{"id":461490,"date":"2026-08-09T12:31:12","date_gmt":"2026-08-09T19:31:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=461490"},"modified":"2026-08-09T12:31:14","modified_gmt":"2026-08-09T19:31:14","slug":"north-sea-wind-down-to-cost-treasury-13bn-in-tax-rebates-by-2035-warns-ex-bp-chief","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=461490","title":{"rendered":"North Sea Wind-Down to Cost Treasury \u00a313bn in Tax Rebates by 2035, Warns Ex-BP Chief"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"
AI generated by Grok<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Labour\u2019s policies accelerating the North Sea oil and gas wind-down are expected to cost the UK Treasury around \u00a313 billion in tax rebates and lost revenue by 2035, according to warnings from Brian Gilvary (former BP finance chief, now chairman of Ineos Energy).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gilvary argues that high tax rates (an effective 78% levy on profits after Labour raised and extended the Energy Profits Levy) combined with restrictions\/bans on new drilling have prompted operators to halt activity and decommission platforms and pipelines earlier than planned. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Decommissioning costs can be offset against prior years\u2019 taxed profits, generating rebates (or reducing current\/future tax payments). This brings forward liabilities while also cutting future tax receipts from ongoing production.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rebates plus foregone tax ~\u00a313bn between now and 2035. This aligns with North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) data showing annual decommissioning spend rising from ~\u00a32bn in 2024 to ~\u00a33bn per year through at least 2030, with ~\u00a328bn total decommissioning spend forecast from now to 2035.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Remaining decommissioning costs from 2025 onward around \u00a344bn (2024 prices). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

HMRC-linked projections have put the Exchequer cost of related tax relief (repayments + reduced offshore corporation tax) in the region of \u00a311\u201312bn in recent official figures, though accelerated timing raises near-term pressure. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Longer-term or higher estimates (including older National Audit Office figures) have pointed to substantially larger totals in some scenarios.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Related earlier warnings (including from Gilvary) cited figures in the \u00a310\u201311bn range for taxpayer exposure on the \u00a344bn cost base, with roughly half as direct rebates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This follows BP\u2019s recent plans to exit its North Sea operations (its CEO noted the region \u201cdoesn\u2019t compete for capital\u201d<\/strong>). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gilvary has described the decline as eroding long-term national wealth, damaging supply chains and skilled jobs (especially in Scotland and the North East), and reducing the fiscal capacity to fund public services and the energy transition<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He contrasts this with higher investment levels in the Norwegian sector of the same basin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Decommissioning tax relief is a longstanding feature of the UK fiscal regime for oil and gas (companies can carry back losses against past profits under ring-fence corporation tax and related rules; Petroleum Revenue Tax reliefs also apply in some cases). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Decommissioning Relief Deeds provide additional certainty on minimum relief levels. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Official estimates of the Exchequer liability have varied with cost forecasts, oil\/gas prices, production levels, and discount rates. Acceleration due to policy is the core of the recent criticism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The story originates primarily from The Telegraph (7 August 2026 reporting on Gilvary\u2019s comments) and has been covered by outlets such as the Daily Sceptic. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It builds on earlier analyses of how the Energy Profits Levy, investment restrictions, and the shift toward net zero have sped up field closures relative to previous expectations.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UK vs Norway North Sea (UKCS vs NCS): A Tale of Two Sectors<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The UK Continental Shelf (UKCS<\/strong>) and Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) <\/strong>share the same geological basin<\/strong> but have diverged sharply in recent years due to differences in policy, fiscal regimes, licensing, and political approach<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Norway treats oil and gas as a long-term national asset with stable, investment-friendly rules; the UK has imposed high and frequently changing taxes, restricted new exploration, and accelerated managed decline.