{"id":451186,"date":"2026-06-19T12:08:19","date_gmt":"2026-06-19T19:08:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=451186"},"modified":"2026-06-19T12:08:21","modified_gmt":"2026-06-19T19:08:21","slug":"rethinking-the-black-hole-singularity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=451186","title":{"rendered":"Rethinking the Black Hole Singularity"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Michael Aaron Cody<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Black holes have been understood as infinite singularities for a century<\/a>. In 1916, months after Einstein published general relativity, Karl Schwarzschild did something that surprised even Einstein himself. He formulated one of the very first exact solutions to relativity\u2019s equations for a single spherical mass. Out of that solution came a radius now commonly called \u201cthe Schwarzschild radius,\u201d also known as the event horizon \u2013 the boundary around a black hole where nothing can escape. For the last 110 years the field has built on those equations, and the picture that settled into place is the one we are all taught, that at the center of a black hole sits a singularity, a point of infinite density. Now, new published works offer a different perspective on what black holes are. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The nearest known black hole is Gaia BH1, about 1,600<\/a> light years away. That\u2019s roughly 9,400,000,000,000,000 miles. After the 1916 solution, the field continued on with the singularity. In 1965, Penrose wrote \u201cGravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singularities<\/a>.\u201d The idea is that a star becomes infinite once it collapses, leading to an unavoidable singularity. Similarly, Stephen Hawking took the same kind of reasoning and turned it the other way, applying it not to a single collapsing star but to the whole universe, running backwards in time, and arrived at the same place. A beginning that traces back to a singularity of its own. Between the two of them, the message was hard to argue with. General relativity, taken exactly as written, points to its own breaking point.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The field has, for some reason, largely ignored the elephant in the room and hasn\u2019t yet stopped to question the singularity. Until now, at least. The problem is the singularity itself, this idea that a black hole is just infinity and that\u2019s the end of it. But if a collapsing star creates an infinity, that calls the whole picture into question. Is it really geometry folding neatly into an infinite point? Look at the word we use often. Collapse<\/em>. Einstein used that word. So did Penrose and Hawking. But they were describing matter contracting to a singularity,<\/a> not a full geometric failure of spacetime itself. Matter falls inward, geodesics run out, and they called that the end. What they did not say is that the geometry carrying all of it has a breaking point of its own. Geometry does not fold into a point. It fails. It breaks apart. And what is left in its wake, the empty void we call a black hole, is what remains after the break. Or at least, that is what newly published theories are talking about in 2026. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

New literature attacks the very fundamentals of how we describe black holes and what they are. The work that defined this shift, \u201cBlack hole singularities and the limits of the spacetime continuum,<\/a>\u201d published in Springer Nature in January, explained exactly how, why, and where black holes fail. It treats the square root of the Kretschmann scalar as a physical load on the geometry, sets a critical threshold where that load can no longer hold, and computes an exact failure surface, a calculable radius where geometry gives way, using nothing but the equations of general relativity already in hand, with no new forces and no exotic matter. The event horizon stops being a gateway to an infinite interior and becomes a phase boundary, the surface where one description of spacetime ends. The paper also unifies the field, pulling the scattered approaches \u2013 the limiting-curvature models, the emergent and thermodynamic pictures, the elastic analogies, the phase-transition descriptions \u2013 into a single principle. Spacetime has a breaking point, and everything the theory predicts outside the black hole stays exactly the same. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Earlier this year, in March 2026, a notable group of researchers came to the same conclusion from a different direction. Jorge Ovalle, Roberto Casadio, and Alexander Kamenshchik, in a paper published in Physical Review D, \u201cOn Schwarzschild black hole singularity formation<\/a>,\u201d tracked what happens to the geometry of spacetime as a star collapses. They found it cannot stay smooth. At the center, the geometry cracks, a discontinuity they named \u201cMinkowski breaking,\u201d where the structure of spacetime stops being continuous. Before the black hole can settle into its final form, the geometry tears. No stress threshold, no failure surface, none of the same math. Two different roads, the same destination. And when two independent results both refuse to let the Schwarzschild geometry form smoothly, the singularity starts to look like it was never a feature of the universe, just an artifact of the equations we mistook for the real thing. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Both of these papers are bold, fresh, and provocative. They challenge the very foundation of how we understand geometry and black holes. Since 1916, the many physicists who built this field have led us to where we are now, but that understanding is starting to shift. Black holes may be infinite singularities, or they may be phase boundaries, places where geometry fails. The uncertainty goes back to a simple fact: it has only been 110 years since this started. Humanity is still at the cusp of exploring space beyond its own moon, with much left to learn about space and its geometry. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article was originally published by RealClearScience and made available via RealClearWire.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Black holes have been understood as infinite singularities for a century. In 1916, months after Einstein published general relativity, Karl Schwarzschild did something that surprised even Einstein himself. He formulated one of the very first exact solutions to relativity\u2019s equations for a single spherical mass. Out of that solution came a radius now commonly called \u201cthe Schwarzschild radius,\u201d also known as the event horizon \u2013 the boundary around a black hole where nothing can escape. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":451190,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691843722,691843723,691843721,691830818],"class_list":["post-451186","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-black-holes","tag-schwarzschild-radius","tag-singularity","tag-space","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-ChatGPT-Rethinking-the-Black-Hole-Singularity.png?fit=1536%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1Tnc","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":410473,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=410473","url_meta":{"origin":451186,"position":0},"title":"Is Public Criticism of Climate Claims a Criminal Offence in Today\u2019s Britain and Europe?