Rising Tide Demonstrates Even Climate Protestors Need Fossil Fuel

Last weekย Rising tideย provided an impressive showcase for plastic fossil fuel products during their climate protest.

Opponents of oil trains and barges that service the Port of Albany paddle along the Hudson River on Friday in Albany, N.Y. The demonstration was part of the Break Free from Fossil Fuels movement.

From Watts Up With That?

Essay by Eric Worrall

Last week Rising tide provided an impressive showcase for plastic fossil fuel products during their climate protest.

Arrests made as Rising Tide climate change protesters take to Newcastle Harbour over coal exports

By Romy Stephens and Bridget Murphy

In short:

Activism group Rising Tide says multiple people have been arrested at an anti-fossil fuels demonstration in Newcastle.

Thousands have attended the multi-day protest, where Midnight Oil front man Peter Garrett delivered a speech and performed.

Whatโ€™s next?

The demonstration is expected to continue until Sunday evening.

Several people have been arrested at a climate protest in Newcastle that involved hundreds of activists taking to the cityโ€™s harbour in canoes and kayaks.

The demonstration, organised by activism group Rising Tide, was advertised as a โ€œblockadeโ€ of the worldโ€™s largest coal port.

A Rising Tide statement said multiple people were arrested on Saturday afternoon, most of whom were released without charge.

โ€ฆRead more:ย 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-23/police-arrests-climate-change-protest-rising-tide-newcastle/104620058

If you look closely at the picture above, you would struggle to find one thing which is not made of plastic, other than the ship carrying the coal. Their life jackets are plastic, their oars are made of plastic, their kayaks are made of plastic, their T-shirts are mostly plastic, and if we could see them, we would likely discover whatever they were wearing on their feet is likely made of plastic.

If all the petroleum products carried by and being used by the protestors were to suddenly disappear, they would all find themselves naked and swimming in the water.

China makes extensive use of coal in plastics synthesis. Mainland China has lots of coal but very little oil or gas, so their petrochemical industry is increasingly geared to use coal as its base plastic synthesis hydrocarbon.

Black Coal to White Trash

February 13, 2020 By Richard Liu

Coal has long been Chinaโ€™s โ€œblack gold,โ€ supplying over half of the nationโ€™s electricity. Yet as coalโ€™s energy share decreases due to domestic action to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, a new coal industry is emerging. In Chinaโ€™s arid northwest, eight plants are pulverizing coal chunks and โ€œcookingโ€ coal powder into something more valuable than powerโ€”or maybe even gold. These coal conversion plants, soon numbering over 20, churn out chemicals to produce plastic.

In Chinaโ€™s Thirteenth Five-Year Energy Development Plan, central policymakers set a target to decrease coalโ€™s share in Chinaโ€™s energy mix. Reducing coal power puts China on track to meet its 2015 Paris Agreement commitment to peak emissions by 2030. But Chinaโ€™s investments in coal conversion now threaten to increase coal consumption. The risk of China deepening its coal dependency intensified at the 2019 United Nations Climate Summit, when Chinaโ€™s State Councilor Wang Yi made no new commitments to cut coal.

โ€ฆ

Chinaโ€™s love affair with CTO

While most plastics are produced from natural gas or crude oil, Chinese plants are converting coal into chemicals used to produce plastics through direct coal-to-olefins (CTO) or the multistep coal-to-methanol (from coal) and then methanol-to-olefins. China is the only country to implement CTO at scale. From 2011 to 2015, Chinaโ€™s CTO capacity grew from 1 million tons annually (MTA) to 7.2 MTA, equivalent to 20 percent of Chinaโ€™s plastic feedstock capacity.

