{"id":446093,"date":"2026-05-23T08:32:44","date_gmt":"2026-05-23T15:32:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=446093"},"modified":"2026-05-24T16:50:01","modified_gmt":"2026-05-24T23:50:01","slug":"greenwishing-shiny-promises-fall-short","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=446093","title":{"rendered":"Greenwishing: Shiny Promises Fall Short"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From Master Resource<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Stephen Heins<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve got to call out the greenwishing of energy\u2019s future. Excitement is good; delusion isn\u2019t. Let\u2019s demand proof, not promises. Reliable, affordable energy isn\u2019t a luxury\u2014it\u2019s the foundation of modern life\u2014time to get serious about what energy technologies actually scales.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

I\u2019ve been watching this energy debate for years, and I\u2019m tired of the hype. We\u2019ve got politicians, billionaires, and startups promising the next big \u201cgreen\u201d breakthrough that\u2019ll solve everything from climate change to data center power demands, with no downsides.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But most of it is what I call greenwishing\u2014a cousin to greenwashing, where they polish up promising energy ideas, but unproven, unscalable technologies with fancy renderings, press releases, and government grants, all while the real engineering and economics lag behind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t get me wrong. I\u2019m all for clean, reliable, affordable energy. As a guy in the Frozen Tundra (Wisconsin), I know we need power that works in the dead of winter and doesn\u2019t bankrupt families or factories. Wind and solar have their place in backup systems, but they\u2019re intermittent. Nuclear has proven itself, but new construction will drag on for a decade or more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The real excitement\u2014and the real risk\u2014lies in these next-gen sources that sound amazing on paper but aren\u2019t ready for prime time. Let\u2019s break down a few big ones that fit my \u201cgreenwishing\u201d label perfectly as of 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nuclear Fusion: The Eternal 30-Years-Away Star<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fusion is the poster child for greenwishing. The dream is simple: smash hydrogen atoms as the sun does, get clean, nearly limitless energy with no long-lived waste, and power the world forever. Private investment has exploded past of billions dollars, with companies like Commonwealth Fusion Systems talking about grid power in the 2030s. ITER in France keeps plugging along, and we\u2019ve seen net energy gains in labs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But let\u2019s be real. We\u2019ve been hearing \u201cfusion is 30 years away\u201d since the 1970s, and it\u2019s still mostly true. Engineering hurdles are massive: containing plasma at insane temperatures, materials that survive neutron bombardment, repetitive operation at power-plant scale, and costs that make economic sense. Even optimistic projections put commercial rollout decades out, and that\u2019s before supply chains, regulations, and grid integration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s exciting science, but clearly not a baseload solution for the Frozen Tundra or anywhere else for that matter. Not yet. We\u2019re greenwishing it by treating demo breakthroughs as if their future is guaranteed. On the other hand, AI data centers hungry for power can\u2019t wait for stars in a bottle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Green Hydrogen: The Swiss Army Knife That Costs a Fortune<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Green hydrogen\u2014produced by electrolyzing water with renewable electricity\u2014gets hyped as the answer for heavy industry, trucking, shipping, and even power storage. Governments are pouring subsidies into projects, and announcements are made left and right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It could decarbonize sectors that batteries or electrification can\u2019t touch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The problems? Cost and efficiency kill it. Green H2 is still way more expensive than gray (fossil-based) hydrogen, thanks to the high cost of electrolyzers, renewable power variability, and massive energy losses in production, compression, storage, and transport. Efficiency hovers around 60-70%, and infrastructure barely exists at scale\u2014no pipelines, ports, or refueling networks ready for gigatons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Blue hydrogen (with carbon capture) is scaling faster in the U.S., but it comes with its own emissions baggage from methane leaks and lower climate benefits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We\u2019re greenwishing this one hard by pretending its future is solid while real deployments lag and rely on massive taxpayer support. For places like Wisconsin with cold winters and industrial needs, reliable hydrogen would be great\u2014if it weren\u2019t so far from economic reality. Demand uncertainty and custom-built projects create a economic chicken-and-egg problem that won\u2019t vanish with more announcements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Advanced Geothermal: Hot Rocks with Huge Potential, But Drilling Hell<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Next-gen geothermal\u2014enhanced (EGS) or superhot rock systems\u2014promise 24\/7 baseload power almost anywhere by drilling deep, fracturing rock, and circulating fluid to harvest heat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Companies like Fervo are building projects in Utah, with Cape Station eyeing commercial operation soon. MIT spinouts and others are pushing millimeter-wave drilling and closed-loop designs. It\u2019s not as flashy as fusion, but it could be a game-changer for firm clean power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Challenges remain big. Drilling costs in hot, hard rock are brutal, even with fracking\u2019s oil-and-gas tech adaptations. Induced seismicity fears, water use, and long-term reservoir sustainability need to be proven at scale. While costs have dropped and projects are advancing (Fervo\u2019s expansions, pilots in Germany), we\u2019re still talking small MW outputs compared to what the grid needs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s promising, but greenwishing creeps in when boosters claim it\u2019ll unlock terawatts overnight without addressing the \u201cgreat filter\u201d of repeated, cheap drilling success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tidal and Wave Energy: Predictable Power from the Ocean, If It Survives<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tidal power taps reliable lunar cycles; wave energy harvests ocean swells. Both sound perfect for coastal or island grids\u2014predictable, dense energy without fuel. Prototypes exist, especially in Europe, with some tidal stream projects operating.