{"id":448192,"date":"2026-06-02T08:35:57","date_gmt":"2026-06-02T15:35:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=448192"},"modified":"2026-06-14T07:34:02","modified_gmt":"2026-06-14T14:34:02","slug":"the-rice-catastrophe-paper-and-the-rcp-8-5-rug-pull","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=448192","title":{"rendered":"The Rice Catastrophe Paper and the RCP 8.5 Rug-Pull"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"482\" data-attachment-id=\"448194\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=448194\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-Copilot_Projected-warming-will-exceed-the-long-term-thermal-limits-of-rice-cultivation.png?fit=1536%2C1024&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1536,1024\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0 Copilot_Projected warming will exceed the long-term thermal limits of rice cultivation\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-Copilot_Projected-warming-will-exceed-the-long-term-thermal-limits-of-rice-cultivation.png?fit=723%2C482&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-Copilot_Projected-warming-will-exceed-the-long-term-thermal-limits-of-rice-cultivation.png?resize=723%2C482&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-448194\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-Copilot_Projected-warming-will-exceed-the-long-term-thermal-limits-of-rice-cultivation.png?resize=1024%2C683&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-Copilot_Projected-warming-will-exceed-the-long-term-thermal-limits-of-rice-cultivation.png?resize=300%2C200&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-Copilot_Projected-warming-will-exceed-the-long-term-thermal-limits-of-rice-cultivation.png?resize=768%2C512&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-Copilot_Projected-warming-will-exceed-the-long-term-thermal-limits-of-rice-cultivation.png?resize=640%2C427&amp;ssl=1 640w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-Copilot_Projected-warming-will-exceed-the-long-term-thermal-limits-of-rice-cultivation.png?resize=1200%2C800&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-Copilot_Projected-warming-will-exceed-the-long-term-thermal-limits-of-rice-cultivation.png?w=1536&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-Copilot_Projected-warming-will-exceed-the-long-term-thermal-limits-of-rice-cultivation.png?w=1446&amp;ssl=1 1446w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2026\/06\/01\/the-rice-catastrophe-paper-and-the-rcp-8-5-rug-pull\/\">Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/author\/jeeztheadmin\/\">Charles Rotter<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s43247-025-03108-0\">new paper published earlier this year in&nbsp;<em>Communications Earth &amp; Environment<\/em><\/a>&nbsp;reports that the area of land in Asia\u2019s major rice-producing nations exceeding rice\u2019s long-term thermal limits will expand by ten to thirty times by the end of this century. The lead author is Nicolas Gauthier of the Florida Museum of Natural History. The funding came in part from the Zegar Family Foundation. The press coverage has been the kind of coverage one would expect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sample headlines:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.livescience.com\/planet-earth\/global-warming-is-accelerating-5-000-times-faster-than-rice-can-evolve\">\u201cGlobal warming is accelerating 5,000 times faster than rice can evolve\u201d<\/a>&nbsp;(Live Science).&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/phys.org\/news\/2026-04-years-cultivation-rice-thermal-limit.html\">\u201cAfter 9,000 years of cultivation, rice has reached its thermal limit\u201d<\/a>&nbsp;(Phys.org). The story is rice will fail, billions will suffer, and the climate is to blame.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The paper defines rice\u2019s thermal limits as the 95% temperature range at locations where rice is currently grown, supplemented by 9000 years of archaeological occurrences. It then runs <strong>CMIP6 projections<\/strong> under three <strong>Shared Socioeconomic Pathway scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP3-7.0, SSP5-8.5)<\/strong>, counts grid cells that exceed the thresholds, and reports the multiplier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The headline range derives from spanning the three scenarios. Two of those three are now formally dead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Two of the three scenarios just got retired<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As WUWT readers will know from our&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2026\/05\/09\/ding-dong-rcp8-5-is-dead\/\">extensive<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2026\/05\/14\/shocked-silence-greets-rcp8-5-demise-as-implausibility-ruling-leaves-net-zero-fearmongering-in-tatters\/\">recent<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2026\/05\/24\/ssp5-8-5-garbage-in-doomcasting-out\/\">coverage<\/a>, the ScenarioMIP team formally eliminated SSP5-8.5 and SSP3-7.0 from CMIP7 on April 7, 2026. The&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5194\/gmd-19-2627-2026\">Van Vuuren et al. paper in&nbsp;<em>Geoscientific Model Development<\/em><\/a>&nbsp;is the document that did it. Pielke called this&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.aei.org\/articles\/rcp8-5-is-officially-dead\/\">\u201cthe most significant development in climate science in decades.\u201d<\/a>&nbsp;The new CMIP7 HIGH scenario, on Pielke\u2019s apples-to-apples FaIR comparison, produces about 0.9 \u00b0C less warming than SSP5-8.5 by 2081-2100, and roughly 1.4 \u00b0C less than IPCC AR6 reported.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The official justification reads:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On the high-end of the range, the CMIP6 high emission levels (quantified by SSP5-8.5) have become implausible, based on trends in the costs of renewables, the emergence of climate policy and recent emission trends.