Climate Activists Flying to Belém, paying $1000+ / Night, to Demand More Money

The new Virgin Amazon Rainforest highway appears to connect the upmarket end of town to the conference center, via the Red-Light District.

A woman in a blue shirt walks past a large yellow sign that reads 'See you at COP30!' and 'Brasil', surrounded by lush greenery and vibrant banners.

From Watts Up With That?

Essay by Eric Worrall

A group of six people, dressed in formal suits, walking away down a corridor lined with lush plants and colorful flowers, with one person in a white outfit at the center.

The new Virgin Amazon Rainforest highway appears to connect the upmarket end of town to the conference center, via the Red-Light District.

03 November 2025 | Climate Change, News, Social

COP 30 – a turning point for climate, human rights and the finance sector?

This year’s COP30 takes place in the wake of the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) ruling in July 2025, positioning the discussions in Brazil this November to break new ground for human rights. This article explains how the ruling not only far-reaching implications for States’ obligations has but outlines the business opportunities it opens up for financial institutions, the risks of ignoring a consideration of human rights, and provides examples of innovation already taking place in the finance sector. 

The conclusions of the ICJ confirmed the UN General Assembly’s 2022 resolution recognizing a clean, healthy and sustainable environment as a foundational human right, acknowledging that it is necessary for the enjoyment of all other human rights. This means States that are party to international treaties, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, must now address climate change as part of their human rights obligations. COP30 therefore presents a unique opportunity to build on this momentum and place human rights at the heart of climate action. 

The ruling has far-reaching implications for States’ obligations, but the increased actions taken by States to ensure compliance could create business opportunities for financial institutions (FIs) to support mitigation and adaptation measures. The ruling might also generate greater regulatory incentives or pressure on those States seeking to avoid liability for the omissions or inaction of non-state actors such as real-economy companies and financiers. Exactly what this will mean for commercial enterprises remains to be seen, however, it does make clear the direction of travel, and as such, provides new momentum to opportunities that centre human rights alongside climate change. 

This development is part of a broader shift ushering the finance sector towards adopting practices that embed human rights considerations into its response to climate change. Impacts of climate change that may once have seemed irrelevant are steadily becoming material risks to banks and insurers, including the human impact of the changes that are occurring. Regulators and investors are increasingly seeking to drive positive action on this front, and that trend looks set to continue. Financial institutions now have a chance to be proactive, demonstrate leadership, and position themselves at the forefront of emerging opportunities in sustainable finance.  

Banks and insurance companies already have in place many processes that can effectively support this agenda, and some are already forging ahead. Indeed, due diligence and know–your–client mechanisms, for instance, provide opportunities to integrate human rights into their processes. UNEP FI has developed tools for financial institutions, such as the Human Rights Toolkit, specifically designed to assist with the integration of human rights due diligence into standard practice. However, the Court’s ruling sets an even broader challenge: addressing the interdependence between environmental protection and restauration including climate action, and human rights protection and promotion will require stronger collaboration across teams within financial institutions and greater efforts to integrate environmental and social processes that too often operate in isolation.

Another powerful way forward for the integration of human rights into finance is through adopting Just Transition principles into strategy and operations. Key to the concept is the idea that the transition to a greener economy can, and must, be done in such a way that individuals and communities also benefit, from creating new jobs, improving existing livelihoods, or cleaner air quality. For banks, among other things, this means directing capital towards enabling the real economy to shift towards environmental sustainability while fostering societal resilience. For insurers, there is scope to contribute both as investors and in the provision of products and services that enhance resilience and bolster the economic viability of businesses that generate livelihoods. 

There are many examples of banks grasping these opportunities and innovating in a socially positive way. For example, Triodos Bank, United Kingdom provided GBP 3 million of new senior debt alongside over GBP 500,000 from a community bond offer to bring a solar farm to full community ownership, generating enough renewable electricity to power 825 homes each year. BNP Paribas’s My Sustainable Home initiative supports the decarbonisation of residential real estate by assisting customers to find the subsidies and grants available to make their homes more energy efficient and identifying accessible and affordable lending solutions for younger customers.  

