{"id":461265,"date":"2026-08-08T11:27:44","date_gmt":"2026-08-08T18:27:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=461265"},"modified":"2026-08-08T11:27:46","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T18:27:46","slug":"no-sciencedaily-data-show-no-sharp-acceleration-in-warming","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=461265","title":{"rendered":"No, ScienceDaily, Data Show No \u2018Sharp Acceleration\u2019 in Warming"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From ClimateRealism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Anthony Watts<\/a>
<\/p>\n\n\n\n


<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

ScienceDaily\u2019s article, \u201cScientists detect a sharp acceleration in global warming<\/a>,\u201d promotes a new Geophysical Research Letters<\/em> paper claiming that global warming has entered \u201ca faster gear\u201d since about 2015. This is false.  The authors argue that after statistically removing the effects of El Ni\u00f1o, volcanic eruptions, and solar variability from five global surface temperature datasets, they detect a statistically significant acceleration in warming of about 0.35\u00b0C per decade over the past 10 years. But historical temperature data show a much different picture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is no convincing evidence that Earth\u2019s warming has suddenly accelerated. Instead, this appears to be an exercise in statistical manipulation built upon climate modeling assumptions, presented as though it were an observational discovery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And there\u2019s advocacy behind the paper too, as evidenced by this quote from the paper\u2019s co-author, climate science blogger Stefan Rahmstorf:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the warming rate of the past 10 years continues, it would lead to a long-term exceedance of the 1.5\u00b0C limit of the Paris Agreement before 2030. How quickly the Earth continues to warm ultimately depends on how rapidly we reduce global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels to zero.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Science and advocacy are not a convincing combination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The paper does not report the discovery of a new measurement. It takes existing surface temperature records, applies a statistical procedure designed to subtract what the authors consider \u201cnoise\u201d from El Ni\u00f1o, volcanic aerosols, and solar variability, and then analyzes the adjusted temperatures for an acceleration signal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other words, the claimed acceleration appears only after the authors modify the observations. ScienceDaily presents this as though scientists have discovered a new physical phenomenon. They haven\u2019t. They have created a new statistical product.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While that may be a perfectly legitimate scientific exercise, it should not be confused with or take precedent over direct observational evidence. In addition, to be a fair statistical comparison, they would have had to run the same analysis, \u201cremoving noise,\u201d from past historical temperature data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The paper acknowledges that the apparent acceleration is not statistically significant in the unadjusted data. Only after removing what the authors characterize as natural variability does the acceleration exceed their chosen confidence threshold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That raises an obvious question: If the temperature acceleration is so obvious, why must it first be extracted mathematically via statistical methods?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even more revealing is what the authors admit later in the paper. Their adjustment for El Ni\u00f1o, volcanic eruptions, and solar influences is \u201cempirically based, but approximate and imperfect,\u201d and they acknowledge that the influence of the powerful 2023-2024 El Ni\u00f1o may not have been completely removed. Those are important caveats, and ScienceDaily barely mentions them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Instead, readers are told that global warming has \u201cshifted into overdrive\u201d and that warming has accelerated with more than 98 percent statistical certainty. That makes for a dramatic headline, but statistical confidence in a chosen analytical method is not the same thing as confirmation that the climate system itself has fundamentally changed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The paper also leans heavily on climate models. ScienceDaily notes that the observed acceleration is considered \u201cconsistent\u201d with current climate models, while the journal paper likewise states that such acceleration is expected under standard global warming scenarios and falls within the range of model predictions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That should immediately raise skepticism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Climate models are hypotheses expressed as computer code. They are useful research tools, but they are not measurements. Their value depends on how well they match the real world. Using model expectations to validate statistical adjustments derived from observations risks becoming a circular exercise, i.e. \u201cjunk science.