{"id":429515,"date":"2026-03-04T18:11:37","date_gmt":"2026-03-04T17:11:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=429515"},"modified":"2026-03-04T18:11:39","modified_gmt":"2026-03-04T17:11:39","slug":"nuclear-at-70-federal-subsidies-and-regulation-did-not-work","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=429515","title":{"rendered":"Nuclear at 70: Federal Subsidies and Regulation Did Not Work"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Master Resource<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Robert Bradley Jr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cNuclear fission is the most complicated, fraught, expensive way to boil water to produce steam to drive electrical turbines.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

What U.S. industry is at once the most subsidized<\/em> and regulated<\/em> by the federal government? The answer is commercial nuclear power. As a result, the 73-year-old \u201cAtoms for Peace\u201d program represents the most expensive failure (malinvestment) in US business. potholed with uncompleted projects and massive cost overruns with completed projects. Future decommissioning costs will add to this liability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But hyperbole rules with this technology, and there is always tomorrow. Forget that competitive viability did not emerge in the 1950s or 1960s, and George W. Bush and Joe Biden both failed at their attempted \u201cnuclear renaissance.\u201d Expect the same to result from today\u2019s interventionist energy policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A future post will outline the crash attempt by President Trump and DOE secretary Chris Wright to get new nuclear capacity on track. Regulatory streamlining is not enough; taxpayer largesse (grants and loan guarantees) are required. This in itself is a red flag and violation of Free Market 101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I recently prepared a White Paper for the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER), Nuclear Power: A Free Market Approach<\/a>. I began that historical review with ten points, reproduced below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ten Points<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  1. Commercial nuclear fission dates from the 1950s, a time when electricity was generated by fossil fuels (80 percent) and hydro (20 percent). Today, nuclear supplies 19 percent of US generation and 10 percent globally. Nuclear fusion remains in the laboratory with little prospect of foreseeable commercialization.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Nuclear power is a government-enabled industry<\/em>. It emerged from wartime R&D and continued under the postwar \u201cAtoms for Peace\u201d subsidy programs. The Price\u2013Anderson Act of 1957, which capped liability payouts from nuclear accidents, was instrumental.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Rate-base treatment under state-level public utility regulation was a de facto insurance policy for utilities to commit to experimental technology. A \u201cbandwagon effect\u201d occurred after Westinghouse and General Electric offered performance (\u201cturnkey\u201d) guarantees for new reactors, but losses ended the program and transferred risk to owners and ratepayers.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Government subsidies incited multiple technical designs and plant-size escalation in the 1960s, all contributing to cost and construction failures in the next decade.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. Activist regulation by the Atomic Energy Commission\/Nuclear Regulatory Commission contributed to cost overruns and completion delays. Extensions of the Price-Anderson Act (1966, 1975, 1988, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2024) have kept federal regulators in charge.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  6. Orders for new reactors ended in 1979, the year of the Three Mile Island accident. In response, nuclear utilities engaged in collaborative best practices that have proven effective for safety and reliability.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  7. New subsidies in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 resulted in four new reactors. Two were abandoned during construction, and two entered service after multiple delays and major cost overruns (2023, 2024).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  8. New subsidies in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 were designed to keep existing units in operation and encourage new-generation Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). The Trump administration is expanding this Biden administration program with grants, guarantees, and executive orders.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  9. The quest for competitive commercial nuclear power has been long on promises and short on performance. Technological complexity and government policies have resulted in the worst of all worlds, with today\u2019s situation not unlike that of the 1950s.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  10. A free-market approach to nuclear policy would entail the following: Ending governmental research and development in the field. Abolishing public grants and tax preferences for the industry. Halting foreign-loan guarantees. Repealing the Price-Anderson Act in order to privatize safety and insurance regulation. Lifting all antitrust constraints on industry collaboration. Making waste storage the responsibility of waste owners. Removing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the US Department of Energy from civilian nuclear policy.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Sorry for the bad news. But the underlying fact is, nuclear fission is the most complicated, fraught, expensive way to boil water to produce steam to drive electrical turbines<\/em>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    I invite any nuclear expert or energy scholar to challenge any of the above points or to reach a different conclusion about imminent competitiveness. After all, I am energy-and-technology neutral, thus not \u201cfor\u201d or \u201cagainst\u201d nuclear fission (or fusion) per se. May the best energies win.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Sorry for the bad news. But the underlying fact is, nuclear fission is the most complicated, fraught, expensive way to boil water to produce steam to drive electrical turbines. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":429518,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691841730,691828255,691841729,691818206,691820066],"class_list":{"0":"post-429515","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-atoms-for-peace","9":"tag-free-market-2","10":"tag-nuclear-fission","11":"tag-nuclear-power","12":"tag-regulation","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AQMel9d7OE0Bo7XVbUuNIbGihPE0fNDHEyMosbbGCeV1JbptgCNoHXNFKWN-aoKEEuCaAETmVGkfvosRmoySCKMxsi0F6F7U0y4ViqphSD528TQR9kniRHHzef1mWw.jpeg?fit=1491%2C836&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1NJF","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":351755,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=351755","url_meta":{"origin":429515,"position":0},"title":"Government-enabled Nuclear: Trump Demures","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"20\/11\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Commercial nuclear power (fission) was a government-created industry in the 1950s that continues to hold false promise today. It is by far the most complicated, expensive, and fraught way to boil water.","rel":"","context":"In \"Net zero\"","block_context":{"text":"Net zero","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=net-zero"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Tennessee-Valley-Authority-Watts-Bar-Unit-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Tennessee-Valley-Authority-Watts-Bar-Unit-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Tennessee-Valley-Authority-Watts-Bar-Unit-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Tennessee-Valley-Authority-Watts-Bar-Unit-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/0Tennessee-Valley-Authority-Watts-Bar-Unit-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":345827,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=345827","url_meta":{"origin":429515,"position":1},"title":"The small modular reactor revolution is arriving soon","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/10\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s been a big year for nuclear energy in the U.S. The Department of Energy has allocated a large amount of capital to nuclear energy research and has committed $900 million to advance Gen III+ (more on them below) small modular reactors (SMRs). The Inflation Reduction Act\u2019s inclusion of nuclear\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"European Commission\"","block_context":{"text":"European Commission","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=european-commission"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/00SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020-1.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/00SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020-1.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/00SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020-1.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/00SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020-1.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/00SMR-CM-RENDER-New-2020-1.webp?fit=1200%2C668&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":201143,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=201143","url_meta":{"origin":429515,"position":2},"title":"Endless Energy: Nuclear Provides Prospect of Safe, Reliable & Affordable Power Forever","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/05\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Putin\u2019s Ukrainian adventure has Europeans talking about nuclear power as if their existence depends on it. Threaten to deprive people of access to reliable and affordable energy and the love affair with wind and solar is soon forgotten. It doesn\u2019t take a rocket scientist to explain the relationship between total\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0Screenshot-2022-05-24-093509.png?fit=1049%2C562&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0Screenshot-2022-05-24-093509.png?fit=1049%2C562&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0Screenshot-2022-05-24-093509.png?fit=1049%2C562&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0Screenshot-2022-05-24-093509.png?fit=1049%2C562&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":360769,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=360769","url_meta":{"origin":429515,"position":3},"title":"Horse Manure, Climate Change, and Nuclear Energy","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The \"Great Manure Crisis\" of the late 19th century offers some serious lessons for those worried about the \"existential threat\" of global warming from CO2 emissions.\u00a0 \u00a0","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/014713045_10157426088105411_4561574081669332359_o.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/014713045_10157426088105411_4561574081669332359_o.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/014713045_10157426088105411_4561574081669332359_o.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/014713045_10157426088105411_4561574081669332359_o.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/014713045_10157426088105411_4561574081669332359_o.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286503,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=286503","url_meta":{"origin":429515,"position":4},"title":"Kathryn Porter On Nuclear\u00a0Power","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/11\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"If ever there was a case for massive government intervention, this is it. From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT By Paul Homewood h\/t Philip Bratby Another excellent article by Kathryn Porter: I\u00a0write a lot about\u00a0what isn\u2019t working in the energy transition\u00a0\u2013 so what do I think will work?\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336144,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=336144","url_meta":{"origin":429515,"position":5},"title":"The U.S. Navy proves nuclear is better","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBad Boys\u201d Isaac Orr and Mitch Rolling, both formerly of the Minnesota-based Center for the American Experiment, just posted an article contending that, in the long run, nuclear energy is cheaper (and better) than wind or solar (though not as cheap as coal or natural gas) despite high up-front capital\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Net zero\"","block_context":{"text":"Net zero","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=net-zero"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0-U.S.-Navy-proves-nuclear-is-better.jpeg?fit=1200%2C772&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0-U.S.-Navy-proves-nuclear-is-better.jpeg?fit=1200%2C772&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0-U.S.-Navy-proves-nuclear-is-better.jpeg?fit=1200%2C772&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0-U.S.-Navy-proves-nuclear-is-better.jpeg?fit=1200%2C772&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0-U.S.-Navy-proves-nuclear-is-better.jpeg?fit=1200%2C772&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/429515","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=429515"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/429515\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":429519,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/429515\/revisions\/429519"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/429518"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=429515"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=429515"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=429515"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}