Insurers too are responding in innovative ways to emerging challenges. In the Philippines, for example, Pioneer Life Insurance recognized that climate change—through rising temperatures and increased flooding—was driving the spread of mosquito-borne diseases like dengue. They launched MediCash — Dengue Insurance to help families manage the resulting financial shocks. Hollard Zambia, an insurer that is part of the Hollard Group from South Africa, developed a bundled solution for micro business owners, offering insurance for about 2 USD per month to help them strengthen their climate resilience. 

These examples all illustrate the innovative and positive ways that financial institutions can engage with the human impact of climate change to protect the life, dignity and livelihoods of communities around the world. COP30 represents an opportunity to refocus our collective efforts on maintaining a liveable world for the flora and fauna, as well as the many and diverse people that inhabit it. 

For further information and guidance, access the UNEP FI Human Rights Toolkit and the UNEP FI-ILO report Just Transition Finance – pathways for banking and insurance guidance.  

To learn more, please join the UNEP FI Human Rights Day webinar in December 2025. 

Source: https://www.unepfi.org/themes/climate-change/cop-30-a-turning-point-for-climate-human-rights-and-the-finance-sector/

The new highway also appears to pass close to some luxurious sounding rainforest retreat style accomodation.

What can I say? Clearly Brazil have gone the extra mile to accomodate delegates. But with the USA a no-show, I doubt there will be much actual cash on the table.

Trump Admin Touts Record-Shattering Energy Report Despite Biden-Era Crackdown

The Department of Energy (DOE) touted a report on Wednesday which states that America broke records in liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports.

A digital artwork depicting a liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker in motion, with a blend of flags representing the United States and the European Union in the background, alongside an expressive portrait of a man resembling Joe Biden.

From The Daily Caller

Daily Caller News Foundation

Audrey Streb
DCNF Energy Reporter

The Department of Energy (DOE) touted a report on Wednesday which states that America broke records in liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports.

The U.S. became the first country to export over 10 million metric tonnes of LNG in one month in October, Reuters reported on Monday, citing preliminary data from the financial firm LSEG. The DOE posted on X on Wednesday that “there are big opportunities ahead for U.S. natural gas” and has consistently championed LNG in a sharp departure from former President Joe Biden’s crackdown on the resource.

“The fact that America’s oil and gas industry was able to pass this stunning milestone is impressive considering all the roadblocks to progress which were thrown up by the Biden administration,” David Blackmon, an energy and policy writer who spent 40 years in the oil and gas business, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “It is a testament to both the resilience and innovative mindset of the industry and to the phenomenal wealth of America’s natural gas resource.” 

(RELATED: Trump Admin Barreling Forward With Oil And Gas Permits Through Government Shut Down)

Two facilities in Louisiana and Texas are responsible for the LNG export surge, according to Reuters. The U.S. LNG industry emerged as an energy sector giant in recent decades, with America now leading the world in LNG exports after being projected to be a net importer as late as 2010, according to S&P Global.

The Biden administration enacted a freeze on new LNG export permits and “intentionally buried a lot of data and released a skewed study to discredit the benefits of American LNG,” the DCNF previously reported. The environmental lobby applauded Biden’s January 2024 freeze on new LNG export terminals, though critics argued that the policy stalled investment, would not reduce emissions and undermined America’s global strategic interests.

In contrast, President Donald Trump sought opportunities to bolster LNG and reversed the new permit pause through a day-one executive order. Some energy policy experts told the DCNF that the reported milestone highlights the resiliency of the industry and the benefit of Trump’s “American energy dominance” agenda.

“By expediting LNG terminal expansion and signing off on export agreements, the Trump administration is rapidly powering the world while simultaneously keeping his commitment for U.S. energy dominance,” Sterling Burnett, director of the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy at The Heartland Institute, told the DCNF. “The world wants U.S. gas, and under Trump they are getting it, in the process showing the world what a market economy can do when unfettered by unnecessary, duplicative, regulations that stifle growth.”

