Norway Rejects Climate Orthodoxy’s False Choice, Builds Wealth

Norway Minister of Energy Terje Aasland told Reuters that his country will keep developing oil and gas in the Barents Sea irrespective of a European Union (EU) ban on Arctic drilling.

Europe already has suffered economic damage from its “green” pretense. The IEA reports that EU electricity prices for energy-intensive industry averaged more than double American levels in 2025 and were nearly 50% above China’s.

A cartoon depicting Norway's energy and wealth conversation, featuring a Viking figure, an offshore oil platform, and various characters discussing fossil fuels, climate action, and economic prosperity. Text highlights include 'Sovereign Wealth Fund', 'No Fossil Fuels!', and 'Norwegian gas to Europe'.

From CO2 Coalition

By Vijay Jayaraj

Norway Minister of Energy Terje Aasland told Reuters that his country will keep developing oil and gas in the Barents Sea irrespective of a European Union (EU) ban on Arctic drilling.

“In today’s geopolitical and security environment … I believe continued activity in the Barents Sea serves both Norwegian and European interests,” said Aasland.

Although not an EU member, Norway is a close ally and Europe’s largest gas supplier, meeting about 30% of the demand across the European Union and Britain. Last year Norwegian gas output ran near record levels and oil production hit its highest mark since 2009.

Without new fields, however, official projections show output dropping sharply after 2030. But Aasland intends to hold production and exports near current levels until at least 2035, and he has said that the Arctic is important to Norway remaining a long-term supplier.

The EU currently backs a ban on new Arctic drilling on environmental grounds, while buying the gas that keeps its factories running. Anders Opedal, CEO of Norwegian multinational energy company Equinor, has said that producers of Barents oil and natural gas will find buyers somewhere else if Europe refuses to buy.

Even Fatih Birol, head of the International Energy Agency (IEA) and a promoter of transitioning away from fossil fuels, has urged the EU to reconsider its opposition to Arctic development for the sake of energy security.

Europe already has suffered economic damage from its “green” pretense. The IEA reports that EU electricity prices for energy-intensive industry averaged more than double American levels in 2025 and were nearly 50% above China’s. A 2024 report on European competitiveness warned that such costs are hollowing out manufacturing.

Here is where the story stops being about the Arctic and becomes about everyone else.

Norway is not a struggling petro-state rationalizing a bad habit. It is among the richest societies ever built, with per capita gross domestic product above $105,000 and a sovereign wealth fund that crossed $2.39 trillion in June. Five and a half million people have converted seabed hydrocarbons into universal healthcare, free universities, and pensions for grandchildren not yet born.

If Norway considers oil and gas indispensable to its economic position, it is unreasonable to demand that poorer countries abandon their own resources. This matters enormously for Africa, South Asia, and other rapidly developing regions. For many African households, unreliable energy can be catastrophic.

Delay of fossil fuel projects costs in ways spreadsheets miss. A gas project blocked by climate posturing means that engineering teams disband, drilling rigs go elsewhere, borrowing costs rise, and the fertilizer plant that would have used the hydrocarbon feedstock never gets built. A decade of compounding benefits is lost to a national balance sheet.

Western proponents of climate orthodoxy declare as immoral the ladder their societies climbed to unprecedented prosperity. Every advanced economy industrialized with coal, oil, and gas. Norway is still doing it with a $2 trillion cushion. Norwegian leaders recognize oil and gas are critical to their nation’s future, unlike their counterparts in the EU, Canada, and Australia.

When ministers from developing nations sit down with lenders and donor agencies, they should place the Aasland interview on the table and ask a single question: If continued Arctic development serves Norwegian and European interests, on what basis does a Nigerian gas plant or a Bangladeshi terminal serve a lesser interest?

Climate alarmists present a false choice between affordable, dependable energy and environmental stewardship. Norway rejects that trap. A country can cut waste, improve technologies, protect ecosystems, and maintain the reliable fuel base that modern life requires.

Energy abundance and human flourishing track together in every dataset anyone has assembled. Norway understands this and acts on it. Poor nations understand it too. What they lack is not evidence but permission, and permission is not something a sovereign state should have to request. Leaders of developing nations should leverage Norway’s example and build on it.

Originally published at PJ Media, September 4th, 2026.

Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Fairfax, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India. He served as a research associate with the Changing Oceans Research Unit at University of British Columbia, Canada.

Trump Administration Lifts Stop-Work Order on $5 Billion New York Offshore Wind Project

The Trump administration has rescinded a stop-work order that had temporarily halted construction of the Empire Wind 1 offshore wind project near New York. The decision clears the way for Equinor, the project’s developer, to resume building the $5 billion installation intended to generate electricity for the state.

From Watts Up With That?

