{"id":468057,"date":"2026-09-03T12:04:02","date_gmt":"2026-09-03T19:04:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=468057"},"modified":"2026-09-03T12:04:04","modified_gmt":"2026-09-03T19:04:04","slug":"climate-majority-project-scientists-freaking-out","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=468057","title":{"rendered":"Climate Majority Project: Scientists \u201cFreaking Out\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From Master Resource<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Robert Bradley Jr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cSay \u2018enough\u2019 to the United Nations\/IPCC\/COP process. Call off the CO2 fests. Shift from mitigation (fail) to adaptation. Demote government, promote realism and civil society. And practice social justice with the new imperative: First, do no harm<\/em>. That starts and ends with energy prices\u2013no climate premium please.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The Climate Majority Project<\/a> (CMP) is predicated on a shaky premise<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Most people sense that the planet is in deep trouble and want to do something. Welcome to the climate majority.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Climate majority? Only from polls where responders can claim to worry without having to pay for climate action\u2013and not be told that their collective actions will not affect local or global climate for decades, if ever. The pollsters might as well ask: \u201cDo you want more or less extreme weather?\u201d \u2026 \u201cDo you want more or less safety?\u201d The fix is in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CMP is dedicated to<\/a> \u201ceffective, coordinated climate action by a broad-based coalition of citizens; from grassroots initiatives to high-level policy.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Through grassroots and policy level organising with communities, schools [\u201cClimate Courage Schools\u201d] and businesses [\u201cRegulate Us. Better.\u201d], we are working to turn that silent majority into a self-aware one \u2014 one that is able to slow climate breakdown and prepare for the impacts that are already underway.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Freak Out?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The CMP recently stated that \u201cMost climate scientists are quietly freaking out,\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

A 2021 anonymous poll by Nature<\/em> found that the vast majority of climate scientists don\u2019t believe humanity will limit warming to 1.5\u00b0C. In fact, 60% expected temperatures to rise beyond 3.0\u00b0C \u2014 levels that mean a high risk of triggering \u201chothouse Earth\u201d conditions. So it comes with no surprise that 82% of those same scientists expected to see catastrophic impacts to our civilisation in their own lifetimes. Yet almost none were saying so publicly.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Enter a new term, scientific reticence<\/em>, \u201cwhen being too cautious puts us at risk.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

This kind of silence has a name. James Hansen \u2014 the godfather of climate science \u2014 calls it \u201cscientific reticence\u201d<\/strong>: scientists\u2019 tendency to hold back from stating their conclusions in full. There\u2019s also a communication problem baked into scientific culture: researchers are trained to lead with uncertainty, even when the evidence is overwhelming. A finding with 90\u201395% confidence is remarkably strong but will often be communicated with ifs and buts and doubt \u2013 every caveat chips away at the message, and the public often walks away hearing cool uncertainty rather than alarm.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\u201cOther people are waiting on scientists to take bold action on climate,\u201d the Climate Majority Project continues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

That reticence has real consequences. Business leaders, policymakers, and civil servants often rely on scientific consensus to justify urgent action. When scientists won\u2019t spell out how bad things truly are, it quietly removes the permission others feel they need to sound the alarm themselves.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Strange. The IPCC and mainstream media live off the \u201cconsensus\u201d argument. And critics have responded that science is not consensus, and climate models are not science. Academic climate scientists are all-in with alarmism to demonstrate their importance as \u201cexperts\u201d and to keep the government money flowing. Never mind Climategate or RCP 8.5. Just keep alarming and don\u2019t dare get skeptical. The benefits of anthropogenic climate change? Don\u2019t go there; let the skeptics do that and stick to the consensus meme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Back to the upside down Climate Majority Project:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