While methanol-to-olefins has become unviable in recent years due to uncompetitive methanol pricing, the profitability of CTO draws investment. According to Tian Yajun, a coal conversion expert from the National Institute of Clean and Low Carbon Energy, โ€œCTO companies profit from high oil prices. In recent years, CTO has the best return out of all coal conversion industries because demand is high and the central government doesnโ€™t control olefins or plastic prices.โ€

โ€ฆRead more: https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2020/02/black-coal-white-trash/

Most Kayaks today are made from polyethylene resins โ€“ a direct product of Chinaโ€™s growing coal to plastic chemistry.

I find it difficult to see this ridiculous plastic Rising Tide โ€œclimate protestโ€ as a legitimate protest. I see it more as an unconscious cry for help from young adults who were failed by their teachers and the Aussie education system. If they had the faintest clue about science or the machine age products they take for granted, they wouldnโ€™t be out there making such fools of themselves.

What happens to the coal which is exported from Newcastle? You are wearing it and sitting on it, Rising Tide.


Update (EW): purecolorartist points out I neglected to mention which Newcastle. The protest was in Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

ABC Rejects Police Request for Climate Protest Crime Scene Video

Personally , Iโ€™ve now reached a point where I believe breaking the law for the climate is the ethically responsible thing to do.โ€ (- Chris Packham, UK Wildlife TV presenter

From Watts Up With That?

Essay by Eric Worrall

โ€œโ€ฆ if the [Aussie] ABC provided footage to the police it would breach Four Corners journalistsโ€™ commitment to keep some activistsโ€™ identities anonymous. โ€ฆโ€

ABC facing internal pressure to withhold Four Cornersโ€™ Woodside material

By Hamish Hastie and Calum Jaspan
October 6, 2023 โ€” 3.56pm

The ABC is facing internal pressure to defy an order from WA Police to hand over footage filmed for a Four Corners investigation into climate protesting and police tactics, due to air on Monday.

Staff on the public broadcasterโ€™s media union house committee met on Friday to demand their bosses withhold the footage, warning to hand it over would damage the organisationโ€™s reputation as a producer of public interest journalism.

โ€ฆ

A promotional video released this week for the episode, โ€œEscalation: Climate, protest and the fight for the futureโ€, features footage of Disrupt Burrup Hub activists being arrested outside Woodside chief executive Meg Oโ€™Neillโ€™s Perth home during an attempted protest in August.

Under powers prescribed in the stateโ€™s Criminal Investigations Act, WA Police regularly send โ€œorders to produceโ€ to media outlets, including for footage of crime scenes captured by news cameras or CCTV and mobile phone footage obtained by journalists.

Disrupt Burrup Hub media advisor Jesse Noakes, who was also arrested outside Oโ€™Neillโ€™s house for his alleged role in the protest, said that if the ABC provided footage to the police it would breach Four Corners journalistsโ€™ commitment to keep some activistsโ€™ identities anonymous.

โ€ฆ

WA Police Minister Paul Papalia said he was comfortable with police actions.

โ€œIf Four Corners knew about these events in advance itโ€™s actually really irresponsible and pretty disgraceful behaviour that they didnโ€™t notify the police,โ€ he said.

โ€ฆRead more: https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/abc-facing-internal-pressure-to-withhold-four-corners-material-20231006-p5eabl.html

A trailer for the video at the center of this controversy isย available here.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-05/escalation:-climate,-protest-and-the-fight-for-the/102936960?utm_campaign=abc_news_web&utm_content=link&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_source=abc_news_web

The protestors didnโ€™t get a chance to do much protesting โ€“ the police somehow knew about the attack on the Woodside Oil CEOโ€™s house, no thanks to the ABC. Police stormed out of the residence and arrested the protestors after they allegedly illegally trespassed on Meg Oโ€™Neillโ€™s property.

The big question in my mind though, does press freedom extend to having advance knowledge of an upcoming criminal attack on someoneโ€™s home, and not informing the police? Or to withholding video evidence of the incident when police demand access?

Letโ€™s accept for a moment the ABC possibly wasnโ€™t aware an alleged crime was about to be committed โ€“ maybe the โ€œsourceโ€ only informed them there was going to be a protest. Does protecting sources still apply, after people get arrested?

