Analysis: National Academies Ignores the Scientific Method – ‘Review of backgrounds of NAS committee members, found that 13 of 15 have a strong bias’ to climate alarm view

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) have created a committee purportedly to have an unbiased assessment of the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposal to repeal the regulation of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a pollutant, which is known as the Endangerment Finding.

A scenic view of a green field with tall crops under a clear blue sky, featuring a harvesting machine in the distance.

From Climate Depot

By Admin

https://myemail.constantcontact.com/National-Academies-of-Sciences-Ignores-Science.html?soid=1101509381788&aid=ZbyWOGNgCGI

National Academies Ignores the Scientific Method

The phrase 'scientific METHOD' displayed in large wooden letters on a tablet against a cloudy background.

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) have created a committee purportedly to have an unbiased assessment of the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposal to repeal the regulation of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a pollutant, which is known as the Endangerment Finding.

The NASEM announcement of the study stated that the committee should “contain the requisite expertise to address its task and whether the points of views of individual members are adequately balanced such that the committee as a whole can address its charge objectively.”

In our review of the backgrounds of committee members, we found that 13 of the 15 have a strong bias toward linking increasing atmospheric CO2 to supposedly dangerous global warming and a threat to human health. In other words, the committee was constructed to reinforce the very claim it is purportedly designed to test rather than carry out an impartial investigation.

By populating the committee with members whose views embrace the so-called “consensus” opinion that increasing CO2 is leading to dangerous warming and harm to human health, the NASEM has stacked the deck to arrange a pre-determined outcome which will oppose repeal of the Endangerment Finding.

The possibility of an honest evaluation of the science underlying CO2’s actual role in the environment, which is that of a plant food necessary for all life, is unlikely. 

The formal comment period on the provisional committee slate ends on September 11, 2025 at 11:59 ET.

Download our full evaluation here.


Discover more from Climate- Science.press

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Author: uwe.roland.gross

Don`t worry there is no significant man- made global warming. The global warming scare is not driven by science but driven by politics. Al Gore and the UN are dead wrong on climate fears. The IPCC process is a perversion of science.

Discover more from Climate- Science.press

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading