{"id":431813,"date":"2026-03-17T19:08:05","date_gmt":"2026-03-17T18:08:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=431813"},"modified":"2026-03-17T19:08:07","modified_gmt":"2026-03-17T18:08:07","slug":"outline-of-my-cfact-heartland-climate-conference-presentation-a-case-study-on-the-23-24-el-nino","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=431813","title":{"rendered":"Outline of my CFACT\/Heartland climate conference presentation \u2014 A case study on the 23-24 El Ni\u00f1o"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Joe Bastardi<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

I will be speaking at the Heartland Climate Conference in April and presenting a case study on how sudden warming from geothermal input can ruin a forecast. The name of the talk is going to be \u201cA Weather\/Climate Tomahawk Fight with Geronimo,\u201d because that is exactly what this is, and there is no cavalry coming to solve the problem. Not only that, but frankly, no one in research on either side gives a darn about this, because they don\u2019t forecast and have to tolerate it. Many meteorologists simply accept the model output, so I am on an island. AGW people would not want to see it in the first place, because it blows the whole CO2 argument out of the water, and people on my side don\u2019t want to hear it because they sweep it away \u2014 as one person put it because it\u2019s like \u201cthe input of a Bunsen burner at the bottom of a swimming pool.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well, there are estimated to be 10 million Bunsen Burners (the estimate of vents). Interesting, though, I certainly understand that if one is not involved in the application of what this does to the weather, one would be skeptical.  I get it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I have found that everyone is married to their own idea to solve a problem that, to me, is a simple equation: the sun, the oceans, stochastic events, and the very design of the system far outweigh any input man can put in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, my goal is to get some people to say, \u201cHey, this is the oldest global private-sector forecaster out there, who has produced a value-added product for his company every day since March 1, 2011 \u2014 maybe we should look at what he is saying.\u201d So a dose of weather is coming at attendees, and then, the simple implication is that over the last 35 years, there have been countless hot spots showing up. Though they ebb and flow, overall, that input is what is raising the SST, and then, of course, the rest follows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But, back to the case study.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The European is going to be used here. By September, it has a borderline Super Nino developing.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Far ahead of what it had with the strong Oceanic Ni\u00f1o Index El Ni\u00f1o it had in Sept 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

What is hugely different in the FORECAST is the Atlantic, which is heading for a negative AMO look, and that means that hurricane numbers I have out have to come down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But notice where its forecast went in subsequent months.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

By November, it had the classic look of colder water to the northeast of Australia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This has an impact on the MJO as cold water around Australia tends to blunt the MJO trying to move through the kiss of death for winter phases of the MJO, phases 4\/5\/6.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

If we look at the MJO chart, we see the center of the strongest convection<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

moving through phases 4\/5\/6 sets off reactions that in turn impact the global pattern in a way that favors warm U.S. weather. The La Nina base state favors this most of the time, and it\u2019s why many La Nina winters are warm in the eastern part of the country. When the water is cold, it suppresses convection there, so in November, this looked great for the winter. And models were not shy about it. They showed plenty of blocking and a pattern similar to some of the great winters of the 1970s.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

While I have you here, it shows how absurd it is for the people pushing climate change to explain the buckling jet stream as we had in the extreme cold period in the east this winter, as being due to man-made warming.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

It reveals the ignorance of past events. Blocking has always been with us. But the fact is, we are a 10-minute sound bite society, and so people will fall for it. And so the average person is open to accepting simplistic arguments to blame something driven by an agenda.  As meteorologists, if we are going to push that, we should be ashamed of ourselves, FOR NOT SHOWING THE HISTORY OF THE PAST TO FRAME THE ENTIRE PICTURE. So how is it 2 of the greatest blocking winters ever occurred in a time when there was talk of another ice age coming?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

BTW the La Ni\u00f1a and El Ni\u00f1o, because of the oceanic warming, are not what they used to be as far as reactions.. The surrounding oceans have changed so much that their impact is distorted. The aforementioned winter and case study, 23-24, did not even have the Southern Oscillation Index averaging out to an El Ni\u00f1o in the winter. It was there in November, but the sudden warming of the water to the east of Australia was unlike anything ever seen in an El Ni\u00f1o, and it impacted the SOI. Yet no one seems to care.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But let\u2019s look at this and understand why this is so important<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The SST in November was very cold around Australia. What does that do to the MJO? It SUPPRESSES convection in phases 4\/5\/6 as the greatest convergence is going to occur in the western Indian Ocean and northeast of Australia in a pattern like this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But look what happened<\/p>\n\n\n\n

IT WARMED ALL OVER THE PLACE AROUND AUSTRALIA!<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Here is the average of El Ni\u00f1os, with SST. Again, cold water around Australia. What happened here was unprecedented, a sudden winter warming<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Look what happened<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Here is the change in SST<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

