the Climate Change song. Since 1982 human emissions of CO2 have grown from a cumulative total of 640 billion tons up to 1,800 billion tons and it hasn’t made the slightest difference to downpours.

That’s a 280% increase in man-made CO2 and there’s nothing to show for it.

Graph by Jose Gefaell.

Matt Ridley points to the enthusiastic dam removal programs the EU has been ordering:

In the past few years, the Spanish government has been removing dams at a furious rate. Under a European Union programme to encourage the restoration of rivers to their wild state for the benefit of fish migration, Spain set about dismantling barriers of all kinds. In 2021 it got rid of 108 dams and weirs; in 2022, another 133. That year, according to Dam Removal Europe, a coalition of seven green pressure groups, it was Europe’s proud league champion at dismantling them…

The billionaire’s ski club called the WEF brags about how many dams they have removed: The removal of dams in Europe is reviving rivers and boosting biodiversity

The BBC was touting the environmental wonders of dam removal in Europe only 6 months ago:

They not only cause biodiversity loss, impacting fish and microorganisms, but also prevent nutrients and sediments from flowing downstream, hindering fisheries and the livelihoods that depend on them.

Research now shows that at least 1.2 million instream obstacles block river flows in 36 European countries, with about 68% less than 2m (6.6ft) in height. “Even barriers as small as 20cm (8in) may impact or delay the movement of some organisms,” says Carlos Garcia de Leaniz professor in Aquatic Biosciences at Swansea University and coordinator of Amber, a project that created the first atlas of European river barriers.

Some dams are sacred though — no bureaucrat is going to get rid of a hydro-dam. They stop floods by reducing human CO2 emissions which may in a thousand years, slightly reduce world temperatures in such a way as to change jet-streams, and maybe possibly, lessen the intensity of downfalls. Screw the fish eh?

Acknowledging that dams have a detrimental effect on ecosystems doesn’t mean denying hydropower’s benefits in supplying energy, however. “Absolutely nobody is proposing to blow up or remove barriers which are in use,” clarifies Garcia de Leaniz…

But as Matt Ridley notes, the Cheste dam was “was specifically designed to prevent flooding, to ‘regulate the flows coming from the upper basin of the Poyo and Pozalet ravines’.” It was abandoned in 2004. “Could it have saved Valencia?” he wonders, pointing out that “the city of Aragon was saved last month by a dam built by the emperor Augustus.”

In the tragedy of the Spanish flood, an ancient Roman dam saves the city of Aragon 

Built nearly 2,000 years ago by Emperor Augustus, the 34-meter dam prevented destruction and loss in the region

This is the tallest surviving Roman dam in the world! pic.twitter.com/Xqz8IPtzYd

— Mambo Italiano (@mamboitaliano__) November 4, 2024

Britain’s wind power falls to virtually zero as Miliband prepares to cut reliance on gas

Britain’s wind generation is set to plummet to virtually zero this week as Ed Miliband presses ahead with plans to increase the nation’s reliance on renewable energy.

Much of the UK has seen zero hours of sunshine this month, and the first part of this week will see already-light winds hit fresh lows in many areas, according to Met Office forecasters.

Energy Secretary is expected to commit to further reducing UK carbon footprint at Cop29

Britain’s wind generation is set to plummet to virtually zero this week as Ed Miliband presses ahead with plans to increase the nation’s reliance on renewable energy.

Much of the UK has seen zero hours of sunshine this month, and the first part of this week will see already-light winds hit fresh lows in many areas, according to Met Office forecasters. The Telagraph has the story.

The dark and windless weather comes as Sir Keir Starmer and Mr Miliband, the Energy Secretary, fly to the UN climate talks in Baku, Azerbaijan, to pledge massive cuts in UK greenhouse gas emissions.

They are expected to pledge to cut CO2 emissions by 240m tonnes, or 60pc of their 2022 levels, by 2035.

They will also confirm plans to “decarbonise” the UK electricity system by 2030, by ending the use of the UK’s 32 main gas-fired power stations.

