{"id":431711,"date":"2026-03-16T18:50:05","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T17:50:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=431711"},"modified":"2026-03-16T18:50:07","modified_gmt":"2026-03-16T17:50:07","slug":"scotus-agrees-to-hear-case-on-colorado-dispute-over-climate-change-it-should-throw-that-case-and-all-the-others-out","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=431711","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Case on Colorado Dispute over Climate Change; (it should throw that case and all the others out)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

From the Gelbspan Files<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Russell Cook<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I don\u2019t just write about these things, I try to get something done. Upon learning the news on Feb 23 that the Supreme Court will be adding the effort to hear the concerns about the Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County<\/em> situation<\/a>, I fired off the verbatim email below to the main lawyer representing the energy companies<\/a> (I spelled out the individual web links instead of embedding each one as I\u2019ve done below; the bold highlighted words below where highlighted the same way in my email).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It bothers me no end how the defendants in the \u201cExxonKnew\u201d lawsuits argue endlessly on esoteric jurisdiction technicalities<\/a> when the golden opportunity to outright kill each one of these lawsuits is practically right in front of them in every lawsuit where the claim is that they ran \u2018disinformation campaigns.\u2019 No, it\u2019s the enviro-activists who are putting out the disinformation, and this whole lawfare effort is deserving of deep investigation for fraud activity by the Department of Justice. I don\u2019t just write about that suggestion, either; I\u2019ve put in to major tip efforts to the DoJ about it.
\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mr Shanmugam,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I just learned of the news about SCOTUS scheduling a hearing over the climate cases<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Forgive me for the bluntness of my question, born out of frustration from my own documenting of the fatal faults<\/a> in the current \u201cExxonKnew\u201d lawsuits ever since they started appearing in 2017:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are the defendants in these cases literally unaware that the core accusation elements<\/a> within essentially all of them in one form or another (Boulder v Suncor<\/em> contains the false accusation<\/a> against skeptic climate scientist Dr Willie Soon, apparently plagiarized out of the 2017 San Francisco v BP<\/em> filing<\/a> are all completely without merit?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n