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reality check: Harsh marine environments destroy equipment fast. Corrosion, biofouling, storms, and high installation\/maintenance costs make LCOE (levelized cost) sky-high\u2014often $130-280\/MWh versus $20-50 for wind\/solar. Suitable high-flow sites are limited, supply chains are immature, and environmental impacts on marine life continue to spark environmental debate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wave Tech is even further behind. We continue greenwishing these energy solutions by celebrating small demos while ignoring that total global installed capacity remains tiny after decades of effort. Great niche potential, lousy broad scalability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

SMR: Closer, But Still Not There<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Small Modular Reactors deserve mention, too. Factory-built nuclear reactors under 300 MW could be cheaper and faster to deploy, and could be sited flexibly for data centers or towns. U.S. projects are advancing with DOE funding, and some designs aim for early 2030s operations. Russia and China already have units running.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But in general licensing, supply chains, first-of-a-kind costs, and public acceptance slow things down to a crawl. They\u2019re more proven than pure fusion, but they still carry energy\u2019s vibes when pitched as instant solutions that ignore regulatory and economic risks. Traditional nuclear works fine; scaling new designs is the hurdle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Greenwishing Has Consequences<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

These technologies aren\u2019t scams\u2014they represent real human ingenuity chasing hard problems. Private capital, DOE programs, and international efforts show momentum. But the danger is overpromising. We delay proven options like expanding reliable nuclear, improving grid resilience, or pragmatic mixes of gas, hydro, and renewables with storage while chasing moonshots. Energy demand is surging from AI, EVs, and manufacturing. Hyping unready tech risks blackouts, higher bills, or policy whiplash when timelines slip or disappear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Wisconsin, we value practicality. Build what works. Support R&D aggressively\u2014fusion, hot rock geothermal, better electrolyzers\u2014but don\u2019t bet the farm on greenish timelines. Prioritize energy density, reliability, and cost. Baseload matters. Innovation thrives with honest engineering, not marketing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The path forward? Aggressive permitting reform, sustained funding for demos that actually prove scalability, and an all-of-the-above mindset that doesn\u2019t dismiss working tech for perfect future ones. Fusion might power the 2050s or beyond. Green hydrogen could carve out industrial niches if costs crash. Advanced geothermal and ocean energy at best might fill regional gaps. But today, they\u2019re aspirational with capital A.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We\u2019ve got to call out the greenwishing of energy\u2019s future. Excitement is good; delusion isn\u2019t. Let\u2019s demand proof, not promises. Reliable, affordable energy isn\u2019t a luxury\u2014it\u2019s the foundation of modern life\u2014time to get serious about what energy technologies actually scales.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Stephen Heins writes at The Word Merchant,<\/a> where this post<\/a> first appeared. His previous post on the energy contributions of Robert L. Bradley Jr. is here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I\u2019ve been watching this energy debate for years, and I\u2019m tired of the hype. We\u2019ve got politicians, billionaires, and startups promising the next big \u201cgreen\u201d breakthrough that\u2019ll solve everything from climate change to data center power demands, with no downsides.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":446095,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691843245,691843246,691819849,691843244,691843247],"class_list":["post-446093","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-energys-future","tag-geothermal-enhanced-egs","tag-green-hydrogen","tag-greenwishing","tag-tidal-and-wave-energy","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0-ChatGPT-Greenwishing-Shiny-Promises-Fall-Short.png?fit=1402%2C1122&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1S33","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":248137,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=248137","url_meta":{"origin":446093,"position":0},"title":"Reality Bites: Europe\u2019s Wind & Solar Disaster Forces Serious Reversal On \u2018Green\u2019 Transition","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/17\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Investment in new wind turbines and solar panels has plummeted across Europe. Coal-fired power is back in vogue and nuclear plants are the next must-have.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/1a4120207027627f0b.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/1a4120207027627f0b.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/1a4120207027627f0b.