It would be easy to say A CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED at this point, but lets turn the situation on its head. Imagine the protestors were a group we sympathise with, rather than a vile bunch of hypocritical greenshirts.

Say a citizen journalist captured footage of vaccine freedom protestors clashing with police.

Most media sources have accepted the official narrative that at lockdown protests in Melbourne, during which police opened fire at protestors with rubber bullets, the lockdown protestors were the aggressors.

But one witness who makes me seriously question this version of events is former Victoria Police sergeant Krystle Mitchell. She claims she could no longer stand to wear her police uniform, after police opened fire with rubber bullets at protestors assembled around the Melbourne shrine of remembrance.

The official version of events, that protestors were the aggressors, that they came armed and prepared for battle. This would be the legal basis for any official demand for protest footage. But given Krystleโ€™s vehement denial that protestors instigated the aggression, I have my doubts about the truth of the official narrative โ€“ which raises the possibility that the seized footage could be used to persecute innocent people who have been entrapped, provoked into responding by deliberate police brutality.

Similarly the January 6th protest โ€“ look at all the conflicting narratives that event has spawned, and consider how some of those narratives might be abused.

If someone attacked my home, as Meg Oโ€™Neillโ€™s home was allegedly attacked, Iโ€™d want every effort to be made to identify and prosecute the perpetrators. But would it be right to force journalists to hand over footage which they obtained with a promise they would never reveal their sources? Aside from the obvious criticism, that such footage should never have been filmed if it was so sensitive, how can laws be framed which allow police to obtain the evidence they need to identify and prosecute criminals, yet at the same time which maintain protections for journalistic freedom?

A final question,ย where did the police obtain their high quality tipoff?ย Have the police already seen the privileged video, and now just need official access, so they can use it as evidence? If the police have an informant inside the ABC, or if the police are just covering for their friends in the ABC,ย making a big show of conflict with the press to conceal that the ABC gave them a friendly tipoffย to let them know what was happening, that is a whole new can of worms.

Tribal Rangers Smash Burning Man Climate Protest Roadblock

What can I say? Donโ€™t mess with Nevada police, especially the native rangers.

From Watts Up With That?

Essay by Eric Worrall

Apparently its not OK for climate protestors to stop Americaโ€™s elites from attending important events.

Watch: Native American Tribal Police Bust Up Climate Change Activists Blocking Road to Burning Man

JORDAN DIXON-HAMILTONย 28 Aug 2023

Nevada Tribal Rangers on Sunday plowed through a climate change protest that caused a miles-long backup blocking traffic to the annual Burning Man festival.

Video footage from Sunday showed the Nevada Tribal Rangers successfully breaking up the demonstration by driving a truck through the blockade. Close to 150 cars were reportedlyย haltedย on the only road to Burning Man due to the protesters.

Read more (including video):ย 

https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2023/08/28/native-american-tribal-police-bust-climate-change-activists-blocking-road-burning-man/

For anyone concerned about the level of force the rangers used, Breitbart notes the sheer irresponsibility of the climate protest. Being trapped in a road jam in the Nevada desert heat can be life threatening. To deliberately create such a road jam is grossly irresponsible, and if anyone came to harm, would likely lead to accusations of criminal negligence.

While drivers could obviously have turned back, doing a u-turn in such conditions, with non a zero risk of high speed oncoming traffic, could have been very risky.

Having said that, one of the rangers is apparently under review for his actions;

One of the videos features a protestor screaming โ€œWeโ€™re environmental protestorsโ€, as they are rounded up and carted off.

If the protesters had stuck to lawfully waving a few banners from the side of the road, without inflicting their eco fascist roadblock onto other road users, I would have defended their right to protest, and of course, the right of drivers to ignore them.

What can I say? Donโ€™t mess with Nevada police, especially the native rangers.