\u201d As importantly, models consistently fail, without adjustment, to accurately portray past and present temperatures. If models don\u2019t get past and present temperatures right, consistently overstating measured warming, no one should trust their projections of the future or base predictions upon their outputs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the question is whether global warming has accelerated, perhaps the first place to look should be the atmosphere itself. The University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) satellite temperature record provides one of the world\u2019s longest continuous measurements of lower-tropospheric temperature using microwave sounding instruments carried aboard satellites. The UAH team has maintained this record since 1979, producing a globally consistent dataset that measures the bulk atmosphere rather than relying on a patchwork of imperfect and biased surface weather stations<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The latest UAH global temperature time series, seen below, tells a very different story from the one presented by ScienceDaily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The graph accompanying the July 2026 report<\/a> shows that lower-troposphere temperatures surged during the recent El Ni\u00f1o, peaked in 2024, and have since declined noticeably. The current anomaly remains above the long-term average, but the sharp rise that fueled so many alarming headlines has subsided. The short-term trajectory is downward, not upward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That does not prove that global warming has ended. Neither does it support headlines claiming that warming has suddenly accelerated into a new phase.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Instead, it illustrates something climate scientists have long recognized: global temperatures fluctuate considerably from year to year because of natural variability, particularly from El Ni\u00f1o and La Ni\u00f1a events<\/a>. A few unusually warm years following a strong El Ni\u00f1o are not, by themselves, evidence that the long-term warming rate has permanently changed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ironically, even the paper cited by ScienceDaily acknowledges this uncertainty. The authors explicitly state that they are not identifying the physical cause of the claimed acceleration and concede that whether such rapid warming continues \u201cremains to be seen.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those are appropriately cautious scientific statements. ScienceDaily\u2019s headline is not, and that is the broader lesson here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Science advances through observations that can be independently verified, not through increasingly sophisticated methods of massaging existing datasets until they reveal the desired statistical signal. When a claimed acceleration appears only after extensive adjustments for multiple variables and is then celebrated because it agrees with climate model expectations, skepticism is not only appropriate, but also essential. Also, there is no evidence whatsoever presented in the article that reducing fossil fuel use will change temperature trends in the near or long-term, although statistical filtering and manipulations might project a favorable decline called for by the advocates\/researchers if the data is massaged enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The climate is changing, as it always has. The question is how fast, why, and with what degree of confidence we can measure those changes. Those questions are answered by observations, not by admittedly imperfect statistical filters designed to tease out an \u201cacceleration\u201d that isn\u2019t obvious by simply looking at the base data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ScienceDaily\u2019s readers deserved to hear that distinction. Instead, they received another clickbait style headline announcing certainty with possible future consequences where the underlying science remains far more nuanced and proof of danger of exceeding a politically chosen<\/a> temperature target<\/a> is non-existent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ScienceDaily\u2019s article, \u201cScientists detect a sharp acceleration in global warming,\u201d promotes a new Geophysical Research Letters paper claiming that global warming has entered \u201ca faster gear\u201d since about 2015. This is false. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":461268,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"ScienceDaily's article, \"Scientists detect a sharp acceleration in global warming,\" promotes a new Geophysical Research Letters paper claiming that global warming has entered \"a faster gear\" since about 2015. This is false.","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691844550,691822729,691819743,691818200,691818087,691833018,691844549,691828452],"class_list":["post-461265","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-a-faster-gear","tag-climate-modeling","tag-climate-propaganda","tag-el-nino","tag-global-warming","tag-prof-stefan-rahmstorf","tag-sciencedaily","tag-uah-global-temperature","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1VZL","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":274304,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=274304","url_meta":{"origin":461265,"position":0},"title":"New Study: People Distressed, Anxious About Climate Have Less \u2018Climate-Specific Knowledge\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/18\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe degree of one\u2019s emotions varies inversely with one\u2019s knowledge of the facts, the less you know the hotter you get.\u201d \u2013 Bertrand Russell","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0worried-millens.jpg?fit=1200%2C685&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0worried-millens.jpg?fit=1200%2C685&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0worried-millens.jpg?fit=1200%2C685&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0worried-millens.jpg?fit=1200%2C685&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0worried-millens.jpg?fit=1200%2C685&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":430828,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=430828","url_meta":{"origin":461265,"position":1},"title":"No, TIME, the Planet Isn\u2019t \u2018Heating Faster Than Ever\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/13\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"TIME claims in a recent article, \u201cThe Planet is Heating Faster Than Ever Before,\u201d that global warming has dramatically accelerated since 2015. This is demonstrably false. Observational satellite data disagree with that claim, showing short-term variability driven by natural, short-lived, events, with current temperatures now below the 2015\u20132016 El