{"id":441621,"date":"2026-04-27T10:18:01","date_gmt":"2026-04-27T17:18:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=441621"},"modified":"2026-04-27T10:18:03","modified_gmt":"2026-04-27T17:18:03","slug":"the-psychology-of-climate-doom-how-narrative-outpaces-nuance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=441621","title":{"rendered":"The Psychology of Climate Doom: How Narrative Outpaces Nuance"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"485\" data-attachment-id=\"441622\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?attachment_id=441622\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-Psychology-of-Climate-Doom-How-Narrative-Outpaces-Nuance.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"1168,784\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"0 The Psychology of Climate Doom How Narrative Outpaces Nuance\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-Psychology-of-Climate-Doom-How-Narrative-Outpaces-Nuance.jpg?fit=723%2C485&amp;ssl=1\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-Psychology-of-Climate-Doom-How-Narrative-Outpaces-Nuance.jpg?resize=723%2C485&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-441622\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-Psychology-of-Climate-Doom-How-Narrative-Outpaces-Nuance.jpg?resize=1024%2C687&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-Psychology-of-Climate-Doom-How-Narrative-Outpaces-Nuance.jpg?resize=300%2C201&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-Psychology-of-Climate-Doom-How-Narrative-Outpaces-Nuance.jpg?resize=768%2C516&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-Psychology-of-Climate-Doom-How-Narrative-Outpaces-Nuance.jpg?resize=640%2C430&amp;ssl=1 640w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-Psychology-of-Climate-Doom-How-Narrative-Outpaces-Nuance.jpg?w=1168&amp;ssl=1 1168w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2026\/04\/25\/the-psychology-of-climate-doom-how-narrative-outpaces-nuance\/\">Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/author\/wattsupwiththat\/\">Anthony Watts<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Spend enough time watching the public discussion around climate, and a pattern emerges that has less to do with radiative physics and more to do with how people process information under uncertainty. The persistence of \u201cclimate doom\u201d narratives isn\u2019t mysterious\u2014it follows recognizable psychological and social patterns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Before digging into the details, here\u2019s the short list of what drives it:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Humans are wired to prioritize alarming information over neutral data<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Media coverage amplifies extreme events while downplaying context<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cConsensus\u201d messaging substitutes for deeper understanding<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Scientific uncertainty gets compressed into false precision<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Moral framing turns disagreement into a social risk<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Worst-case scenarios are treated as baseline expectations<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Keep those in mind\u2014they show up repeatedly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Start with a basic feature of cognition: humans are highly sensitive to perceived threats. Psychologists call this negativity bias, and it ensures that alarming language\u2014\u201ccatastrophic,\u201d \u201cirreversible,\u201d \u201ctipping points\u201d\u2014carries more weight than measured descriptions of gradual change with uncertainty ranges. That bias interacts with the availability heuristic, where people judge reality based on what they can easily recall. If media coverage repeatedly highlights wildfires, hurricanes, or heatwaves and links them to climate change, those events become intuitive proof, even when long-term datasets show more complexity or variability. Vivid imagery tends to override statistical context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Most people don\u2019t engage directly with technical literature, so they rely on institutional signals. Phrases like \u201cscientific consensus\u201d act as shortcuts, conveying that the issue is settled and discouraging further scrutiny. While there is broad agreement on some fundamentals, that agreement often gets extended in the public mind to areas where uncertainty remains\u2014such as climate sensitivity, feedback mechanisms, and long-term projections. The complexity of climate modeling adds to this disconnect. Models depend on assumptions about emissions, cloud dynamics, and ocean behavior, and the literature routinely acknowledges uncertainty:&nbsp;<em>\u201cClimate projections are subject to uncertainties arising from internal variability, model structure, and future emissions scenarios.\u201d<\/em>&nbsp;Yet in public communication, those uncertainties are frequently compressed into precise-sounding forecasts, where ranges become single numbers and scenarios are treated as expectations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At the same time, climate has increasingly been framed in moral terms\u2014\u201csaving the planet,\u201d \u201cprotecting future generations\u201d\u2014which shifts the discussion from technical analysis into ethical territory. Once that shift occurs, disagreement carries social consequences. Skepticism can be interpreted as irresponsibility, and nuance can be viewed as obstruction. Media ecosystems reinforce this dynamic by amplifying emotionally engaging content, often favoring the most dramatic interpretations. Over time, users encounter a narrower range of perspectives, creating a perception of unanimity and reinforcing confidence in more extreme conclusions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another important