Ethanol Mandates are Dead, Long Live SAF (Sustainable Aviation Fuel)

A bill has been introduced which could drive up US food prices, for the benefit of EU greens.

From Watts Up With That?

Essay by Eric Worrall

A bill has been introduced which could drive up US food prices, for the benefit of EU greens.

US Climate Change Denial May Dampen Ethanol, SAF Demand 

March 3, 2026
Frank Zaworski 

Insight Focus

…

Rolling back regulations on greenhouse gases will likely have an impact on biofuels, as the petroleum and auto industries celebrate the potential removal of restrictions on the production of their respective products. The rollbacks may also somewhat disincentivise further development within the biofuels sector.

…

“This rollback is sort of cementing things that have already been done, such as the relaxation of the fuel economy standards,” said Michael Gerrard, a climate law expert from Columbia University. “But it really does put US automakers in a bind, because nobody else is going to want to buy American cars.”

…

Airlines and Energy Firms Double Down on SAF

Meanwhile, the world is intent on reducing the carbon footprint of air transportation by increasing the use of SAF.

…

In the US, a draft farm bill from the House Ag Committee calls for USDA to develop a plan to advance production of SAF. The bill would include using crops and promoting public-private partnerships that would lead to commercial-scale production of SAF.

…Read more: https://www.czapp.com/analyst-insights/us-climate-change-denial-may-dampen-ethanol-saf-demand/

It is sad that a biofuel bill has been proposed which would drive up the price of food, despite all the efforts President Trump has made to liberate Americans from market distorting green mandates.

The text of the bill;

S.144 – Farm to Fly Act of 2025 119th Congress (2025-2026)

Sponsor:Sen. Moran, Jerry [R-KS] (Introduced 01/16/2025)
Committees:Senate – Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
Latest Action:Senate – 01/16/2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.  (All Actions)
Tracker: TipThis bill has the status Introduced

Here are the steps for Status of Legislation: Introduced => Passed Senate => Passed House => To President => Became Law

Summary: S.144 — 119th Congress (2025-2026)All Information (Except Text)

Listen

There is one summary for S.144. Bill summaries are authored by CRS.

Shown Here:
Introduced in Senate (01/16/2025)

Farm to Fly Act of 2025

This bill directs the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to integrate the advancement of sustainable aviation fuels into its programs.

Specifically, this bill includes sustainable aviation fuel as an advanced biofuel for the purposes of several USDA bioenergy programs that primarily provide support and incentives for renewable energy projects.

For purposes of these programs, the bill defines sustainable aviation fuel as liquid fuel, the portion of which is not kerosene, which (1) meets specific international standards, (2) is not derived from coprocessing specific materials (e.g., triglycerides) with a non-biomass feedstock, (3) is not derived from palm fatty acid distillates or petroleum, and (4) is certified as having a lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions reduction percentage of at least 50% compared with petroleum-based jet fuel (based on specific standards and agreements).

In addition, the bill specifically includes fostering and advancing sustainable aviation fuels as part of the Biorefinery, Renewable Chemical, and Biobased Product Manufacturing Assistance Program.

Further, USDA must carry out a comprehensive and integrated pursuit of all USDA mission areas for the advancement of sustainable aviation fuels, including through

  • the identification of opportunities to maximize the development and commercialization of the fuels,
  • supporting rural economic development through improved sustainability for aviation, and
  • advancing public-private partnerships.

Read more: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/144

I just have one question. WHY?

Pouring government subsidies into a scheme to help EU airlines puts the US government in competition with the US people, over who gets to purchase agricultural produce, for no net benefit whatsoever to anyone in the USA, except for farmers who receive subsidies from other taxpayers.

