{"id":476088,"date":"2026-10-02T11:32:45","date_gmt":"2026-10-02T18:32:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=476088"},"modified":"2026-10-02T11:32:48","modified_gmt":"2026-10-02T18:32:48","slug":"big-oil-is-the-new-big-tobacco-remembering-the-2012-la-jolla-legal-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=476088","title":{"rendered":"\u201cBig Oil Is the New Big Tobacco\u201d (Remembering the 2012 La Jolla Legal Plan)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"An<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From Master Resource<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Stephen Heins<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cLet\u2019s be clear: the frequent comparison of the fossil fuel and tobacco industries is nonsense. Fossil fuels are a valuable energy source that has done yeomen service for humankind.\u201d \u2013 James Hansen (below)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

At the time, this environmental workshop was not secret. That is the first thing worth saying about the June 2012 meeting at the Martin Johnson House, on the grounds of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On June 14 and 15, the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Climate Accountability Institute brought together about two dozen scientists, lawyers, historians, and public-opinion hands. The workshop was conceived by Naomi Oreskes, then at the University of California\u2013San Diego; Peter C. Frumhoff and Angela Ledford Anderson of the Union of Concerned Scientists; Richard Heede of the Climate Accountability Institute; and Lewis M. Branscomb.  Seth Shulman of UCS wrote the summary. In October 2012 they published it under a title that did not bother with code: Establishing Accountability for Climate Change Damages: Lessons from Tobacco Control<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They said what they were doing. The fossil-fuel industry, they argued, had copied the tobacco companies\u2019 old trick of manufacturing doubt. The remedy, they proposed, was to copy the tobacco control campaign in return: find internal documents, build a public story of knowing deception, attach particular damages to particular companies, and take the fight into court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Oreskes put the assignment in one sentence that still reads like a brief. \u201cWhen I talk to my students I always say, tobacco causes lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mouth cancer. My question is: What is the \u2018cancer\u2019 of climate change that we need to focus on?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That was the agreed propaganda. Not a slur. A plan, written down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The report\u2019s own highlights are plain. A breakthrough against tobacco came when internal documents showed the industry had misled the public. Similar documents, the group said, \u201cmight\u201d sit in the vaults of fossil-fuel companies and their trade associations. Any corporate talk about climate could certainly be used against them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They discussed how a forthcoming \u201ccarbon majors\u201d analysis could let advocates attribute sea-level rise and other changes to named producers. But, a compelling public narrative was still missing, and litigation, science, and advocacy should reinforce one another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Stanton Glantz, a veteran of the tobacco document wars, was in the room. So was Sharon Eubanks, who had led the Justice Department\u2019s racketeering case against the cigarette makers. So were trial lawyers and legal scholars, including Mary Christina Wood. The point was not a seminar. The point was they were looking for a transferable methodology to demonize energy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, this method had a hole in it the size of a nuclear power plant, and the hole is still there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A cigarette is a product that harms the person who buys it, sold by companies that spent years denying the harm their own scientists had measured. A barrel of oil, a ton of coal, and a thousand cubic feet of natural gas are the inputs of modern life. They heat the house in Sheboygan in January. They move us from place to place. They move the grain. They make the fertilizer, the steel, the plastic in the hospital equipment. James Hansen, father of the alarm, put the mischaracterization in its place<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Let\u2019s be clear: the frequent comparison of the fossil fuel and tobacco industries is nonsense. Fossil fuels are a valuable energy source that has done yeomen service for humankind.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Treating the seller of that energy as the legal twin of the seller of cigarettes required a story that ignored the difference. The La Jolla group set out to build that story before the attribution paper even existed. Heede\u2019s carbon-majors work came after the meeting that had already decided it would be useful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What followed tracked the actual memo. The PR came first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

InsideClimate News<\/em> and the Los Angeles Times<\/em>, with Columbia Journalism School, published the 2015 investigations that became #ExxonKnew. Rockefeller family philanthropies helped fund the work. New York\u2019s attorney general opened an investigation of the kind the workshop had sketched.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