This matters more than it might seem. Research on climate communication consistently finds that powerful people respond strongly to direct, negative facts \u2014 more than to hopeful messaging. Frank, emotionally honest speech from scientists could itself become a tipping point, particularly when paired with visible public support for action.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Again, this seems opposite of the real world. The \u201cnegative facts\u201d is the neo-Malthusian narrative since Paul Ehrlich in the 1960s. Doom fatigue set in a long time ago. The latest iteration\u2013the European heat waves this summer\u2013is not demonstrative because it is localized.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gotta fundraise. Can\u2019t be too negative. There is hope\u2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

There are signs the taboo is lifting. Hansen was among the first prominent scientists to say plainly that mainstream climate action has failed. Since then, a Guardian<\/em> poll of scientists, Bill McGuire\u2019s book Hothouse Earth<\/em>, and a petition signed by 1,500 climate scientists have all declared the 1.5\u00b0C target effectively dead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Greater scientific openness could be a catalyst \u2014 for coalition-building, for mobilisation, and for giving people permission to speak honestly about what the evidence actually shows. If you are a scientist, or know a scientist, forward this message along. One of the positive things about silent majorities is that sharing messages such as this one can actually make a difference.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The Climate (non)Majority Project ends:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

If you know a scientist, share this with them. One of the hopeful things about silent majorities is that the more we become aware of all the others who share our concerns, the more we can build the feeling of being part of a movement large enough to make a difference.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Or do the opposite. Say \u201cenough\u201d to the United Nations\/IPCC\/COP process. Call off the CO2 fests. Shift from mitigation (fail) to adaptation. Demote government, promote realism and civil society. And practice social justice with the new imperative: First, do no harm<\/em>. That starts and ends with energy prices\u2013no climate premium please.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Climate majority? <\/p>\n

Only from polls where responders can claim to worry without having to pay for climate action\u2013and not be told that their collective actions will not affect local or global climate for decades, if ever. <\/p>\n

The pollsters might as well ask: \u201cDo you want more or less extreme weather?\u201d \u2026 \u201cDo you want more or less safety?\u201d <\/p>\n