How Biofuel Mandates Raise Food and Energy Prices

Blending requirements harm consumers and the environment

November 4th 2022 
By Adin Richards

Introduction

The U.S. biofuel mandate fails at its stated objectives, worsens food security, and increases costs for consumers. Biofuels are plant-derived substitutes for petroleum-based transportation fuels. Congress has mandated their use since 2005 as part of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). The government’s mandate was justified by claiming it would reduce emissions, increase U.S. energy security, spur the development of more advanced biofuels, and help American farmers. In practice, the Renewable Fuel Standard has delivered on only one of its initial promises: boosting the incomes of American farmers. Conventional biofuels have proven to be more carbon intensivethan fossil fuels, the technology advances that Congress had counted on have not come to fruition, and the U.S. is incapable of producing biofuels at the level the law requires. Rather than increasing American energy independence, the U.S. has become a net biofuel importer in order to meet the biofuel blending mandate. Inflexible federal policy has also meant that when corn and soybean prices rise, gasoline prices go up, harming U.S. consumers. By diverting crops from livestock feed and human food, biofuel blending mandates also worsen food insecurity, particularly in crises like the one triggered by COVID-19 supply disruptions and the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

…Read more: https://ifp.org/biofuel-mandates-raise-food-and-energy-prices/

If the goal is to help farmers and boost food security, instead of hurting consumers by subsidising useless biofuel mandates, why not subsidise food production? I do not support subsidies, but a subsidy which provides no benefit whatsoever to US consumers is next level absurd.

Biofuel mandates have a horrible track record for causing harm. Even Oxfam complained about EU biofuel policies in 2012, and Oxfam normally embrace green policies.

Europe’s thirst for biofuels spells hunger for millions, as food prices shoot up

Published: 17th September 2012

Land used to power European cars with biofuels for one year could produce enough wheat and maize to feed 127 million people, Oxfam reveals ahead of today’s important EU Energy Ministers’ meeting.

With the world’s poorest at greater risk of hunger as a result of spiraling food prices, the international agency is calling on the EU to rethink its dangerous love affair with biofuels.

In a new GROW campaign report, The Hunger Grains, Oxfam warns that Europe’s growing appetite for biofuels is pushing up global food prices and driving people off their land, resulting in deeper hunger and malnutrition in poor countries.

In Europe, EU biofuel mandates could cost every adult about €30 each year by 2020. In 2008, about €3 billion were spent in tax exemptions and other incentives for biofuel production in the EU, comparable to the value of cuts agreed under the controversial Greek bail-out deal in February.

“Depriving millions of people of food, land and water”

…Read more: https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/europes-thirst-biofuels-spells-hunger-millions-food-prices-shoot

Only US voters can stop this nonsense; by making it clear to representatives that they should not support measures which will drive up domestic food prices. If farmers genuinely need government support, at least make it a form of support which provides a tangible benefit. A US taxpayer subsidy which hurts US consumers but helps the green lunatics who run the EU maintain their net zero charade, this makes no sense whatsoever.

COP30, Green Hype, And Real-World Rip-Offs

COP30 unfolds in Belém, Brazil, amid the familiar spectacle of jet-setting elites lecturing on climate from air-conditioned halls.

Entrance to the COP30 climate change conference in Belém, Brazil, featuring the United Nations logo and decorative wooden panels.

From CFACT

By Melanie Collette

COP30 unfolds in Belém, Brazil, amid the familiar spectacle of jet-setting elites lecturing on climate from air-conditioned halls.

This year’s darling? The “bioeconomy“— swapping fossil fuels for products derived from nature’s bounty: plants, forests, algae, microbes, and waste. Think biofuels for your F-150, bioplastics for packaging, industrial chemicals, even drugs from organic scraps. Proponents promise circular economies, emission slashes, rural job booms, and freedom from foreign oil barons and rare-earth tyrants.

It evokes Reagan-era optimism: American grit turning cornfields into energy independence. But this U.N.-fueled fantasy is big-government snake oil — crony subsidies inflating costs, ravaging ecosystems, and mocking true conservation. Conservatives have battled these mandates since the Paris debacle; the bioeconomy is their sequel, exporting our prosperity to Brazilian bureaucrats while squeezing U.S. families. 

(RELATED: United Nations Recruits Countries To Crack Down On What They Call Climate ‘Denialism’)

Crop-based biofuels exemplify the scam. EPA models paint corn ethanol as a low-carbon hero. Reality bites: Mandates surge demand, spurring farmers to raze prairies and forests. “Indirect land-use change” (ILUC) unleashes buried carbon, often doubling emissions over decades. A seminal 2008 Searchinger study confirmed U.S. ethanol rivals’ gasoline’s footprint when ILUC counts. The EU, green as it is, now phases out high-ILUC fuels to zero by 2030 under its Renewable Energy Directive.