State and city lawsuits followed, many of them filed by the same small circle of firms, pleading public nuisance and consumer fraud, and seeking money for sea walls and adaptation. The Center for Climate Integrity and allied groups kept the public script running.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Oreskes stayed on the case, later co-authoring the 2023 Science paper on Exxon\u2019s old internal projections. Frumhoff and UCS stayed in the briefing business. Heede\u2019s producer-by-producer accounting became a standard exhibit. The \u201ccancer\u201d they settled on was not one disease. It was every flood, fire, and heat wave that could be passed through an attribution study and handed to a plaintiff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is the current green propaganda, and it has chief proponents rather than a single author.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The legal wing is the plaintiffs\u2019 bar that lives on these cases, backed by the Center for Climate Integrity and by funders who have been open about wanting industry documents and industry money. The scientific wing is attribution research put to work as exhibit A, with Oreskes as the historian of the indictment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The advocacy wing runs from the Union of Concerned Scientists through 350.org and the larger climate NGOs, which still frame the problem as a conspiracy of sellers rather than a physics-and-engineering problem of supply. The media wing, led for years by the New York Times<\/em>, the Guardian<\/em>, and the specialty climate outlets, treats the La Jolla theory as settled background. The political wing is the attorney general or the city council that files, then poses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The script has been updated, not replaced. Where La Jolla said \u201cfind the documents,\u201d the update says \u201cthey knew.\u201d Where La Jolla asked for a cancer, the update supplies a weekly one: this hurricane, this wildfire, this heat dome, with a percentage attached.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where La Jolla wanted courts to do what legislatures would not, the update keeps filing after federal judges have thrown cases out, and keeps hoping a state jury will do the regulating. The tobacco line is still the prestige analogy. It still does the work of making a complicated energy system sound like a pack of Marlboros.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What the script leaves out is the part a Midwest reader notices first. It leaves out that the same fuels under indictment are why infant mortality fell and why a Wisconsin winter is survivable. It leaves out that the United States has cut emissions while growing, largely by swapping gas for coal and by not shutting the nuclear plants that still run.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It leaves out that China builds coal plants on a scale that makes a San Francisco lawsuit look like a press release. It leaves out the woman in a kitchen in Lagos or rural India whose \u201ctransition\u201d is still a wood fire and a bad lung. And it leaves out the price of the remedy on offer: intermittent power, higher bills, and a planning system that treats reliability as a moral failure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La Jolla was candid about means. The current campaign is candid about villains. Neither has been candid about the product. Energy is not tobacco. A strategy that needs them to be the same thing is a strategy for the courtroom and the headline, not for the energy grid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 36 pages from October 2012 are still the best field guide to what followed. Compare them against the lawsuits, the attribution briefs, and the evening news. The plot has not changed. Only the stationery has changed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Stephen Heins writes commentary at The Word Merchant,<\/a> where this slightly revised post originally appeared<\/a>. For other analyses of \u2018ExxonKnew\u2019, see Big Oil, Exxon Not Guilty as Charged (a rebuttal in six parts)<\/a>. He can be reached at steve@heins.net<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

They said what they were doing. The fossil-fuel industry, they argued, had copied the tobacco companies\u2019 old trick of manufacturing doubt.<\/p>\n

My question is: What is the \u2018cancer\u2019 of climate change that we need to focus on?\u201d<\/p>\n

