{"id":452202,"date":"2026-06-25T11:21:09","date_gmt":"2026-06-25T18:21:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=452202"},"modified":"2026-06-25T11:21:11","modified_gmt":"2026-06-25T18:21:11","slug":"no-the-conversation-the-amoc-doesnt-have-an-image-problem-it-has-a-credibility-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=452202","title":{"rendered":"No, The Conversation, the AMOC Doesn\u2019t Have an Image Problem. It Has a Credibility Problem."},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From ClimateRealism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Anthony Watts<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the story, \u201cOne of the world\u2019s most important climate threats has an image problem<\/a>,\u201d The Conversation claims that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation<\/a> (AMOC) is a major climate change threat that is misunderstood; its suffers from an \u201cimage problem\u201d because the public struggles to visualize a slow-moving ocean current hidden beneath the Atlantic Ocean. This is simplistic and wrongheaded. The AMOC\u2019s problem is not that people cannot visualize it. The problem is that after more than two decades of alarming headlines, scientists still cannot agree on whether the current is slowing down, speeding up, or remaining essentially unchanged, and whether human greenhouse gas emissions have any impact on the AMOC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
The global conveyor belt, shown in part here, circulates cool subsurface water and warm surface water throughout the world. The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation is part of this complex system of global ocean currents. This illustration is captured from a short video produced by NOAA Science on a Sphere.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Conversation argues that AMOC fails to capture public attention because it lacks compelling visuals. Unlike wildfires, hurricanes, glaciers, or polar bears, ocean circulation is difficult to photograph and therefore difficult to communicate. According to the author, climate journalism needs better images to help the public understand the threat. This completely misses the point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

People do not ignore AMOC because it lacks dramatic imagery. They ignore it because evidence that climate change is affecting it is contradictory and they rightly recognize there is nothing humans can do about shifts in the AMOC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Over the past 20 years, scientific papers and media reports have alternately claimed that AMOC is slowing, accelerating, collapsing, stabilizing, or behaving within the range of natural variability. The scientific literature has not produced anything close to a consensus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As Climate Realism <\/em>documented in \u201cClimate Activists Flip-Flop on Ocean Currents Yet Again,<\/a>\u201d studies have repeatedly contradicted one another. In one year, researchers announce alarming evidence of weakening. The next year, another study finds little evidence of long-term change. Then another paper claims acceleration. Then another predicts collapse. The narrative changes far more often than the ocean current itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That uncertainty is acknowledged, though somewhat buried, in The Conversation article. The author admits that \u201cwe still don\u2019t know exactly how fast the circulation will change or even its future trajectory\u201d and that \u201cpredicted outcomes remain uncertain.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Exactly. That is not an image problem; it\u2019s a scientific uncertainty problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article cites studies suggesting AMOC is weakening and repeats familiar warnings that Europe could cool dramatically, monsoons could shift, and sea levels could rise along the U.S. East Coast. Yet these warnings have been circulating for decades without materializing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Climate Realism<\/em> addressed a similar wave of media panic in 2024 after CNN and numerous other outlets promoted claims that climate change was causing AMOC to collapse.<\/a> As that analysis showed, the observational record remains sparse, direct measurements are relatively recent, and much of the collapse narrative depends heavily on computer model simulations rather than direct observations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That distinction matters because models are not data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The overwhelming majority of alarming AMOC headlines rely on model projections that extend decades or centuries into the future. Yet as Climate at a Glance<\/em> notes in its review of ocean currents<\/a>, direct measurements of AMOC cover only a tiny fraction of the timescales over which ocean circulation naturally varies. Historical proxy reconstructions often disagree with one another, while models produce widely differing outcomes depending on assumptions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The result is not a scientific consensus; it is scientific debate in progress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ironically, the author comes close to admitting this when discussing the challenge of communicating AMOC to the public. The article notes that researchers often rely on computer models to reconstruct ocean circulation and generate three-dimensional animations. In other words, much of what is being presented to the public as future risk is derived from simulations of a system that remains incompletely understood.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article then laments that frozen-Europe imagery may oversimplify the science because \u201cmost scientists say such a doomsday scenario is unlikely.