{"id":446230,"date":"2026-05-24T04:44:14","date_gmt":"2026-05-24T11:44:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=446230"},"modified":"2026-05-24T04:44:16","modified_gmt":"2026-05-24T11:44:16","slug":"waste-of-the-day-radioactive-wasted-money","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=446230","title":{"rendered":"Waste of the Day: Radioactive Wasted Money"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Jeremy Portnoy<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Topline: <\/strong>The federal government is so prone to excessive spending that it is even wasting money on waste itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Department of Energy could save up to $229.2 billion over the next several years by changing the way it disposes of nuclear waste, according to the Government Accountability Office<\/a>. A vague and poorly understood law from the 1980s makes the process overly burdensome and expensive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Key facts: <\/strong>The Department of Energy is in charge of treating water, soil, equipment and more that were contaminated from nuclear weapons production during World War II and the Cold War. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Disposing of \u201chigh-level\u201d radioactive waste is time-consuming and expensive. It must be stored for years to let some of its radioactivity decay, and then it is buried deep underground. \u201cLow-level\u201d waste, which has less radiation, is easier to get rid of. It gets placed in a steel or concrete drum and is buried just a few feet below ground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Waste of the Day 5.22.26
Open the Books<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But, according to the GAO, the definitions for each kind of waste are ambiguous and have not been updated since 1983. There is no standard way to measure what federal law considers \u201chighly radioactive.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To be safe, the Department of Energy errs on the side of classifying nuclear waste as high-level. It spends billions every year on the expensive storage and burial of waste that would likely be classified as low-level if the 1983 law were updated. The department told the GAO that otherwise, it might be sued by environmental advocacy groups for not following a strict interpretation of the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nuclear waste treatment plants are located in New York, South Carolina, Idaho and Washington. The Washington site alone could save up to $210 billion in 14 years by classifying 80% of its high-level waste as low-level without sacrificing safety, according to the GAO. The other three sites could save a combined $19.2 billion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Search all federal, state and local salaries and vendor spending with the world\u2019s largest government spending database at <\/em>OpenTheBooks.com<\/em><\/a>. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Summary: <\/strong>Congress should consider updating the legal definition of high-level radioactive waste if cost savings can be realized without compromising safety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The #WasteOfTheDay is brought to you by the forensic auditors at OpenTheBooks.com<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article was originally published by RealClearInvestigations and made available via RealClearWire.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Department of Energy could save up to $229.2 billion over the next several years by changing the way it disposes of nuclear waste, according to the Government Accountability Office. A vague and poorly understood law from the 1980s makes the process overly burdensome and expensive.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":446232,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691823935,691834572,691818206,691832274,691843256],"class_list":["post-446230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-department-of-energy","tag-government-accountability-office-gao","tag-nuclear-power","tag-nuclear-waste","tag-openthebooks-com","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1S5g","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":470079,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=470079","url_meta":{"origin":446230,"position":0},"title":"U.S. Nuclear Waste: History of a Failed Endeavor","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/11\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"For 80 years, the U.S. government and its industrial and utility partners have failed to understand the problem of the noxious and dangerous nuclear waste for war and peace and successfully respond. It began at Hanford during World War II\u2019s Manhattan Project when little attention was paid to what was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)\"","block_context":{"text":"Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atomic-energy-commission-aec"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/0-U.S.-Nuclear-Waste.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/0-U.S.-Nuclear-Waste.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/0-U.S.-Nuclear-Waste.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/0-U.S.-Nuclear-Waste.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/0-U.S.-Nuclear-Waste.