AI revolution: So big, Texas grid needs the equivalent of 30 Nuclear Reactors By 2030 to meet Power Demand

The world is about to flip from an energy diet to an electrical boom. Look at Texas.

From JoNova

By Jo Nova

The insatiable hunger for electricity

The world is about to flip from an energy diet to an electrical boom. Look at Texas.

Here in Australia our top Blob Scientists tell us it will take 15 years to build one nuclear plant. But in Texas, which has two nuclear plants already, the AI revolution is beating down the door, and itโ€™s saying โ€œFeed me 30 plants for breakfast โ€ โ€” or at least by 2030. Itโ€™s like a different planet.

There are already 340 datacentres in Texas which use 8GW of power, but new projects are so large, they are starting to ask for a whole gigawatt up front. And the sum total of requests for new electrical supply adds up to 99 gigawatts โ€” most of which have materialized in the last year. The new level of demand is so big, the grid managers are starting to worry that single new industrial loads are large enough to threaten the grid.

Weโ€™re talking of a seismic shift:

The ERCOT grid peak load last summer was 86 gigawatts. The new peak demand by 2030 is expected to be 75% bigger. It may not all be nuclear, ERCOT did ask for โ€œthe equivalentโ€ of 30 new nuclear plants. But it will be big and fast.

Texas has 31 million people. Australia has 26 million (plus a million foreign uni students). Weโ€™re performing a national pantomime over whether itโ€™s realistic to build a few nuclear plants and a couple of SMRโ€™s, as if weโ€™re plotting to build the first colony on Venus. Meanwhile Texas is leading the revolution.

Texas Needs Equivalent of 30 Reactors to Meet Data Center Power Demand

Financial Post

โ€œWeโ€™ve never existed in a place where large industrial loads can really impact the reliability of the grid, and now we are stepping into that world.โ€

[Bloomberg]โ€” Demand on the Texas power grid is expected to expand so immensely that it would take the equivalent of adding 30 nuclear plantsโ€™ worth of electricity by 2030 to meet the needs.

Thatโ€™s according to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, which manages the grid. The forecast is based on the addition of new data centers needed to power artificial intelligence. And itโ€™s raising concerns about whether infrastructure in the state will be able to expand fast enough โ€” and at what cost.

ZeroHedge

Individual projects are already starting to request 1 gigawatt of power and they pose new risks to maintaining a stable grid, said Agee Springer, Ercotโ€™s senior manager of grid interconnections. A gigawatt is typically enough to power 250,000 homes in Texas.

Ercot said itโ€™s gotten requests equal to 99 gigawatts for new connections to the grid from big power users, including data centers, bitcoin miners and hydrogen producers, according to an internal grid presentation Thursday. Thatโ€™s up from 40.8 gigawatts last March.

Thereโ€™s a big question as to whether infrastructure can be built fast enough because of supply chain issues, resulting in long wait times for things like big turbines to produce electricity and other key equipment such as transformers. Another critical issues is who is going to pay for all of this build out.

One company is already planning to build 30 micronuclear plants. Another wants to develop molten salt reactors.

None of the AI teams are begging for wind or solar power. If Australia were to build new coal plants, or new nuclear plants with spare capacity, Big AI would be here in a flash. The La Trobe Valley could become a world leading AI centre if the government was willing to keep using theย 300 years of cheap brown coal there. Atย 3 cents a kilowatt hourย wholesale, itโ€™s still the cheapest electricity on the planet.

Do we want to be the coal and iron mine at the edge of the world, or would we like to ride the revolution?

Bidenโ€™s Dam Removal Plan and Its Impact on Electrical Supply

In a recent development, the Biden administration, in concert with environmental groups and Native American tribes, has set in motion a plan that could lead to the removal of four hydroelectric dams in Washington state.

Ice Harbor Dam Snake River

From Watts Up With That?

In a recent development, the Biden administration, in concert with environmental groups and Native American tribes, has set in motion a plan that could lead to the removal of four hydroelectric dams in Washington state. This decision, ostensibly made to protect salmon populations, raises significant concerns about the stability and reliability of the western power grid, particularly in terms of grid inertia and energy supply.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admin-creates-pathway-eco-groups-shutter-energy-source-serving-millions-americans

The White House, in coordination with Native American tribes and environmental groups, announced actions Thursday that provide a pathway for breaching, or removing, four hydroelectric dams in Washington state to protect salmon.