\u201d That statement deserves far more attention than the article gives it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, media outlets have invoked imagery reminiscent of the Hollywood disaster movie The Day After Tomorrow<\/em><\/a>, portraying AMOC slowdown as a trigger for sudden climate catastrophe. Yet the article concedes that the dramatic version of the story is highly unlikely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the most memorable visual representation of AMOC is scientifically implausible, perhaps the problem is not the public\u2019s inability to understand the issue. Perhaps the problem is that the most alarming claims are not supported by strong evidence. Most people intuitively understand this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The average person is concerned about things that directly affect daily life: jobs, energy costs, housing, health care, education, and public safety. A hypothetical change in a deep-ocean current that scientists cannot confidently measure over long timescales and cannot reliably predict decades into the future ranks understandably low on that list.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

No amount of improved graphics in the media will change that reality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Conversation assumes that if journalists can simply find better images, the public will finally appreciate the danger. But people are not rejecting AMOC warnings because they lack imagination. They are skeptical because the scientific story is unsettled with the evidence and predictions in constant flux.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For more than 20 years, headlines have warned that the AMOC is slowing, collapsing, accelerating, recovering, or behaving unpredictably. The public notices those contradictions. And, of course, if any of the narratives are actually accurate, slowing, accelerating, or remaining relatively stable, the question of what impact if any that human emissions have on the AMOC\u2019s behavior remains an open question. In short, the evidence that the world faces an AMOC problem is lacking, and there is even less evidence that humans can impact AMOC shifts whatever direction they may take.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article concludes that AMOC reveals \u201cthe gap between what matters and what becomes visible.\u201d In reality, it reveals something else entirely, the gap between doomsday laden media narratives and an unsettled, highly uncertain scientific record.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The AMOC issue in the media does not have an image problem, it has a credibility problem.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the story, \u201cOne of the world\u2019s most important climate threats has an image problem,\u201d The Conversation claims that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is a major climate change threat that is misunderstood; its suffers from an \u201cimage problem\u201d because the public struggles to visualize a slow-moving ocean current hidden beneath the Atlantic Ocean. This is simplistic and wrongheaded.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":452208,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691821384,691818056,691819696,691842981,691843815,691843816,691821854],"class_list":["post-452202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-atlantic-meridional-overturning-circulation-amoc","tag-climate-change","tag-climate-journalism","tag-computer-model-simulations","tag-dramatic-imagery","tag-media-panic","tag-the-conversation","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-ChatGPT-No-The-Conversation-the-AMOC-Doesnt-Have-an-Image-Problem.-It-Has-a-Credibility-Problem.png?fit=1536%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1TDA","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":371387,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=371387","url_meta":{"origin":452202,"position":0},"title":"No, NewsBreak, the Supposed \u201cCold Blob\u201d in the Atlantic Isn\u2019t a Harbinger of the Atlantic Ocean Current Collapsing","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/22\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"An article published at NewsBreak (NB) titled,\u00a0Scientists issue urgent warning about mysterious \u2018cold blob\u2019 in the ocean: \u2018Most likely underestimated\u2019\u00a0claims that a \u201cmysterious cold blob\u201d in the Atlantic Ocean signals an impending collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), which could have \u201ccatastrophic\u201d consequences. This claim is, at best,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)\"","block_context":{"text":"Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atlantic-meridional-overturning-circulation-amoc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0cold-blob-2018-NASA.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0cold-blob-2018-NASA.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0cold-blob-2018-NASA.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0cold-blob-2018-NASA.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0cold-blob-2018-NASA.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301708,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=301708","url_meta":{"origin":452202,"position":1},"title":"No, CNN and Other Media Outlets, Climate Change Is Not Causing the Ocean Circulation to Collapse","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/14\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent CNN headline, \u201cCritical Atlantic Ocean current system is showing early signs of collapse, prompting warning from scientists\u201c misleads its readers into believing that a collapse of a critical Atlantic Ocean current is pending. This is false.","rel":"","context":"In \"Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current (AMOC)\"","block_context":{"text":"Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current (AMOC)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atlantic-meridional-overturning-current-amoc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00SEI_165307949.webp?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00SEI_165307949.webp?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00SEI_165307949.webp?