By Charles Rotter

The Trump administration has rescinded a stop-work order that had temporarily halted construction of the Empire Wind 1 offshore wind project near New York. The decision clears the way for Equinor, the project’s developer, to resume building the $5 billion installation intended to generate electricity for the state.

According to a report by Just the News, the project had been paused for a month after Interior Secretary Doug Burgum issued the order, citing concerns that the previous administration under President Biden had “rushed” the federal environmental review process. The pause sparked political and economic concerns, particularly due to the scale of the project and its associated job numbers.

Governor Kathy Hochul announced the federal government’s decision to lift the halt following discussions with the White House. She stated:

“I want to thank President Trump for his willingness to work with me to save the 1,500 good paying union jobs that were on the line and helping get this essential project back on track”.

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/trump-lifts-stop-work-order-new-york-offshore-wind-project

Empire Wind 1, which is being developed by the Norway-based energy company Equinor, is projected to deliver 810 megawatts of electricity—reportedly enough to power about 500,000 homes. The company said it welcomed the administration’s decision to allow construction to continue.

“We appreciate the fact that construction can now resume on Empire Wind, a project which underscores our commitment to deliver energy while supporting local economies and creating jobs,” said Anders Opedal, President and CEO of Equinor ASA.

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/trump-lifts-stop-work-order-new-york-offshore-wind-project

Equinor had previously warned that it might abandon the project if the stop-work order was not lifted, citing construction delays that were costing the company up to $50 million per week. The company has already invested more than $2.5 billion in the development, which is approximately one-third complete.

The resumption of the project also follows legal and political tensions. New York and other northeastern states had filed lawsuits against the Trump administration, contesting its authority to indefinitely halt federal wind-energy approvals under an executive order issued on January 20. The legal challenges reflect broader disputes over the federal government’s role in regulating offshore wind development and its alignment with state-level clean energy goals.

Former President Biden’s administration had aimed to develop 35 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity by 2030, starting with projects such as Vineyard Wind off Massachusetts. The Empire Wind 1 project is one of several large-scale efforts along the U.S. East Coast that form part of state and federal clean energy targets.

For now, the lifting of the stop-work order represents a significant step toward the project’s completion and a continuation of New York’s attempt at an energy transition, though broader debates over offshore wind’s environmental and economic implications remain active.

Equinor Cut Green Investment in Half

Norwegian energy giant Equinor is halving investment in renewable energy over the next two years while increasing oil and gas production.

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

h/t Ian Cunningham

More bad news for the idiot Miliband:

Norwegian energy giant Equinor is halving investment in renewable energy over the next two years while increasing oil and gas production.

Chief executive Anders Opedal said that the transition to lower carbon energy was moving slower than expected, costs had increased, and customers were reluctant to commit to long term contracts.

Mr Opedal told the BBC he was confident that Rosebank – a giant new oil field in the North Sea – would go ahead, despite a recent court ruling that consent had been awarded unlawfully.

He also warned that gas prices could rise next winter as European gas storage levels were lower now than this time last year.

“We are scaling down our investments in renewables and low carbon solutions because we don’t see the necessary profitability in the future,” Mr Opedal said.

It will cut investments in renewables to $5bn over the next two years, down from about $10bn.

It will also drop a target to spend half of its fixed assets budget on renewables and low carbon products by 2030.

By contrast, Equinor will be increasing oil and gas production by 10% over the next two years.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1jg7k1kjwyo

This is of course part of a much wider trend, as we saw today with Orsted’s decision to call a halt to offshore wind development. Renewable energy is wholly dependent on govt subsidy, which as President has shown is illusionary.

Incredibly the far-left BBC still believe that “Rosebank is not straightforward”

What could not be more straightforward than a British oil field which could supply ultra cheap oil and gas to the country, sustain thousands of well paid jobs, send millions in tax revenues to the govt, provide an element of energy security and actually reduce emissions in comparison with importing the stuff.

Only the British hating BBC could object to that!

BTW

I cannot help but be reminded what the Xi’s useful idiot, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard said last week, when he said that the world’s investors were chasing green energy because that was where the money was!

Dream on, Ambrose!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Floating Wrecks: Perpetually Failing Siemens Offshore Wind Turbines Practically Uninsurable

Norwegian energy giant Equinor will temporarily remove all five floating wind turbines from the Hywind Scotland array later this year after discovering a need for “heavy maintenance” on the Siemens Gamesa machines deployed there, Recharge has learned.

STOP THESE THINGS

Hywind Statoil. Stord, Norway.

The wind industry’s sudden implosion saw Siemens suffer a €5.8 billion ($6.3 billion) market value write-down in a single day in June, followed by another 40% write-down in October – slashing a further €3 billion ($3.16 billion) off its market value, following revelations by Siemens that it was demanding billions in government-backed guarantees from the German government.