“The only thing that has held the U.S. economy and our energy independence and dominance back over the decades is Democratic administration’s pushing inane, futile, climate policies, restricting fossil fuel use,” Burnett continued. “New LNG export data shows those days are over and what America can accomplish for itself and the world, when a President puts America first.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Pakistan’s Deadly Floods Are Not Worsened by Climate Change, BBC

The BBC posted an article, “Devastation on repeat: How climate change is worsening Pakistan’s deadly floods,” which, as the title suggests, claims that recent monsoon flooding in Pakistan was worsened by climate change. This is false. Data don’t indicate that monsoon floods are worse now than in the past, and the article offers an alternative explanation for the amount of damage: more people settling in flood prone areas.

Aerial view of a flooded residential area, with houses partially submerged in muddy water surrounded by trees and open fields.

From ClimateRealism

By Linnea Lueken

A view of a muddy river flowing through a narrow valley surrounded by buildings, with people on the banks observing the scene. Clothes are hung along a stone wall, and debris is scattered on the riverbank.

The BBC posted an article, “Devastation on repeat: How climate change is worsening Pakistan’s deadly floods,” which, as the title suggests, claims that recent monsoon flooding in Pakistan was worsened by climate change. This is false. Data don’t indicate that monsoon floods are worse now than in the past, and the article offers an alternative explanation for the amount of damage: more people settling in flood prone areas.

The BBC reports annual monsoons in Pakistan have often brought deadly flooding but claims that Pakistan “is struggling with the devastating consequences of climate change, despite emitting just 1% of global greenhouse gas emissions.”

They go on to say that “[i]n every province, climate change was having a different impact,” and “the poor suffer most.”

The article highlights several major floods that resulted in tragic deaths and major damage to infrastructure, but the one that has the most claim to being allegedly “climate change driven” was the first, when monsoon floods destroyed “hundreds of homes” from landslides and flash flooding in Gilgit-Baltistan. The BBC tied this destruction to climate change by describing how melting glaciers in the Himalayas, Karakoram, and Hindu Kush can create glacial lakes that can burst and flood villages.

The BBC ignored an earlier article discussing the formation of a temporary lake due to a glacier burst that dammed a river in August, along with a few other glacier bursts causing flooding. That article interviews a local figure who says that these flooding events are nothing new. He told Dawn.com that “lakes being formed by natural floods in the area were an ongoing phenomenon for a long time,” at least as far back in his memory as the 1980s, and that some of them become popular scenic tourist destinations. So, the lakes were not formed by recent glacial melt; they have been building for decades. That doesn’t make up for the loss of life and property, but it does add perspective.

Glacial retreat and melting is nothing new, and it does not appear to be happening very fast. In the case of the Himalayas, researchers recently reported that those glaciers are melting much more slowly than expected. And, again, this isn’t even a new trend. By 1950, the earth already lost 75 percent of glaciers, which had hit a short-term peak by 1850, before the end of the little ice age. During that period, glaciers expanded, threating small mountain villages, as reports, wood cuts, and other art from the time show.

Graph depicting NH climate reconstruction with temperature changes, glacial length records, and CO2 levels from 1700 to 2000.
Figure 1: Chart by David Middleton, from WattsUpWithThat.com. His description of the figure reads: “45% of the ice loss occurred before 1900, when atmospheric CO2 was still below 300 ppm. By 1950, 75% of the ice loss had occurred. Only 25% of the ice loss has occurred since humans allegedly became the primary drivers of climate change. At the time of “The Ice Age Cometh” (1975), 90% of the ice loss had already occurred.”

History shows that ice-dams burst and drown villages around the world even during times when glaciers are advancing, like during the little ice age.

In order to show that monsoons are worsening due to climate change in Pakistan, there needs to be data indicating a long-term trend of monsoon seasons becoming more extreme with more precipitation and flooding. However, available data actually show nothing of the sort. As explained in “Climate Change Is Not Making the South Asian Monsoon More Dangerous, Phys.org,” the South Asian monsoon, impacting India and Pakistan alike, waxes and wanes over decades and centuries, with no apparent pattern. Other Climate Realism posts (here, for instance) have debunked this claim as well. The media hypes similar unverified assertions every time there is a very wet monsoon season, but long-term data doesn’t show a consistent pattern of worsening monsoon rains.

