Hurricane Melissa

It seems we get a storm or flood of the century nearly every year!

Satellite image of Hurricane Melissa approaching Jamaica, showcasing swirling clouds and a distinct eye at the center.

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

 It seems we get a storm or flood of the century nearly every year!

'Storm of the Century' hits the Caribbean, satellite image of the hurricane.

Melissa may well be the most powerful hurricane to hit Jamaica in recent times. But is this significant in itself?

Jamaica is a relatively tiny speck in the Caribbean. Hurricanes barrel across the Caribbean every year. What are the odds of a Cat 5 one making a direct hit on Jamaica? Most would just bypass the island.

So, let’s take a dispassionate look at the facts.

First, and most importantly of all, the death toll in Jamaica at the moment stands at four. This will likely increase over the next few days but is a remarkably low number at this stage.

Secondly, there is no evidence at all that Melissa made landfall with winds of 185 mph, something which has been widely reported across the media as fact. Let me repeat – NO EVIDENCE AT ALL.

Let me explain.

The claim is derived from wind speeds estimated from hurricane hunter aircraft data sometime prior to 11.00 AM EDT. Sustained winds were calculated at 160 kts, or 184 mph.

A bulletin from the National Hurricane Center discussing Hurricane Melissa, highlighting its strengthening and reported wind speeds.
https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2025/al13/al132025.discus.029.shtml

The previous advisory was six hours earlier, so the aircraft data would have been collected sometime during that six-hour period.

Melissa made landfall at 1.00 PM, at least two hours after the aircraft data had been collected, when Melissa would still have been maybe 50 miles or more out at sea. However, there were no further measurements during that time, or at landfall itself. Therefore, the figure of 185 mph was retained as the official “landfall speed”:

Text update from the National Hurricane Center regarding Hurricane Melissa making landfall in Jamaica as a Category 5 storm, noting maximum sustained winds and central pressure.

Hurricanes invariably weaken as they near land, because the sea becomes shallower and the coastline interferes with atmospheric airflow.

The satellite data confirms this weakening, and shows that even before landfall winds were lower than claimed at 155 kts, 178 mph.

What the windspeeds actually were at landfall, we simply do not know. Nobody measured them. This may sound like I am splitting hairs, but this is, of course, precisely the situation we would have been in prior to the satellite/hurricane hunter era began forty years or so ago. That is why we simply cannot directly compare today’s hurricanes with those of the past.

To put windspeeds into perspective, the highest sustained speed recorded was from Hurricane Allen in 1980, which measured 190 mph.

How does Melissa match up historically? I recently came across this NOAA study from 1983, long before hurricanes were looked at through the lens of global warming.

Cover page of a NOAA report titled 'The Deadliest, Costliest, and Most Intense United States Hurricanes of This Century', authored by Paul J. Hebert and Glenn Taylor, dated January 1983.
Table showing the deadliest hurricanes in the United States from 1900 to 1982, including their names, years, categories, and death tolls.

Was Melissa any worse than Galveston? Or Okechobee? Or the Great Miami hurricane which wiped out Miami in 1926.

Or the strongest US hurricane of the lot, the Labor Day storm in 1935? Or the second most powerful, Camille in 1969?

These, of course, are purely US hurricanes. Many more more wreaked havoc across the Caribbean and elsewhere. The worst of all was the Great Hurricane of 1780, which is estimated to killed 27500 dead in Martinique, Barbados and elsewhere. This is an astonishing number by any account. Winds have since been estimated at over 200 mph.

A closer look at Camille exemplifies well just how observation methods have changed over the years.

In 1969, satellite technology was pretty much useless as far as monitoring hurricanes were concerned, other than for tracking purposes. Hurricane hunter aircraft tended to be pot luck as well, unable to fly inside hurricanes for hours on end in order to find the peak winds, which they routinely do nowadays.

The official report stated that hurricane hunters had estimated sustained winds of 190 mph, based on dropsonde data. But this was ten hours before landfall and no further flights were made.

The official data for Camille states that winds at landfall were 175 mph. These were derived from two land based recordings of barometric pressure, both of which were close to the eyewall and both instruments were inspected later and confirmed as reliable.

Comparing Camille and Melissa then is comparing chalk and cheese. Wind speeds for the former are accurate at landfall but Melissa’s are not at landfall at all but 50 or so miles out at sea, when they would have been higher.

Whatever the wind speeds were, there can be mistaking the devastation wrought in August 1969, as the before and after photos of the Richelieu Apartment block show:

Aerial view of the Richelieu Apartments prior to Hurricane Camille, showing the building and surrounding area.
Aerial view of the Richelieu Apartments after the devastation caused by Hurricane Camille, showing extensive damage to the surrounding area.
https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/about_us/meet_us/roger_pielke/camille/gallery.html

Let me be clear. I am not in any way trying to minimise how powerful and damaging Melissa was. It was a terrible storm and a historic one.