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Production<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Norway:<\/strong> Much higher and more stable. In 2025, NCS total petroleum production reached high levels (around 239 million Sm\u00b3 o.e., one of the strongest years since 2009). Oil\/liquids often exceed 2 million bpd in monthly figures (e.g., ~2.2 million bpd liquids in early 2026). Overall output is roughly 3\u20134 times the UK\u2019s. Production is expected to hold relatively steady into the early 2030s before gradual decline.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UK: <\/strong>In long-term decline. Peaked at ~4.5 million boe\/d in 1999; recent figures around 1.0\u20131.1 million boe\/d (2024\u20132025), with NSTA projections falling to ~0.9 million in 2026 and under 0.7 million by 2029\u20132030. Oil production has roughly halved in five years in some measures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Norway produces the large majority of North Sea oil and gas; the UK share continues to shrink.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Investment (Capex)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Norway:<\/strong> Strong and sustained. Upstream investment was ~$24bn in 2025 (up from ~$21bn in 2015). NCS investments remain high (hundreds of billions of NOK annually; e.g., ~NOK 250\u2013270bn range in recent forecasts). Greenfield\/development investment expected at ~$43bn cumulative to 2030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UK:<\/strong> Sharp drop. From ~$18.8bn in 2015 to ~$5.5bn in 2025. Further declines projected (some forecasts under $3.5\u20135bn near-term). Cumulative development investment to 2030 only ~$11bn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Norway\u2019s spending is several times higher; the gap is widening.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Exploration & Licensing<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Norway:<\/strong> Active and predictable. 33 exploration wells completed in 2025; 40+ planned for 2026. Regular Awards in Predefined Areas (APA) rounds (dozens of licences awarded annually, e.g., 53\u201357 recently). Significant discoveries (2.62 billion BOE from 2016\u20132025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UK: <\/strong>Near-standstill. Zero exploration wells spudded in 2025 (first time since 1960); only a handful planned for 2026. Licensing rounds infrequent and delayed; ban\/restrictions on new exploration under current policy. Far fewer discoveries (370 million BOE over the same decade).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fiscal Regime (Tax)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Both have high headline marginal rates around 78%, but the systems differ fundamentally:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Norway:<\/strong> Stable since 1992. High rate offset by generous, predictable reliefs \u2014 including ~72% cash refund on exploration losses (and strong deductions for development\/decommissioning). Government shares risk; companies get timely refunds. Cross-party consensus supports the framework.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UK:<\/strong> Unstable and punitive in practice. Ring-fence CT (30%) + Supplementary Charge (10%) + Energy Profits Levy (38%, extended to 2030) = 78%. Frequent changes since 2022, investment allowances largely removed, limited decommissioning relief under EPL. Creates high uncertainty and discourages new capital.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Norway\u2019s \u201chigh tax + high relief + stability\u201d model attracts investment; the UK\u2019s combination of high tax + instability + exploration limits drives exits and accelerated decommissioning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Broader Outcomes & Policy<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Norway:<\/strong> \u201cDevelop, not dismantle.\u201d Maintains production for energy security (major European gas supplier), funds the sovereign wealth fund (>$2 trillion), supports jobs and the energy transition. Continues new projects and even reactivates older fields.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UK: <\/strong>Managed decline toward net zero. High taxes and no new licences accelerate field closures, raise near-term decommissioning costs (and associated tax relief claims on the Treasury), reduce domestic supply, and increase import dependence (much of it from Norway). Jobs, supply chain, and tax revenues are declining faster.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Same rocks, opposite trajectories.<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Norway maximises recovery and value with policy certainty and risk-sharing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The UK\u2019s approach has led to collapsing investment, faster production decline, and rising costs of early shutdowns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Industry analyses (OEUK, Westwood, Wood Mackenzie, etc.) consistently highlight this policy-driven divergence.