The other floods that the BBC article references were caused by things like cloudbursts and other short-term weather patterns that have nothing to do with global warming.

Interestingly, later in the article, BBC offers an explanation for the flooding severity completely unrelated to climate change:

In villages and cities, millions have settled around rivers and streams, areas prone to flooding. Pakistan’s River Protection Act – which prohibits building within 200 ft (61m) of a river or its tributaries – was meant to solve that issue. But for many it’s simply too costly to settle elsewhere.

Illegal construction makes matters worse.

Climate scientist Fahad Saeed blames this on local corruption and believes officials are failing to enforce the law. He spoke to the BBC in Islamabad, next to a half-built, four-story concrete building as big as a car park – and right by a stream that he saw flood this summer, killing a child.

Worse, the BBC reports on the sad fact that many poor Pakistanis rebuild in the same places that flooded previously because they can’t afford to move. This is not unusual in underdeveloped parts of the world. Climate Realism covered the same issue with regular floods in developing parts of Nigeria. There, explosive population growth along flood-prone rivers has caused issues for water management. However, people continue to build in flood zones even as regular flooding destroys their homes.

This isn’t a climate problem, it is a poverty, infrastructure, and city planning problem. People reasonably prefer to live near a major and reliable water source, but major water sources flood, especially in lowlands and valleys. Development that involves paving roads and parking lots, impermeable surfaces, will lead to increased water flow unless it is addressed sufficiently during the planning stages. If not, water will pool that has nowhere to go but into residences and commercial buildings, sometimes sweeping them away.

Had the BBC focused on the infrastructure, poverty, and poor governance issues that resulted in recent deadly flooding it would have made a positive contribution to highlighting a serious problem, not just in Pakistan but in other impoverished communities along rivers where rainfall is high. Instead, most of its story is a red herring. It focuses on climate change despite the fact there is no trend suggesting the slight warming of the past century-and-a-half has changed monsoon patterns, which both plague and benefit India and Pakistan. The BBC turned the piece that could have been a rational criticism of corruption that leads to major infrastructure issues and human deaths into a propaganda piece that pushes the idea that degrowth and de-industrialization is what will save Pakistan, when the opposite is true.

The False Temperature Claims That Underpin the COP30 Alarmist Agenda

The next two weeks of COP30 will see three favourite climate scares relentlessly broadcast to promote the fast-fading hard-Left Net Zero fantasy. They are: breaching a 1.5°C global ‘threshold’ leading to runaway temperatures; human-caused tipping points producing unimaginable natural disasters; and attribution of single-event bad weather to the use of natural hydrocarbons. The 1.5°C figure is a meaningless number invented by politicians and activists to concentrate Net Zero minds; tipping points are climate model codswallop; and ditto attribution crystal ball-gazing.

A vibrant conference scene depicting COP30, with large crowds gathered outdoors surrounded by lush greenery and colorful flowers, set against a clear blue sky.

From The Daily Sceptic

By Chris Morrison

Signage for the COP30 UN Climate Change Conference with large letters, '#COP30', and details about the event's location and dates.

The next two weeks of COP30 will see three favourite climate scares relentlessly broadcast to promote the fast-fading hard-Left Net Zero fantasy. They are: breaching a 1.5°C global ‘threshold’ leading to runaway temperatures; human-caused tipping points producing unimaginable natural disasters; and attribution of single-event bad weather to the use of natural hydrocarbons. The 1.5°C figure is a meaningless number invented by politicians and activists to concentrate Net Zero minds; tipping points are climate model codswallop; and ditto attribution crystal ball-gazing. None of them are backed up by credible scientific evidence and observation. Which of course is why political elites have trashed the scientific process of inquiry, banned and cancelled any dissenting discussion and declared the matter ‘settled’.