Ni\u00f1o\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate propaganda\"","block_context":{"text":"climate propaganda","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-propaganda"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQNDJTOEkiuOGrMs73KdjsZ7B3AY92HHsQaWcdPg266YWK1RX3KiM-udN0qfZwmwVw761t2sQ73GAJ35PktKrZtxcM25ldtXeIvRQOGdX7GMYm6qshCnBEMVhZ3aArxd.jpeg?fit=1200%2C916&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQNDJTOEkiuOGrMs73KdjsZ7B3AY92HHsQaWcdPg266YWK1RX3KiM-udN0qfZwmwVw761t2sQ73GAJ35PktKrZtxcM25ldtXeIvRQOGdX7GMYm6qshCnBEMVhZ3aArxd.jpeg?fit=1200%2C916&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQNDJTOEkiuOGrMs73KdjsZ7B3AY92HHsQaWcdPg266YWK1RX3KiM-udN0qfZwmwVw761t2sQ73GAJ35PktKrZtxcM25ldtXeIvRQOGdX7GMYm6qshCnBEMVhZ3aArxd.jpeg?fit=1200%2C916&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQNDJTOEkiuOGrMs73KdjsZ7B3AY92HHsQaWcdPg266YWK1RX3KiM-udN0qfZwmwVw761t2sQ73GAJ35PktKrZtxcM25ldtXeIvRQOGdX7GMYm6qshCnBEMVhZ3aArxd.jpeg?fit=1200%2C916&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQNDJTOEkiuOGrMs73KdjsZ7B3AY92HHsQaWcdPg266YWK1RX3KiM-udN0qfZwmwVw761t2sQ73GAJ35PktKrZtxcM25ldtXeIvRQOGdX7GMYm6qshCnBEMVhZ3aArxd.jpeg?fit=1200%2C916&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":388635,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=388635","url_meta":{"origin":461265,"position":2},"title":"Voodoo-science strikes again: Climate change is awakening volcanoes","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/14\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"If ever you have doubts that we are merely 3 genes away* from being mammoth hunting tribes of prophets and bone pointing shamen, look no further than modern captive science. These nice geochemists haven\u2019t even published a paper yet, but five minutes after giving a speech at a conference, it\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-24.-Mai-2025-20_11_24-1.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-24.-Mai-2025-20_11_24-1.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-24.-Mai-2025-20_11_24-1.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-24.-Mai-2025-20_11_24-1.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280648,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=280648","url_meta":{"origin":461265,"position":3},"title":"The world needs to cut \u2018carbon intensity\u2019 seven times faster to limit warming to 1.5\u00b0C \u2013 say net-zero obsessed\u00a0analysts","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/27\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s dangerous, *we must* do this that and the other, ambition, fight, requirements etc. When will the tedious climate ranting ever stop? Endless stats come and go, announcing the latest failures of policies supposedly intended to arrange global temperatures to some fraction of a degree. The more they complain, the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Photosynthesis-Diagram-1024x759-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C759&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Photosynthesis-Diagram-1024x759-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C759&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Photosynthesis-Diagram-1024x759-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C759&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0Photosynthesis-Diagram-1024x759-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C759&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242672,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=242672","url_meta":{"origin":461265,"position":4},"title":"AI`s Trained on Climate Models Predict Faster Warming","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/01\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Using a simulation or model allows a large number of training runs to be packed into a short period of time, and constrains the output of the AI. But the AI is then tainted by the model, it effectively becomes an extension of the model.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-23.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-23.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-23.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-23.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-23.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":418336,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=418336","url_meta":{"origin":461265,"position":5},"title":"No, NPR, CBS, and NBC, Climate Change Isn\u2019t a Proven Cause of Arctic Warming","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/23\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"National Public Radio (NPR) recently published an article titled \u201cOrange rivers and melting glaciers: federal report shows rapid change in the Arctic.\u201d Simultaneously, CBS News published \u201cArctic temperatures increasing at over double the global rate since 2006, NOAA report says,\u201d while NBC News published \u201cArctic is again the hottest it\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Arctic sea ice trends\"","block_context":{"text":"Arctic sea ice trends","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=arctic-sea-ice-trends"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/OIGP.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/OIGP.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/OIGP.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/OIGP.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/0-ChatGPT-No-ScienceDaily-Data-Show-No-%E2%80%98Sharp-Acceleration-in-Warming.png?fit=1536%2C1024&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/461265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=461265"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/461265\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":461278,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/461265\/revisions\/461278"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/461268"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=461265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=461265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=461265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}