{"id":426984,"date":"2026-02-19T13:47:37","date_gmt":"2026-02-19T12:47:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=426984"},"modified":"2026-02-19T13:47:39","modified_gmt":"2026-02-19T12:47:39","slug":"texas-windpower-will-negative-pricing-blow-out-the-lights-ptc-vs-reliable-new-capacity-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=426984","title":{"rendered":"Texas Windpower: Will Negative Pricing Blow Out the Lights? (PTC vs. reliable new capacity)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From The Master Resource<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Josiah Neeley<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ed. note<\/strong>: This post by Josiah Neeley, originally\u00a0published<\/a>\u00a0at MasterResource in November 2012, predicted the decline of reliable (dispatchable) power a decade before Storm Uri, the subject of yesterday\u2019s post. Meanwhile, climate\/renewable activists such as Chris Tomlinson (Houston Chronicle<\/em>) was calling out the \u2018fossil fuel-supporting Chicken Littles<\/a>\u2018. Tomlinson (et al.) misinterpreted the event by focusing on the physical \u2018why\u2019 instead of the economic \u2018why behind the why\u2019 (here<\/a>,\u00a0here<\/a>, and\u00a0here<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cIt is well known that Texas is undergoing a major challenge in maintaining resource adequacy due to improper price signals;\u00a0less well known is that a significant portion of the problem can be laid directly on the doorstep of subsidies for wind generation.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The federal Production Tax Credit (PTC), which currently provides a $0.022\/kWh subsidy to qualifying renewables, is set to expire at year-end. Just the prospect of expiration has dramatically slowed new construction of industrial wind capacity, despite a raft of other subsidies<\/a> to politically correct energy. [1]<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Texas Public Policy Foundation has released a new paper<\/a> looking at the effect of the production tax credit both on taxpayers and consumers. Bill Peacock and I found that PTC continuance puts the Texas electricity market at increased risk of price spikes and blackout by discouraging the construction of new reliable, on-peak generating capacity.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Texans are not only paying for the PTC\u2019s direct annual cost of $622 million; they could pay billions of dollars more from forgone capacity given negative pricing where wind producers generate unneeded electricity just to pocket tax credits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Background<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is well known that Texas is undergoing a major challenge in maintaining resource adequacy due to improper price signals; less well known is that a significant portion of the problem can be laid directly on the doorstep of subsidies for wind generation<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When wind is bid into the market at a negative price, superior forms of generation must match that price or risk getting knocked off the grid. This decreases the profitability of non-wind generation and makes companies less likely to invest in new capacity. This has already degraded Texas\u2019s resource adequacy, and it could get worse before it gets better. This increases the risk of blackouts if unusual events reduce capacity and\/or increase demand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Donna Nelson, chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) explains<\/a> this well:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Federal incentives for renewable energy\u2026 have distorted the competitive wholesale market in ERCOT. Wind has been supported by a federal production tax credit that provides $22 per MWh of energy generated by a wind resource. With this substantial incentive, wind resources can actually bid negative prices into the market and still make a profit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We\u2019ve seen a number of days with a negative clearing price in the west zone of ERCOT where most of the wind resources are installed\u2026. The market distortions caused by renewable energy incentives are one of the primary causes I believe of our current resource adequacy issue\u2026 [T]his distortion makes it difficult for other generation types to recover their cost and discourages investment in new generation.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The Northbridge Group recently published a study<\/a> confirming the distortions in the market caused by the PTC. Northbridge found that the five-fold increase in wind generation since 2006 parallels the increase in negative pricing. In ERCOT, negative pricing occurred between 8 percent and 13 percent of the time from 2008 to 2011.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Percentage of Hours with Negative Real-Time Electric Energy Prices in ERCOT, 2006-11<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
Source: The Northbridge Group<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The disruption of the Texas electrical market by negative wind prices is only going to get worse as more renewable-specific transmission lines are built, and as the frequency of negative pricing in new parts of the state comes to resemble the West Zone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As another recent report<\/a> by the Brattle Group noted:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wind generation puts downward pressure on energy prices in all parts of ERCOT whenever the wind blows. However, the effect is greatest in the West Zone, where more than 70% of ERCOT\u2019s wind capacity is located\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The CREZ project is primarily designed to move electricity generated by wind and other renewable resources from remote parts of Texas (i.e., West Texas and the Texas Panhandle) to the more heavily- populated areas of Texas (e.g., Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth, and San Antonio). This transmission expansion will also increase Texas\u2019s ability to build more wind generation but may in the future erode non-wind generator economics more by depressing energy prices in the other three zones.