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Read it twice. The scenarios are not implausible because they always were. They are implausible because <strong>climate policy and renewable energy<\/strong> have&nbsp;<em>made them<\/em>&nbsp;so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is the gaslighting, and it is not subtle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For fifteen years, anyone who pointed out that <strong>RCP 8.5<\/strong> was built on impossible assumptions about coal expansion, population growth, and technological stagnation was branded a denier. The science was settled. The scenarios were peer-reviewed. The skeptics were wrong, possibly malicious, certainly not worth engaging. Now those scenarios have been retired by the institutions that built them, and the institutions are not apologizing. They are taking credit. The new story is that the scenarios used to be valid, and our heroic climate policies have made them implausible. Bask in the glow of the policy victory you funded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decade and a half of climate impact literature downstream of these scenarios is not being retracted. Pielke counts more than 2,600 studies in 2026 alone using the now-dead high-emission scenarios, and tens of thousands published in the preceding decade. The fearmongering headlines they produced are not being corrected. The trillions in policy investment justified by their projections are not being refunded. The institutional apparatus simply pivots, gives itself an award, and moves on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The scenarios were implausibly high from the outset. Coal use has been roughly flat globally for a decade. Population projections have been revised downward across nearly every major forecast. Wind and solar combined remain under 10% of global primary energy. None of those values support a scenario built on a near-fivefold expansion of coal use through 2100. RCP 8.5 and SSP5-8.5 were always physically and demographically incoherent. The official 2026 explanation, which credits climate policy with making them implausible, is a rewriting of the record that requires the reader to forget what the underlying assumptions actually were.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That is the broader story. For the rice paper specifically, the operational fact is this: of the three scenarios the paper hinges on, two have just been killed. The headline ten-to-thirty range comes from spanning all three. The ten end is SSP1-2.6, still valid. The thirty end is SSP5-8.5, dead. The middle is SSP3-7.0, also dead. The press ran with the thirty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The rest of the problems are routine<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The methodology defines rice\u2019s thermal limits as the 95% temperature range of places where rice is currently cultivated, then treats this as a biological constraint. It is not. It is a measurement of where rice has been grown, which is determined by rivers, paddy infrastructure, civilizational history, and ten thousand years of cultural practice. The archaeological supplement reports that no Holocene rice site experienced a mean annual temperature above 28.2 \u00b0C. This confirms that ancient civilizations did not establish themselves in the hottest deserts on earth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The paper concedes in its own introduction that rice cultivation in China has shifted northward and intensified irrigation in hot zones, and that this has&nbsp;<q>masked any potential adverse effects of rising temperatures.<\/q>&nbsp;That is the system adapting. The projections credit no further adaptation. The paper also notes that the <strong>Green Revolution<\/strong> achieved rapid breeding advances within thirty years, then assumes the next thirty years of breeding, equipped with genomic tools the Green Revolution did not have, will produce less.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The 5,000-times-faster-than-rice-can-evolve number<\/strong> that drove the press headlines comes from a comparison of modern warming rates to&nbsp;<em>wild<\/em>&nbsp;grass niche evolution. The relevant rate for rice is human breeding, which moves several orders of magnitude faster than natural drift. And the lead author himself told&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.livescience.com\/planet-earth\/global-warming-is-accelerating-5-000-times-faster-than-rice-can-evolve\">Live Science<\/a>&nbsp;that&nbsp;<q>you could keep global rice production the same by moving cultivation around,<\/q>&nbsp;which is a different claim from the catastrophe framing of the press cycle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>What this looks like from the cheap seats<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The rice paper was published three months before its principal scenarios were formally retired. The press cycle that ran with its catastrophic numbers has not been updated. The 2,600 impact studies still in the 2026 literature have not been corrected. The institutions that built the framework, defended it for fifteen years, declared it implausible last month, and are now taking credit for the implausibility are not apologizing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Rice has fed civilizations<\/strong> through the <strong>Holocene Climatic Optimum<\/strong>, the<strong> mid-Holocene warm spike<\/strong>, the <strong>Medieval Warm Period<\/strong>, and the <strong>Little Ice Age<\/strong>. The paper\u2019s own author concedes that aggregate production can be maintained. The paper\u2019s own introduction acknowledges that adaptation is already masking the warming that has occurred. And the paper\u2019s thirty-times figure rests on a scenario that no longer exists in the literature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The press will not mention any of this. That is the press cycle doing its job, which is what the press cycle has always been for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new paper published earlier this year in Communications Earth &#038; Environment reports that the area of land in Asia\u2019s major rice-producing nations exceeding rice\u2019s long-term thermal limits will expand by ten to thirty times by the end of this century. The lead author is Nicolas Gauthier of the Florida Museum of Natural History. The funding came in part from the Zegar Family Foundation. The press coverage has been the kind of coverage one would expect.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":448194,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691821061,691829863,691818087,691832963,691843465,691818369],"class_list":["post-448192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-climate-catastrophism","tag-cmip6-projections","tag-global-warming","tag-rcp-8-5-scenario","tag-rcp-8-5-science-fiction","tag-rice-production","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/0-Copilot_Projected-warming-will-exceed-the-long-term-thermal-limits-of-rice-cultivation.png?fit=1536%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1SAU","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":364091,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=364091","url_meta":{"origin":448192,"position":0},"title":"Projected Increase in Heat-Related Deaths in Europe: Misleading Models and Statistical Fearmongering","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/31\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent study published in Nature Medicine\u00a0warns that Europe could face up to 2.3 million annual heat-related deaths by 2100 unless drastic emission reductions are implemented. The dire prediction, eagerly echoed in headlines, paints a catastrophic future for the continent. However, closer examination reveals that this projection rests on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/OIG-32.