Sir Keir’s speech, expected on Tuesday, coincides with a record “dunkelflaute” spell of low winds and sunshine that have already slashed output from renewables.

Wind speeds are expected to fall again this week, making gas more essential than ever to keep the lights on.

“Many of our weather stations have recorded zero sunshine so far this month,” said a Met Office forecaster. It’s very unusual.”

Those weather stations are spread across the southern UK, with zero sunshine readings from Brize Norton in Oxfordshire, Ross on Wye, near the Welsh borders, St Athan, west of Cardiff, Liscombe in Devon and Wittering, near Peterborough.

Read the full story here.

Trump’s Re-Election: A Deliciously Timed Reality Check for COP29

The global climate circus, formally known as the 29th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29), is underway in Baku, Azerbaijan, and the timing couldn’t be better. Or worse—depending on your perspective.

From Watts Up With That?

By Charles Rotter

The global climate circus, formally known as the 29th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29), is underway in Baku, Azerbaijan, and the timing couldn’t be better. Or worse—depending on your perspective.

Donald Trump’s return to the White House has delivered a well-deserved gut punch to the assembled climate faithful.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/11/climate/cop29-climate-talks-trump/index.html

After all, nothing ruins a good sermon on planetary salvation like a parishioner who refuses to take the gospel seriously.

While COP29 delegates scurry to manufacture “consensus,” the reality is clear: global climate policy was always a house of cards, and Trump’s election is the gust of wind that exposes its flimsy foundation.

Trump’s Record: Climate Realism Over Ideology

Say what you will about Trump, but at least he’s consistent. His first term shredded the Paris Agreement and unapologetically promoted American energy independence, prioritizing economic pragmatism over nebulous climate goals. Now, with a second term, the climate crusaders are sweating—not because of global warming, but because their multi-trillion-dollar plans depend on the unquestioning cooperation of the United States.

The Paris Agreement itself, hailed as a landmark in climate diplomacy, is fundamentally toothless. Even the International Energy Agency (IEA) admits that current commitments fall far short of the targets it claims are necessary. With Trump back in charge, even these ineffective promises are likely to be ignored. Let’s be honest—shouldn’t we applaud the clarity? At least someone is willing to call the bluff.

COP29: A Summit in Disarray

If Trump’s victory isn’t enough to sour the mood in Baku, the absence of major world leaders has surely done the trick. The European Union’s Ursula von der Leyen, Brazil’s Lula da Silva, and other prominent figures are conveniently “too busy” to attend, leaving the climate choir without its star soloists​.

Empty Chairs and Empty Promises

This lack of attendance is more than a scheduling conflict; it’s a silent acknowledgment that the climate summit routine is losing steam. Decades of annual COP meetings have delivered little beyond bloated communiqués and unenforceable agreements. The true believers, of course, will still emerge with proclamations of “progress,” but anyone paying attention knows the truth: the wheels are coming off.

The $1 Trillion Fantasy

One of the main agenda items at COP29 is a proposal to funnel $1 trillion annually to developing nations for climate adaptation and mitigation. How to fund this massive wealth transfer? Ideas range from taxing oil companies to levies on air travel and shipping​.

It’s an impressive grift, but let’s break it down. Developing countries demand reparations for a problem they claim they didn’t cause, while rich nations pledge money they don’t have. Even if these taxes materialized (highly doubtful), the funds would likely be squandered on boondoggles like solar farms that stop working after two years or wind turbines that can’t survive a stiff breeze.

Developing Nations: Right to Complain or Convenient Excuse?

The loudest voices at COP29 come from countries that portray themselves as victims of industrialized nations. Yet many of these same countries are doubling down on coal, oil, and gas projects, proving once again that hypocrisy is the true renewable resource. With Trump unwilling to play the guilt-ridden benefactor, these nations may need to rethink their strategy—or better yet, focus on real development instead of chasing climate handouts.

Azerbaijan: Petrostate Hosts the Climate Cult

Choosing Azerbaijan to host COP29 is either peak irony or a moment of clarity. A nation whose economy relies on oil and gas exports is now the stage for global discussions on phasing out fossil fuels. It’s like asking a fox to guard the henhouse—and then handing it a cookbook.

The official line is that Azerbaijan is diversifying into renewables, but let’s not kid ourselves. Hosting COP29 is a PR stunt, an opportunity to burnish the country’s image while continuing to rake in profits from the very resources the climate crowd wants to eliminate​.

What Does This Say About Climate Policy?

The choice of Azerbaijan is emblematic of a larger truth: climate diplomacy is rife with contradictions. World leaders preach austerity while flying in private jets. Fossil-fuel-dependent nations promise net zero. And now, the champions of decarbonization are meeting in a petrostate. It’s all theater, and the audience is growing weary.

The Decline of Climate Diplomacy

Let’s face it: the COP process was never designed to succeed. It relies on unenforceable agreements and the goodwill of nations with conflicting interests. The result is a predictable cycle of overhyped announcements, vague pledges, and little action.

The Problem with Consensus

By requiring unanimity, COP summits effectively guarantee mediocrity. Every nation gets a veto, and any serious proposal is watered down to meaninglessness. Add to this the political instability in key countries—Trump in the U.S., geopolitical tensions in Europe, and economic turmoil in developing nations—and the cracks in the system become glaringly obvious.

What’s the Point?

The most amusing part of COP29 is the pretense that any of this matters. Even if the proposed $1 trillion fund were fully realized (spoiler alert: it won’t be), it wouldn’t make a dent in global emissions. Why? Because China and India, the world’s largest emitters, are still building coal plants faster than you can say “carbon offset.”

Conclusion: Schadenfreude and Reality

Trump’s re-election is a sharp reminder of the futility of global climate policies. His unapologetic rejection of climate orthodoxy exposes what many already suspect: these summits are little more than elaborate charades, divorced from practical realities and rife with contradictions.

Instead of bemoaning Trump’s return, perhaps the climate faithful should thank him. By refusing to play along, he’s exposing the hollowness of their agenda. And if COP29 achieves nothing beyond demonstrating that truth, then it will have been a summit worth remembering.

COP29 Will Be Haunted by the Ghost of the President Yet-to-Come

Spare a thought this morning for Justin Rowlatt of the BBC as he sits down for breakfast in Baku wondering how he will spin the looming disaster of the now Trump-wrecked COP29, which begins today.

From The Daily Sceptic

By Chris Morrison

Spare a thought this morning for Justin Rowlatt of the BBC as he sits down for breakfast in Baku wondering how he will spin the looming disaster of the now Trump-wrecked COP29, which begins today. In happier days, the thought of wasting billions of dollars on free handouts, or climate reparations, as they are laughably called, would have warmed his heart. In happier days, western governments could pretend to be saving the planet by rebadging foreign aid for so-called climate projects. Few seemed to take their climate obligations more seriously than the Belgians who funded a romantic film about a green activist and a rugby-playing logger set in a rainforest. Sadly, to date, your correspondent has been unable to catch this eco-classic when the tree hugger met the hunk with the big log. The Belgians justified the movie as ‘climate finance’ because it “touches on deforestation”.

The latest COP in Azerbaijan is all about money – a massive annual trillion dollar heist planned by global elites as a transfer from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries. But Trump’s election has blown these plans out of the water. America’s commitment to the Paris agreement, crucial to much of this funding, will soon be ditched by Trump along with green boondoggles of every variety. Can Rowlatt and co. step up to the plate and put the best possible face on the new reality? Rarely can a BBC correspondent have faced a more difficult assignment.

David Wojick of CFACT is not sanguine about the prospects of the useful idiots covering the conference for mainstream media. “That people take this nonsense seriously speaks volumes about the unreality of the UN climate programme. But it will be great fun to watch them hit the NO WAY wall,” he says.