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Labour\u2019s policies accelerating the North Sea oil and gas wind-down are expected to cost the UK Treasury around \u00a313 billion in tax rebates and lost revenue by 2035, according to warnings from Brian Gilvary (former BP finance chief, now chairman of Ineos Energy). <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":461492,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691844564,691844565,691818610,691833118,691844568,691819148,691844567,691844566],"class_list":["post-461490","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-13-billion","tag-brian-gilvary","tag-north-sea","tag-north-sea-transition-authority-nsta","tag-norwegian-continental-shelf-ncs","tag-oil-and-gas","tag-uk-continental-shelf-ukcs-2","tag-ukcs-vs-ncs","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1W3o","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":448404,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=448404","url_meta":{"origin":461490,"position":0},"title":"BP Plans North Sea Exit After Labour\u2019s Tax Raid","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/04\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"BP is preparing to exit or significantly reduce its presence in the UK North Sea after more than 60 years, with a potential sale of its UK offshore operations reportedly in play (possibly to buyers like Ithaca, though talks may have stalled).","rel":"","context":"In \"British Petroleum (BP)\"","block_context":{"text":"British Petroleum (BP)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=british-petroleum-bp"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-BP-Plans-North-Sea-Exit-After-Labours-Tax-Raid.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-BP-Plans-North-Sea-Exit-After-Labours-Tax-Raid.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-BP-Plans-North-Sea-Exit-After-Labours-Tax-Raid.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-BP-Plans-North-Sea-Exit-After-Labours-Tax-Raid.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-BP-Plans-North-Sea-Exit-After-Labours-Tax-Raid.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":419382,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=419382","url_meta":{"origin":461490,"position":1},"title":"Offshore pipeline closure risk: the hidden threat to GB energy security","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/01\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Porter's analysis centers on a warning from the National Energy System Operator (NESO), issued around the time of the UK Autumn Budget in late 2025. NESO highlighted an \"emerging risk\" to gas supply security due to potential premature closures of offshore pipeline infrastructure in the North Sea. As UK Continental\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"National Energy System Operator (Neso)\"","block_context":{"text":"National Energy System Operator (Neso)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=national-energy-system-operator-neso"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQOMMwvE3fwJcJ_AywWXlQsg6pAonaGrhWv7-6Ptu_ij9jf4drGAZ0XGiU7Tc51T6wC2R8C2sSFMtYmwHCK3N6Jk8shMVYICNuKNw5QCu_Uda1oPdaZcph4BJGeDPBK5kjAvc8aDPMzvezOJgG6YXySVWkqBRQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQOMMwvE3fwJcJ_AywWXlQsg6pAonaGrhWv7-6Ptu_ij9jf4drGAZ0XGiU7Tc51T6wC2R8C2sSFMtYmwHCK3N6Jk8shMVYICNuKNw5QCu_Uda1oPdaZcph4BJGeDPBK5kjAvc8aDPMzvezOJgG6YXySVWkqBRQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQOMMwvE3fwJcJ_AywWXlQsg6pAonaGrhWv7-6Ptu_ij9jf4drGAZ0XGiU7Tc51T6wC2R8C2sSFMtYmwHCK3N6Jk8shMVYICNuKNw5QCu_Uda1oPdaZcph4BJGeDPBK5kjAvc8aDPMzvezOJgG6YXySVWkqBRQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQOMMwvE3fwJcJ_AywWXlQsg6pAonaGrhWv7-6Ptu_ij9jf4drGAZ0XGiU7Tc51T6wC2R8C2sSFMtYmwHCK3N6Jk8shMVYICNuKNw5QCu_Uda1oPdaZcph4BJGeDPBK5kjAvc8aDPMzvezOJgG6YXySVWkqBRQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQOMMwvE3fwJcJ_AywWXlQsg6pAonaGrhWv7-6Ptu_ij9jf4drGAZ0XGiU7Tc51T6wC2R8C2sSFMtYmwHCK3N6Jk8shMVYICNuKNw5QCu_Uda1oPdaZcph4BJGeDPBK5kjAvc8aDPMzvezOJgG6YXySVWkqBRQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":399964,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=399964","url_meta":{"origin":461490,"position":2},"title":"Reeves \u2018faces \u00a311bn bill\u2019 over Miliband\u2019s North Sea shutdown","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/04\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Rachel Reeves will face a bill of up to \u00a311bn for Ed Miliband\u2019s North Sea shutdown, an energy executive has warned.","rel":"","context":"In \"drilling bans\"","block_context":{"text":"drilling bans","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=drilling-bans"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMALgHdF2ej733GE-OBSptieZHYyPeIb4m0m-xmExY0p1mc6ZcuFPw4nkGaxQUetd7oKlzEXtObBrDudjwxcLYQp1NVZyKQX8_Fg6G8-GUBwhKAh9rUEAMrWPQ-ypZAQ1MSe4Bur0Ssp4SUbZS_3bMKt_R8vg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMALgHdF2ej733GE-OBSptieZHYyPeIb4m0m-xmExY0p1mc6ZcuFPw4nkGaxQUetd7oKlzEXtObBrDudjwxcLYQp1NVZyKQX8_Fg6G8-GUBwhKAh9rUEAMrWPQ-ypZAQ1MSe4Bur0Ssp4SUbZS_3bMKt_R8vg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMALgHdF2ej733GE-OBSptieZHYyPeIb4m0m-xmExY0p1mc6ZcuFPw4nkGaxQUetd7oKlzEXtObBrDudjwxcLYQp1NVZyKQX8_Fg6G8-GUBwhKAh9rUEAMrWPQ-ypZAQ1MSe4Bur0Ssp4SUbZS_3bMKt_R8vg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMALgHdF2ej733GE-OBSptieZHYyPeIb4m0m-xmExY0p1mc6ZcuFPw4nkGaxQUetd7oKlzEXtObBrDudjwxcLYQp1NVZyKQX8_Fg6G8-GUBwhKAh9rUEAMrWPQ-ypZAQ1MSe4Bur0Ssp4SUbZS_3bMKt_R8vg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMALgHdF2ej733GE-OBSptieZHYyPeIb4m0m-xmExY0p1mc6ZcuFPw4nkGaxQUetd7oKlzEXtObBrDudjwxcLYQp1NVZyKQX8_Fg6G8-GUBwhKAh9rUEAMrWPQ-ypZAQ1MSe4Bur0Ssp4SUbZS_3bMKt_R8vg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299809,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=299809","url_meta":{"origin":461490,"position":3},"title":"Most