The foundation scam is temperature. The world is said to be warming dramatically, leading to tipping points and worsening extreme weather. Changes are said to be occurring at unprecedented rates and are caused primarily by humans increasing atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide. In fact the temperature rise is small, about 1°C over 200 years (making allowance for all the fake temperature estimates and urban heat-ravaged measurements) and similar rises are commonplace in both the historical and paleo record. The recent ‘hottest evah’ rises have been seen in the past – sudden changes in temperature are caused by sudden local events such as volcano eruptions. As it happens, the underwater Hunga Tonga volcano released vast quantity of water vapour into the upper atmosphere in 2022, a ‘greenhouse’ warming event that would have been helped along by a recent strong El Niño oscillation. Recent accurate satellite measurements show the overall global temperature has been falling during 2025.

Don’t take my word for all this natural movement. Professor Mark Maslin is a Professor of something termed Earth Systems Science at UCL and one of the authors of a recent tipping point report timed for COP30. This particular computer model-based bilge suggested that warm water corals may already be crossing their “thermal tipping points”, despite the fact that coral has been around for hundreds of millions of years and survives in waters between 24-32°C. This would appear to be the same Mark Maslin who as a humble geography lecturer in 1999 wrote a paper that said possibly most of the large climate changes involving movements of several degrees occurred at most on a timescale of a few centuries, sometimes decades, “and perhaps even a few years”. These days he whines that “Earth is already becoming unliveable”, while climate change politics helps build “a new political and socio-economic system”. In 2018, he was one of a number of eco-activists who signed a letter to the Guardian saying they would no longer “lend their credibility” by debating climate science scepticism.

No wonder people like Maslin – needless to say a BBC regular on all learned climate Armageddon matters – walked away from climate science debate. Tying CO2 levels to rising temperatures to make Left-wing political capital relies on observations from just a few recent years. Widen the observations out to hundreds and then hundreds of millions of years gives a different picture. Sometimes temperatures rise and fall at the same time as CO2, sometimes not. Sometimes even CO2 levels rise before the following temperatures, more often than not they don’t. The simple explanation that warming gases such as CO2 become ‘saturated’ once they pass certain concentrations, with heating falling off a logarithmic cliff, is a scientific hypothesis or opinion, but it has much to offer when past observational evidence is considered.

Let us consider some of these observations starting with the long-term record over 600 million years. The graph below shows wide temperature-CO2 divergence.

Graph illustrating the relationship between atmospheric CO2 levels and average global temperature over millions of years, showing fluctuations across different geological periods.

Over 600 million years it is difficult to observe any general lockstep connection between temperature and gas. It might, however, be noted that over 600 million years, CO2 has generally been declining in the atmosphere to the near denuded levels seen today. As we have seen over the last 40 years even small rises in CO2 lead to significant planet-wide biomass growth. All that CO2 was good for the dinosaurs who roamed the Earth until 66 million years ago, with levels more than three times higher than today. The little extra has also been good for humans since recent crop yields have soared and helped to alleviate naturally-occurring world famine.

These records of course are very long term and are compiled from proxies with accuracy only to a few thousand years. In the more immediate record we find additional and conclusive proof that CO2 is not the main climate thermostat. Temperatures in medieval times were similar to today, possibly slightly higher in the Roman period and often 3-4°C higher in the Holocene thermal maximum around 8,000 to 5,000 years ago. During these periods, CO2 was remarkably stable around 260 parts per million, a mark that is in fact dangerously low to sustain life on Earth. The notorious Michael-Mann-1,000-year temperature ‘hockey stick’ removed the linking problem by abolishing the medieval warming period and the subsequent little ice age that ran up to around 1800.

Remarkable recent scientific evidence has emerged to suggest that abrupt rises in temperature have been a feature of the global climate going back to the iceless Jurassic period over 150 million years ago. Dramatic temperature changes based on 1,500-year cycles, as the younger Maslin can testify, have been known to have occurred in Greenland and the North Atlantic. But a group of French scientists led by Slah Boulila from the Sorbonne found large temperature hikes going back millions of years across the globe. The scientists noted warming up to 15°C within a few decades, “pointing to abrupt and severe changes in Earth’s past climate”. The 1,500 year cycles are often called Dansgaard-Oeschger (DO) events after the scientists who discovered them. Some scientists have downplayed the initial DO findings and suggested the short term temperatures rises of around 1.5°C were caused by specific northern hemisphere oscillations of ice sheets and surrounding waters.