The fix is in.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":468058,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Climate majority?\n\nOnly from polls where responders can claim to worry without having to pay for climate action\u2013and not be told that their collective actions will not affect local or global climate for decades, if ever.\n\nThe pollsters might as well ask: \"Do you want more or less extreme weather?\" ... \"Do you want more or less safety?\"\n\nThe fix is in.","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691845135,691818994,691845134,691819265,691845133,691831103,691819941],"class_list":["post-468057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-scientific-reticence","tag-climate-action","tag-climate-courage-schools","tag-climategate","tag-cmp-climate-majority-project","tag-global-climate","tag-rcp-8-5","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1XLj","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":432974,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=432974","url_meta":{"origin":468057,"position":0},"title":"The \u201cSpiral of Silence\u201d is Concealing Majority Support for Climate Action","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/21\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s not that nobody cares, its just people worried about the imminent end of the world are too shy to speak up.","rel":"","context":"In \"Big Oil\"","block_context":{"text":"Big Oil","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=big-oil"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-The-Spiral-of-Silence-is-Concealing-Majority-Support-for-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-The-Spiral-of-Silence-is-Concealing-Majority-Support-for-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-The-Spiral-of-Silence-is-Concealing-Majority-Support-for-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-The-Spiral-of-Silence-is-Concealing-Majority-Support-for-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":455974,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=455974","url_meta":{"origin":468057,"position":1},"title":"Claim: Climate Change Should be Depoliticised by Convincing Everyone to Support Climate Action","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/16\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c\u2026 We need to take the politics out of the debate and get the people to demand that governments take action to minimise the climate threat \u2026\u201d The evidence is that climate scientists were recently forced to admit their worst doomsday scenarios have been falsified. RCP 8.5 is not alone.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Banking on Climate Chaos report\"","block_context":{"text":"Banking on Climate Chaos report","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=banking-on-climate-chaos-report"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/0-Claim-Climate-Change-Should-be-Depoliticised-by-Convincing-Everyone-to-Support-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/0-Claim-Climate-Change-Should-be-Depoliticised-by-Convincing-Everyone-to-Support-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/0-Claim-Climate-Change-Should-be-Depoliticised-by-Convincing-Everyone-to-Support-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/0-Claim-Climate-Change-Should-be-Depoliticised-by-Convincing-Everyone-to-Support-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/0-Claim-Climate-Change-Should-be-Depoliticised-by-Convincing-Everyone-to-Support-Climate-Action.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":429143,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=429143","url_meta":{"origin":468057,"position":2},"title":"Can \u201cThe Silent Majority\u201d and Media Intervention Drag Climate Action Back onto the Global Agenda?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/02\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Media cannot prevent the collapse of interest in climate change, because media companies which focus on covering the bottom of the list of people\u2019s priorities go broke, as US mainstream media companies are discovering the hard way.","rel":"","context":"In \"\u201cliving costs and inflation\u201d\"","block_context":{"text":"\u201cliving costs and inflation\u201d","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=living-costs-and-inflation"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/The-Green-Blob.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/The-Green-Blob.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/The-Green-Blob.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/The-Green-Blob.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":406931,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=406931","url_meta":{"origin":468057,"position":3},"title":"Net-Zero Banking Alliance to Stop Operations After Member Exodus","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/07\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Bye bye, good riddance. Global banking climate group to stop operations after member exodus.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQOo7Ui3GrUfJsWNIC5W6HNqRuJST8krpaIMR6fQGJl7qWaa4DGcZOPleL1PhtsDjY9mIsNmT0P3GvBjMfF5WXMhbCmj5ZEFWUZq41g1tn2suFUUCyz0DHaiei3MxGwP-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C643&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQOo7Ui3GrUfJsWNIC5W6HNqRuJST8krpaIMR6fQGJl7qWaa4DGcZOPleL1PhtsDjY9mIsNmT0P3GvBjMfF5WXMhbCmj5ZEFWUZq41g1tn2suFUUCyz0DHaiei3MxGwP-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C643&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQOo7Ui3GrUfJsWNIC5W6HNqRuJST8krpaIMR6fQGJl7qWaa4DGcZOPleL1PhtsDjY9mIsNmT0P3GvBjMfF5WXMhbCmj5ZEFWUZq41g1tn2suFUUCyz0DHaiei3MxGwP-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C643&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQOo7Ui3GrUfJsWNIC5W6HNqRuJST8krpaIMR6fQGJl7qWaa4DGcZOPleL1PhtsDjY9mIsNmT0P3GvBjMfF5WXMhbCmj5ZEFWUZq41g1tn2suFUUCyz0DHaiei3MxGwP-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C643&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQOo7Ui3GrUfJsWNIC5W6HNqRuJST8krpaIMR6fQGJl7qWaa4DGcZOPleL1PhtsDjY9mIsNmT0P3GvBjMfF5WXMhbCmj5ZEFWUZq41g1tn2suFUUCyz0DHaiei3MxGwP-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C643&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250136,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=250136","url_meta":{"origin":468057,"position":4},"title":"Sorry, Vanuatu, Trends Don\u2019t Support Climate Damages Claims in The Hague","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/29\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While Vanuatu claims is it particularly vulnerable to likely impacts of climate change, there are no specific harms it can attribute to human induced climate change.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1229.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1229.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1229.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1229.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1229.png?fit=1200%2C674&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249801,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=249801","url_meta":{"origin":468057,"position":5},"title":"Scientists Shifting Global Warming Goalposts to 1.8-1.9C?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/26\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c\u2026 economic modelling has often suggested that temperature increases well above \u2026 the 2 \u00b0C target \u2026 would result in higher total welfare \u2026\u201d","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0Global-Temperature-Models.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0Global-Temperature-Models.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0Global-Temperature-Models.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0Global-Temperature-Models.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/0-ChatGPT-Climate-Majority-Project-Scientists-Freaking-Out.png?fit=1536%2C1024&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=468057"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468057\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":468063,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468057\/revisions\/468063"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/468058"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=468057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=468057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=468057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}