All the warming is away from the El Nino RIGHT OVER THE AXIS OF UNDERWATER VOLCANIC ACTIVITY, which we do not know about until after it happens. We suspect it\u2019s going on when the water suddenly warms, but because of the terrible data gathering, it takes months for the data to come in.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

How do you ignore this or think this is a Bunsen burner? Well, it\u2019s a product of not having to actually forecast the weather. The sudden warming is Geronimo. The tomahawks are the input of warmth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The entire weather\/climate community has been duped into thinking that putting buoys that go down to 6,000 feet\u2014once for every 100,000 square miles\u2014is somehow enough data for the source of 99 percent of the heat available for the entire system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So the argument is, \u201cJoe, you have no proof.\u201d No, I don\u2019t\u2014until I see the water warm like this, because it\u2019s not the sun, it\u2019s not CO2 that could have done that so fast and against all indications.  But if someone is not looking at this, they simply dismiss it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And what needs to be done\u2014for all the money we have spent on climate change and weather forecasting\u2014is to suck it up and saturate the bottom of the oceans where these things are going off, and actually go to the source region. But that would solve the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As for those that dismiss it: well, you have no proof it\u2019s not, because the data is not there to disprove it. So if you are not looking and you are married to one idea or one agenda, then you dismiss it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

BTW, this is nothing new<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

And by now you have to know that with the help of Dr. Arthur Viterito, the explanation for this kind of warming of the ocean since the late 1980s<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Has to have a linkage to the increase in geothermal input, which preceded the rise in temperatures.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Put water vapor in the air, and guess what happens to the global temperature, which, by the way, is a horrible metric. Wet bulb temperatures and better still saturation mixing ratios are much better for quantifying and explaining the whys of the climate. But far be it from people pushing the global temperature almighty to go to the source, because it reveals it can\u2019t be CO2 to any great degree.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

So what did the winter MJO do in 23-24? Just as cold air was trying to come in and did for a while in January, off it goes<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Lucy pulls the football away from Charlie Brown ( my forecast)<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

And you can kiss the winter goodbye mid Jan on<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

That awesome 500 mb pattern? Here is what happened<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

So can you understand why this is important? It can\u2019t be 3 months after the fact that the data comes in and shows the increase in geothermal activity. How the heck does that help you? And if you are not looking at all of this, you simply accept what you are told. It\u2019s the opposite of the great reason to search that the Apostle Paul implied when he said. \u201d Those who know what they know. DON\u2019T KNOW WHAT THEY OUGHT TO KNOW.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The unmoved mover of a lot of what we see going on may be this aspect.  I have shown you with an actual case study. The scars of a wrong forecast heal, but are always there to remind me of what happened.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So I ask you not to necessarily accept what I am saying, but at least understand where I am coming from. If you saw me in a tomahawk fight with Geronimo, at least you would have some sympathy or try to get me something to fight back with, wouldn\u2019t you<\/p>\n\n\n\n

