{"id":441024,"date":"2026-04-23T03:37:57","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T10:37:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=441024"},"modified":"2026-04-23T03:37:59","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T10:37:59","slug":"an-earth-day-musing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=441024","title":{"rendered":"An Earth Day Musing"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

From The CO2 Coalition Substack<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By James \u201cJed\u201d E. Dukett<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Clean Air Act (CAA) was signed on December 31, 1970, seven months after the first Earth Day. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, which I worked under for more than 27 years, reaffirmed and strengthened regulation of the six criteria pollutants under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Those pollutants are Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Particulate Matter, Ozone, Lead, and Carbon Monoxide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not Carbon Dioxide (CO\u2082).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is the point of this commentary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These six pollutants were chosen because they have direct and immediate health effects. My work focused on their secondary environmental impacts. CO\u2082 was not included in the 1990 update for one primary reason, it is not a pollutant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is also worth remembering that the 1990 amendments were among the most bipartisan environmental laws in American history. Support in the Senate was close to 90 percent. Support in the House was over 95 percent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So what changed? How did CO\u2082 get pulled into Clean Air Act discourse, and what does that mean now?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before the rise of fear-based climate messaging, environmental stewardship in the United States was grounded in human environmental conservation<\/strong>, or HEC<\/strong>. HEC is the philosophy that people are part of the environment, not a threat to it. It guided the creation of the CAA. It guided the criteria pollutant framework. It guided the bipartisan consensus that environmental protection and human flourishing are not in conflict.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

About 30 years ago a different idea began to take hold, misanthropic environmental<\/strong> preservation<\/strong>, or MEP<\/strong>. MEP is not a medical condition. It is a cultural posture. It treats human existence as an environmental liability. It replaces stewardship with suspicion. It replaces conservation with guilt. It replaces HEC with a worldview that sees fewer people as the solution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The best early treatment for MEP is simple. Thoughts and prayers, followed by a healthy dose of children. Coaching a youth sport, preferably 3- to 5-year-old T-Ballers, also helps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Still, MEP is powerful. A false understanding of CO\u2082 acts like a drug. Once someone accepts the idea that CO\u2082 is inherently harmful, the logic becomes a trap.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here is how it works. Well-meaning people follow the ubiquity of CO\u2082 down a rabbit hole and calculate how much they personally \u201ccontribute.\u201d The outcome is predictable. Helplessness, hopelessness, and shame for simply being alive. Because CO\u2082 is everywhere, this is not a fringe conclusion. It is a precise conclusion built on a false premise. That premise is the core of MEP syndrome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And the cultural results are easy to see.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NBC News ran a piece titled \u201cScience proves kids are bad for Earth. Morality suggests we stop having them.\u201d<\/em> It claimed that having a child is one of the worst things you can do for the environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Two advocacy groups pushed similar messages. Population Matters launched its \u201cFewer Feet\u201d <\/em>campaign, using condoms to promote the idea that fewer children mean a cooler planet. The Center for Biological Diversity followed with its \u201cEndangered Species Condoms,\u201d distributing more than a million condoms to link human reproduction to environmental harm. The message was clear. We do not just need smaller footprints. We need fewer feet. That is MEP in its purest form.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And our kids heard all of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Teenagers absorbed the rhetoric. Climate anxiety rose. Fear about the future grew. Doubts about having children appeared. Therapists report eco anxiety. Teachers hear despair. Young adults reconsider marriage or family plans. They were told to calculate their \u201ccarbon footprint\u201d as if their existence were a problem. That is MEP syndrome working exactly as designed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The #NoFutureNoChildren pledge is real. It was launched by 18-year-old Emma Lim, who vowed not to have children unless governments take stronger climate action. \u201cI have always wanted to be a mom,\u201d<\/em> she said, \u201cbut I will not bring a child into a world where they will not be safe.\u201d<\/em> That message is deeply sad, and now circulates through media and into schools, where it lands directly in front of our kids.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Critics of MEP saw it coming. If you tell children the planet is dying, and then tell them they are the reason, they will lose hope.