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Wind generation puts downward pressure on energy prices in all parts of ERCOT whenever the wind blows. However, the effect is greatest in the West Zone, where more than 70% of ERCOT\u2019s wind capacity is located\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The CREZ project is primarily designed to move electricity generated by wind and other renewable resources from remote parts of Texas (i.e., West Texas and the Texas Panhandle) to the more heavily- populated areas of Texas (e.g., Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth, and San Antonio). This transmission expansion will also increase Texas\u2019s ability to build more wind generation but may in the future erode non-wind generator economics more by depressing energy prices in the other three zones.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The Real Cost of Wind<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is difficult to quantify the cost of the PTC\u2019s distortions on the market, though the Foundation will address this issue more fully in an upcoming paper. But one method of doing so would be of looking at the cost of solving Texas\u2019 resource adequacy challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PUC Commissioner Ken Anderson recently did some \u201cback of the envelope\u201d calculations of the cost of imposing a PJM-style capacity market on ERCOT. He came up with a cost of over $3.6 billion per year<\/a>. The portion of this cost that can be attributed to renewable energy subsidies is debatable, but these costs could easily exceed the costs of the direct subsidies, more than doubling the costs on consumers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At a bare minimum, renewables energy subsidies in Texas are costing more than half a billion a year. Because of the PTC\u2019s per megawatt hour subsidy, it causes substantially more distortion to the market than other renewable subsidies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A credible case could be made that the PTC is more responsible than any other factor in causing ERCOT\u2019s resource adequacy challenges and thus driving Texas toward some kind of forward capacity market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Competition is working in the Texas electricity market. It is government interference with the market\u2014led by the PTC\u2014that is causing the current reliability challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Texas need not abandon wholesale competition and move toward a capacity market. But this will be difficult to avoid as long as the PTC is in place. Congress should allow the PTC to expire; if not, we may see the end of Texas\u2019 world-class energy-only electricity market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[1<\/strong>] The PTC is only one of the subsidies available to renewable energy producers in Texas. Others available in Texas include Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) under the state\u2019s Renewable Portfolio Standard, federal grants under the 2009 stimulus bill, and access to transmission through the Competitive Renewable Energy Zone (CREZ) program. Altogether, renewable energy subsidies in Texas, including PTC, will cost taxpayers and consumers about $12.9 billion over the same period. [The PTC, set to expire at year-end 2012, has been extended six (6) times<\/a> since this post.]<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014-<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Josiah Neeley <\/em><\/a>is a policy analyst for the Armstrong Center for Energy & the Environment at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a non-profit, free-market research institute based in Austin. <\/em>Bill Peacock<\/em><\/a>, coauthor of this post, is the Vice President for Research and Director for the Center for Economic Freedom at the TPPF.<\/em> [Update: Mr. Neeley is Senior Fellow and Energy Director, Texas at R-Street<\/a>]<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The federal Production Tax Credit (PTC), which currently provides a $0.022\/kWh subsidy to qualifying renewables, is set to expire at year-end. Just the prospect of expiration has dramatically slowed new construction of industrial wind capacity, despite a raft of\u00a0other subsidies\u00a0to politically correct energy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":426991,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691841501,691821951,691827143,691841500,691819094,691841502,691818299,691818577],"class_list":{"0":"post-426984","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-electrical-market","9":"tag-ercot","10":"tag-production-tax-credit-ptc","11":"tag-public-utility-commission-of-texas-puc","12":"tag-renewable-green-energy","13":"tag-renewable-energy-credits-recs","14":"tag-subsidies","15":"tag-texas","17":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNe5xoru5ELbcArNVvKGUTyy-xu762Va-OkcxFpq37F4OwQ8Amaq4lT6llBi22iYBn4Uxu487Z4LJGVc0F4dlXCnyhdTUNgTySV-b6gxF4S1fSS665fMOcV054_XDKqLqArT-siPQLYWENmOPkp6WgSHcXvg-1.jpeg?fit=1280%2C1280&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1N4Q","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200129,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=200129","url_meta":{"origin":426984,"position":0},"title":"\u201cNegative Electricity Prices and the Production Tax Credit\u201d (2012 warning for Texas went unheeded)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"17\/05\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Robert Bradley Jr.\u00a0 [Editor note: The\u00a0current (May) problems of the Texas Grid\u00a0reflect a socialized wholesale market (ERCOT) in light of the wind\/solar cancer that has wounded the \u2018reliables.\u2019 Specifically,\u00a0negative pricing\u00a0of windpower, a decade-old phenomenon, has ruined margins for natural gas and coal plants, causing\u00a0premature retirements, decisions against new capacity,\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0texasflag.