CCC Threaten Climate Disaster By 2050

The Climate Change Committee have now gone well beyond any objective assessment of climate change. Instead, their latest report belongs in the world of fantasy and disaster movies:

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

h/t Ian Magness

This is fraud, pure and simple:

The Climate Change Committee have now gone well beyond any objective assessment of climate change. Instead, their latest report belongs in the world of fantasy and disaster movies:

From Sky News:

A blistering new report has slated government efforts to protect Britons from climate change that is already flooding homes, farmland and railways, overheating hospitals and schools and fuelling wildfires.

Following deadly flooding in Valencia and furious wildfires in Los Angeles, the UK’s climate advisers have warned people and critical infrastructure are highly exposed to extreme weather due to a “piecemeal and disjointed approach”.

They warned progress in adapting to a hotter world has either been glacial, or moved in the wrong direction – amid fears of budget cuts in the upcoming spending review and spiralling problems in the water industry.

Of the 46 measures of government delivery – from protecting railways from collapsing to ensuring water and food security – not one was rated “good”.

The “Progress in adapting to climate change” report warns that by 2050:

  • Over half of England’s top farmland, one in four homes and half of roads and rail lines will be at risk of flooding
  • Heat-related deaths could pass 10,000 in an average year
  • Unchecked climate change could cost 7% of GDP.

It said climate change is already hitting hard:

  • Extreme heat buckles rail lines, fuels wildfires and drives up food bills
  • Heatwaves wiped out a hospital data centre, cancelling appointments when the health service is “already on its knees”
  • Children are toiling through exams in boiling school halls.

https://news.sky.com/story/government-warned-it-is-setting-country-up-for-disaster-unless-it-better-prepares-uk-for-heavy-flooding-and-intense-heat-13358235

Shame on Sky for giving credence to this BS!

Whatever effect a few days of heat in summer may have, it is certainly dwarfed by the impacts of cold in winter – disruption to transport, hospital overloads, schools shut because of snow. The list goes on and on.

But it is the forecast for 2050 which really shows up this report to be a fraudulent attempt to scare the public into accepting Net Zero.

The idea that our climate would be any noticeably different in 25 years time is ridiculous. It certainly has not changed a jot in the last 25 years.

And anybody who claims that half of farmland and 7 million homes will be at risk of flooding should not be allowed near any position of authority. The actual number of properties flooded last year was 5000.

Never mind a cost of 7% of GDP, which equates to about £140 billion a year.

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2024/09/05/floods-data-for-2023-24-in-england/

Meanwhile summer death rates remain the lowest of the year, in contrast to the report’s claims of people dying because of heat, which have already been thoroughly debunked by the ONS.

It is interesting that the report is equally critical of the Labour government for failing to take action. That might be because they are not going to waste billions on adapting to a non-existent problem!

Clearly the CCC are throwing their toys out of the pram, annoyed that nobody is taking their increasingly absurd warnings and threats.

FOOTNOTE

Baroness Brown, who presented the report as Chair of the Adaptation Committee, is still unaccountably a non-executive director of Ceres Power (developers of green hydrogen) and Orsted (Danish wind power company).

Both these companies stand to make a lot of money out of the climate scare.

But I am sure this is just pure coincidence!

Sky Blame Babet Floods On Climate Change

Sky News publishing lies like this without any consequences as long as climate change get blamed.

After torrential rain amid Storm Babet the nearby river burst its banks and gallons of water flowed through the village of Bettws Cedewain (Image: Josh Jones)

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

h/t Ian Magness

From Sky’s “We Never Had Floods Before” Department:

Babet has been an exceptional storm, bringing torrential rain to Britain’s dry side.

Eastern areas are sheltered from storms that normally barrel in from the Atlantic at this time of year.

But Babet has come from a more southerly direction, channelled by an unusual position of the jet stream, and the east has been lashed with rain.

Met Office figures show between Thursday and Saturday morning, 79mm fell in Charsfield, Suffolk. That’s a little over three inches in two days.

The rain was even heavier further north.

So why did Babet bring so much rain?

It has a lot to do with the unusually warm seas it crossed as it tracked up from Portugal and the Bay of Biscay to the UK.

It meant more water evaporated into the atmosphere. And because the air is relatively warm too, all that moisture got transported with the storm system to fall as rain over Britain.

It’s exactly what scientists predict from climate change, particularly over winter.

The UK will have to prepare for more floods, even in areas that are normally much drier.

https://news.sky.com/story/why-storm-babet-brought-so-much-rain-and-why-were-likely-to-see-more-storms-like-it-12989128

But just how exceptional was the rain?

According to the Met Office, the wettest place in the UK on Friday was Sheffield, which had 84mm of rain, 3.3 inches:

The record daily rainfall there stands at 119.2mm, set in July 1973. Extreme rainfall hit much of Britain on several days that month, as the Met Office reported at the time:

https://digital.nmla.metoffice.gov.uk/IO_f1a640eb-7f0b-4062-8370-da6c03979a69/

Clearly there is nothing at unusual about 3 inches of rain falling in a day, even in the supposedly dry side of the country, as a glance back at the weather of a hundred years ago shows:

https://digital.nmla.metoffice.gov.uk/IO_ed88fd44-4fc1-4ead-a4be-5dd520067710/

Note the comment that only falls of over 4 inches are regarded as noteworthy, and that in 1917 there had been 68 instances, with 1923 being seen as low.

Note as well the storm at Carrbridge, which lies in the Northeast of Scotland, near to the areas affected by Babet.

And as KNMI shows, Babet’s rainfall in NE Scotland was not exceptional by historical standards, nor is there any trend to more intense daily rainfalls in the region:

https://climexp.knmi.nl/getstations.cgi

Quite how Sky News can get away with publishing lies like this without being censured by OFCOM is a mystery.