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And the effort has worked. A major UN backed study found that nearly one in five people are having fewer children than they want because of fear of the future, including climate change. Harvard researchers note that Americans increasingly cite climate change and overpopulation when explaining their views on family size.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now, about CO\u2082.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yes, humans are the limiting factor. We exhale it. We add more of it when we bring new life into the world. But the idea that CO\u2082 is a pollutant on par with Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, or the other criteria pollutants is a category error. It is the central scientific mistake that fuels MEP syndrome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Physics tells the story. CO\u2082\u2019s radiative effect drops off sharply after its first few hundred parts per million. Beyond that point, the marginal warming impact becomes negligible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And here is the part the \u201ccarbon footprint\u201d scolds never mention. Every breath you exhale is 40,000 parts per million CO\u2082. The atmosphere is 420 parts per million. You emit two to three pounds of CO\u2082 every day just by being alive. That is more than our avocados from Mexico or that fancy Lululemon purse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And here is the uncomfortable truth for MEP logic. If CO\u2082 is the villain, then human existence becomes the crime. Unless we all drop dead, maybe rethink the role of CO\u2082 in the environment, because none of this is true.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For anyone trying to help someone caught in MEP syndrome, it helps to mention the photosynthetic benefits of CO\u2082. Global greening. The revival of arid regions. The simple molecule that makes life possible. For goodness\u2019 sake, at the very least, remind them that without CO\u2082 there is no beer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most importantly, the CO\u2082 humans emit is not remotely comparable to the six criteria pollutants our nation identified when HEC, not MEP, guided environmental policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That distinction mattered in 1970. It mattered in 1990. And it matters even more today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Originally published on Substack on April 22, 2026.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jed Dukett<\/a> is a CO2<\/sub> Coalition<\/a> Member and former acid rain scientist<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What\u2019s New!<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The CO2<\/sub><\/em> Coalition has released its new episode of the Climate Debrief<\/em> Podcast<\/em> featuring Jim Steele. Watch the full video on YouTube here<\/a><\/em>!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Climate Debrief Podcast <\/em>is now also available on Apple<\/a>, Spotify<\/a>, Amazon<\/a>, and iHeartRadio<\/a>!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Clean Air Act (CAA) was signed on December 31, 1970, seven months after the first Earth Day. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, which I worked under for more than 27 years, reaffirmed and strengthened regulation of the six criteria pollutants under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Those pollutants are Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Particulate Matter, Ozone, Lead, and Carbon Monoxide.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":441025,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691841986,691829997,691842473,691823923,691822252,691842474,691842475,691819359],"class_list":{"0":"post-441024","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-carbon-footprint-2","9":"tag-carbon-dioxide-co","10":"tag-clean-air-act-amendments","11":"tag-climate-anxiety","12":"tag-global-greening","13":"tag-hec-human-environmental-conservation","14":"tag-mep-misanthropic-environmental-preservation","15":"tag-the-clean-air-act-caa","17":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-The-Earth-in-the-space.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1QJi","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":400855,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=400855","url_meta":{"origin":441024,"position":0},"title":"What is the Scientific Threshold for GHG Endangerment?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Today, I explain why the acceptance of just these claims provides a sufficient basis under the\u00a0U.S. Clean Air Act\u00a0(CAA) to find that greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) endanger public health or welfare. The quote above comes from the executive summary of the much-discussed\u00a0report\u00a0of the Department of Energy\u2019s Climate Working Group (DOE\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"2009 EPA Endangerment Finding\"","block_context":{"text":"2009 EPA Endangerment Finding","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=2009-epa-endangerment-finding"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0AQNz-3v_GUn7bhBqsq0byriNLYF6ycCo45QH7ELe2ZWCrgWn-ySePgmhDfB21nb3nn7qfa_7RgBKE8ObxFA7LNI8u44gTkbN1qUhL2K-YkoWfCG0psr_sRcVRJf8wA.jpeg?fit=1080%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0AQNz-3v_GUn7bhBqsq0byriNLYF6ycCo45QH7ELe2ZWCrgWn-ySePgmhDfB21nb3nn7qfa_7RgBKE8ObxFA7LNI8u44gTkbN1qUhL2K-YkoWfCG0psr_sRcVRJf8wA.jpeg?fit=1080%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0AQNz-3v_GUn7bhBqsq0byriNLYF6ycCo45QH7ELe2ZWCrgWn-ySePgmhDfB21nb3nn7qfa_7RgBKE8ObxFA7LNI8u44gTkbN1qUhL2K-YkoWfCG0psr_sRcVRJf8wA.jpeg?fit=1080%2C720&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0AQNz-3v_GUn7bhBqsq0byriNLYF6ycCo45QH7ELe2ZWCrgWn-ySePgmhDfB21nb3nn7qfa_7RgBKE8ObxFA7LNI8u44gTkbN1qUhL2K-YkoWfCG0psr_sRcVRJf8wA.jpeg?fit=1080%2C720&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0AQNz-3v_GUn7bhBqsq0byriNLYF6ycCo45QH7ELe2ZWCrgWn-ySePgmhDfB21nb3nn7qfa_7RgBKE8ObxFA7LNI8u44gTkbN1qUhL2K-YkoWfCG0psr_sRcVRJf8wA.jpeg?fit=1080%2C720&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206528,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=206528","url_meta":{"origin":441024,"position":1},"title":"All Eyes on SCOTUS: Supreme Court to Issue Climate Endangerment Finding Ruling \u2013 To Decide if EPA, or Congress, has authority to regulate CO2","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/30\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"From Climate Depot The case before the U.S. Supreme Court is West Virginia vs. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).The primary plaintiff of the case is West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey; he is joined by attorney generals from Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/image-122.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/image-122.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/image-122.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/image-122.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":426214,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=426214","url_meta":{"origin":441024,"position":2},"title":"Trump Administration Ends Obama-Era Climate Finding, Repeals Vehicle GHG Standards","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/14\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"On February 12, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under Administrator Lee Zeldin and alongside President Trump, finalized a major rule that revokes the 2009 Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding, a landmark Obama-era determination that greenhouse gases (GHGs) like carbon dioxide endanger public health and welfare. This finding had served\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Biden and Obama administrations\"","block_context":{"text":"Biden and Obama administrations","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biden-and-obama-administrations"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-12-184328-1.png?fit=1033%2C937&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-12-184328-1.png?fit=1033%2C937&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-12-184328-1.png?fit=1033%2C937&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Screenshot-2026-02-12-184328-1.png?fit=1033%2C937&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244623,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=244623","url_meta":{"origin":441024,"position":3},"title":"New York\u2019s Good Environmental Intentions Unsullied by Reality","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/21\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"However noble the concept of eliminating any risks from any source of pollution, if it is construed to mean that anything that might be contributing to bad health must be prohibited, then there will be massive consequences.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-525.png?fit=1200%2C840&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-525.png?fit=1200%2C840&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-525.png?fit=1200%2C840&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-525.png?fit=1200%2C840&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-525.png?fit=1200%2C840&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373018,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=373018","url_meta":{"origin":441024,"position":4},"title":"Net Zero crumbling in the U.S.","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Voters last November rejected the grandiose plans of the Biden Administration to abandon gasoline- and diesel-powered engines, natural gas hot water heaters and other appliances, and coal- and gas-fired power plants. But who foresaw the total reversal of the anti-business regulatory climate of the past fifty years?","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0net-zero.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0net-zero.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0net-zero.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0net-zero.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0net-zero.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207250,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=207250","url_meta":{"origin":441024,"position":5},"title":"EPA now stuck between a rock and a hard place on CO2","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/05\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"There are lots of happy reports on the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling throwing out EPA\u2019s so-called Clean Power Plan. Some go so far as to suggest that EPA is barred from regulating power plant CO2 emissions. It is not quite that simple and the result is rather amusing. EPA is still\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0EPA-sign.jpg?fit=632%2C366&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0EPA-sign.jpg?fit=632%2C366&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0EPA-sign.jpg?fit=632%2C366&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/441024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=441024"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/441024\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":441029,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/441024\/revisions\/441029"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/441025"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=441024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=441024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=441024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}