{"id":433731,"date":"2026-03-24T09:10:27","date_gmt":"2026-03-24T08:10:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=433731"},"modified":"2026-03-24T09:10:29","modified_gmt":"2026-03-24T08:10:29","slug":"theres-nothing-voluntary-about-a-smart-meter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=433731","title":{"rendered":"There\u2019s Nothing \u201cVoluntary\u201d About a Smart Meter"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Although I am not on board with Rupert Lowe\u2019s new political party (I remain a loyal \u2018Sir Nigel\u2019 band member), I increasingly find myself fielding the same criticism levelled at him. Question anything that sits comfortably within the modern consensus and you are quickly placed in the same bracket, as though mild scepticism is a sign of defect rather than a starting point for discussion. That is where we now are. I do not want a smart meter, and I do not currently have one, which seems to be enough to invite suspicion in itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My instinct is to question systems that expand quietly while being presented as optional. That instinct was sharpened during COVID-19, when measures introduced with caveats and assurances had a tendency to outgrow both. It is therefore difficult to accept repeated claims at face value when the structure surrounding them suggests a different outcome. The smart meter rollout is a good example of that approach. No law says that you must have one. That line is repeated often and confidently. Think Nadim Zahawi (Reform \u2013 why?!<\/em>) denying the roll-out of vaccine passports only for this to became mandatory in certain settings weeks later. At the point it is parroted it is true, but what is not explained with the same clarity is how the system has been constructed so that, in time, most households will end up with one regardless of their initial preference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The mechanism is not complicated, though it is rarely set out plainly. Electricity meters are not permanent fixtures. Under the Electricity Act 1989 and the Meters (Certification) Regulations 1998, they must be certified and approved for billing purposes and that certification has a defined lifespan. For many homes built in the early 2000s, that lifespan is around 20 years. Once it expires, the meter is no longer compliant and cannot remain in service. At that point, the supplier is required to replace it. That requirement is no longer discretionary. It sits alongside another obligation, this time within Ofgem\u2019s licence conditions, which requires suppliers to take all reasonable steps to install smart meters when replacing existing equipment. Traditional non-smart meters have largely disappeared from circulation. They are not widely manufactured, they are not offered as replacements, and they do not form part of the current rollout strategy. When a replacement is required, what is fitted in practice is a SMETS2 smart meter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the existing meter remains within certification, there is room to decline. Emails can be ignored, appointments can be refused and the matter can be pushed away. That window remains open only for as long as the meter remains compliant. Once the certification expires, the position changes. The old meter cannot stay, and the replacement offered is \u2018smart\u2019. There is no alternative presented at that stage. The process does not rely on compulsion in the conventional sense. It works by removing every other option.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The technical framework that follows is not incidental. SMETS2 meters are enrolled onto the Data Communications Company network, a centrally managed system established under the regulatory framework that developed after the Energy Act 2008. Suppliers are required to participate in that system. When a smart meter is installed, it is connected and begins communicating automatically. Consumers are told that they can control how their data are used, which is true up to a point. Billing frequency can be set to monthly rather than daily or half-hourly, marketing can be declined and third-party access can be restricted. Those are real choices, though they relate to how the supplier interacts with the data rather than whether the data exist. The homeowner is simply allowed to decide how much glitter to roll the turd in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Half-hourly consumption data are recorded regardless of the billing preference selected. Ofgem\u2019s Market-wide Half-Hourly Settlement programme relies on that level of detail to balance supply and demand across the grid and allocate costs within the system. The supplier may only use monthly reads for billing if that is your preference, though the underlying measurement remains far more granular. That distinction is not always made clear. This matters because it shows where control genuinely sits. The customer can influence presentation. The system itself continues to operate at full resolution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The financial consequences follow naturally from that structure. A system built on granular measurement lends itself to costs that reflect when energy is used. Winter demand is higher, so winter bills rise accordingly. Summer demand is lower and bills fall with it. What had previously been spread across the year becomes concentrated in the months where consumption is greatest. The traditional approach, which relied on a small number of readings and averaged payments over time, allowed households to plan with a degree of certainty. Two readings a year, one in spring and one in autumn, were enough to keep the account aligned while smoothing the extremes. The household paid a steady amount and the variation in usage was absorbed within the system rather than passed directly through.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That arrangement is now being replaced by one that exposes those variations in full. High usage produces high cost at the point it occurs and the financial impact is no longer softened by the structure of the billing system. That may be described as accuracy and in a narrow technical sense it is. It also makes budgeting more difficult, particularly for households that rely on predictability rather than constant adjustment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is worth remembering how widely supported this direction of travel has been. The legislative framework begins with the Energy Act 2008, introduced by Gordon Brown\u2019s Labour government. The Conservative and Lib Dem Coalition and later Conservative governments carried it forward, Labour continues it and there has been no meaningful political resistance at any stage. That level of agreement is often presented as strength. To me it screams dodgy. No healthy legislation receives so much untrammelled support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What exists now is a nationwide infrastructure capable of recording detailed energy usage, transmitting it centrally and feeding it into a regulatory system designed to reshape how electricity is priced and consumed. It is being introduced by stealth via the back door, through certification rules, supplier obligations and the removal of alternatives. The language surrounding it remains careful. The process is described as \u201cvoluntary<\/a>\u201c. The practical outcome is that, once existing meters reach the end of their life, all households will move onto smart metering whether they ever actively chose to or not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Call it what you like. I call it a con.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And yes, as you\u2019ve probably deduced, my electricity meter\u2019s certification expired a few days ago.