See you at the conference.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

GET YOUR TICKETS NOW<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I will be speaking at the Heartland Climate Conference in April and presenting a case study on how sudden warming from geothermal input can ruin a forecast. The name of the talk is going to be \u201cA Weather\/Climate Tomahawk Fight with Geronimo,\u201d because that is exactly what this is, and there is no cavalry coming to solve the problem. Not only that, but frankly, no one in research on either side gives a darn about this, because they don\u2019t forecast and have to tolerate it. Many meteorologists simply accept the model output, so I am on an island. AGW people would not want to see it in the first place, because it blows the whole CO2 argument out of the water, and people on my side don\u2019t want to hear it because they sweep it away \u2014 as one person put it because it\u2019s like \u201cthe input of a Bunsen burner at the bottom of a swimming pool.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":431869,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691829997,691819287,691841916,691834391],"class_list":{"0":"post-431813","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-carbon-dioxide-co","9":"tag-el-nino-2","10":"tag-heartland-climate-conference","11":"tag-sst-sea-surface-temperature-2","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQMXW0YglThsv7wV0_x8YBGe-KTMFXEZbLx55uX4giqPVsYBbjJrphvPDnIMfFejK-VgpspcFPYVP9-NVc9xCrw-NEZkd5R_tzC5UqJRW_RCsmQTqYPToAqUomZS_iTMgWPXHP33TOy56xLLQkrCLyLQjVaHQw.jpeg?fit=1280%2C1280&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1OkJ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":251153,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=251153","url_meta":{"origin":431813,"position":0},"title":"Implausible Climate Goals For a Non-Existent Emissions Crisis, Steve Milloy","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/04\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"El Ninos. Milloy provides a plethora of graphs to backup this position, and as well, lays out the consequences that a net zero future would entail.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0Screenshot-2023-04-04-175641.png?fit=1200%2C539&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0Screenshot-2023-04-04-175641.png?fit=1200%2C539&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0Screenshot-2023-04-04-175641.png?fit=1200%2C539&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0Screenshot-2023-04-04-175641.png?fit=1200%2C539&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/0Screenshot-2023-04-04-175641.png?fit=1200%2C539&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245975,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=245975","url_meta":{"origin":431813,"position":1},"title":"CFACT presents Jo Nova with the Dauntless Purveyor of Climate Truth Award 2023","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/27\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"At the Heartland Institute\u2019s 15th International Conference on Climate Change in Orlando, FL, CFACT presented Joanne Nova with its Dauntless Purveyor of Climate Truth Award for 2023.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-911.png?fit=848%2C565&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-911.png?fit=848%2C565&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-911.png?fit=848%2C565&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-911.png?fit=848%2C565&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245351,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=245351","url_meta":{"origin":431813,"position":2},"title":"Watch the LIVE-STREAMS of Heartland\u2019s Climate Conference","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/24\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Don\u2019t miss a minute of The Heartland Institute\u2019s 15th International Conference on Climate Change, taking place February 24-25 in Orlando, Florida.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-732.png?fit=1096%2C510&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-732.png?fit=1096%2C510&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-732.png?fit=1096%2C510&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-732.png?fit=1096%2C510&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-732.png?fit=1096%2C510&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":414170,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=414170","url_meta":{"origin":431813,"position":3},"title":"Foolish Fossil Fuel Phase-Out \u2014 The Climate Realism Show\u00a0#183","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/21\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Heartland Institute\u2019s Jim Lakely, Sterling Burnett, and Linnea Lueken will be joined by special guests Craig Rucker of CFACT, who just got back from COP 30 in Brazil, and Tony Heller, one of the most-popular and influential climate realism communicators in America. We will also cover also cover some\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0Screenshot-2025-11-21-185144.png?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0Screenshot-2025-11-21-185144.png?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0Screenshot-2025-11-21-185144.png?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0Screenshot-2025-11-21-185144.png?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0Screenshot-2025-11-21-185144.png?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":437443,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=437443","url_meta":{"origin":431813,"position":4},"title":"When it comes to climate (etc.), is Europe more anchor to the U.S. than ally?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/05\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The answer appears to be more of an anchor weighing our progress down. And of course, in other matters outside of climate, you may also think they are more anchor than ally. Assuming we are an \u201cally,\u201d one has to wonder how long we can be allies with people who\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQM21e8ZM2nXWDGL9UOIfCFOlIG1mPL78AHxFBVjsmg5gMqocK_dc_MNd9g4ZBAknlz19lMXI2KaEH-fC4ZqtXSm6olGOWLuMTMjjLoYdY7K2Y-B2IDyturHg7Gtw_Yz.jpeg?fit=1200%2C813&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQM21e8ZM2nXWDGL9UOIfCFOlIG1mPL78AHxFBVjsmg5gMqocK_dc_MNd9g4ZBAknlz19lMXI2KaEH-fC4ZqtXSm6olGOWLuMTMjjLoYdY7K2Y-B2IDyturHg7Gtw_Yz.jpeg?fit=1200%2C813&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQM21e8ZM2nXWDGL9UOIfCFOlIG1mPL78AHxFBVjsmg5gMqocK_dc_MNd9g4ZBAknlz19lMXI2KaEH-fC4ZqtXSm6olGOWLuMTMjjLoYdY7K2Y-B2IDyturHg7Gtw_Yz.jpeg?fit=1200%2C813&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQM21e8ZM2nXWDGL9UOIfCFOlIG1mPL78AHxFBVjsmg5gMqocK_dc_MNd9g4ZBAknlz19lMXI2KaEH-fC4ZqtXSm6olGOWLuMTMjjLoYdY7K2Y-B2IDyturHg7Gtw_Yz.jpeg?fit=1200%2C813&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQM21e8ZM2nXWDGL9UOIfCFOlIG1mPL78AHxFBVjsmg5gMqocK_dc_MNd9g4ZBAknlz19lMXI2KaEH-fC4ZqtXSm6olGOWLuMTMjjLoYdY7K2Y-B2IDyturHg7Gtw_Yz.jpeg?fit=1200%2C813&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":306567,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=306567","url_meta":{"origin":431813,"position":5},"title":"It\u2019s climate fact check time","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/08\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Another month, another load of unvetted climate exaggerations and misrepresentations that climate campaigners set bouncing about the media echo chamber.","rel":"","context":"In \"\u201cDallas\"","block_context":{"text":"\u201cDallas","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=dallas-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Fact-check-keyboard-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C736&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Fact-check-keyboard-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C736&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Fact-check-keyboard-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C736&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Fact-check-keyboard-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C736&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Fact-check-keyboard-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C736&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/431813","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=431813"}],"version-history":[{"count":30,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/431813\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":431870,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/431813\/revisions\/431870"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/431869"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=431813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=431813"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=431813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}