factor is the treatment of scenarios. In scientific work, a range of possibilities is explored, including worst-case outcomes. These are useful for testing models, but in public discourse they often become the default narrative. High-end emissions pathways or upper-bound sensitivity estimates are presented as likely futures rather than conditional ones, anchoring perception around extreme outcomes. There\u2019s also a broader psychological appeal here\u2014large-scale crisis narratives provide structure, clarity, and a sense of purpose in a complex world, making them particularly compelling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">None of this means there is no signal in the data. Temperatures have risen, and atmospheric CO\u2082 has increased. The complexity lies in interpretation: how sensitive the system is, how reliable long-term projections are, and how specific events should be attributed. Those questions remain open to varying degrees, even if public messaging often implies otherwise. Where this becomes consequential is in policy. Decisions based on high-confidence, worst-case framing can prioritize urgency over reliability, with real implications for energy systems, economic stability, and access to resources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Skepticism plays a necessary role in keeping those assumptions in check. It involves testing models against observations, questioning inputs, and maintaining visibility of uncertainty. When that process is sidelined, the feedback loop that refines scientific understanding weakens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Bottom Line<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The persistence of climate doom narratives follows a predictable pattern:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Human cognition amplifies threats<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Media systems favor dramatic framing<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Social dynamics reinforce consensus signals<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Scientific uncertainty gets compressed or omitted<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By the time the message reaches the public, it reflects more than the data\u2014it reflects the filters it passed through.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Understanding those filters doesn\u2019t resolve every question in climate science. It does make it easier to see why the conversation so often leans toward certainty and urgency, even when the underlying evidence remains probabilistic and open to interpretation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Spend enough time watching the public discussion around climate, and a pattern emerges that has less to do with radiative physics and more to do with how people process information under uncertainty. The persistence of \u201cclimate doom\u201d narratives isn\u2019t mysterious\u2014it follows recognizable psychological and social patterns.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":441622,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691842584,691842585,691819134,691818153,691819140,691842588,691818811,691842586,691842587],"class_list":{"0":"post-441621","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-alarming-language","9":"tag-consensus-2","10":"tag-climate-alarmism","11":"tag-climate-models","12":"tag-climate-science","13":"tag-dramatic-framing","14":"tag-media","15":"tag-moral-framing","16":"tag-worst-case-scenarios","18":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-Psychology-of-Climate-Doom-How-Narrative-Outpaces-Nuance.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1QSV","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":227073,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=227073","url_meta":{"origin":441621,"position":0},"title":"The climate change cult and the war on the mind \u2013 3","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/02\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Today I examine a group using their expertise in the field of psychology to nudge the population into believing their world view of climate-induced doom.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/0APOCALYPSE-DREAM-MEANING.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/0APOCALYPSE-DREAM-MEANING.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/0APOCALYPSE-DREAM-MEANING.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/0APOCALYPSE-DREAM-MEANING.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/0APOCALYPSE-DREAM-MEANING.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441910,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=441910","url_meta":{"origin":441621,"position":1},"title":"The State of Climate Science: Uncertainty, Complexity, and the Politics That Follow","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/29\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The climate system is a complex, chaotic, coupled system involving the atmosphere, oceans, land, ice, biosphere, and solar\/astronomical influences. Human emissions of greenhouse gases (primarily CO\u2082, methane) exert a warming influence via the greenhouse effect, with water vapor providing the strongest positive feedback. This much is well-established basic physics. However,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate models\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate models","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-models"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-State-of-Climate-Science-Uncertainty-Complexity-and-the-Politics-That-Follow.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-State-of-Climate-Science-Uncertainty-Complexity-and-the-Politics-That-Follow.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-State-of-Climate-Science-Uncertainty-Complexity-and-the-Politics-That-Follow.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-State-of-Climate-Science-Uncertainty-Complexity-and-the-Politics-That-Follow.