{"id":431474,"date":"2026-03-15T20:37:28","date_gmt":"2026-03-15T19:37:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=431474"},"modified":"2026-03-15T20:37:30","modified_gmt":"2026-03-15T19:37:30","slug":"these-people-are-crazy-climate-science-and-the-cult-of-self-loathing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=431474","title":{"rendered":"\u201cThese People are Crazy:\u201d Climate Science and the Cult of Self-Loathing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Terry L. Headley<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

There was a time when environmental stewardship meant conservation grounded in gratitude rather than condemnation. It reflected a belief that a prosperous and confident society could protect its natural inheritance without repudiating the very progress that made such protection possible. The American conservation tradition grew from strength, not shame. In recent decades, however, much of what is presented as settled \u201cclimate science\u201d has drifted from practical environmental management toward a sweeping moral narrative that indicts industrial civilization itself. The debate is no longer confined to atmospheric chemistry or predictive modeling; it has evolved into a broader philosophical claim that humanity\u2019s advancement is inherently suspect. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Science, properly practiced, is iterative and self-correcting. It advances through questioning, testing, and refinement. Yet public climate discourse increasingly exhibits the traits of ideological orthodoxy. Skepticism about model assumptions or policy prescriptions is often met not with counterargument but with moral denunciation. The language of heresy\u2014\u201cdenial,\u201d \u201canti-science,\u201d \u201cexistential threat\u201d\u2014is deployed to narrow the field of acceptable opinion. When a discipline presents itself as beyond debate and frames policy disagreement as ethical failure, it ceases to resemble open inquiry and begins to resemble doctrine. This transformation warrants scrutiny not because environmental concerns are illegitimate, but because intellectual humility is essential to credible science. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The philosophical undercurrent of contemporary climate activism reveals a deeper unease with human progress. At its more radical edges, the movement portrays mankind not primarily as steward but as contaminant. Human industry is described as invasive, consumption as pathological, and growth as inherently destructive. Advocates of \u201cdegrowth\u201d openly argue that reduced economic output and lower living standards constitute moral improvement. Discussions about limiting childbirth in the name of reducing carbon footprints have moved from fringe to mainstream academic settings. Such arguments rest upon a pessimistic anthropology that views human flourishing as environmentally incompatible. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This view stands in tension with the historical record. The expansion of reliable, affordable energy\u2014fueled by coal, oil, and natural gas\u2014enabled sanitation systems that dramatically reduced disease, agricultural productivity that alleviated famine, and electrification that transformed medicine and education. Life expectancy increased, infant mortality declined, and extreme poverty fell on a global scale. These gains were not incidental to industrialization; they were direct consequences of abundant energy and technological innovation. To characterize the energy systems that facilitated these improvements as moral failures requires overlooking the harsh realities of pre-industrial existence, where scarcity, vulnerability, and shortened lifespans were the norm. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Climate rhetoric frequently adopts theological contours. Carbon functions as a symbol of collective guilt. Industrialization is cast as a civilizational fall. Redemption is framed in terms of sacrifice\u2014fewer conveniences, constrained mobility, diminished expectations. Atmospheric targets are elevated to moral absolutes, and extreme weather events are interpreted as judgment upon modern living. The language employed often transcends empirical description and enters the realm of moral drama. This framing shifts the conversation from managing risk to expiating sin, and from evaluating tradeoffs to demanding repentance. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The convergence between radical climate activism and longstanding critiques of market economies is notable. Industrial capitalism has long been viewed by its detractors as exploitative and morally corrosive. Climate policy provides a powerful vehicle for advancing those critiques under the banner of planetary survival. Proposals to dismantle fossil fuel infrastructure within compressed timelines are coupled with calls to redesign transportation systems, housing patterns, dietary habits, and financial structures. The scope extends well beyond emissions management into comprehensive social transformation. Centralized authority inevitably expands when entire sectors of economic life are targeted for rapid restructuring. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Predictive certainty has also been overstated in public discourse. Climate models are complex simulations that rely on assumptions regarding technological development, economic growth, and behavioral change. They generate scenarios rather than guarantees. Over time, projections have been revised as new data emerge and methodologies improve. Arctic ice fluctuations, agricultural yields, and sea-level measurements illustrate the evolving nature of the science. Acknowledging uncertainty does not negate concern about environmental trends, but it does counsel against framing policy choices as responses to infallible prophecy. Responsible governance demands deliberation rather than panic. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The asymmetrical moral framing of global emissions further complicates the discussion. Western industrial nations are urged to rapidly curtail fossil fuel use, while developing nations continue expanding energy consumption to raise living standards. Emissions from resource-dependent regions are condemned as retrograde, even as energy-intensive manufacturing flourishes abroad to meet global demand. The atmosphere does not discriminate among sources, yet political rhetoric often does. This inconsistency suggests that cultural narratives about Western industry and prosperity are interwoven with environmental arguments. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Energy policy carries tangible human consequences. Elevated electricity costs burden working families and retirees living on fixed incomes. Manufacturing relocates to jurisdictions with lower energy prices, eroding local employment bases. Grid reliability is tested when dispatchable generation is retired prematurely. Advocates who call to \u201ckeep it in the ground\u201d seldom dwell on the livelihoods dependent upon resource development or the communities structured around energy production. Environmental objectives must be balanced against economic stability and social cohesion. Policies divorced from that balance risk undermining the very populations they claim to protect. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Perhaps most concerning is the cultivation of despair. Younger generations are told that catastrophe is imminent and that their future is defined by ecological decline. Anxiety is framed as moral awakening. Pessimism becomes intellectual currency. This narrative contrasts sharply with the American tradition of confronting challenges through innovation and resolve. Previous generations faced world wars, economic upheaval, and severe environmental degradation, yet they responded with technological breakthroughs, regulatory reforms, and infrastructural investment rather than civilizational repudiation. Confidence in human ingenuity proved justified time and again. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A prudent environmental ethic recognizes that stewardship and prosperity are not mutually exclusive. Technological improvements can reduce emissions without mandating economic contraction. Efficiency gains, cleaner combustion technologies, and market-driven innovation have already achieved substantial environmental progress. Constructive debate about timelines, costs, and tradeoffs is not obstruction; it is responsible policymaking. The deeper question remains anthropological: do we view humanity as primarily a problem to be constrained or as a creative force capable of adaptation and improvement? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

When environmental advocacy slips into narratives that portray human existence as inherently destructive, it crosses the line into Malthusian madness. A civilization that internalizes self-contempt risks forfeiting the confidence necessary to solve complex problems. Stewardship should flow from gratitude for human capacity, not hostility toward it. The challenge of managing environmental impact in a world of billions requires realism, innovation, and balance. It does not require embracing a philosophy that treats progress as sin. A healthy society can pursue cleaner technologies while affirming the dignity, creativity, and resilience of the human person. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

About the Author <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Terry L. Headley, MBA, MA, is a communications and research professional with more than twenty-five years of experience in the American energy sector. A former journalist and longtime industry communications director, he has worked at the intersection of public policy, energy markets, and strategic advocacy throughout his career. Headley has advised major coal and energy organizations, developed statewide public engagement campaigns, and authored multiple books examining the role of traditional energy in American prosperity. His work focuses on energy reliability, economic competitiveness, and the cultural implications of public policy. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

