Tag: Climate Haven

Hype and Nonsense Surrounding Hurricane Helene

The basis of the emotion driven narrative that there is an existential threat of climate change is fueled by endless articles and opinion pieces in the mass media that conflate every extreme weather event with climate change.

From ClimateRealism

Guest essay by Roger Caiazza

The basis of the emotion driven narrative that there is an existential threat of climate change is fueled by endless articles and opinion pieces in the mass media that conflate every extreme weather event with climate change.  Remember climate is what you expect, and weather is what you get.  This article describes how the hucksters incorrectly make the extreme weather devastation caused when a rare weather pattern caused the storm to stall into an example of worsening climate change when a hurricane in hurricane alley during the hurricane season occurred.

Good Energy Hype

I was prompted to write this post when I came across an opinion piece in the LA Times: Helene destroyed my hometown. I don’t want climate change stories of false hope by Anna Jane Joyner.  She is the founder and chief executive of the “story support nonprofit” Good Energy.  Last March I did an article about Irina Slaw’s article “Burn, Hollywood, burn” where Slav called out the blatant indoctrination and propaganda associated Good Energy – “Story support for the age of climate change”.

After noting that she had been checking on the weather and evacuation plans while preparing to board a plane on her way to NYC Climate Week  Joyner writes:

The hurricane didn’t come for my partner and me this time, but it destroyed my hometown in the mountains of North Carolina. I’ve spent 20 years working on climate and I live between Los Angeles and the Gulf Coast of Alabama, where I’ve reckoned with the likelihood of one day losing our home. I’ve also accepted that worsening fires, droughts and heat waves could make Southern California unlivable. But Asheville was considered a climate haven. I’ve always told family members we can never sell our homes there. It is utterly unfathomable that it would be devastated first by one of the worst climate disasters in U.S. history. Helene showed us nowhere is safe.

Joyner went on to provide descriptions of the destruction caused by storm.  This was followed by her attempt to link the storm to climate change and her climate change false hope argument:

Scientists estimate that climate change increased Hurricane Helene’s rainfall by up to 50% in parts of the Carolinas and Georgia, dumping more than 40 trillion gallons of water. At NYC Climate Week, the annual awareness event held alongside the U.N. General Assembly, the disconnect from this shattering reality was surreal. There were fancy parties, cheerful sun imagery and giant signs reading “HOPE.” The dominant theme was: We can solve this! We need to tell hopeful climate stories! But there’s no “solving” a hurricane wiping out western North Carolina, hundreds of miles from the sea. Only focusing on optimism is like telling a cancer patient that everything will be OK if they just stay positive. At best, it comes across as out of touch; at worst, it feels callous. Yes, we can still prevent the worst impacts and must demand our governments scale solutions and act urgently, but we cannot minimize the horrors unfolding now, or that it will get worse in the coming years.

If you thought the hyperbole could not get worse I have bad news:

Fossil fuel executives have known since the 1970s that burning oil, coal and gas would cause escalating climate catastrophes and worldwide suffering. Yet they lied, sacrificed our safety for their greed and just unleashed an apocalypse on my hometown. Their actions will condemn children today to a planet that’s more hell than Earth by the end of the century if we don’t stop them. It isn’t just a tragedy; it’s a crime against humanity.

Sorry to subject you to that.  Joyner goes on to argue that more stories are needed and I am sure she will be happy to provide them to anyone with a deep wallet.

What’s happening in North Carolina doesn’t feel real. I have no emotional framework for this, no story to help me. Right now, what I desperately need are authentic stories that help us figure out how to be human in this changing world, to face this overwhelming crisis with bravery. Stories that help us navigate our very understandable fear, anxiety, grief, despair, uncertainty and anger in a way that allows us to feel seen. Stories that make us laugh — not in ignoring our reality, but in the midst of it — and stories that remind us there’s still so much beauty here to fight for. That capture how, in the living nightmare of climate disasters, people demonstrate extraordinary kindness and creativity, as they’re doing in Asheville and Black Mountain at this very moment. And we need stories that expose the guilt of the fossil fuel industry.

Reality

In the real world, her pessimism is unwarranted.  A quick review of recent articles at Watts Up With That demonstrates that the devastation of the remnants of Helene in the Asheville region was an extreme weather event and not evidence of climate change.