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Although I am not on board with Rupert Lowe\u2019s new political party (I remain a loyal \u2018Sir Nigel\u2019 band member), I increasingly find myself fielding the same criticism levelled at him. Question anything that sits comfortably within the modern consensus and you are quickly placed in the same bracket, as though mild scepticism is a sign of defect rather than a starting point for discussion. That is where we now are. I do not want a smart meter, and I do not currently have one, which seems to be enough to invite suspicion in itself.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":433737,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691841988,691818128,691818154,691819379,691820257,691841987],"class_list":{"0":"post-433731","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-data-communications-company-network","9":"tag-energy","10":"tag-net-zero","11":"tag-propaganda","12":"tag-smart-meters","13":"tag-smets2-meters","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Theres-Nothing-Voluntary-About-a-Smart-Meter-1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1OPF","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":284372,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=284372","url_meta":{"origin":433731,"position":0},"title":"Seven Million Smart Meters Need To Be\u00a0Upgraded","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/21\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Concerns also arise regarding obsolescence, with an estimated seven million smart meters requiring component replacement when the 2G and 3G mobile communication networks are phased out. From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT By Paul Homewood Billpayers will be forced to foot the cost of upgrading seven million smart\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Billpayers\"","block_context":{"text":"Billpayers","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=billpayers"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-569.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-569.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-569.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-569.png?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284297,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=284297","url_meta":{"origin":433731,"position":1},"title":"UK smart meter upgrade\u00a0fiasco","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/21\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Nice definition: The Public Accounts Committee examines the value for money of Government projects, programmes and service delivery. Drawing on the work of the National Audit Office the Committee holds government officials to account for the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of public spending.- Oh really? From Tallbloke's Talkshop October 20,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Billpayers\"","block_context":{"text":"Billpayers","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=billpayers"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-552.png?fit=1200%2C724&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-552.png?fit=1200%2C724&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-552.png?fit=1200%2C724&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-552.png?fit=1200%2C724&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/image-552.png?fit=1200%2C724&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262406,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=262406","url_meta":{"origin":433731,"position":2},"title":"Homes stuck with millions of faulty smart\u00a0meters","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/16\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Households have been saddled with three million faulty smart meters in a botched roll-out that is ballooning over budget, a report reveals today.","rel":"","context":"In \"Homes\"","block_context":{"text":"Homes","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=homes"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00-smart-meters.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00-smart-meters.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00-smart-meters.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00-smart-meters.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/00-smart-meters.jpeg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225840,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=225840","url_meta":{"origin":433731,"position":3},"title":"Scrap The Smart Meter Rollout Now","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/26\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"If consumers really can save money with a smart meter, let them buy their own.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-1252.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-1252.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-1252.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-1252.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-1252.png?fit=1200%2C720&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269566,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=269566","url_meta":{"origin":433731,"position":4},"title":"Intrusive \u2018smart meters\u2019 threaten to turn UK homes into Net Zero\u00a0panopticon","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/26\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Net Zero Watch warns that being cut off will be a feature of decarbonisation drive","rel":"","context":"In \"Net zero\"","block_context":{"text":"Net zero","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=net-zero"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0smart-meter.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0smart-meter.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0smart-meter.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0smart-meter.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/0smart-meter.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362196,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=362196","url_meta":{"origin":433731,"position":5},"title":"Millions of households at risk of smart meter\u00a0snooping","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/15\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A\u00a0privacy row has broken out over government proposals to allow energy companies to harvest household smart meter data as part of a net zero push.","rel":"","context":"In \"Energy companies\"","block_context":{"text":"Energy companies","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=energy-companies"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0sensors-23-02118-g004.png?fit=1200%2C679&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0sensors-23-02118-g004.png?fit=1200%2C679&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0sensors-23-02118-g004.png?fit=1200%2C679&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0sensors-23-02118-g004.png?fit=1200%2C679&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0sensors-23-02118-g004.png?fit=1200%2C679&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=433731"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433731\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":433740,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433731\/revisions\/433740"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/433737"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=433731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=433731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=433731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}