If all goes well at COP 29, the Italians will no longer have to save the planet one ice cream at a time. Part of their past climate aid helped an Italian retailer to open a chain of chocolate and gelato stores across Asia. This formed part of the agreement reached in Paris in 2015 that pledged $100 billion a year for climate action in the developing world. In fact, a recent survey by Reuters and Big Local News at Stanford University found that billions of dollars had been spent building new coal- and gas-fired power stations, along with airport and hotel developments. Japan is said to have provided at least $776.3 million to finance three airports including the Borg El Arab development in Egypt. The pragmatic Egyptian climate minister Mohamed Nasr noted that “people have to fly”.

The two largest climate finance contributors to date are the USA and Japan. The researchers found that Japan grants itself a great deal of latitude when it comes to defining climate finance. It provided $2.4 billion to help fund the Matarbari ultra supercritical coal-fired power station in Bangladesh. Apparently, Japan considers Matarbari a project worthy of its climate backing because it uses Japanese technology to generate more energy with less coal. If worrying about carbon dioxide is your thing, you will not be pleased to learn that according to the researchers Matarbari will produce more emissions than the entire city of San Francisco in 2019.

Desperation at the BBC is evident in pre-COP copy with arch eco-activists Matt McGrath and Georgina Rannard stating that world leaders are “hoping to rein in rising temperatures which are making deadly events like the recent floods in Spain far worse”. Note the lack of the usual ‘scientists say’ qualification to make a statement for which there is scant scientific evidence. Desperate times calls for desperate editorial measures. The luxury belief that humans control a chaotic, non-linear atmosphere and can somehow “rein in” temperatures around the world, is a political message that backs the increasingly absurd climate emergency and its death cult Net Zero solution.

Of course, a lot of silly people who claim that you can take hydrocarbons out of a modern industrial economy have gathered in Baku. There are few sillier than mad Ed Miliband, who is rushing headlong into ‘decarbonising’ the U.K.’s electricity grid within the next 60 months. He has been told that there is no reliable back up for intermittent breezes and beams except a full fleet of gas-fired power stations. Since Miliband is also banning new oil and gas exploration, he might care for a meeting with Elnur Soltanov, the Chief Executive of Azerbaijan’s COP team.

We are obliged to J. Rowlatt for reporting that Soltanov is taking the opportunity to promote the country’s burgeoning oil and gas business. It is after all essential to have some access to hydrocarbons if you are too virtuous to drill for them yourself. Or the Mad One might bump into forward planners from the Trump team. There will be plenty of gas available across the pond in the next four years with the incoming President promising to “drill baby drill”. The price may be a little higher than any domestic supply since it needs to be compressed and transported. Since the U.K. will be dealing at the top with a capitalist deal maker President, the price will need to reflect all these costs, and possibly a small premium to help assuage the seller’s conscience of having the customer over a barrel.

One can hardly blame the representatives of developing countries turning up at Baku and asking for free money for bad weather. The island states will be there in force claiming rising sea levels will sweep away their coral and sand bank homes. Again, substantial handouts will help assuage consciences. It must be hard to keep telling these fibs to halfwitted journalists and politicians when all the scientific evidence suggests that most tropical islands in the Pacific are growing by natural accretion. But no doubt the cash will be put to good use building more money-spinning beach resorts.

But there is a more serious and darker side to the climate giving game – the suggestion that it’s a form of climate colonialism. In a recent essay in Watt Up With That?, Charles Rotter noted that global financial institutions and wealthy nations dictate energy policy that prioritises carbon reduction over human development. Across Africa, electricity blackouts are common. The region’s most populous country, Nigeria, is repeatedly plunged into darkness. The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund have curtailed funding for oil and gas projects, while the European Investment Bank has banned support for hydrocarbon projects. Hopefully, help in providing reliable energy to developing countries for electricity, clean water and sanitation may be on its way from the U.S. Under pressure from the Biden administration, American development agencies are reported to have halted backing for overseas hydrocarbon projects. This is likely to change. As Rotter notes, forcing developing nations to rely on unreliable and expensive renewables means that wealthier countries maintain their industrial advantage.

