{"id":456517,"date":"2026-07-19T09:15:23","date_gmt":"2026-07-19T16:15:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=456517"},"modified":"2026-07-19T09:15:25","modified_gmt":"2026-07-19T16:15:25","slug":"rolling-blackouts-hit-new-york","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=456517","title":{"rendered":"Rolling Blackouts Hit New York"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From Manhattan Contrarian<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

 By Francis Menton<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

At least since New York passed its Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) back in 2019, it has been clear that trouble has been coming for New York\u2019s electrical grid. The CLCPA effectively prohibits construction of new fossil fuel power plants, even natural gas plants; and the old ones are aging and are forbidden to be replaced or upgraded. Supposedly, lots of wind and solar generators were going to be added to the system. But those have been slow to come and, more importantly, can\u2019t be counted on to generate anything when you need them. In addition, new construction of such things has now been stalled by the end of federal subsidies. At some point the lines of diminishing reliable generation and increasing demand would have to cross.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, here at this website I have held off predicting imminent grid failure. The reason is that I don\u2019t want to be the boy who cried wolf. Our grid operators are competent people, and they have a lot of tricks up their sleeves to hold things together even in difficult circumstances. In a pinch, they can start up every ancient \u201cpeaker\u201d plant, and then import some power from PJM, or New England, or even from Canada. Despite New York\u2019s hostile energy environment, they could get lucky and avoid blackouts for at least several more years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So I think it is important to report that on this past July 2 and 3, Con Edison ran out of options and imposed rolling blackouts in parts of the North Bronx and Southern Westchester County.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You haven\u2019t heard about this? It\u2019s another example of the legacy media burying an inconvenient story. Checking to see what the New York Times has to say about these blackouts, I find just one sentence in the sixth paragraph of a July 3 article<\/a> that is otherwise reporting on the heat wave that hit that weekend. The sentence in question reads, \u201cThe heat also put stress on power grids, contributing to scattered outages in New Jersey, New York and Ohio for tens of thousands of utility customers on Thursday, according to the tracking website PowerOutage.us.\u201d<\/em> The heat put \u201cstress\u201d<\/em> on the grid, leading to \u201cscattered outages.\u201d<\/em> That\u2019s it. No mention in the Times that the blackouts on that day in New York were intentionally imposed, or that the ongoing degradation of grid reliability had anything to do with it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I have been waiting to report on this until I could find a credible source attributing the blackouts to an intentional act by Con Edison versus, for example, a heat-related accident of some sort. On July 16, the Institute for Energy Research had a piece with the headline \u201cNew York City Cuts Power During July 4th Heat Wave.\u201d<\/a> Excerpt:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Con Edison shut off electricity to over 5,000 customers in the Riverdale section of the Bronx, leaving residents there without air conditioning. Affected residents were directed to city cooling centers for relief. Con Edison had decided the N.Y. grid could not handle the load, saying the shutoffs were necessary to reduce strain on the grid, protect equipment, and speed up restoration. The company also cut voltage by 8% in areas of the city as a precaution to protect equipment and keep service running while crews worked.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

So it was not just blackouts for 5,000 customers, but also 8% voltage cuts in various \u201careas of the city.\u201d IER does not specify the extent of the areas covered by the voltage cuts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nor were the blackouts limited to just the Bronx. My colleague Richard Ellenbogen lives in Southern Westchester County, in a town called Pelham. Pelham is just north of the Bronx, and also within Con Edison service territory. In a July 12 email that he sent to his distribution list, Ellenbogen described what happened in his area:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Over the weekend of July 3-5], [t]here were numerous power surges associated with the rolling blackouts where the lights went on and off several times before going out. . . .  Those surges destroyed a bunch of equipment in my home despite having surge suppressors on the equipment. . . . I missed the Friday evening [July 3] rolling blackout and I returned to a mess.  There is thousands of dollars in damages related to the surges.  Based upon the Facebook Page MOPS (Mothers of Pelham), my home was not the only one impacted as many people are complaining about electronic equipment not working after the blackouts, notably air conditioners. . . . My home is going to need about $3000 worth of new battery backups. . . .<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I don\u2019t find any reporting in the press about these blackouts in Westchester.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

New York definitely experienced a severe heat wave in early July. The temperature at the Central Park weather station in New York City reached 100\u00b0 F on July 2, and 98\u00b0 F on July 3. These are unusually high temperatures that are not reached in most years. Indeed, the last time it reached 100\u00b0 F at Central Park was in 2012. On the other hand, these temperatures were by no means records. The highest temperature ever recorded at the Central Park station (with data going back into the late 1800s) was 106\u00b0 F in 1936. Here from recordtemps.in<\/a> is a list of the highest temperatures ever recorded at the Central Park weather station:<\/p>\n\n\n\n