However, the French scientists note: “The 1,500-year cycle is documented in both hemispheres, in other oceans and in continents.” Their work is said to support the global nature of DO-like events, and in particular that their potential primary cause is independent of ice sheet dynamics. Meanwhile, scientific evidence continues to grow indicating much higher temperatures a few thousand years ago. One recent paper found the plant Ceratopteris had grown 8,000 years ago at 40°N in northern China, suggesting winter temperatures 7.7°C higher than today. Another found types of molluscs surviving in the Arctic Svalbard 9,000 years ago that indicated temperatures were 6°C warmer.

The current Net Zero fantasy rests on catastrophising tiny temperature rises that frankly are not even measured properly, demonising CO2 boosts that are helping Earth return to a more healthy biosphere and atmospheric balance, inventing ‘tipping points’ using junk computer models and insulting the intelligence with untestable tales claiming humans are making the weather worse.

And they call us sceptics the ‘deniers’.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor. Follow him on X.

Wilma, The Most Intense Hurricane in History?

We were told Melissa was the most powerful hurricane to hit Jamaica, with winds of 185 mph.
We don’t know of course what the wind speeds were at landfall, as the 185-mph figure was measured hours before landfall.

Satellite image of Hurricane Wilma approaching the Gulf Coast of Florida, showcasing intense cloud formations and swirling winds.
Hurricane Wilma

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

'Storm of the Century' hits Caribbean, accompanied by a satellite image of a hurricane.

We were told Melissa was the most powerful hurricane to hit Jamaica, with winds of 185 mph.

We don’t know of course what the wind speeds were at landfall, as the 185-mph figure was measured hours before landfall.

But more importantly, we have only had comprehensive satellite and aircraft data for maybe three or four decades.

This is more than just an academic matter, as we can see by looking at Hurricane Wilma, officially the most intense Atlantic hurricane, which passed through the Caribbean in 2005:

Table listing the most intense Atlantic hurricanes by peak pressure and pressure at landfall, including names, seasons, and pressure values.

I have often mentioned this study by Chris Landsea and Andrew Hagen:

A research article titled 'On the Classification of Extreme Atlantic Hurricanes Utilizing Mid-Twentieth-Century Monitoring Capabilities' by Andrew B. Hagen and Christopher W. Landsea, published on July 1, 2012, with citation details.

Abstract

An investigation is conducted to determine how improvements in observing capabilities and technology may have affected scientists’ ability to detect and monitor Saffir–Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale Category 5 hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean basin during the mid-twentieth century.

Previous studies state that there has been an increase in the number of intense hurricanes and attribute this increase to anthropogenic global warming.

Other studies claim that the apparent increased hurricane activity is an artifact of better observational capabilities and improved technology for detecting these intense hurricanes.

The present study focuses on the 10 most recent Category 5 hurricanes recorded in the Atlantic, from Hurricane Andrew (1992) through Hurricane Felix (2007).

These 10 hurricanes are placed into the context of the technology available in the period of 1944–53, the first decade of aircraft reconnaissance.

A methodology is created to determine how many of these 10 recent Category 5 hurricanes likely would have been recorded as Category 5 if they had occurred during this period using only the observations that likely would have been available with existing technology and observational networks.

Late-1940s and early-1950s best-track intensities are determined for the entire lifetime of these 10 recent Category 5 hurricanes.

It is found that likely only 2 of these 10—Category 5 landfalling hurricanes—would have been recorded as Category 5 hurricanes if they had occurred during the late-1940s period. The results suggest that intensity estimates for extreme tropical cyclones prior to the satellite era are unreliable for trend and variability analysis.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/25/13/jcli-d-11-00420.1.xml

Essentially it analysed the most recent ten Cat 5 hurricanes, when it was written in 2012, and established how they would have been categorised using 1940/50s observation technologies. Of the ten, only two would have been classed as Cat 5, both of which made landfall at Cat 5 – Andrew and Felix.