North Sea oil and gas projects would be \u2018unviable\u2019 under Labour plans","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/04\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Three-quarters of all the North Sea\u2019s new oil and gas projects would be rendered\u00a0economically unviable under Labour\u2019s tax proposals, industry chiefs have warned.","rel":"","context":"In \"Labour plans\"","block_context":{"text":"Labour plans","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=labour-plans"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0AA1mBbLe.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0AA1mBbLe.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0AA1mBbLe.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0AA1mBbLe.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/0AA1mBbLe.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":433546,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=433546","url_meta":{"origin":461490,"position":4},"title":"Miliband’s North Sea Ban: Ideological Madness in the Face of War-Driven Energy Chaos","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/23\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Miliband maintains that extra North Sea production would make no \u201cmaterial difference\u201d to household bills (prices are set globally) or long-term supply. He frames the policy as essential for the \u201cjust transition,\u201d arguing excessive fossil fuel dependence is the real long-term security risk. New licences wouldn\u2019t meaningfully slow the basin\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Ed Miliband\u2019s Department of Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ)\"","block_context":{"text":"Ed Miliband\u2019s Department of Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=ed-milibands-department-of-energy-security-and-net-zero-desnz"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Milibands-North-Sea-Ban-Ideological-Madness-in-the-Face-of-War-Driven-Energy-Chaos1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Milibands-North-Sea-Ban-Ideological-Madness-in-the-Face-of-War-Driven-Energy-Chaos1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Milibands-North-Sea-Ban-Ideological-Madness-in-the-Face-of-War-Driven-Energy-Chaos1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Milibands-North-Sea-Ban-Ideological-Madness-in-the-Face-of-War-Driven-Energy-Chaos1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":459617,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=459617","url_meta":{"origin":461490,"position":5},"title":"End of an Era: BP Puts Entire North Sea Business Up for Sale","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/01\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The UK's North Sea energy transition represents one of the most complex and high-stakes industrial shifts in Europe: managing the managed decline of a mature oil and gas basin while scaling up renewables, carbon capture, and a \"just transition\" for workers and communities.","rel":"","context":"In \"British Petroleum (BP)\"","block_context":{"text":"British Petroleum (BP)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=british-petroleum-bp"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/0-End-of-an-Era-BP-Puts-Entire-North-Sea-Business-Up-for-Sale.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/0-End-of-an-Era-BP-Puts-Entire-North-Sea-Business-Up-for-Sale.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/0-End-of-an-Era-BP-Puts-Entire-North-Sea-Business-Up-for-Sale.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/0-End-of-an-Era-BP-Puts-Entire-North-Sea-Business-Up-for-Sale.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/0-End-of-an-Era-BP-Puts-Entire-North-Sea-Business-Up-for-Sale.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/0-North-Sea-Wind-Down-to-Cost-Treasury-13bn-in-Tax-Rebates-by-2035-Warns-Ex-BP-Chief.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/461490","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=461490"}],"version-history":[{"count":28,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/461490\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":461521,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/461490\/revisions\/461521"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/461492"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=461490"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=461490"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=461490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}