{"id":469783,"date":"2026-09-10T09:28:10","date_gmt":"2026-09-10T16:28:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=469783"},"modified":"2026-09-10T09:28:12","modified_gmt":"2026-09-10T16:28:12","slug":"wrong-bulletin-of-the-atomic-scientists-nuclear-power-isnt-the-reliability-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=469783","title":{"rendered":"Wrong, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Nuclear Power Isn\u2019t the Reliability Problem"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"Cartoon<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From ClimateRealism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Anthony Watts<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"An<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists<\/em> claims in \u201cClimate change is exposing nuclear power\u2019s reliability problem,\u201d<\/a> that climate change is exposing a fundamental reliability problem with nuclear power because heat waves, droughts, and other weather events have forced temporary reactor shutdowns in Europe. This is highly misleading if not false. The best available evidence suggests that while nuclear plants, like all thermal power stations, can occasionally be affected by weather-related cooling constraints, they remain among the most reliable sources of electricity ever developed. More importantly, wind and solar are inherently dependent on the weather every hour of every day, while nuclear plants are only occasionally affected by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article\u2019s central flaw is one of perspective. The authors describe several temporary nuclear shutdowns in Europe during an unusually hot, dry summer and conclude that climate change has exposed a fatal weakness in nuclear power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What they never ask is the obvious question: Compared to what?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Every source of electricity has vulnerabilities. Natural gas pipelines can freeze. Coal plants can experience fuel delivery interruptions. Hydroelectric dams depend entirely on rainfall and snowpack. Wind turbines produce nothing when the wind is calm or excessively strong, or if they ice up in the winter. Solar panels stop producing electricity every night and produce much less during cloudy weather or winter months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Only nuclear power routinely delivers electricity around the clock, independent of whether the sun is shining or the wind is blowing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That distinction is the entire discussion the Bulletin leaves out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The authors point to temporary reductions in nuclear output in Hungary, Romania, and France during periods of drought and elevated river temperatures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those events happened, but isolated operational constraints are not the same thing as chronic unreliability. The overwhelming majority of nuclear reactors operate at capacity factors exceeding 90 percent, meaning they generate electricity almost continuously throughout the year except during planned maintenance or refueling outages. Wind and solar cannot approach those numbers because their output is governed entirely by weather conditions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is the irony running throughout the Bulletin\u2019s article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The authors repeatedly criticize nuclear power for occasionally being affected by weather while praising solar power for helping offset European electricity shortages during the same heat wave.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But solar generation only helped because the weather happened to cooperate. Had thick clouds covered much of Europe during those critical days, solar production would have dropped dramatically. Likewise, had the event occurred after sunset, solar output would have fallen to zero regardless of electricity demand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article treats intermittent renewable generation during one favorable weather event as proof of resilience while portraying occasional nuclear deratings as evidence of systemic failure. That comparison is a double standard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Bulletin also ignores the fact that cooling water limitations are not unique to nuclear plants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coal-fired power stations, natural gas combined-cycle plants, biomass facilities, and many industrial operations also rely on cooling water and can face operational constraints during extreme drought or unusually warm river conditions. Nuclear reactors generally require more cooling because of their design, but the underlying engineering challenge is common to all thermal generation technologies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue is not unique to nuclear power. It is unique to power plants that produce electricity continuously.