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0texasflag.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0texasflag.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0texasflag.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0texasflag.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/0texasflag.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200279,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=200279","url_meta":{"origin":426984,"position":1},"title":"\u201cNegative Electricity Prices and the Production Tax Credit\u201d (2012 warning for Texas went unheeded)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/05\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"From\u00a0MasterResource By Robert Bradley Jr. \u2014 May 17, 2022 [Editor note: The\u00a0current (May) problems of the Texas Grid\u00a0reflect a socialized wholesale market (ERCOT) in light of the wind\/solar cancer that has wounded the \u2018reliables.\u2019 Specifically,\u00a0negative pricing\u00a0of windpower, a decade-old phenomenon, has ruined margins for natural gas and coal plants, causing\u00a0premature\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/068478577_m.webp?fit=900%2C580&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/068478577_m.webp?fit=900%2C580&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/068478577_m.webp?fit=900%2C580&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/068478577_m.webp?fit=900%2C580&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202535,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=202535","url_meta":{"origin":426984,"position":2},"title":"Wind & Solar Subsidies Destroying Reliable & Affordable Power Supplies","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/06\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Wind and solar subsidies were designed to undermine the owners of reliable power generation plants, making them uncompetitive in the first instance and ultimately putting them out of business. The problem with that model, though, is that once-reliable generators are knocked off the grid, power consumers are then forced to\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/image-6.png?fit=907%2C495&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/image-6.png?fit=907%2C495&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/image-6.png?fit=907%2C495&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/image-6.png?fit=907%2C495&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282905,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282905","url_meta":{"origin":426984,"position":3},"title":"Giberson on Negative Wind Pricing (2008)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The subsidy for renewable power is ending in blackouts and blackouts. From\u00a0Master Resource By Robert Bradley Jr. \u201cThis seems a little crazy. During these negative price periods,\u00a0suppliers are paying ERCOT to take their power\u2026. You could \u2026 build a giant toaster in West Texas and be paid by generators to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Collateral Damage\"","block_context":{"text":"Collateral Damage","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=collateral-damage"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0ac123c14-da9c-4e2e-8521-fc474aa5b8f3-texas_topper.webp?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0ac123c14-da9c-4e2e-8521-fc474aa5b8f3-texas_topper.webp?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0ac123c14-da9c-4e2e-8521-fc474aa5b8f3-texas_topper.webp?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0ac123c14-da9c-4e2e-8521-fc474aa5b8f3-texas_topper.webp?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0ac123c14-da9c-4e2e-8521-fc474aa5b8f3-texas_topper.webp?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":212680,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=212680","url_meta":{"origin":426984,"position":4},"title":"Big Wind\/Solar Roll Taxpayers, Landscape: Legislative Bonanza: A Terror Unleashed","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"New zero-emission resources, including small modular nuclear or hydrogen generation, won\u2019t reach commercial scale anytime soon.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-265.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-265.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-265.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-265.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":212422,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=212422","url_meta":{"origin":426984,"position":5},"title":"Big Wind\/Solar Roll Taxpayers, Landscape: Legislative Bonanza: A Terror Unleashed","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/08\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By\u00a0Lisa Linowes\u00a0 \u201cThe Schumer-Manchin bill provides that after 2024 the traditional PTC and ITC programs expire, but the benefits live on through the new \u201cClean Electricity\u201d tax credit program.\u201d \u201cBased on published project footprints of recently sited wind projects in Wyoming, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Colorado, new wind turbines will\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-206.png?fit=1200%2C549&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-206.png?fit=1200%2C549&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-206.png?fit=1200%2C549&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-206.png?fit=1200%2C549&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/image-206.png?fit=1200%2C549&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/426984","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=426984"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/426984\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":426993,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/426984\/revisions\/426993"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/426991"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=426984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=426984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=426984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}