One of the ten, of course, was Wilma. This is their summary for Wilma – note, the explanatory box below is taken from Fig 5, which the report omits to avoid repetition:

Graph displaying data on Hurricane Wilma (2005) including aircraft measurements and pressure readings over time.
Best-track comparison graph for Hurricane Andrew indicating intensity from both recent and early 1950s observational technologies.
Text describing Hurricane Wilma, including its classification as a Category 5 storm and peak intensity details.
A segment of text discussing Hurricane Wilma's intensity and the technology used to measure hurricanes in the mid-20th century.
An excerpt discussing the rapid intensification of Hurricane Wilma, with details on its Category 5 intensity and observational technology limitations.

I have highlighted the key comment – Aircraft in the late 1940s and early 1950s would not have been able to penetrate the center since the central pressure was below 940 mb.

Without the data from the centre of Wilma when pressure fell below 940mb, Hagen and Landsea reckon that at most it would have been rated as Cat 4 with winds of 125 kts, 144 mph.

Of course, before the late 1940s, there were no hurricane hunter aircraft at all, meaning Wilma would not have been properly measured until landfall. Many hurricanes, of course, never hit land at all, or if they do as much weaker storms.

The reality is that hurricanes as strong as Melissa have almost certainly hit Jamaica in recorded history there. But we simply did not have the technology at the time to measure them.

Germany´s dream of green steel

Admittedly, we are a bit undecided about what verdict we should give to the Tagesschau podcast 11Km on the topic of “Green Steel”.
It is certainly commendable that an overview of the situation in Germany is given. What is which company currently doing?

From KlimaNachrichten

By KlimaNachrichten Editor

A molten metal being poured from a large container in an industrial setting, with vibrant green light illuminating the background.

Admittedly, we are a bit undecided about what verdict we should give to the Tagesschau podcast 11Km on the topic of “Green Steel”.

It is certainly commendable that an overview of the situation in Germany is given. What is which company currently doing?
And there are big differences. Salzgitter AG has already started converting a blast furnace to hydrogen. ThyssenKrupp is still considering, and ArcelorMittal has abandoned plans to convert its plants in Germany to hydrogen.

Somehow, however, the editors of the podcast forget the elephant in the room and that is green hydrogen. Although it is rightly stated that there is too little of it, it is not that this little hydrogen is significantly more expensive than grey hydrogen.
People are more concerned that there may not be enough green electricity, but less so about the affordability of green hydrogen.

The editors also did not understand how to decipher the language of the managers of the corporations. Whenever they say that it is a task of “politics as a whole” and “society as a whole”, they mean subsidies that they would like to have.
So, the “task” is to pay for a business that would otherwise not be competitive.
In this case, not only aid for the restructuring of production, which ArcelorMittal rejects, but also aid for green hydrogen, should it actually be available in sufficient quantities.

However, it becomes bizarre when a trade unionist threatens ArcelorMittal that they have a social duty.
As if Germany were the only location of the group. What world do such people live in?

Basically, the conclusion had already been reached recently by the Federal Court of Auditors and thus hit the bull’s eye. Green hydrogen will become a permanent subsidy.
We reported.

At school, a teacher would probably have written under such a paper, unfortunately slightly off topic. 11km claims to deal with a topic in depth.
Here, however, we only snorkeled in shallow water.

The podcast and an accompanying Panorama report can be found in the ARD media library.

Politicians seem to have a completely different solution in mind.
In order to dampen the price disadvantage, the EU Commission is considering increasing tariffs and reducing the import quota.

Deutschlandfunk:

The EU Commission has officially confirmed its plans to protect the European steel industry, which have already been announced. The Brussels authority proposes to increase import duties from 25 to around 50 percent, as EU Industry Commissioner Séjourné announced.

In addition, the quota for steel imports from abroad is to be halved. Producers in the European Union are under economic pressure due to weak demand, high energy costs and competition from the Far East. Séjourné stressed that the aim was to save European steel producers and jobs.

Before the new rules can come into force, the European Parliament and the EU states must agree. Great Britain demanded clarification from the EU Commission on the impact of steel import quotas on British producers. Norway, however, assumes that it is not affected by the European Union’s proposal.


Saarland’s Prime Minister Rehlinger also has tariffs in mind.