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By contrast, wind and solar face an even more fundamental limitation. They are not merely influenced<\/em> by weather, they are beholden<\/em> to it. No amount of engineering can make a wind turbine generate electricity during calm conditions. No technological breakthrough can make photovoltaic panels produce electricity at midnight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Every utility operator understands this reality, which is why electric grids require dispatchable generation, whether from nuclear, natural gas, hydroelectric, or other sources, to stabilize renewable energy whenever weather conditions change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ironically, the article begins by quoting claims that nuclear plants can operate \u201c24 hours a day, 7 days a week\u201d regardless of weather, only to spend the rest of the piece arguing that because a handful of reactors occasionally reduced output during exceptional weather events, those claims are invalid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is like arguing commercial aviation is unreliable because flights are occasionally delayed by thunderstorms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reliability is measured over years of operation, not by selecting exceptional circumstances. The Bulletin further argues that climate change will make these interruptions increasingly common. That may prove true in some locations, but the article offers remarkably little context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It never compares projected nuclear interruptions with the vastly larger weather-driven variability already inherent in wind and solar generation. Nor does it acknowledge that modern reactor designs increasingly employ cooling towers, closed-loop systems, air cooling, seawater cooling, or siting decisions that reduce dependence on river flows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Engineering adapts to change, that has always been true.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Perhaps the biggest omission is what reliable electricity actually means. Reliable generation is not simply electricity that works when weather is favorable. Reliable generation is electricity that remains available when demand is highest, hospitals must stay open, factories must continue operating, and homes require heating or air conditioning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is precisely why electric grids continue to rely heavily on dispatchable generation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Good journalism requires comparison, context, and perspective. Instead, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists<\/em> presents occasional nuclear weather-related outages as though they invalidate decades of exceptional operating performance while giving only passing mention to the fact that its favored alternatives are completely dependent on the weather from the moment they begin generating electricity. That is bogus scaremongering against nuclear technology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Readers deserve a balanced comparison of all generating technologies, not another attempt to redefine one of the world\u2019s most reliable energy sources as unreliable simply because it, like every other form of power generation, occasionally encounters adverse weather.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists claims in \u201cClimate change is exposing nuclear power\u2019s reliability problem,\u201d that climate change is exposing a fundamental reliability problem with nuclear power because heat waves, droughts, and other weather events have forced temporary reactor shutdowns in Europe. This is highly misleading if not false. <\/p>\n

What they never ask is the obvious question: Compared to what?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":469784,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"Discover why nuclear power is deemed a reliable energy source compared to renewables, despite occasional weather-related outages.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"Nuclear Power: The Most Reliable Energy Source Explained","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691845282,691818056,691818656,691818583,691845284,691818206,691845283],"class_list":["post-469783","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-bulletin-of-the-atomic-scientists","tag-climate-change","tag-electricity","tag-europe","tag-european-electricity-shortages","tag-nuclear-power","tag-nuclear-shutdowns","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1Yd9","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":423905,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=423905","url_meta":{"origin":469783,"position":0},"title":"Oh No \u2013 President Trump\u2019s Climate Policies Just Edged Us Closer to Doomsday","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/30\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Ha, the latest update from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists on January 27, 2026, the Doomsday Clock stands at 85 seconds to midnight- the closest it has ever been in its nearly 80-year history. This represents a move forward by 4 seconds from the 2025 setting of 89 seconds\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"2026 Doomsday Clock\"","block_context":{"text":"2026 Doomsday Clock","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=2026-doomsday-clock"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQN8DK4OWyAf6mgRN4LRzsNZcdRyuW4A9VjD-qhTpu_OSZh3REt1t_2KMf-2Xj5GoXBRInRUqaGSMpHBTHD66zc5LG5EWHOfQ4fOmV361GvX4YAiW8fRNa7t68rtTJw-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C709&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQN8DK4OWyAf6mgRN4LRzsNZcdRyuW4A9VjD-qhTpu_OSZh3REt1t_2KMf-2Xj5GoXBRInRUqaGSMpHBTHD66zc5LG5EWHOfQ4fOmV361GvX4YAiW8fRNa7t68rtTJw-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C709&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQN8DK4OWyAf6mgRN4LRzsNZcdRyuW4A9VjD-qhTpu_OSZh3REt1t_2KMf-2Xj5GoXBRInRUqaGSMpHBTHD66zc5LG5EWHOfQ4fOmV361GvX4YAiW8fRNa7t68rtTJw-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C709&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQN8DK4OWyAf6mgRN4LRzsNZcdRyuW4A9VjD-qhTpu_OSZh3REt1t_2KMf-2Xj5GoXBRInRUqaGSMpHBTHD66zc5LG5EWHOfQ4fOmV361GvX4YAiW8fRNa7t68rtTJw-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C709&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQN8DK4OWyAf6mgRN4LRzsNZcdRyuW4A9VjD-qhTpu_OSZh3REt1t_2KMf-2Xj5GoXBRInRUqaGSMpHBTHD66zc5LG5EWHOfQ4fOmV361GvX4YAiW8fRNa7t68rtTJw-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C709&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367477,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=367477","url_meta":{"origin":469783,"position":1},"title":"New