Such sentiments about the underlying wickedness of COP will no doubt have Rowlatt choking over his organic oatmeal.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

Climate Fact-Check October 2024 Edition

The monthly Climate Fact Check is intended to correct misinformation constantly spewing from mainstream media. Many of our fact checks focus on correcting the Washington Post. In explaining his decision to not endorse a presidential candidate,

From ClimateRealism

By Steve Milloy

Guest Post by: The Competitive Enterprise Institute, The Heartland Institute, the Energy & Environmental Legal Institute, the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, and the International Climate Science Coalition, and Truth in Energy and Climate.

Editor’s note: This summary serves as a fact check on the biggest false claims made in the media in October, 2024. 

The monthly Climate Fact Check is intended to correct misinformation constantly spewing from mainstream media. Many of our fact checks focus on correcting the Washington Post. In explaining his decision to not endorse a presidential candidate, Post owner Jeff Bezos wrote this op-ed, excerpted below:

“In the annual public surveys about trust and reputation, journalists and the media have
regularly fallen near the very bottom… We must be accurate, and we must be believed to
be accurate. It’s a bitter pill to swallow, but we are failing on the second requirement. Most
people believe the media is biased. Anyone who doesn’t see this is paying scant attention
to reality, and those who fight reality lose. Reality is an undefeated champion. It would be
easy to blame others for our long and continuing fall in credibility (and, therefore, decline
in impact), but a victim mentality will not help. Complaining is not a strategy. We must work harder to control what we can control to increase our credibility.”

As Bezos noted, “Reality is an undefeated champion.” The Climate Fact Check is our effort to vindicate that statement. Now on to this month fact checks:

Links: The New York Times article, get more information.
Links: The Washington Post article.
Links: The Washington Post article, get more information.
Links: The Washington Post article.
Links: The Washington Post article.
Links: Reuters article, Smithsonian report.
Links: The Associated Press article, get more information.
Links: Bloomberg Law article.
Links: CNBC article, The Washington Post article.

We’ll close out this month by spotlighting the annual “Emissions Gap Report” from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). The report contained this graph that shows despite much alarmist propaganda and trillions of dollars spent on reducing emissions to below 1990 levels, nothing of the sort has occurred. Emissions have steadily increased since the dawn of climate alarm.

And don’t forget to check out these and more great fact checks:

ClimateRealism.com

WattsUpWithThat.com

See you in December for the November Climate Fact Check!

Originally posted at JunkScience.com, reposted with permission.

30-by-30 land grabs kept at bay – for now (ft. Margaret Byfield of American Stewards of Liberty)

In Episode 468 of District of Conservation, Gabriella welcomes back American Stewards of Liberty executive director Margaret Byfield. Margaret chats about COP16 currently happening in Colombia, biodiversity/nature credits, the status of 30-by-30, natural asset companies, natural capital accounts, and the future of property rights. Tune in to learn more!

From CFACT

By Gabriella Hoffman

“I think that they are getting more pushback back than they realized, and that they thought they would be further along, so that that’s a credit to our side of the fight….We know that they’re going to continue to push this as you mentioned this. You know [it] had its roots in 1980–the iterations of 30 by 30. So once they get these kind of plans going, they never really quit. I think even though we may be seeing some success – and I do think we are – I think we’re part of the reason why they haven’t been able to do this, particularly stopping the natural asset company, investment company here in the US that set them back big time. And so I think also it’s a combination of the whole messaging: this nature crisis, the climate crisis, is based on a false narrative.” — Margaret Byfield

In Episode 468 of District of Conservation, Gabriella welcomes back American Stewards of Liberty executive director Margaret Byfield. Margaret chats about COP16 currently happening in Colombia, biodiversity/nature credits, the status of 30-by-30, natural asset companies, natural capital accounts, and the future of property rights. Tune in to learn more!

