{"id":432966,"date":"2026-03-21T19:47:08","date_gmt":"2026-03-21T18:47:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=432966"},"modified":"2026-03-21T19:47:10","modified_gmt":"2026-03-21T18:47:10","slug":"these-people-are-crazy-climate-science-and-the-cult-of-self-loathing-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=432966","title":{"rendered":"\u201cThese People are Crazy\u201d climate science and the cult of self-loathing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

ByTerry L. Headley<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Stockholm, Sweden. 12 April, 2019. Climate activists joining 16-year-old Swedish Greta Thunberg for school strike against climate change.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

There was a time when environmental stewardship meant conservation grounded in gratitude rather than condemnation. It reflected a belief that a prosperous and confident society could protect its natural inheritance without repudiating the very progress that made such protection possible. The American conservation tradition grew from strength, not shame. In recent decades, however, much of what is presented as settled \u201cclimate science\u201d has drifted from practical environmental management toward a sweeping moral narrative that indicts industrial civilization itself. The debate is no longer confined to atmospheric chemistry or predictive modeling; it has evolved into a broader philosophical claim that humanity\u2019s advancement is inherently suspect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Science, properly practiced, is iterative and self-correcting. It advances through questioning, testing, and refinement. Yet public climate discourse increasingly exhibits the traits of ideological orthodoxy. Skepticism about model assumptions or policy prescriptions is often met not with counterargument but with moral denunciation. The language of heresy\u2014\u201cdenial,\u201d \u201canti-science,\u201d \u201cexistential threat\u201d\u2014is deployed to narrow the field of acceptable opinion. When a discipline presents itself as beyond debate and frames policy disagreement as ethical failure, it ceases to resemble open inquiry and begins to resemble doctrine. This transformation warrants scrutiny not because environmental concerns are illegitimate, but because intellectual humility is essential to credible science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The philosophical undercurrent of contemporary climate activism reveals a deeper unease with human progress. At its more radical edges, the movement portrays mankind not primarily as steward but as contaminant. Human industry is described as invasive, consumption as pathological, and growth as inherently destructive. Advocates of \u201cdegrowth\u201d openly argue that reduced economic output and lower living standards constitute moral improvement. Discussions about limiting childbirth in the name of reducing carbon footprints have moved from fringe to mainstream academic settings. Such arguments rest upon a pessimistic anthropology that views human flourishing as environmentally incompatible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This view stands in tension with the historical record. The expansion of reliable, affordable energy\u2014fueled by coal, oil, and natural gas\u2014enabled sanitation systems that dramatically reduced disease, agricultural productivity that alleviated famine, and electrification that transformed medicine and education. Life expectancy increased, infant mortality declined, and extreme poverty fell on a global scale. These gains were not incidental to industrialization; they were direct consequences of abundant energy and technological innovation. To characterize the energy systems that facilitated these improvements as moral failures requires overlooking the harsh realities of pre-industrial existence, where scarcity, vulnerability, and shortened lifespans were the norm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Climate rhetoric frequently adopts theological contours. Carbon functions as a symbol of collective guilt. Industrialization is cast as a civilizational fall. Redemption is framed in terms of sacrifice\u2014fewer conveniences, constrained mobility, diminished expectations. Atmospheric targets are elevated to moral absolutes, and extreme weather events are interpreted as judgment upon modern living. The language employed often transcends empirical description and enters the realm of moral drama. This framing shifts the conversation from managing risk to expiating sin, and from evaluating tradeoffs to demanding repentance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The convergence between radical climate activism and longstanding critiques of market economies is notable. Industrial capitalism has long been viewed by its detractors as exploitative and morally corrosive. Climate policy provides a powerful vehicle for advancing those critiques under the banner of planetary survival. Proposals to dismantle fossil fuel infrastructure within compressed timelines are coupled with calls to redesign transportation systems, housing patterns, dietary habits, and financial structures. The scope extends well beyond emissions management into comprehensive social transformation. Centralized authority inevitably expands when entire sectors of economic life are targeted for rapid restructuring.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Predictive certainty has also been overstated in public discourse. Climate models are complex simulations that rely on assumptions regarding technological development, economic growth, and behavioral change. They generate scenarios rather than guarantees. Over time, projections have been revised as new data emerge and methodologies improve. Arctic ice fluctuations, agricultural yields, and sea-level measurements illustrate the evolving nature of the science. Acknowledging uncertainty does not negate concern about environmental trends, but it does counsel against framing policy choices as responses to infallible prophecy. Responsible governance demands deliberation rather than panic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The asymmetrical moral framing of global emissions further complicates the discussion. Western industrial nations are urged to rapidly curtail fossil fuel use, while developing nations continue expanding energy consumption to raise living standards. Emissions from resource-dependent regions are condemned as retrograde, even as energy-intensive manufacturing flourishes abroad to meet global demand. The atmosphere does not discriminate among sources, yet political rhetoric often