French Nuclear Fusion Record \u2013 22 Minutes","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/24\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"No doubt nuclear fusion is just 20 years away, just like last time\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"France\u2019s Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)\"","block_context":{"text":"France\u2019s Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=frances-atomic-energy-commission-cea"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/00Screenshot-2025-02-24-100108.png?fit=1200%2C783&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/00Screenshot-2025-02-24-100108.png?fit=1200%2C783&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/00Screenshot-2025-02-24-100108.png?fit=1200%2C783&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/00Screenshot-2025-02-24-100108.png?fit=1200%2C783&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/00Screenshot-2025-02-24-100108.png?fit=1200%2C783&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":383487,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=383487","url_meta":{"origin":469783,"position":2},"title":"How Nuclear Power Might Save The Day","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/17\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The\u00a0Telegraph\u00a0has published an interview with a 32 year-old scientist called Tim Gregory who argues that\u00a0decarbonisation needs a total rethink\u00a0in his book\u00a0Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World. His argument, unsurprisingly, is that nuclear power is the solution to clean and better energy and it\u2019s been staring everyone in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Screenshot-2025-06-16-110933.jpeg?fit=1200%2C621&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Screenshot-2025-06-16-110933.jpeg?fit=1200%2C621&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Screenshot-2025-06-16-110933.jpeg?fit=1200%2C621&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Screenshot-2025-06-16-110933.jpeg?fit=1200%2C621&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0Screenshot-2025-06-16-110933.jpeg?fit=1200%2C621&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":432641,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=432641","url_meta":{"origin":469783,"position":3},"title":"The word \u201cnuclear\u201d in Iran, what is the issue?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/20\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"All the drama currently unfolding in Iran is reaching a crossroads, or maybe a fork in the road, or, more likely, a spaghetti junction on the freeway.","rel":"","context":"In \"\u201catomic\u201d\"","block_context":{"text":"\u201catomic\u201d","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atomic"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0Iran-demonstrators-down-with-usa.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0Iran-demonstrators-down-with-usa.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0Iran-demonstrators-down-with-usa.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0Iran-demonstrators-down-with-usa.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0Iran-demonstrators-down-with-usa.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347908,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=347908","url_meta":{"origin":469783,"position":4},"title":"Jane Fonda\u2019s Views on Nuclear Energy Are Stuck in the 1970s","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/20\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"You might think that a self-proclaimed climate advocate would be thrilled to see an announcement of more clean, reliable energy on the grid. But, you\u2019d be wrong.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/067126d9a471c2.webp?fit=1200%2C795&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/067126d9a471c2.webp?fit=1200%2C795&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/067126d9a471c2.webp?fit=1200%2C795&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/067126d9a471c2.webp?fit=1200%2C795&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/067126d9a471c2.webp?fit=1200%2C795&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267360,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=267360","url_meta":{"origin":469783,"position":5},"title":"If Your Country\u2019s Not Backing Nuclear Power It\u2019s Probably Going\u00a0Backwards","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/14\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Wild claims about the purported benefits of wind and solar never survive the first contact with reality. So, acolytes have to defer and deflect on the defensive, while attacking nuclear power as the work of the devil, costly, dangerous, or some other equally fallacious argument.","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-407.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-407.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-407.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-407.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/0-ChatGPT-Wrong-Bulletin-of-the-Atomic-Scientists-Nuclear-Power-Isnt-the-Reliability-Problem.png?fit=1536%2C1024&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/469783","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=469783"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/469783\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":469792,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/469783\/revisions\/469792"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/469784"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=469783"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=469783"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=469783"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}