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/1a4120207027627f0b.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/1a4120207027627f0b.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279094,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=279094","url_meta":{"origin":446093,"position":1},"title":"UK wind power hype fails the reality\u00a0test","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/17\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Wind power triumphs: UK\u2019s energy mix breezes past fossil fuels\u2019 \u2013 trumpets Energy Live News. But turning to Gridwatch this morning, the current picture is totally different: wind minimal, gas nearly half of total electricity generation. As usual, reports misleadingly highlight wind *capacity*, which is merely the theoretical maximum output\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"reality\u00a0test\"","block_context":{"text":"reality\u00a0test","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=reality-test"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0NRELs-91-Year-Old-Palmer-Carlin___a-Wind-Energy-Pioneer-News-.-796358.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0NRELs-91-Year-Old-Palmer-Carlin___a-Wind-Energy-Pioneer-News-.-796358.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0NRELs-91-Year-Old-Palmer-Carlin___a-Wind-Energy-Pioneer-News-.-796358.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0NRELs-91-Year-Old-Palmer-Carlin___a-Wind-Energy-Pioneer-News-.-796358.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/0NRELs-91-Year-Old-Palmer-Carlin___a-Wind-Energy-Pioneer-News-.-796358.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250927,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=250927","url_meta":{"origin":446093,"position":2},"title":"Climate Obsessed British Politicians are Embracing Fantasy Energy Solutions","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The British Government is seriously telling people in working class areas they will have jobs at an operational, power producing nuclear fusion plant by 2040","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0AdobeStock_328816750-scaled-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0AdobeStock_328816750-scaled-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0AdobeStock_328816750-scaled-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0AdobeStock_328816750-scaled-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0AdobeStock_328816750-scaled-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294666,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=294666","url_meta":{"origin":446093,"position":3},"title":"Are \u2018Green\u2019 Agendas Carrying Governors to Political Cliffs?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/12\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon are riding the same \u201cgreen energy\u201d horse, trotting into the sunset \u2014 or toward a political cliff.","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/image-211.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/image-211.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/image-211.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/image-211.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263667,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=263667","url_meta":{"origin":446093,"position":4},"title":"Net Zero Crunch Time\u2013Dieter Helm","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/24\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"For years, Net Zero was something in the far distant future. Politicians could make all sorts of vague promises and set targets, in the knowledge that their successors would actually have to pay for it all.","rel":"","context":"In \"Diether Helm\"","block_context":{"text":"Diether Helm","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=diether-helm"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Screenshot-2023-06-24-175630.png?fit=936%2C885&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Screenshot-2023-06-24-175630.png?fit=936%2C885&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Screenshot-2023-06-24-175630.png?fit=936%2C885&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0Screenshot-2023-06-24-175630.png?fit=936%2C885&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268271,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=268271","url_meta":{"origin":446093,"position":5},"title":"DAVID BLACKMON: Here\u2019s What Our Climate Overlords Fail To Understand About Fossil Fuels","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/19\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Where oil and natural gas are concerned, the report adds, \u201cData indicates that future demand for oil and gas is UNDERESTIMATED, while demand destruction is HYPED.\u201d That conclusion is supported by repeated upwards revisions of global demand estimates this year by both OPEC and the International Energy Agency.","rel":"","context":"In \"Energy Outlook Advisors (EOA)\"","block_context":{"text":"Energy Outlook Advisors (EOA)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=energy-outlook-advisors-eoa"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0GettyImages-81677556.jpg?fit=1200%2C802&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0GettyImages-81677556.jpg?fit=1200%2C802&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0GettyImages-81677556.jpg?fit=1200%2C802&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0GettyImages-81677556.jpg?fit=1200%2C802&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0GettyImages-81677556.jpg?fit=1200%2C802&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/446093","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=446093"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/446093\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":446101,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/446093\/revisions\/446101"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/446095"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=446093"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=446093"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=446093"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}