But it is a sad fact of life that hurricanes like Melissa have always brought death and destruction to the Caribbean, Gulf and Atlantic coasts of America, and they always will.

The 2025 hurricane season

The 2025 Hurricane Season should have fewer impacts than 2024.
2018 is the closest analog.
Unlike last year, there are currently no clear landfall signals.
The high impact forecast area map will be issued with the April update.
An El Niño may develop but likely won’t be a huge factor if it does.

By Joe Bastardi

  • The 2025 Hurricane Season should have fewer impacts than 2024.
  • 2018 is the closest analog.
  • Unlike last year, there are currently no clear landfall signals.
    • The high impact forecast area map will be issued with the April update.
  • An El Niño may develop but likely won’t be a huge factor if it does.

Forecast according to the Power & Impact Scale

Named Storms: 15-19 (Saffir Simpson, same)
Category 1 or greater hurricanes: 7-9 (Saffir Simpson, same)
Category 2.5 (start of Power & Impact major hurricane classification): 3

Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale Forecast

Named Storms: 15-19
Total Hurricanes: 7-9
Major Hurricanes: 2-3
ACE Index: 120-150

Impact Forecast and this is what I am most concerned with, the number game above is window dressing

Tropical Storm Conditions: 5-7.
Total Hurricanes: 3-4
Major Hurricanes: 1-2

Quick Review of last year

The original window dressing numbers were overdone. Part of the reason is we had very few “ham sandwiches” as I call them, storms that years ago probably would not have been seen or counted.  As it turned out a storm that should have been named that hit the South Carolina coast with hurricane gusts and close to 20 inches of rain had multi-billion-dollar impacts. The subjectivity problem is still a consideration, how many will or won’t be named based on whatever is being weighed in at the time. So, there is a chance that is underdone if we get more of them.  But unless you are a ship or flying fish, you probably are not that concerned

But the impact forecast was the best I have ever put out. The hurricane season from hell was the 2cnd most expensive on record and the storms where they were supposed to go. I never wavered on this map and our midseason adjustment to the window dressing numbers was on target.

Commentary

The forecast is based on the overall cooling of SSTs in the Atlantic and forecasted warming in the ENSO areas of the Pacific. Even now, the Main Development Region is much cooler than last year at this time. 2024:

Now:

I believe the Euro has the right idea on the ENSO region, which is the opposite of last year when the strong El Niño collapsed. This year, the Euro is forecasting a weak La Niña reversing to an El Niño by the hurricane season.

The consensus of the models is not as impressed with that chance (compiled by IRI).

The consensus is a very low chance for El Niño. I am following the example of the 2017-18 pattern that resulted in a similar winter to what we will wind up with here, after a similar hurricane season in 2017. That was actually the hurricane season with the most damage and 2023 was second. The winter MJO rotation has been close to 2017-18, indicating there is an overall similarity in the global pattern.

Finally, I don’t believe a weak El Niño, given the current global warmth, would be as big of a deal when it comes to the total number of storms as it may have had in the past. Based on the ONI we had a strong El Niño in 2023 and there were more total storms than in 2024. The key was almost all were out at sea. As far as clustering, if there is to be a clustering of tracks, it’s liable to be to the east of last year and coming more from systems passing to the north, and not to the south of the Caribbean islands.

A look at the Euro SSTs for May-July:

Still, it doesn’t have an El Niño. The Atlantic is much cooler than last year, and the swath of warmer water is shown to the north. This suggests less Main Development Region activity, but the worry about rapid feedback farther to the north and in close to the coast is there. So, it will be a different look but one that will still have its share of issues.

Note that last year’s forecasted pattern stood out like a sore thumb:

I suspect when I do put out the impact map it will be less than average in the Caribbean and more than average near the east coast   There are seasons similar to last year like 95 and 98 where the following year the cluster showed up east

1995 season. notice the cluster in the gulf and the other further east

then the following year

tracks in between

1998 there was alot aimed for the gulf and southeast

1999 thracks clustered near the east coast

While the eastern gulf has been hyper active the past several years, the major hurricane hit drought on southeast Fla continued last year and the hurricane drought on Long Island and New England has also.  As remarkable as the cluster has been in the eastern gulf   the lack of hits in southeast Florida and in New England is just as remarkable, and at the opposite end of the scale.

1941-1950 major hits

Knowledge of the past prevents hysteria about the present and the future

Typical of nature, a balancing act

The Verdict

There is no question that what we saw stood out so much that from December we hit the hurricane season from hell, the second most costly on record. I was overdone in the numbers game, though. With a less impressive look this year, I am expecting true tropical cyclones to be less, but there is going to be a better chance for the “ham sandwiches” in the North Atlantic to pump up numbers.

This season will be a year where in-close development is a concern, as it has been recently, due to the distortion of overall feedback patterns likely brought about by the distortion of warming, the Global Wind Oscillation, and Sea Level Pressure patterns.

As a side note, we had a well below average global ACE last year due to the Western Pacific being so far down. I expect a more normal number in the Western Pacific this year.