The pain hits home. Biofuel diversions fueled the 2007-08 food crisis, spiking corn and soy prices 75%, per World Bank leaks. Families in flyover country — not speculators — paid dearly. That’s not security; it’s starvation politics from Washington.

Brazil’s RenovaBio, COP30’s showcase, fares worse. Since 2017, it trades credits for “lifecycle-low” biofuels, claiming transport emission wins. Lula’s team hypes it as a bioeconomy beacon. But peer reviews expose the rot: no ILUC accounting, enabling Amazon-chewing sugarcane sprawl. An IEA report slams weak fraud checks and deforestation risks as demand booms. Pre-COP exposés reveal land grabs and indigenous clashes — hardly the sustainable idyll being sold.

Wood pellets? “Renewable” power’s grim reaper. Labeled carbon-neutral, they ignore the math: Burning trees flood the air with CO₂ now, regrowth lagging for 40-100 years amid fires and blight. NPR probes show wood pellets are dirtier than coal in the short-term, poisoning rural air for subsidies. It’s not stewardship; it’s subsidized savagery.

Bioplastics follow suit. “Biodegradable” PLA from corn demands industrial infernos to dissolve — useless in landfills or oceans, where it festers like PET. It commandeers food acres, gums recycling, and yields zilch on waste, per Yale analyses. Feel-good fiction, not a fix.

“Sustainable” wastes? Crop residues cap at soil-safe levels to dodge erosion; overreach invites Dust Bowls 2.0. Used cooking oil? Scarce, scam-prone — importers fake “waste” from palm plantations for green gold.

Beyond ledgers, its values are at stake. Monocrops gut biodiversity — 80% species drops in Amazon hotspots, per global reports — eviscerating jaguars and habitats. Smallholders flee land rushes, igniting conflicts sans U.S.-style rights. Cronyism reigns: billions subsidize agra-giants; mandates crush independents; energy bills soar; innovation freezes. Climate impact? Negligible against fossils, sidelining nukes and gas.

Conservatives offer clarity: Free markets over edicts. Mandate tech-neutrality with ironclad lifecycle math — no ILUC dodges or neutrality nonsense. Axe high-risk feedstocks, EU-style. Champion audited wastes over crops. Electrify pragmatically — fleet EVs, not mandates — but gut permitting for modular reactors, fracked abundance, grid upgrades.

Unleash Iowa innovators and Texas drillers on equal footing. Energy dominance  demands merit, not Brasília busybodies.

COP30’s bioeconomy is hemp-clad socialism: Slick pitches veiling pricier groceries, barren fields, and bogus cuts. As delegates toast in Belém, recall: Prosperity springs from unchained enterprise, not U.N. utopias. Spurn subsidies; seize reliable, cheap power for families and freedoms. America first — red, white, and verdant truth.

Melanie Collette is a CFACT Policy Analyst. She comes to CFACT (Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow) with a background in environmental/energy policy work, especially in combating the offshore wind turbine groups and green organizations in their plans for northeast construction of wind farms up and down the Atlantic coast. 

 This article originally appeared at Daily Caller.

South Western Railway disruption after biofuel clogs engines

Derailed by climate obsession? According to The Telegraph the problem is that ‘algae produced by green fuels blocks engines’, if they’re left unused for a certain period of time. Potential implications for other motorised transport here.

From Tallbloke’s Talkshop

April 21, 2023 by oldbrew

Derailed by climate obsession? According to The Telegraph the problem is that ‘algae produced by green fuels blocks engines’, if they’re left unused for a certain period of time. Potential implications for other motorised transport here.
– – –
A train operator has reduced services after diesel engines were clogged with biofuel, reports BBC News.

South Western Railway (SWR) said a fault was discovered on Wednesday in much of its diesel fleet at depots in Exeter and Salisbury.

It said the issue would disrupt services in the Romsey area and west of Salisbury until further notice.

BBC South transport correspondent Paul Clifton said SWR would run a fraction of normal services on the routes.

He said the issue would affect the West of England line for the next week.

Full report here.