A barrel of oil, a ton of coal, and a thousand cubic feet of natural gas are the inputs of modern life. They heat the house in Sheboygan in January. They move us from place to place.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":476089,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"Explore the parallels between the fossil fuel and tobacco industries, examining strategies of deception and the ongoing climate litigation.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"Big Oil vs. Tobacco: Examining the Deception Strategies","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691825105,691845953,691820285,691845954,691845951,691845950,691845955,691845952,691837270],"class_list":["post-476088","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-anti-fossil-fuels","tag-carbon-majors","tag-big-oil","tag-big-tabacco","tag-climate-accountability-institute","tag-institution-of-oceanography-in-la-jolla","tag-la-jolla-conference","tag-tobacco-control","tag-union-of-concerned-scientists-ucs","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1ZQQ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":326405,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=326405","url_meta":{"origin":476088,"position":0},"title":"Rockefellers Have a Bad Day at The Senate Budget Committee","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/05\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Senate Budget Committee took the House Democrats\u2019\u00a0political-theatre-esque\u00a0investigation\u00a0into energy companies\u00a0and turned it into a complete political dud. At a\u00a0hearing\u00a0Wednesday intended to build off of the House Oversight Committee\u2019s (HCOR)\u00a0failed investigation\u00a0into energy companies back in 2022, Democratic politicians and activist witnesses failed to produce anything of substance to support their decades-long\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Democrats\"","block_context":{"text":"Democrats","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=democrats"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0Screenshot-2024-05-05-100915.png?fit=1182%2C607&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0Screenshot-2024-05-05-100915.png?fit=1182%2C607&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0Screenshot-2024-05-05-100915.png?fit=1182%2C607&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0Screenshot-2024-05-05-100915.png?fit=1182%2C607&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0Screenshot-2024-05-05-100915.png?fit=1182%2C607&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350226,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=350226","url_meta":{"origin":476088,"position":1},"title":"Private Firms, States Use Tobacco Lawsuit Playbook in Energy Cases","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/05\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Last September, tens of thousands of climate change true believers marched to protest President Biden\u2019s appearance before the United Nations. Although the Biden administration ushered into law sweeping legislation aimed at combatting global warming and earmarked tens of billions of dollars for alternative energy ventures, the demonstrators were not appeased.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (\u201cCO2\u201d)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (\u201cCO2\u201d)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co2-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/04k-dolly-shot-of-oil-rig_sg1nggy5_1080__D.00_00_18_18.Still002-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/04k-dolly-shot-of-oil-rig_sg1nggy5_1080__D.00_00_18_18.Still002-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/04k-dolly-shot-of-oil-rig_sg1nggy5_1080__D.00_00_18_18.Still002-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/04k-dolly-shot-of-oil-rig_sg1nggy5_1080__D.00_00_18_18.Still002-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/04k-dolly-shot-of-oil-rig_sg1nggy5_1080__D.00_00_18_18.Still002-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376378,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=376378","url_meta":{"origin":476088,"position":2},"title":"Psychoanalysis on Climate \u2018Denial\u2019? (stranger and stranger)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/25\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Climate alarmists live in a self-righteous bubble where humankind is the scoundrel. Nature is optimal and fragile; anthropogenic change cannot be good, even toward greening, warming, and moistening. Think about that nonpolluting trace gas, carbon dioxide (CO2).","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/OIG3-39.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/OIG3-39.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/OIG3-39.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/OIG3-39.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331989,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=331989","url_meta":{"origin":476088,"position":3},"title":"UN Chief says ban Fossil Fuel Adverts to cool world (Whatever you do, don\u2019t let the people see how useful fossil fuels are!)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The UN Chief reminds us that we are babies who need an unelected tribal chieftain to protect us from seeing naughty persuasive words. Lord help us if grown up doctors, dentists, economists and people who keep planes-in-the-sky are accidentally exposed to The Word Of Exxon, or Shell, or BP. They\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Censorship\"","block_context":{"text":"Censorship","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=censorship"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0image-asset.jpeg?fit=1200%2C546&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0image-asset.jpeg?fit=1200%2C546&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0image-asset.jpeg?fit=1200%2C546&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0image-asset.jpeg?fit=1200%2C546&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/0image-asset.jpeg?fit=1200%2C546&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307140,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=307140","url_meta":{"origin":476088,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Alternative Facts\u2019: Ted Nordhaus explains how extreme events came to represent climate change contrary to an overwhelming scientific consensus","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/11\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Excerpt: \u2026[A]n excellent new essay by Ted Nordhaus of\u00a0The Breakthrough Institute2\u00a0published today by\u00a0The New Atlantis, titled \u2014\u00a0Did Exxon Make it Rain Today?. Nordhaus does a nice job explaining that disasters occur at the confluence of an extreme event and an exposed and vulnerable society, but most attention these days is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0shutterstock-490722475.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0shutterstock-490722475.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0shutterstock-490722475.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0shutterstock-490722475.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0shutterstock-490722475.webp?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332108,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=332108","url_meta":{"origin":476088,"position":5},"title":"UN Chief Calls For Governments To Censor Fossil Fuel Advertisements","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/08\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"United Nations Secretary-General Ant\u00f3nio Guterres called for governments to ban fossil fuel advertising during a Wednesday speech at the Museum of Natural History in New York City.","rel":"","context":"In \"Ant\u00f3nio Guterres\"","block_context":{"text":"Ant\u00f3nio Guterres","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=antonio-guterres-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/photo_2023-09-07_22-16-35.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/photo_2023-09-07_22-16-35.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/photo_2023-09-07_22-16-35.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/photo_2023-09-07_22-16-35.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/0-Big-Oil-Is-the-New-Big-Tobacco-Remembering-the-2012-La-Jolla-Legal-Plan.png?fit=1536%2C1024&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476088","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=476088"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476088\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":476114,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476088\/revisions\/476114"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/476089"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=476088"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=476088"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=476088"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}