At the heart of their woes is a machine that wears out much faster than promised, is naturally costly to maintain and, in marine environments, suffering catastrophic and often fatal mechanical failures, which requires the turbine to be removed and dragged back to shore for a complete overhaul. Needless to say the cost of all that is astronomical.

Because the failures are occurring so suddenly, ordinarily it’s the manufacturer who suffers the cost of repairs under the (exceedingly ambitious) warranties given by the likes of Siemens, and others. If the manufacturer’s warranty doesn’t cover those costs, the operators then call on their insurers to foot the bill.

However, as detailed in this piece from wind industry propagandist, Gareth Chetwynd, insurers are seeking to limit their exposure by carving out claims based on manufacturer’s defects using “serial defect clauses”. Those clauses mean that offshore turbine operators will have to carry the can, in the highly likely event that the salt-encrusted machines grind to a sudden and early halt. Precisely as happened with a fleet of 6MW Siemens monsters floating off the Scottish coastline.

World’s first floating wind farm Hywind Scotland faces shutdown for ‘heavy maintenance’
Recharg News
Gareth Chetwynd
12 January 2024

Norwegian energy giant Equinor will temporarily remove all five floating wind turbines from the Hywind Scotland array later this year after discovering a need for “heavy maintenance” on the Siemens Gamesa machines deployed there, Recharge has learned.

The 6MW turbines will be towed back to Wergeland on the west coast of Norway as part of a maintenance programme that is likely to take around four months. All units will be reconnected back on the Hywind Scotland site when the maintenance is complete, a spokesman for the Norwegian company confirmed.

The work will involve changing some components on the turbines, as well as more routine maintenance. “What we see from operational data is that there is a need for… heavy maintenance on the turbines,” he told Recharge.

Equinor declined to specify exactly which components would need replacing, but industry insiders consulted by Recharge suggested that the issues must be significant to require intervention on such a scale.

While acknowledging that towing all the turbines to shore for maintenance after seven years of operation was not planned at the outset, the Equinor spokesman claimed such actions are not entirely unexpected.

“We will conduct a combination of exchanging some components, maintaining others and using the opportunity to do regular service as well. All of this is something we regularly do at our other offshore wind farms. What’s different here is that we will tow the turbines to shore,” he said.

He added that the need for heavy maintenance became apparent through “ordinary monitoring and inspections, in close collaboration with the manufacturer.”

Siemens Gamesa was asked to provide clarification of the nature of the problems on Hywind Scotland’s turbines, but a spokesperson said the company would not expand on the information provided by Equinor.

The 30MW Hywind Scotland array was fêted as the world’s first commercial floating wind farm when it became operational in 2017, moving ahead of a number of demonstration projects.

Equinor and 25% project partner Masdar invested the equivalent of $194m in the project and celebrated achieving a 60-70% cost reduction, compared with the Hywind Demo project in Norway.

“Most offshore wind farms require heavy maintenance of turbines from time to time so this was always something that could happen. Towing the turbines to shore is currently the most safe, efficient and proven method to carry out such heavy maintenance of floating turbines,” the spokesman stated.

Insurability concerns
Floating wind ambitions have indeed mushroomed since Hywind Scotland came online, including a potential 19GW of capacity in the pipeline as a result of the UK’s Scotwind tender.

But the problems apparently surfacing on Hywind Scotland go to the heart of challenges facing the floating sector.

Although any issues with the 6MW direct drive turbines are unwelcome for Siemens Gamesa, which has faced high-profile quality problems with its onshore platforms, many in the industry warn that the worry is more about a broader perception of risk that is posing a threat to the fledgling sector’s burgeoning plans.

This is felt particularly when it comes to underwriting costs in the insurance sector.

Michael Bullock, director of consultancy firm Renewable Risk Advisers, underlined this point during a recent industry conference in Lisbon where participants discussed the knock-on risks from equipment failure in relation to issues such as the availability of vessels, access to ports and reconnection challenges.

In addition to policy deductibles, insurers usually limit their exposure through serial defect clauses in policy wordings and in renewal negotiations, posing a risk of residual exposure to the project itself, to the extent that protection is not provided by OEM warranties and despite existing cover provided by insurers, Bullock noted.

“Serial defects happen in the offshore wind sector as elsewhere, even with the proper due diligence and certification in place (but) the risk is potentially aggravated by the frequency of new larger turbine designs with different loadings and fatigue rates, and other characteristics,” he told Recharge in a recent interview.

“The costs of an unscheduled maintenance campaign across multiple offshore units will invariably be considerable, in addition to the substantial loss of revenue arising from turbine downtime.”