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":366440,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=366440","url_meta":{"origin":441621,"position":2},"title":"Was 1.5C a Climate Propaganda Whoopsie?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/16\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Professor\u00a0Mike Hulme: \u201c\u2026 There\u2019s going to be a lot of work done to reconstruct a narrative \u2026\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"1.5C scare\"","block_context":{"text":"1.5C scare","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=1-5c-scare"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0-climate-changed.jpeg?fit=1000%2C563&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0-climate-changed.jpeg?fit=1000%2C563&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0-climate-changed.jpeg?fit=1000%2C563&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0-climate-changed.jpeg?fit=1000%2C563&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275795,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=275795","url_meta":{"origin":441621,"position":3},"title":"Decoding the Climate Psychology Certificate","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/27\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"So, it\u2019s come to this: the \u201cClimate Psychology Certificate\u201d offered by the\u00a0California Institute of Integral Studies (CIIS).\u00a0Just when you think you\u2019ve seen every twist on climate change, along comes a course that combines it with\u2026 psychology? Interesting combo.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate and ecological crises\"","block_context":{"text":"climate and ecological crises","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-and-ecological-crises"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0padeces-el-sindrome-de-la-cabeza-explosiva-y-no-lo-sabes.jpg?fit=1200%2C712&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0padeces-el-sindrome-de-la-cabeza-explosiva-y-no-lo-sabes.jpg?fit=1200%2C712&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0padeces-el-sindrome-de-la-cabeza-explosiva-y-no-lo-sabes.jpg?fit=1200%2C712&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0padeces-el-sindrome-de-la-cabeza-explosiva-y-no-lo-sabes.jpg?fit=1200%2C712&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/0padeces-el-sindrome-de-la-cabeza-explosiva-y-no-lo-sabes.jpg?fit=1200%2C712&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":415532,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=415532","url_meta":{"origin":441621,"position":4},"title":"Rebuttal: When \u201cCoastal Climate Retreat\u201d is just a Narrative \u2013 Why Nightlights Don\u2019t Tell the Whole Coastal Story","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The University of Copenhagen\u00a0press release\u00a0claiming that \u201cover half of global coastal settlements are retreating inland due to intensifying climate risks\u201d sounds like the sort of headline crafted to feed an increasingly popular narrative:\u00a0coasts are becoming uninhabitable battlegrounds of climate doom, and people are fleeing for safety.","rel":"","context":"In \"Bad Science\"","block_context":{"text":"Bad Science","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bad-science"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/0AQPizT-WQwhwh8UkZvPw2SOwlsRBX2sHLUPrpSjbZboh1R0kDEKVbd7d9ajfk2uH8dNfAPdxNlwLHdqvS6ojA9udy3bGX46ulWfeN7tWfMK_tj3T9VicarxhgrNGY2XQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C620&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/0AQPizT-WQwhwh8UkZvPw2SOwlsRBX2sHLUPrpSjbZboh1R0kDEKVbd7d9ajfk2uH8dNfAPdxNlwLHdqvS6ojA9udy3bGX46ulWfeN7tWfMK_tj3T9VicarxhgrNGY2XQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C620&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/0AQPizT-WQwhwh8UkZvPw2SOwlsRBX2sHLUPrpSjbZboh1R0kDEKVbd7d9ajfk2uH8dNfAPdxNlwLHdqvS6ojA9udy3bGX46ulWfeN7tWfMK_tj3T9VicarxhgrNGY2XQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C620&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/0AQPizT-WQwhwh8UkZvPw2SOwlsRBX2sHLUPrpSjbZboh1R0kDEKVbd7d9ajfk2uH8dNfAPdxNlwLHdqvS6ojA9udy3bGX46ulWfeN7tWfMK_tj3T9VicarxhgrNGY2XQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C620&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/0AQPizT-WQwhwh8UkZvPw2SOwlsRBX2sHLUPrpSjbZboh1R0kDEKVbd7d9ajfk2uH8dNfAPdxNlwLHdqvS6ojA9udy3bGX46ulWfeN7tWfMK_tj3T9VicarxhgrNGY2XQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C620&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266601,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=266601","url_meta":{"origin":441621,"position":5},"title":"Turn the Fearmongering Up to Eleven. It\u2019s Working.","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"I hope readers aren\u2019t getting tired of me calling out all these banal studies whose goal is to get those to use manipulation rather than debate and discussion in order to achieve their policy goals.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-287.png?fit=1200%2C821&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-287.png?fit=1200%2C821&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-287.png?fit=1200%2C821&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-287.png?fit=1200%2C821&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/image-287.png?fit=1200%2C821&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/441621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=441621"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/441621\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":441626,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/441621\/revisions\/441626"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/441622"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=441621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=441621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=441621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}