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00SEI_165307949.webp?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/00SEI_165307949.webp?fit=1200%2C799&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363205,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=363205","url_meta":{"origin":452202,"position":2},"title":"AMOC Alarmism Doesn\u2019t Stick (Wunsch caution)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/24\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent peer-reviewed\u00a0article\u00a0in\u00a0Nature\u00a0(discussed\u00a0here) has, once again, knocked this speculative \u201cfat tail\u201d hypothesis down to size. \u201cBased on the here identified relationship and observation-based estimates of the past air-sea heat flux in the North Atlantic from reanalysis products,\u201d the authors concluded, \u201cthe decadal averaged AMOC at 26.5\u00b0N has not weakened from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)\"","block_context":{"text":"Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atlantic-meridional-overturning-circulation-amoc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0348_1255575_f1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C466&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0348_1255575_f1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C466&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0348_1255575_f1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C466&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0348_1255575_f1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C466&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0348_1255575_f1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C466&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379907,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=379907","url_meta":{"origin":452202,"position":3},"title":"CNN Lies in its AMOC Collapse Story: Another Flip-Flop in a Long Line of Alarmist Claims","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/25\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent CNN article by Laura Paddison, titled \u201cA crucial system of ocean currents is slowing. It\u2019s already supercharging sea level rise in the US,\u201d\u00a0references new research on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) to claim the current is slowing down leading to rising seas and costly, deadly coastal flooding.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)\"","block_context":{"text":"Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atlantic-meridional-overturning-circulation-amoc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2Screenshot-2025-02-16-160758.png?fit=1200%2C593&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2Screenshot-2025-02-16-160758.png?fit=1200%2C593&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2Screenshot-2025-02-16-160758.png?fit=1200%2C593&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2Screenshot-2025-02-16-160758.png?fit=1200%2C593&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2Screenshot-2025-02-16-160758.png?fit=1200%2C593&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362826,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=362826","url_meta":{"origin":452202,"position":4},"title":"Surprise! The North Atlantic Current is Stable","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/21\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Another nail in the coffin of climate models? A study published in Nature suggests there is no evidence for a decline in AMOC over the last 60 years.","rel":"","context":"In \"Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)\"","block_context":{"text":"Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atlantic-meridional-overturning-circulation-amoc"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-21-073653.png?fit=1198%2C672&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-21-073653.png?fit=1198%2C672&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-21-073653.png?fit=1198%2C672&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-21-073653.png?fit=1198%2C672&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-21-073653.png?fit=1198%2C672&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353854,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=353854","url_meta":{"origin":452202,"position":5},"title":"When Scientists, Skeptics and Eco-Loons All Agree, Except for Catastrophic Storytelling","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/10\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"We all agree that the wind-driven surface flow of the Atlantic Multidecadal Overturning Circulation (AMOC) brings precious warmth from the tropics towards the Arctic & enables a milder climate in Europe and North America. We all agree it\u2019s the oceans that tremendously effect climate and create temperature changes that cannot\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"arctic temperatures\"","block_context":{"text":"arctic temperatures","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=arctic-temperatures"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0AMOC_Fig_1.jpg?fit=1200%2C707&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0AMOC_Fig_1.jpg?fit=1200%2C707&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0AMOC_Fig_1.jpg?fit=1200%2C707&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0AMOC_Fig_1.jpg?fit=1200%2C707&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0AMOC_Fig_1.jpg?fit=1200%2C707&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/452202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=452202"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/452202\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":452209,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/452202\/revisions\/452209"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/452208"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=452202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=452202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=452202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}