Bullock added that project developers can mitigate the risks through scenario analysis and contingency planning, feeding into operation, maintenance and spare parts strategies, including pre-negotiated call-off agreements for suitable vessels.

Anchor handlers
As one of the world’s leading companies in the offshore production of oil and gas, Equinor is better positioned than many to get its hands on anchor handling tug supply (AHTS) vessels.

The Norwegian offshore giant currently has two AHTS vessels under fixed-term charter, namely the Vega and Ferking but the operator has apparently been arranging extra cover for anchor handlers ahead of the Hywind Scotland operation, according to shipbrokers active in this segment of the market.

“[Equinor] came out with a term charter for an AHTS late last year. They haven’t concluded it yet, but essentially they have two AHTS on charter right now. Ferking goes offhire around October and Vega continues. So from April to October they will have three term-charter AHTS vessels,” a Norwegian shipbroker told Recharge.

Equinor is no stranger to risks emerging in the offshore wind sector, and is among those developers that have stepped back from deals struck for US projects made uneconomic by a surge in supply chain and capital costs.

But recent moves, such as the cancellation of the deal for New York’s fixed bottom 1.2GW Empire Wind 2 project were presaged by the decision, back in May 2023, to suspend the subsidy-free 1GW Trollvind floating wind project in Norway “based on several challenges facing the project, including technology availability, rising cost and a strained timetable to deliver on the original concept”.

A sector-wide need for operational and maintenance experience or “learning opportunities” was also flagged by Victoria Toft, head of data at Danish research consultancy Aegir Insights. She noted that concerns about operational requirements and the implication of repairs of large components raise serious questions for floating wind.

Some technology providers, such as Aker Solutions and Encomara, have come out with new products and solutions aiming, among other things, to facilitate the efficient connecting and re-connecting process with floating turbines.

But a silver bullet solution to the problem of serial defects or failures in large components has not yet emerged, Toft reckons.

“Units in need of larger repairs or major component exchange often need to go far to find suitable ports, due to dimensions of the foundations,” she added.

In the case of Hywind Scotland, Wergeland was identified as the closest yard that was suitable for heavy maintenance purposes, the Equinor spokesperson said.
Recharge News

Regulatory Rebuff Blow to Offshore Wind Projects

The state denial could force some developers whose contracts may not cover project costs to scrap plans to sell power to customers in New York, cancel or delay projects, as happened with a couple of offshore wind projects in Massachusetts. 

From Watts Up With That?

When the breezy dreams of offshore wind giants met the rocky shores of regulation.

In a move that left offshore wind giants like Orsted, Equinor, and BP staggering, New York’s utility regulator has blown away pleas for contract relief.

“Nearly all of New York’s pacesetting 4.3GW of contracted offshore wind capacity is now in limbo following rejection of developers’ pleas for inflation relief by the state’s utility regulator.”

https://www.rechargenews.com/wind/blow-to-orsted-equinor-and-bp-as-new-york-rejects-pleas-for-offshore-wind-contract-relief-leaving-4gw-in-limbo/2-1-1534223

Developers’ Substantial Requests Denied

The developers, caught in the turbulent winds of cost overruns, sought increases to offtake contracts by a staggering 55%. However, the PSC was not swayed by their arguments.

“New York Public Service Commission (PSC) denied petitions by the state’s two offshore wind developers, joint ventures (JVs) of Equinor-BP and Orsted-Eversource, for increases to offtake contracts as high as 55%, which one PSC member reportedly described as ‘breathtaking’.”

Ratepayer Impact: A Central Concern

The PSC stood its ground, prioritizing the interests of ratepayers over the inflation woes of developers. The commission emphasized that the proposed contract increases were not in line with its policy objectives.

“Regulator said cost hikes of up to 55% would have substantial ratepayer impacts and were ‘fundamentally inconsistent’ with commission policy.”

The Uncertain Path Ahead

The decision leaves a significant portion of New York’s offshore wind capacity in a state of uncertainty. The ambitious plans of these offshore developers now seem to be at the mercy of regulatory scrutiny and economic practicality. The future trajectory of these projects remains unclear amidst this regulatory challenge.

Conclusion: Navigating the Regulatory Landscape

The PSC’s decision underscores an interplay of economic considerations and, (finally!) some regulatory prudence in the renewable energy sector. Developers now, perhaps for the first time, face the task of advancing their projects amidst economic fluctuations, having to with regulatory expectations and safeguarding ratepayer interests. We’ll see how many walk away.

Source force this article: https://www.rechargenews.com/wind/blow-to-orsted-equinor-and-bp-as-new-york-rejects-pleas-for-offshore-wind-contract-relief-leaving-4gw-in-limbo/2-1-1534223

HT/david d for sending me official decision below.