About The Hedley Company <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Hedley Company \u2013 Communications & Research for Energy is a strategic advisory firm specializing in energy policy analysis, communications strategy, research publications, and advocacy development. The firm provides data-driven intelligence briefs, economic impact studies, policy memoranda, and media strategy for organizations operating in the coal, natural gas, and critical minerals sectors. With a focus on reliability, affordability, and national security, The Hedley Company supports clients seeking rigorous research and disciplined messaging in a rapidly evolving energy landscape. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There was a time when environmental stewardship meant conservation grounded in gratitude rather than condemnation. It reflected a belief that a prosperous and confident society could protect its natural inheritance without repudiating the very progress that made such protection possible. The American conservation tradition grew from strength, not shame. In recent decades, however, much of what is presented as settled \u201cclimate science\u201d has drifted from practical environmental management toward a sweeping moral narrative that indicts industrial civilization itself. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":431476,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691825373,691819255,691818153,691841897,691822868,691841896],"class_list":{"0":"post-431474","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-carbon-footprints","9":"tag-climate-activism","10":"tag-climate-models","11":"tag-climate-rhetoric","12":"tag-extreme-weather-events","13":"tag-settled-climate-science","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQNyTT3Nr0m6_WOQQnJbCa0GFQKWqd_ymU6L9zc5QOIcFfITLCY-Qw7DrggTbDGJpi_UysGHG8TO9DHxXf04yj69trhkOq1YkRCm6EfWIzIhLRFDu8oEcA2FmsHNBOI-1.jpeg?fit=1041%2C949&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1Ofg","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":432966,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=432966","url_meta":{"origin":431474,"position":0},"title":"\u201cThese People are Crazy\u201d climate science and the cult of self-loathing","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/21\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"There was a time when environmental stewardship meant conservation grounded in gratitude rather than condemnation. It reflected a belief that a prosperous and confident society could protect its natural inheritance without repudiating the very progress that made such protection possible. The American conservation tradition grew from strength, not shame. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Anti-Science\"","block_context":{"text":"Anti-Science","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=anti-science"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQM0bvOjTxc5ziIDjYhjd9X5via4InhknEa2BUwwsU3nz9A9SC9zlI4Kx9krFPJPAJNf1PkaCNEejWfD3uA2kKiSB3K0K0ZiYAdfFaQYCDR8Re8VGpnEqHOWp5Uc3NKa8QtFjFABAjswLP7RmkkjOwPaw5hVtA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQM0bvOjTxc5ziIDjYhjd9X5via4InhknEa2BUwwsU3nz9A9SC9zlI4Kx9krFPJPAJNf1PkaCNEejWfD3uA2kKiSB3K0K0ZiYAdfFaQYCDR8Re8VGpnEqHOWp5Uc3NKa8QtFjFABAjswLP7RmkkjOwPaw5hVtA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQM0bvOjTxc5ziIDjYhjd9X5via4InhknEa2BUwwsU3nz9A9SC9zlI4Kx9krFPJPAJNf1PkaCNEejWfD3uA2kKiSB3K0K0ZiYAdfFaQYCDR8Re8VGpnEqHOWp5Uc3NKa8QtFjFABAjswLP7RmkkjOwPaw5hVtA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQM0bvOjTxc5ziIDjYhjd9X5via4InhknEa2BUwwsU3nz9A9SC9zlI4Kx9krFPJPAJNf1PkaCNEejWfD3uA2kKiSB3K0K0ZiYAdfFaQYCDR8Re8VGpnEqHOWp5Uc3NKa8QtFjFABAjswLP7RmkkjOwPaw5hVtA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQM0bvOjTxc5ziIDjYhjd9X5via4InhknEa2BUwwsU3nz9A9SC9zlI4Kx9krFPJPAJNf1PkaCNEejWfD3uA2kKiSB3K0K0ZiYAdfFaQYCDR8Re8VGpnEqHOWp5Uc3NKa8QtFjFABAjswLP7RmkkjOwPaw5hVtA.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238604,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=238604","url_meta":{"origin":431474,"position":1},"title":"From Nature Conservation to Climate Calamity","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/08\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Conservation, the Environmental Apocalypse, and the Birth of Modern Environmentalism","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0onion5-ipcc.webp?fit=1000%2C1000&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0onion5-ipcc.webp?fit=1000%2C1000&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0onion5-ipcc.webp?fit=1000%2C1000&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0onion5-ipcc.webp?fit=1000%2C1000&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292090,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292090","url_meta":{"origin":431474,"position":2},"title":"Biden admin wants to give climate resilient wolverines ESA protections","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/20\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In Episode 399 of District of Conservation, Gabriella discusses her recent ALEC Summit speech on natural asset companies, fishing in Arizona\u2019s Salt River, previews CSF NASC podcast interviews, and discusses the USFWS\u2019s proposed rule to list the Lower-48 wolverine on the Endangered Species Act with threatened protections on climate change,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Biden Administration\"","block_context":{"text":"Biden Administration","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=biden-administration"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00Climate-Resilient-Wolverines.