Listen on Apple Podcasts

EP 579: BAAJA Blast: Permitting Reform or Bust – District of Conservation

In Episode 579 of District of Conservation, Gabriella discusses the permitting reform bill – aka BAAJA – that is gaining traction in Congress now. The Senate will hold a cloture vote starting at 3:30pm ET in a motion to proceed. Gabriella discusses the status quo without permitting reform, how BAAJA is good for the environment and affordability. Tune in!SHOW NOTESBipartisan Policy Center: BAAJA ExplainerEstimating the US Energy System Impacts of the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act
  1. EP 579: BAAJA Blast: Permitting Reform or Bust
  2. EP 578: Midterms, CO Amendment 83, Disneyland Goes Electric
  3. EP 577: Kaylyn Glenn – Florida Gladeswoman & Conservationist
  4. EP 576: Chiricahua National Park & Energy Security Index
  5. EP 575: Menhaden Madness (ft. Whit Fosburgh, Forage Fish Campaign)

Don’t Rely On Solar Power!

While the dunkelflaute has already lasted a week, and appears to be carrying for another, as well as having little wind power, we have little solar power either.

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

While the dunkelflaute has already lasted a week, and appears to be carrying for another, as well as having little wind power, we have little solar power either.

The days have been uniformly dull and grey until today, and at its peak on Saturday only hit 877 MW, only 4.9% of capacity.

https://www.solar.sheffield.ac.uk/pvlive/#

Average output that day was just 164 MW.

What is the logic of spending billions of pounds on carpeting perfectly good farm land with solar panels which are no use at all in winter?

Former New York GOP Rep. Lee Zeldin Tapped To Lead Environmental Protection Agency

President-elect Donald Trump selected former Republican New York Rep. Lee Zeldin to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, both individuals confirmed on Monday.

Rep. Lee Zeldin participates in New York’s Republican gubernatorial debate at the studios of Spectrum News NY1 on Monday, June 20, 2022, in New York. (Brittainy Newman/Newsday via AP, Pool)

From Watts Up With That?

The Daily Caller

Adam Pack
Contributor

President-elect Donald Trump selected former Republican New York Rep. Lee Zeldin to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, both individuals confirmed on Monday.

“It is an honor to join President Trump’s Cabinet as EPA Administrator,” Zeldin wrote on X announcing his appointment. “We will restore US energy dominance, revitalize our auto industry to bring back American jobs, and make the US the global leader of AI. We will do so while protecting access to clean air and water.” (RELATED: Trump Pledges To End Biden’s EV Mandate To Help Consumers, Calls On UAW To Ditch Democrats)

BREAKING: Lee Zeldin has been tapped to lead the EPA under Trump’s incoming administration. pic.twitter.com/nL76eToJKC

— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) November 11, 2024

Zeldin will likely hit the ground running as the Trump administration looks to roll back the Biden EPA’s stringent regulations on gas-powered vehicles and coal and natural gas generation.

“Lee, with a very strong legal background, has been a true fighter for America First policies. He will ensure fair and swift deregulatory decisions that will be enacted in a way to unleash the power of American businesses, while at the same time maintaining the highest environmental standards, including the cleanest air and water on the planet,” Trump said in a statement. “I have known Lee Zeldin for a long time, and have watched him handle, brilliantly, some extremely difficult and complex situations. I am very proud to have him in the Trump Administration, where he will quickly prove to be a great contributor!”

Zeldin served four terms in the House and was the Republican candidate in New York’s 2022 gubernatorial contest against Democratic incumbent Kathy Hochul. Zeldin came within roughly 7 points of defeating Hochul in a race that was held as a historically strong performance by Zeldin’s campaign.

“I am deeply honored to have been asked by PresidenTrump to serve in his Cabinet. As EPA Administrator, we will restore American energy dominance, revitalize our auto industry to bring back American jobs, make the United States the global leader of Artificial Intelligence advancement, and slash the red tape holding back American workers from upward economic mobility,” Zeldin said in a statement to The New York Post, which first broke the news of Zeldin’s appointment.

Trump has also picked New York Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik to be the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.