Tagesschau:

Saarland’s Prime Minister Anke Rehlinger (SPD) also supports the demand for import tariffs. In the report from Berlin, she said that steel produced here in Germany must be given its chance. If the industry in this country has to fight against dumping prices, then that is not fair. It would be wrong to break things now that could never be made to work again afterwards

Greenland Continues to Defy Alarmist Warming and Ice Melt Narratives

According to a new study, Greenland temperature stations indicate there was an abrupt 2.9°C warming trend from 1922-1932 (10 years) that was almost identical to the 3.1°C warming trend from 1993-2007 (14 years).
Between the two warming periods (identified as WP1 and WP2 in the study) was an overall ~3°C cooling from 1933-1992.

A weather station with various instruments and flags in a snowy landscape, with a red aircraft in the background and researchers in winter gear.

From No Trick Zone

By Kenneth Richard

According to a new study, Greenland temperature stations indicate there was an abrupt 2.9°C warming trend from 1922-1932 (10 years) that was almost identical to the 3.1°C warming trend from 1993-2007 (14 years).

Between the two warming periods (identified as WP1 and WP2 in the study) was an overall ~3°C cooling from 1933-1992.

Thus, as the temperature charts from the study illustrate, there has been almost zero net warming across Greenland in the last century.

This temperature trajectory is consistent with the Box (2009) analysis that said, “the annual whole ice sheet 1919–32 warming trend is 33% greater in magnitude than the 1994–2007 warming.”

“The course of the AT [air temperature] anomaly between 1900 and 2015 relative to the reference period (1986–2015) at the stations UPV, ILU, NUK, QAQ and TAS, the 20CRv3 area average for the globe, the Arctic, Greenland as well as 20CRv3 interpolated to WEG_L shows two distinguished WPs [warm periods]. These two periods are observed at all stations and show a continuous increase over more than 5 years. Based on this, we determine WP1 between 1922 and 1932, and WP2 between 1993 and 2007. During WP1, the AT anomaly increased on average by 2.9 °C across stations, while in WP2, it increased by 3.1 °C, though WP2 spans a longer period (14 years compared to 10 years for WP1). The average annual increase for both WPs across all stations is 0.2 °C yr−1.”

Interestingly, the authors estimate Greenland ice sheet (GIS) melt has added just 1.08 cm to global sea levels since 1900. This is too small to justify alarmist narratives about dramatic warming and ice melt contributions to sea level rise.

Graph illustrating temperature anomalies in Greenland from 1900 to 2015, showing two warming periods (1922-1932 and 1993-2007) and significant cooling between them.
Image Source: Schalamon et al., 2025 (supplemental data)

Labour Mayor Flies To COP30

It’s bad enough Miliband and co flying off to Brazil.

A private jet on an airport runway during sunset, with vibrant orange and purple skies in the background.

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

h/t Ian Magness

It’s bad enough Miliband and co flying off to Brazil.

But the hangers on are going as well:

From the Telegraph:

Headline from the Telegraph addressing the hypocrisy of flying long distances to discuss the climate crisis.

Politicians’ carbon footprints are growing – but fear not, they’ll offset them with a PowerPoint at Cop30

It may only be the first week of November, but I believe the award for Headline of the Year 2025 is already as good as won. It will surely be impossible to beat the following contender from BBC News, published in March.

It read: “Amazon Forest Felled to Build Road for Climate Summit”.

Magnificent – and now topical once more because the climate summit in question is finally about to begin. It’s Cop30, the latest in an annual series of terribly urgent conferences attended by major politicians from all over the globe. And this year, they’re all jetting off to Brazil.

Representing Britain will be Sir Keir Starmer, who must be feeling very worried about the sudden rise of the Greens under Zack Polanski, and Ed Miliband, the Net Zero Secretary. But they’re not alone. A slightly less senior figure who’s taken the 5,700-mile flight to Brazil is Tracy Brabin, the Labour Mayor of West Yorkshire.

In case anyone back home was wondering what on earth she’s doing there, she helpfully set their minds at rest on social media. “Mayors,” she explained, “are the tugboats of change, pushing tankers of government towards a greener world.”

Full story here.

No Ms Brabin, we don’t believe your lies. We know you are going for the junket and nothing else.