Paul Homewood did a nice summary of the data for Hurricane Helene that was highlighted here.  His description of the Asheville rain notes:

In Asheville, North Carolina, a total of 13.98 inches (35.52 centimeters) of rain fell from September 25 to 27, according to National Weather Service records. The storm swamped neighborhoods, damaged roads, caused landslides, knocked out electricity and cell service, and forced many residents to evacuate to temporary shelters. Record flood crests were observed on multiple rivers in the state. Flooding was widespread across the southern Appalachians; preliminary rainfall totals neared or exceeded 10 inches (25 centimeters) in parts of Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.

Note that the 14 inches of rain occurred over three days.  Joyner referenced a statement that climate change increased Hurricane Helene’s rainfall by up to 50% in parts of the Carolinas and Georgia.  I found that the reference stated that “In one provisional rapid attribution statement, a trio of scientists at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory said the rainfall over the 24 hours Helene moved through was made ‘up to 20 times more likely in these areas because of global warming.’”  Comparing the 24 hours in this reference to the three-day storm total makes it clear that the storm motion was a major factor in the amount of rain and that the attribution analysis got that part wrong.

Charles Rotter’s article on the observations of Steve McIntyre and Andy Revkin about the real lessons to be learned from the storm completes the destruction of the arguments in Joyner’s op-ed.  McIntyre explains that flood control dams were planned for some of the rivers that had devastating floods but were not built.  Clearly there are negative consequences of building dams and positive benefits associated with keeping the rivers open.  But if you want to prevent flood damage when you keep the rivers free of dams then you should take prudent actions.  Revkin points out that was not the case:

Revkin also described a 1960 report “Floods on French Broad and Swannanoa Rivers around Asheville” explaining that this storm was not unexpected for experts:

Andy reported that the report stated that developments around Asheville “would cause these great floods of the past to be higher if they occurred again. Land fills and buildings in the flood plain and the many bridges across the streams have seriously reduced flood flow capacity.” “On the French Broad River a flood of the same discharge as the 1916 flood would today be 3 to 4 feet; higher between Pearson Bridge and West Asheville Viaduct than the actual flood elevation. On the Swannanoa River, a repetition of the 1916 flood would be up to 2. 5 feet higher today at Biltmore and up to 15 feet higher upstream from the Recreation Park dam.”

Anthony Watts described a couple of articles from Climate Realism that debunked the media claims about climate change effects on the storm in general.  He shows that the claims of climate change worsening storms such as Helene just don’t hold up.  Of particular note, is the reference to a massive flood in Asheville in 1916. Matthew Wielicki provides a good comparison of this storm and the 1916 storm.  He found that the 1916 flood peaked at 23 feet.  In this storm the peak was 24.7 feet. 

Note that the 1960 report projected that if there was another 1916 storm that the flood would be between 3 to 4 higher because of development.  Hurricane Helene flood waters peaked at less than two feet higher than the 1916 storm.  The observed increase in the peak flood was due to development and not climate change.

Conclusion

Joyner concluded her article:

I need help making meaning of all this, and stories have always been how humans make sense of our world. But as I grieve an unimaginable loss, the last thing I want are optimistic stories about hope. As climate scientist Kate Marvel says: “We need courage, not hope, to face climate change.”

I find it difficult to sympathize with the grief of someone who provides Hollywood “story support for the age of climate change” because reality paints a different picture of the world.  The data show that Helene was a rather typical hurricane in hurricane alley that occurred in the hurricane season.  Devastating floods in Asheville have occurred before and evidence suggests that the greater flood peak was probably due to development.  There is nothing to suggest that this is anything, but an extreme weather event.  It certainly is no evidence of any kind of worsening climate change impacts.

In my opinion, the worst part of this is that the usual suspects are using this tragedy to call for US reductions in fossil fuel to prevent this from happening again.  Putting aside the lack of a causal link between GHG emissions and specific weather events, the relative magnitude of US and global emissions and the rate of change of those emissions, the indisputable fact is that storms causing this kind of devastation have happened before and will happen again whatever is done to mitigate emissions.  If nothing is done to adapt to this observed extreme weather, then the tragedy will inevitably reoccur.  The monomaniacal emphasis on emission reductions is not in the best interests of society.

