{"id":461327,"date":"2026-08-08T13:02:38","date_gmt":"2026-08-08T20:02:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=461327"},"modified":"2026-08-08T13:02:40","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T20:02:40","slug":"in-your-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=461327","title":{"rendered":"In your time\u2026.."},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"
Time concept with old clock mechanism against sky background<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Joe Bastardi<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I got this idea from Bill Gray. Now, do not blame Dr. Gray for it, but he was the one who first got me thinking about this. I was watching a talk he gave, and he explained how all inputs go into such a chaotic pattern that you can\u2019t tell what is dominant and what to believe. So I came up with this idea: the Sun, the oceans, stochastic events, and the system\u2019s very design far outweigh what man can do to it. It involves humbling oneself enough to understand that even if we did things to end life on Earth ( I am talking about things like blowing ourselves up), the system would always overcome and adjust to the state it was meant to be in, and then continue on its natural cycle to wherever it was supposed to go. And there would be no more arguing over saving the planet, since the people arguing would not be here ( nor would anyone else). The planet would, though, and would adjust based on the parameters it has always adjusted to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Suppose there are an unknown number of cycles, ranging from multi-seasonal to multi-century, at work here. And suppose that, for a time, there is a crucial intersection of those cycles\u2014or at least that they come close enough to each other\u2014to tip the balance of the climate one way or the other for a time. How could you tell, since those cycles may be like a tidal wave, masked in the ocean until they actually show up approaching land\u2014in this case, the intersection of another large cycle, which may have other smaller cycles also playing a role? Everything (or enough of it) comes together to produce a result, which then will naturally be forced to reverse, but in its own time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It would explain the variances we have seen in climate through the known geological timescale<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I will use this; it was my dad\u2019s favorite.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

This shows variability that would indicate\u2014as we see with the monster El Ni\u00f1os\u2014an occurrence due to a cumulative buildup and then a response. We are asked to believe that we are now the cause of what has happened every other time without our input. We cannot know for certain that it is not, but history shows us it should be questioned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But until we can explain why this happened before in a precise manner, there is plenty of room for conjecture. They have man-made emissions; I have cyclical intersections (such as the sun, the oceans, stochastic events, and the design of the system, which, due to the way it was created, can never find a balance that it can hit and hold, but must instead move toward greater chaos to a point, then return).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You are in a great forest here, and all you can truly see are the trees. Saying that one tree alone, while excluding all the others that make up the forest, is nonsense. But all the trees together do make it up. And that\u2019s the secret: they are all together. And so cycles that are known and unknown may be coming together in such a way that they are producing what we see now. When you only focus on what you believe, you are incapable of seeing anything different.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Which, sadly, is where we are today in many things, no matter what the intention may be<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I will close with this: a link to Bob Seger\u2019s \u201d In Your Time\u201d. I used to sing it to my son when he was little, and  is widely described as a song he wrote for his son, Christopher Cole Seger. It offers fatherly advice about life\u2019s challenges and reassurance that things will work out<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n