
From American Thinker
Byย Olivia Murray
The village idiot was apparently ready to embarrass himself again, and he didย not disappoint; of course, Iโm talking about the one and only Al Gore. During a televised segment yesterday on CNNโs โState of the Unionโ show, anchor Jake Tapper asked Gore what would happen if the world failed to โreactโ to the impending climate doom-what sufficient โreactionโ looks like is still unclear-and what the โworst-case scenarioโ would be. Below is Goreโs response, via a Breitbartย report:
Gore said, โThe scientist who has warned us of these mega-storms and the floods and mudslides and droughts and the ice melting and the sea level rising and the storms getting stronger and the tropical diseases and climate and migrants crossing international borders in large numbers. They were dead right when they warned us about this, and so we need to pay more attention to them now.โ
He continued, โHere is one thing they say: if we donโt take action, there could be as many as 1 billion climate refugees crossing international borders in the next several decades. Well, a few million have contributed to this wave of populist authoritarianism and dictatorships and so forth. What would a billion do? We canโt do this. We could lose our capacity for self-governance.โ
As we all know from that Gore is reliably unreliable, so of course, those โfactsโ werenโt even accurate. These climate doomsayers are โdead rightโ despite a 100% fail-rate? Yeah, sure. (Last year, the American Enterprise Institute published a โ18 Spectacularly Wrong Predictionsโ piece, and itโs worth a read.)
First of all, glaciers are actually growing, and all signs point to a coming era of extreme cold. Furthermore, cold temperatures have caused (and continue to do so) far more death than โglobal warmingโ ever has; according to Bjorn Lomborg, a โhigh-profile Danish figure known primarily for his internationally-renowned book, The Skeptical Environmentalistโ:
Cold deaths vastly outweigh heat deaths. This is common knowledge in the academic literature and for instance the Lancet finds that each year, almost 600,000 people die globally from heat but 4.5 million from cold.
But Gore doesnโt seem to grasp the true irony of his statement: although as I noted above that the sufficient โreactionโ to temper the climate โemergencyโ isnโt really uniformly articulated (by the parasite class of leftist globalists pushing the agenda), we know it involves a complete and utter surrendering of personal liberties and national sovereignty to shadowy foreign bureaucracies.
What Gore is really saying is that to save โself-governanceโ we have to give it up.
โGive us your lives, your fortunes, and your liberty, and let amorphous unaccountable global agencies micromanage your existence from womb to tomb, OR YOU FORFEIT YOUR โCAPACITYโ FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE AND DEMOCRACY IS DEAD!โ
โTheyโ tell us we canโt fly. โTheyโ took our light bulbs and our freon, while gas stoves, air conditioners, water heaters, and dishwashers, walk up the gallow steps. โTheyโ demand we give up our gas-powered cars, for our own good and safety of course. โTheyโ want social credit scores that include carbon output as a mitigating factor. โTheyโ tell us to murder the most vulnerable and precious among us, for the sake of humanity and compassion. โTheyโ are beyond demented and evil.
But, more absurdly, Gore noted that without mitigation, โclimate refugeesโ will ultimately lead to the death of โself-governanceโ because by his (il)logic, it will invite more โpopulist authoritarianismโ and โdictatorsโ (read, President Donald Trump and anyone else that fits his mold), into the Western nations fixing to be overwhelmed by third world hordes. Ergo, doesnโt that make the Democrat case to curb the open borders policies theyโve championed for so long? If you donโt want Trump, or anyone like him, then why create a melee in which you anticipate losing? Like I said, village idiot, with (heavy,ย heavy) emphasis on the โidiot.โ

















You must be logged in to post a comment.