Roger Caiazza blogs on New York energy and environmental issues at Pragmatic Environmentalist of New York.  This represents his opinion and not the opinion of any of his previous employers or any other company with which he has been associated.

Right, CNN, There Is No Such Thing As A Climate Haven, There Never Has Been

A recent CNN article, “People moved to Asheville to escape extreme weather. They forgot its tragic history,” claims that Asheville North Carolina, which recently suffered catastrophic flooding in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, was once considered a “climate haven” but now is suffering from extreme weather because of climate change. This is false. It’s a confused article, flashing back and forth between an accurate depiction of historical floods and false climate claims.

Flooding in 1916, Asheville North Carolina

From ClimateRealism

By Linnea Lueken

Flooding in 1916, Asheville North Carolina. Archival Photography by Steve Nicklas, NOS, NGS, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

A recent CNN article, “People moved to Asheville to escape extreme weather. They forgot its tragic history,” claims that Asheville North Carolina, which recently suffered catastrophic flooding in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, was once considered a “climate haven” but now is suffering from extreme weather because of climate change. This is false. It’s a confused article, flashing back and forth between an accurate depiction of historical floods and false climate claims. In the end, CNN’s article shows that the damage caused by Helene is nothing new for Asheville. Location and weather, not climate change, are responsible for the recent tragedy.

CNN begins by explaining that “some” media outlets (only one local station was referenced) claimed that Asheville was a “climate haven” because it is far from the coast and isn’t often struck by wildfires and other “climate extremes.”

“So-called climate migrants have long been arriving here from places like California, Arizona, and the coastal Carolinas, said Jesse Keenan, associate professor of sustainable real estate and urban planning at Tulane University,” CNN writes, and follows it up with examples of people on internet forums claiming that Asheville lacks the threat of natural disasters that other cities across the country face.

These people were obviously misinformed, there is no place in the world that is “safe” from occasional extreme weather and natural disasters – regardless of climate change.

To prove that Helene was caused by climate change, CNN references a “rapid climate analysis published Tuesday by scientists from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found fossil fuel pollution caused over 50 percent more rainfall in parts of Georgia and the Carolinas,” and that global warming made rain 20 times more likely in the affected area. This is hogwash. Rapid attribution studies are not a genuine analysis of the weather, they analyzed nothing but counterfactuals within computer models. Presenting them as evidence is deceptive and the scientists responsible know it.

Frequent readers of Climate Realism know that the media heavily relies on attribution modelling rather than actual available historical data to push the climate narrative, simply because attribution models start with the assumption that human emissions have an impact on the weather. Real world data does not give this impression, in fact hurricane data does not show any increase in the intensity or frequency of tropical cyclones.

While Climate Realism has already covered alarmism surrounding Helene twice recently (here, and here) it’s worth noting the flip-flopping within CNN’s own article. After all the initial claims about climate-enhanced weather, the article suddenly shifts and admits that Asheville has, in fact, suffered similar disasters in the past, well before the modern warming period.

Asheville, CNN writes, “is vulnerable to flooding, as a long history attests.” CNN goes on to describe back-to-back hurricane strikes in 1916 that triggered “biblical” floods and was devastating to the city and people who lived there. CNN also lists a similar scenario as recently as 2004, where two storms “concentrated their highest rainfall on western North Carolina, killing 11 people.”

Had CNN checked it would have found, “every single county in North Carolina has had at least two major flood disasters since 1950 – either from rising rivers or hurricane surge,” as the North Carolina Flood Insurance website reports.

These instances of past extreme weather events debunk the narrative that Helene was somehow unprecedented or showed signs of “climate fingerprints” as claimed by the so-called experts CNN cited.

Climate Realism wasn’t alone in noticing that North Carolina has never been a climate haven. On the Yahoo News page where the CNN post was republished, multiple commenters made similar observations:

The locals are knowledgeable about the danger they face by living in the valley, evidently determining that it is worth the risk. Newcomers, many of which were apparently horribly misinformed, from California and other places did not do their research and so have been taken by a terrible surprise. Media outlets like CNN do not have any excuse for burying the truth under climate hysteria and alarmist narratives when they clearly are aware of the region’s weather history.