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/OIG-32.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/OIG-32.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/OIG-32.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":443421,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=443421","url_meta":{"origin":448192,"position":1},"title":"A Generation of Kids Thinks They Have No Future. Science Just Admitted Why.","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/10\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"For nearly two decades, a single climate model scenario haunted virtually every apocalyptic headline you read about our planet\u2019s future. Vanishing coastlines, catastrophic droughts, mass extinctions, cities underwater \u2014 almost all of it was built on a scenario called RCP 8.5.","rel":"","context":"In \"children\"","block_context":{"text":"children","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=children"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0-A-Generation-of-Kids-Thinks-They-Have-No-Future.-Science-Just-Admitted-Why.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0-A-Generation-of-Kids-Thinks-They-Have-No-Future.-Science-Just-Admitted-Why.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0-A-Generation-of-Kids-Thinks-They-Have-No-Future.-Science-Just-Admitted-Why.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0-A-Generation-of-Kids-Thinks-They-Have-No-Future.-Science-Just-Admitted-Why.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0-A-Generation-of-Kids-Thinks-They-Have-No-Future.-Science-Just-Admitted-Why.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":446033,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=446033","url_meta":{"origin":448192,"position":2},"title":"Spot On, New York Post, Billions Have Been Wasted Based on Fake Climate Science","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/23\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent New York Post (NYP) article, titled \u201cBillions have been wasted on UN\u2019s climate change lies,\u201d describes how billions, if not trillions, of dollars have been spent worldwide attempting to slow or stop the world from experiencing the extreme climate change as forecast by the flawed, but widely used\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0right-nyp.jpg?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0right-nyp.jpg?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0right-nyp.jpg?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0right-nyp.jpg?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0right-nyp.jpg?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":318163,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=318163","url_meta":{"origin":448192,"position":3},"title":"Climate Cooking:\u00a0 from Roger Pielke Jr.","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/16\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Pielke Jr. starts with an update on his important work in challenging flawed narratives of catastrophe.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0Climate_Politics_Roger_Pielke_Jr-1007x1024-1.jpg?fit=1007%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0Climate_Politics_Roger_Pielke_Jr-1007x1024-1.jpg?fit=1007%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0Climate_Politics_Roger_Pielke_Jr-1007x1024-1.jpg?fit=1007%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/0Climate_Politics_Roger_Pielke_Jr-1007x1024-1.jpg?fit=1007%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374869,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=374869","url_meta":{"origin":448192,"position":4},"title":"Gila Monsters Are Threatened by Development Not Warming, Science News","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/12\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent\u00a0Science News\u00a0article, \u201cGila monsters may struggle to survive climate change,\u201d claims that Gila monsters living in the Mojave Desert may be displaced and lose habitat due to climate change. The story is purely speculative with no proof given that Gila monsters have suffered from the past hundred-plus years of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0AC0788_PK_Gila-Monster_154x111_1280px__53514.jpg?fit=1200%2C852&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0AC0788_PK_Gila-Monster_154x111_1280px__53514.jpg?fit=1200%2C852&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0AC0788_PK_Gila-Monster_154x111_1280px__53514.jpg?fit=1200%2C852&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0AC0788_PK_Gila-Monster_154x111_1280px__53514.jpg?fit=1200%2C852&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0AC0788_PK_Gila-Monster_154x111_1280px__53514.jpg?fit=1200%2C852&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":446688,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=446688","url_meta":{"origin":448192,"position":5},"title":"Heartland Institute Experts React to President Trump\u2019s Social Media Post About UN Retreating from Extremist Climate Models","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/27\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe United Nations TOP Climate Committee just admitted that its own projections (RCP8.5) were WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! For far too long Climate Activism has been used by Dumocrats to scare Americans, push horrible Energy Polices, and fund BILLIONS into their bogus research programs.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"agenda-driven modeling\"","block_context":{"text":"agenda-driven modeling","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=agenda-driven-modeling"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Trump.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Trump.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Trump.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Trump.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Trump.jpg?fit=1200%2C600&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/448192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=448192"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/448192\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":448206,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/448192\/revisions\/448206"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/448194"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=448192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=448192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=448192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}