As part of the announcement, theย federal government entered into a legal agreementย with the Pacific Northwest tribes and environmental organizations filed earlier in the day in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. Under that agreement, the tribes and eco groups โ€” which had sued the federal government in an effort to forcibly breach the dams โ€” agreed to stay the litigation through 2028.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admin-creates-pathway-eco-groups-shutter-energy-source-serving-millions-americans

Understanding Grid Inertia and Stability

Grid inertia is a critical aspect of power system stability. It refers to the resistance of the electrical grid to changes in frequency, which is essential for maintaining a steady and reliable power supply. Traditional power sources like coal, gas, and hydroelectric dams contribute significantly to grid inertia due to their large rotating generators. These generators store kinetic energy, which acts as a buffer against sudden changes in power supply or demand, thereby stabilizing the grid.

The initiative explicitly recommends that dams are breached within two fish generations, or approximately eight years. While there isnโ€™t an explicit plan to breach the dams โ€” an action that the White House has acknowledged would require congressional approval โ€” the agreement does include commitments to begin replacing the services provided by the dams.https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admin-creates-pathway-eco-groups-shutter-energy-source-serving-millions-americans

And opposition to this extra legal back door deal is growing.

โ€œCongress โ€” and Congress alone โ€” can authorize removal of the dams on the lower Snake River. Bureaucrats, activist litigation, nor this administrationโ€™s radical agenda will determine the fate of any of the Northwestโ€™s federal dams,โ€ Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, said in a statement to Fox News Digital. 

โ€œThis litigation effort was useless: It occurred behind closed doors, between two parties who wanted the same end result โ€” to tear out our dams, and it completely excluded Idahoans who rely on the River System for its energy, transportation, agriculture and recreation benefits,โ€ he continued. โ€œI will continue to fight any breaching efforts, and, at every turn, I will reject the Biden administrationโ€™s efforts to usurp Congressional authority.โ€

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admin-creates-pathway-eco-groups-shutter-energy-source-serving-millions-americans

The hydroelectric dams in question are not just sources of renewable energy; they are also vital contributors to grid inertia. Their removal, as proposed in the Biden administrationโ€™s plan, poses a direct threat to the stability of the western power grid. The dams currently provide about 8% of Washington stateโ€™s electricity and have a total capacity of 3,000 megawatts. This is not just about losing a significant chunk of power supply; itโ€™s about eroding the gridโ€™s ability to withstand and quickly recover from power disturbances.

A grid with reduced inertia is more susceptible to fluctuations in power frequency, which can lead to blackouts and other reliability issues. As we transition to more renewable energy sources like wind and solar, which do not inherently provide inertia, the importance of maintaining other sources of inertia, such as hydroelectric power, becomes even more critical. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has highlighted the evolving role of inertia in maintaining grid reliability, especially as the energy mix changes (NREL).

The Irony of Green Energy Initiatives

The irony in this scenario is palpable. While the intention to protect salmon runs has some merit, the removal of these dams could lead to increased reliance on fossil fuels to compensate for the lost power and grid stability. This move could inadvertently result in higher carbon emissions, as replacing hydropower with natural gas generation would increase carbon emissions by up to 2.6 million metric tons per year.

The Agricultural and Economic Impact

Apart from the electrical implications, thereโ€™s also the agricultural angle. The dams facilitate the transportation of about 60% of Washingtonโ€™s annual wheat exports via barges. Removing them could disrupt this supply chain, impacting both local and national agricultural markets.


In light of these considerations, it is imperative that decisions affecting our power infrastructure be made with a full understanding of their implications on grid stability, energy supply, and the broader environment. While the protection of salmon populations is important, it needs to balanced with the expense of grid reliability and the broader ecological and economic stability.

In conclusion, the Biden administrationโ€™s plan to remove these hydroelectric dams is a short-sighted approach that overlooks the broader implications on grid stability, energy supply, and environmental impact. A more balanced approach that considers all these factors is crucial for ensuring a stable, reliable, energy future.