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/27\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c\u2026 It is perfectly OK to have different opinions on climate change. What becomes problematic is when a society can no longer agree on facts \u2026\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQMACrPHm4fnTA6wO6VAFHITYhV08HQ6Ub3XoLpFLQEDkGEfh5SnUN8RfYMxlICj7aJOo7rn1ebEGeiNqLdLSh9TZFNTPqmBpdZQgl2Sir82zRVLSrr-RHc-tLYS1smR-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQMACrPHm4fnTA6wO6VAFHITYhV08HQ6Ub3XoLpFLQEDkGEfh5SnUN8RfYMxlICj7aJOo7rn1ebEGeiNqLdLSh9TZFNTPqmBpdZQgl2Sir82zRVLSrr-RHc-tLYS1smR-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQMACrPHm4fnTA6wO6VAFHITYhV08HQ6Ub3XoLpFLQEDkGEfh5SnUN8RfYMxlICj7aJOo7rn1ebEGeiNqLdLSh9TZFNTPqmBpdZQgl2Sir82zRVLSrr-RHc-tLYS1smR-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQMACrPHm4fnTA6wO6VAFHITYhV08HQ6Ub3XoLpFLQEDkGEfh5SnUN8RfYMxlICj7aJOo7rn1ebEGeiNqLdLSh9TZFNTPqmBpdZQgl2Sir82zRVLSrr-RHc-tLYS1smR-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0AQMACrPHm4fnTA6wO6VAFHITYhV08HQ6Ub3XoLpFLQEDkGEfh5SnUN8RfYMxlICj7aJOo7rn1ebEGeiNqLdLSh9TZFNTPqmBpdZQgl2Sir82zRVLSrr-RHc-tLYS1smR-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287535,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=287535","url_meta":{"origin":451186,"position":1},"title":"CO2\u00a0is not a bogeyman \u2013 and here\u2019s the proof","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/11\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"By Dave Hipperson We are constantly told, and the majority of people have come to believe, that global warming is mostly caused by increases in CO2. Solid scientific evidence shows this is the wrong way round and that the\u00a0case is, in fact, quite the opposite. It is warming that is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate bogeyman\"","block_context":{"text":"climate bogeyman","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-bogeyman"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0climate-boogeyman.webp?fit=1200%2C561&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0climate-boogeyman.webp?fit=1200%2C561&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0climate-boogeyman.webp?fit=1200%2C561&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0climate-boogeyman.webp?fit=1200%2C561&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0climate-boogeyman.webp?fit=1200%2C561&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251122,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=251122","url_meta":{"origin":451186,"position":2},"title":"Mathematicians discover an elusive \u2018einstein\u2019 tile, with Fibonacci undertones","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/04\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Something different here: \u2018A 13-sided shape called \u2018the hat\u2019 forms a pattern that never repeats\u2019, they say. We note an extra feature: each \u2018hat\u2019 contains 8 \u2018kites\u2019, and 13 and 8 are\u00a0Fibonacci numbers.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0032323_ec_einstein-tiles_feat-1030x580-1.jpg?fit=1030%2C580&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0032323_ec_einstein-tiles_feat-1030x580-1.jpg?fit=1030%2C580&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0032323_ec_einstein-tiles_feat-1030x580-1.jpg?fit=1030%2C580&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0032323_ec_einstein-tiles_feat-1030x580-1.jpg?fit=1030%2C580&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330181,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=330181","url_meta":{"origin":451186,"position":3},"title":"Claim: Trump\u2019s Anti-Science Climate Denial Threatens the Foundations of Prosperity","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/27\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"According to a review of a book by Kings College Professor Daniel Susskind, President Trump is the harbinger of a new age of superstition and prejudice, which threatens to derail science driven economic growth.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0-certainty.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0-certainty.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0-certainty.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0-certainty.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0-certainty.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358319,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=358319","url_meta":{"origin":451186,"position":4},"title":"Dennis Overbye Retiring","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/23\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"I often poke fun, mock and criticize the science reporting in\u00a0the\u00a0New York Times.\u00a0 It has been some time, maybe more than a decade, since I have had faith in the Times\u2019 science desk to report straightforward, unbiased and plain-language explanatory science, medical and environmental news.\u00a0 Gone are the days of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/07626805-Dennis-Overbye-Quote-Once-in-a-while-there-was-a-volcanic-outburst.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/07626805-Dennis-Overbye-Quote-Once-in-a-while-there-was-a-volcanic-outburst.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/07626805-Dennis-Overbye-Quote-Once-in-a-while-there-was-a-volcanic-outburst.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/07626805-Dennis-Overbye-Quote-Once-in-a-while-there-was-a-volcanic-outburst.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/07626805-Dennis-Overbye-Quote-Once-in-a-while-there-was-a-volcanic-outburst.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292301,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292301","url_meta":{"origin":451186,"position":5},"title":"A Thought Experiment; Simplifying the Climate Riddle.","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/22\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Is it possible to simplify the climate sensitivity debate? Einstein was famous for solving the most difficult problems on the back of an old envelope. Without pretending to be in the same league as the great man, is it possible to follow his example, take a sharp pencil and on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-532.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-532.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-532.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-532.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/451186","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=451186"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/451186\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":451191,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/451186\/revisions\/451191"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/451190"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=451186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=451186"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=451186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}