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00Climate-Resilient-Wolverines.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00Climate-Resilient-Wolverines.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00Climate-Resilient-Wolverines.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00Climate-Resilient-Wolverines.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":426209,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=426209","url_meta":{"origin":431474,"position":3},"title":"New York Times Gives Wind Turbines a Free Pass to Slaughter Birds","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/14\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The American Bird Conservancy estimates that wind turbines kill between 700,000 and one million birds annually in the United States alone. Yet the industry is often granted quotas, i.e. literal licenses to kill. The matter is more concerning when these turbines are given a free hand in slaughtering species that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQPa2UdvuaNnT2aPfbeAaId08xQzyMPDTKCnauwYO1NDS-mkvIDZQRfIja4By2JQxf0qAHaPewhNUNazIKnahbUQAAEe0fypi1fnNdk5hha01-6D3WzOQyhwn571-EG0.jpeg?fit=1200%2C679&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQPa2UdvuaNnT2aPfbeAaId08xQzyMPDTKCnauwYO1NDS-mkvIDZQRfIja4By2JQxf0qAHaPewhNUNazIKnahbUQAAEe0fypi1fnNdk5hha01-6D3WzOQyhwn571-EG0.jpeg?fit=1200%2C679&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQPa2UdvuaNnT2aPfbeAaId08xQzyMPDTKCnauwYO1NDS-mkvIDZQRfIja4By2JQxf0qAHaPewhNUNazIKnahbUQAAEe0fypi1fnNdk5hha01-6D3WzOQyhwn571-EG0.jpeg?fit=1200%2C679&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQPa2UdvuaNnT2aPfbeAaId08xQzyMPDTKCnauwYO1NDS-mkvIDZQRfIja4By2JQxf0qAHaPewhNUNazIKnahbUQAAEe0fypi1fnNdk5hha01-6D3WzOQyhwn571-EG0.jpeg?fit=1200%2C679&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQPa2UdvuaNnT2aPfbeAaId08xQzyMPDTKCnauwYO1NDS-mkvIDZQRfIja4By2JQxf0qAHaPewhNUNazIKnahbUQAAEe0fypi1fnNdk5hha01-6D3WzOQyhwn571-EG0.jpeg?fit=1200%2C679&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":415144,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=415144","url_meta":{"origin":431474,"position":4},"title":"Youth voices at COP: A wake-up call for real solutions","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/28\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"As I watched the final round of the youth-led COP30 forum virtually, young attendees took the stage to deliver a message that \u2014 perhaps without realizing it \u2014 exposed deep cracks in the UN\u2019s climate machinery. Their remarks reflected growing disillusionment with the empty pageantry of these conferences: endless speeches,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"COP Youth\"","block_context":{"text":"COP Youth","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=cop-youth"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0Youth-marcih.jpg?fit=1200%2C587&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0Youth-marcih.jpg?fit=1200%2C587&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0Youth-marcih.jpg?fit=1200%2C587&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0Youth-marcih.jpg?fit=1200%2C587&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0Youth-marcih.jpg?fit=1200%2C587&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258092,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=258092","url_meta":{"origin":431474,"position":5},"title":"Study: Climate Believers Are More Likely to Trust Strangers","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/19\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Perhaps greens find it difficult to imagine that scientific authority figures can be self serving lying toads, just like anyone else.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/07d4e2db2ef0110d5ea399ec5f137f147.jpg?fit=960%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/07d4e2db2ef0110d5ea399ec5f137f147.jpg?fit=960%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/07d4e2db2ef0110d5ea399ec5f137f147.jpg?fit=960%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/07d4e2db2ef0110d5ea399ec5f137f147.jpg?fit=960%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/431474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=431474"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/431474\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":431478,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/431474\/revisions\/431478"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/431476"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=431474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=431474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=431474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}