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292183,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292183","url_meta":{"origin":446230,"position":1},"title":"Time to Bring Nuclear Energy Into the 21st Century","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/21\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"There is no question that these proposed reforms are a major departure from the status quo, but they are reasonable, not radical. They would foster good governance and economic progress in the industry. As COP28 representatives discuss how to reduce carbon while raising global living standards, nuclear energy should be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act\"","block_context":{"text":"1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=1982-nuclear-waste-policy-act"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2fd4d8bc5e545a7c41ae93fe88a4abde.jpeg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2fd4d8bc5e545a7c41ae93fe88a4abde.jpeg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2fd4d8bc5e545a7c41ae93fe88a4abde.jpeg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2fd4d8bc5e545a7c41ae93fe88a4abde.jpeg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2fd4d8bc5e545a7c41ae93fe88a4abde.jpeg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":417424,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=417424","url_meta":{"origin":446230,"position":2},"title":"Time to build reactors fueled by nuclear waste","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/16\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"According to noted stock trader Ross Givens, many investors are pouring money into nuclear energy stocks that may never deliver. Innovative generation IV and V reactor designs remain unapproved by a slow-moving federal government. Yet investors remain hopeful that this bottleneck will soon be removed.","rel":"","context":"In \"generation IV and V \u201cfast\u201d reactors\"","block_context":{"text":"generation IV and V \u201cfast\u201d reactors","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=generation-iv-and-v-fast-reactors"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMA4B0BlTW_Ov2eWRuK7H2vR6d7oJ4XKvQ8wfR1kED90Z9ztBse1yiIQY2WHOjAlSIYsq2rNllWQKJLykQ__-0p_sz0xS2NBgPOgo40lqlsvVMqklAclk7bbxSFw1Mp-1.jpeg?fit=1198%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMA4B0BlTW_Ov2eWRuK7H2vR6d7oJ4XKvQ8wfR1kED90Z9ztBse1yiIQY2WHOjAlSIYsq2rNllWQKJLykQ__-0p_sz0xS2NBgPOgo40lqlsvVMqklAclk7bbxSFw1Mp-1.jpeg?fit=1198%2C799&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMA4B0BlTW_Ov2eWRuK7H2vR6d7oJ4XKvQ8wfR1kED90Z9ztBse1yiIQY2WHOjAlSIYsq2rNllWQKJLykQ__-0p_sz0xS2NBgPOgo40lqlsvVMqklAclk7bbxSFw1Mp-1.jpeg?fit=1198%2C799&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMA4B0BlTW_Ov2eWRuK7H2vR6d7oJ4XKvQ8wfR1kED90Z9ztBse1yiIQY2WHOjAlSIYsq2rNllWQKJLykQ__-0p_sz0xS2NBgPOgo40lqlsvVMqklAclk7bbxSFw1Mp-1.jpeg?fit=1198%2C799&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMA4B0BlTW_Ov2eWRuK7H2vR6d7oJ4XKvQ8wfR1kED90Z9ztBse1yiIQY2WHOjAlSIYsq2rNllWQKJLykQ__-0p_sz0xS2NBgPOgo40lqlsvVMqklAclk7bbxSFw1Mp-1.jpeg?fit=1198%2C799&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291727,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=291727","url_meta":{"origin":446230,"position":3},"title":"Time to Bring Nuclear Energy Into the 21st Century","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/18\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The silver lining of this month\u2019s United Nations COP28 global warming conference is the\u00a0growing consensus that nuclear energy\u00a0is critical to meeting national carbon dioxide reduction goals.","rel":"","context":"In \"COP28\"","block_context":{"text":"COP28","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=cop28"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Nuclear-Power-Plant-at-night-ratio-2-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Nuclear-Power-Plant-at-night-ratio-2-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Nuclear-Power-Plant-at-night-ratio-2-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Nuclear-Power-Plant-at-night-ratio-2-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0Nuclear-Power-Plant-at-night-ratio-2-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C683&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245106,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=245106","url_meta":{"origin":446230,"position":4},"title":"Smashed: Claims Solar Power Part of \u2018Clean\u2019 & \u2018Green\u2019 Future Simply Don\u2019t Stack Up","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/23\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The green energy industry has a dirty secret.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-663.png?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-663.png?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-663.png?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-663.png?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258707,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=258707","url_meta":{"origin":446230,"position":5},"title":"Nuclear Now: Time to Scrap Subsidised Wind & Solar Scam & Back Serious Power\u00a0Generation","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/23\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Renewable energy rent seekers and the wind and sun cult hate nuclear power because it works, 24 x 365, whatever the weather. It doesn\u2019t need batteries and it doesn\u2019t need backup.","rel":"","context":"In \"Nuclear power\"","block_context":{"text":"Nuclear power","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=nuclear-power"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0_received_1016596765771562.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0_received_1016596765771562.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0_received_1016596765771562.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0_received_1016596765771562.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0_received_1016596765771562.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0-ChatGPT-Waste-of-the-Day-Radioactive-Wasted-Money.png?fit=1600%2C983&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/446230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=446230"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/446230\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":446241,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/446230\/revisions\/446241"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/446232"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=446230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=446230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=446230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}