does. This inconsistency suggests that cultural narratives about Western industry and prosperity are interwoven with environmental arguments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Energy policy carries tangible human consequences. Elevated electricity costs burden working families and retirees living on fixed incomes. Manufacturing relocates to jurisdictions with lower energy prices, eroding local employment bases. Grid reliability is tested when dispatchable generation is retired prematurely. Advocates who call to \u201ckeep it in the ground\u201d seldom dwell on the livelihoods dependent upon resource development or the communities structured around energy production. Environmental objectives must be balanced against economic stability and social cohesion. Policies divorced from that balance risk undermining the very populations they claim to protect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Perhaps most concerning is the cultivation of despair. Younger generations are told that catastrophe is imminent and that their future is defined by ecological decline. Anxiety is framed as moral awakening. Pessimism becomes intellectual currency. This narrative contrasts sharply with the American tradition of confronting challenges through innovation and resolve. Previous generations faced world wars, economic upheaval, and severe environmental degradation, yet they responded with technological breakthroughs, regulatory reforms, and infrastructural investment rather than civilizational repudiation. Confidence in human ingenuity proved justified time and again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A prudent environmental ethic recognizes that stewardship and prosperity are not mutually exclusive. Technological improvements can reduce emissions without mandating economic contraction. Efficiency gains, cleaner combustion technologies, and market-driven innovation have already achieved substantial environmental progress. Constructive debate about timelines, costs, and tradeoffs is not obstruction; it is responsible policymaking. The deeper question remains anthropological: do we view humanity as primarily a problem to be constrained or as a creative force capable of adaptation and improvement?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When environmental advocacy slips into narratives that portray human existence as inherently destructive, it crosses the line into Malthusian madness. A civilization that internalizes self-contempt risks forfeiting the confidence necessary to solve complex problems. Stewardship should flow from gratitude for human capacity, not hostility toward it. The challenge of managing environmental impact in a world of billions requires realism, innovation, and balance. It does not require embracing a philosophy that treats progress as sin. A healthy society can pursue cleaner technologies while affirming the dignity, creativity, and resilience of the human person.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article originally appeared at RealClear Energy<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

_____________________________________________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"\/<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Terry L. Headley<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Terry L. Headley, MBA, is founder of The Hedley Company \u2013 Communications & Research for Energy. A former journalist, he has more than 25 years of experience analyzing electric power markets, fuel supply, and energy policy, with a focus on grid reliability and the real-world cost impacts of energy decisions on households, businesses, and regional economies.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There was a time when environmental stewardship meant conservation grounded in gratitude rather than condemnation. It reflected a belief that a prosperous and confident society could protect its natural inheritance without repudiating the very progress that made such protection possible. The American conservation tradition grew from strength, not shame. In recent decades, however, much of what is presented as settled \u201cclimate science\u201d has drifted from practical environmental management toward a sweeping moral narrative that indicts industrial civilization itself. The debate is no longer confined to atmospheric chemistry or predictive modeling; it has evolved into a broader philosophical claim that humanity\u2019s advancement is inherently suspect.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":432967,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691832500,691841964,691829997,691825373,691819134,691818153,691819743],"class_list":{"0":"post-432966","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-anti-science","9":"tag-existential-threat-2","10":"tag-carbon-dioxide-co","11":"tag-carbon-footprints","12":"tag-climate-alarmism","13":"tag-climate-models","14":"tag-climate-propaganda","16":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQM0bvOjTxc5ziIDjYhjd9X5via4InhknEa2BUwwsU3nz9A9SC9zlI4Kx9krFPJPAJNf1PkaCNEejWfD3uA2kKiSB3K0K0ZiYAdfFaQYCDR8Re8VGpnEqHOWp5Uc3NKa8QtFjFABAjswLP7RmkkjOwPaw5hVtA.jpeg?fit=1280%2C1280&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1ODk","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":329716,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=329716","url_meta":{"origin":432966,"position":0},"title":"Green left gets uneasy that Jeff Bezos is giving $10 billion to stop climate change \u2014 is that a \u201cconflict of interest\u201d?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/23\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Finally, the Green-left activists are starting to ask if Big Money is distorting their own environmental efforts","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/428cb5e678da63e8f316391bc0d6116d.jpg?fit=1200%2C695&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/428cb5e678da63e8f316391bc0d6116d.jpg?fit=1200%2C695&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/428cb5e678da63e8f316391bc0d6116d.jpg?fit=1200%2C695&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/428cb5e678da63e8f316391bc0d6116d.jpg?fit=1200%2C695&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/428cb5e678da63e8f316391bc0d6116d.jpg?fit=1200%2C695&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369007,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=369007","url_meta":{"origin":432966,"position":1},"title":"SEC\u2019s Climate Risk Disclosure Rule Would Compel Companies to Make Scientifically False and Misleading Disclosures","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/07\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In March last year, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued its climate risk disclosure rule, called \u201cThe Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors.\u201d\u00a0","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Securities-and-Exchange-Commission-SEC.webp?fit=1200%2C719&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Securities-and-Exchange-Commission-SEC.webp?fit=1200%2C719&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Securities-and-Exchange-Commission-SEC.webp?fit=1200%2C719&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Securities-and-Exchange-Commission-SEC.webp?fit=1200%2C719&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0Securities-and-Exchange-Commission-SEC.webp?fit=1200%2C719&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":398666,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=398666","url_meta":{"origin":432966,"position":2},"title":"National Academy of Sciences Goes to War Over CO\u2082","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/29\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The climate establishment is in full panic mode as the EPA moves to rescind its bogus 2009 \u201cendangerment\u201d finding on CO\u2082. The National Academy of Sciences is rushing activist scientists like Michael Mann to the barricades, and the attacks are getting nasty.","rel":"","context":"In \"2009 \u201cendangerment\u201d finding\"","block_context":{"text":"2009 \u201cendangerment\u201d finding","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=2009-endangerment-finding-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0Screenshot-2025-08-29-093801.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0Screenshot-2025-08-29-093801.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0Screenshot-2025-08-29-093801.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0Screenshot-2025-08-29-093801.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0Screenshot-2025-08-29-093801.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":392821,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=392821","url_meta":{"origin":432966,"position":3},"title":"Time to end the EPA\u2019s misguided \u2018endangerment finding\u2019 on greenhouse gases","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/04\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"For more than a decade, the Obama administration\u2019s 2009 \u201cendangerment finding\u201d has been a weapon in the left\u2019s arsenal to reshape the U.S. economy under the guise of saving the planet.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQM1cIGdgz7DkNarzZVgdyYl73Khsqa0oWuS_V1ai4u86xrkWAq3SzEhZYDUbjFsY0Hj4ibLKPKM7vBcFNsRR-iY4m-TYgVWPoMv_Rg9ZDBhnMcPhkZ2NSM_obbuowy1J2bz3jaoTE9BLWCF6Zt-qk8bMHtr8Q-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQM1cIGdgz7DkNarzZVgdyYl73Khsqa0oWuS_V1ai4u86xrkWAq3SzEhZYDUbjFsY0Hj4ibLKPKM7vBcFNsRR-iY4m-TYgVWPoMv_Rg9ZDBhnMcPhkZ2NSM_obbuowy1J2bz3jaoTE9BLWCF6Zt-qk8bMHtr8Q-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQM1cIGdgz7DkNarzZVgdyYl73Khsqa0oWuS_V1ai4u86xrkWAq3SzEhZYDUbjFsY0Hj4ibLKPKM7vBcFNsRR-iY4m-TYgVWPoMv_Rg9ZDBhnMcPhkZ2NSM_obbuowy1J2bz3jaoTE9BLWCF6Zt-qk8bMHtr8Q-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQM1cIGdgz7DkNarzZVgdyYl73Khsqa0oWuS_V1ai4u86xrkWAq3SzEhZYDUbjFsY0Hj4ibLKPKM7vBcFNsRR-iY4m-TYgVWPoMv_Rg9ZDBhnMcPhkZ2NSM_obbuowy1J2bz3jaoTE9BLWCF6Zt-qk8bMHtr8Q-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQM1cIGdgz7DkNarzZVgdyYl73Khsqa0oWuS_V1ai4u86xrkWAq3SzEhZYDUbjFsY0Hj4ibLKPKM7vBcFNsRR-iY4m-TYgVWPoMv_Rg9ZDBhnMcPhkZ2NSM_obbuowy1J2bz3jaoTE9BLWCF6Zt-qk8bMHtr8Q-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":368273,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=368273","url_meta":{"origin":432966,"position":4},"title":"The Importance of Environmental Monitoring in Protecting Our Planet","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/02\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Environmental monitoring plays a critical role in safeguarding the health of our planet by tracking changes in air quality, water resources, soil conditions, and biodiversity. As human activities continue to impact ecosystems, the need for accurate, real-time data has never been more important. By collecting and analyzing environmental information, scientists\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Air Quality Monitoring\"","block_context":{"text":"Air Quality Monitoring","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=air-quality-monitoring"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0image1-35.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0image1-35.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0image1-35.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0image1-35.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0image1-35.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341185,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=341185","url_meta":{"origin":432966,"position":5},"title":"Mourning Real Environmentalism \u2013 The Climate Realism Show\u00a0#125\u00a0(Guest: Matt Wielicki)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/31\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"On The Heartland Institute\u2019s Episode #125 of The Climate Realism Show, we bring back guest Matthew Wielicki, an \u201cearth science professor-in-exile\u201d to talk about how and why a conservationist movement morphed into endless and ever-louder climate hysteria. Heartland\u2019s Jim Lakely, Anthony Watts, and Linnea Lueken will also review the \u201cCrazy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO2)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO2)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-31-104629.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-31-104629.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-31-104629.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-31-104629.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0Screenshot-2024-08-31-104629.png?fit=1200%2C666&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/432966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=432966"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/432966\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":432973,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/432966\/revisions\/432973"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/432967"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=432966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=432966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=432966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}