{"id":426145,"date":"2026-02-14T18:31:50","date_gmt":"2026-02-14T17:31:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=426145"},"modified":"2026-02-14T18:31:52","modified_gmt":"2026-02-14T17:31:52","slug":"new-york-climate-act-issues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=426145","title":{"rendered":"New York Climate Act Issues"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Roger Caiazza<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I was recently asked to give a briefing about Climate Leadership & Community Protection Act<\/a> (Climate Act) issues before the start of the New York legislative annual session.  There are Climate Act issues that Governor Hochul and the Legislature should address because the issues outlined in this article can no longer be ignored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Climate Act Implementation Schedule<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Climate Act established a New York \u201cNet Zero\u201d target (85% reduction in GHG emissions and 15% offset of emissions) by 2050.  Among its interim 2030 targets is a reduction target of 40% less GHG emissions and a 70% renewable energy electricity mandate. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is no longer debatable that New York has fallen behind on its Climate Act transition plan 2030 mandates.  The New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) annual load and capacity data report universally known as the \u201cGold Book<\/a>\u201d data over the last six years is shown in Table 1. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Table 1: NYISO Gold Book Annual Total and Renewable Summer Capability and Generation<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

There is supposed to be a 40% reduction in economy\u2011wide GHG emissions by 2030.  I reviewed the 2025 NYS GHG Emission Inventory Report in my article Implications of New York State 2025 GHG Emissions Inventory<\/a>.  I found that GHG emissions through 2023 are 14% less than the 1990 baseline and emissions have been basically unchanged since 2022. That makes meeting 2030 GHG emission reduction target of a 40% reduction impossible. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Affordability and Rate Impacts<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

New York currently has an energy affordability crisis because as of December 2024<\/a>, over 1.3 million households are behind on their energy bills by sixty-days-or-more, collectively owing more than $1.8 billion.  Kris Martin published a recent post<\/a> that included a table ratepayer impacts. Table 2 summarizes recent electric rate cases (Con Edison, National Grid, Central Hudson, O&R, NYSEG, and RG&E with an estimate of the Climate Act proportion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Table 2: Typical 2024 Residential Electric Costs from <\/strong>What it costs<\/strong><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Department of Public Service (DPS) staff provides estimates of the impact of the Climate Act on electric rates.  The Second Informational Report<\/a> \u201cincludes the estimated costs and outcomes from 2023 through 2029 to provide the most up to date information.\u201d  According to the Summary of Ratepayer Impact for Electric Utilities table, residential impacts of the Climate Act range from 4.6% to 10.3% of 2023 total monthly electric bills. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In my opinion, those estimates are conservative because there is immense pressure on agency staff to minimize the costs of the Climate Act.  In addition, the costs necessary to implement the Climate Act were ramping up in 2023.  I expect that these costs will continue to climb.  Kris Martin also noted that the DPS estimates for future costs don\u2019t include all the Renewable Energy Credits (REC) and OREC (offshore wind REC) costs that would be required to reach Climate Act targets\u2014or even what they might realistically expect to complete. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

All these analyses have focused on utility rate case costs. The New York State Energy Research & Development Authority (NYSEDA) has not been forthcoming about total household costs but did offer a glimpse of those costs in the State Energy Plan as described in my post Energy Affordability Fact Sheet<\/a>.  NYERDA claimed that the use of \u201cnew, efficient equipment and electrification can cut energy spending by $100 to $300 every month for many New York households\u201d in the Fact Sheet.  However, these projections do not cover the costs of the equipment to make the reductions.  Table 3 is derived from the NYSERDA supporting documentation and shows the monthly energy costs when equipment costs are included.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Table 3: Total Monthly Energy Costs Including Levelized Equipment Costs for an Upstate New York moderate income household that uses natural gas for heat projected monthly costs and hardware costs<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

When the costs of equipment are added, the story changes.  Rows 1-5 in Table 3 list monthly energy costs.  Rows 6-8 list the levelized cost for the equipment needed to produce the savings. Row totals all the costs. The cost of Climate Act compliance is the difference between replacement of conventional equipment and the highly efficient electrification equipment in  Row 10.   There is a $594 (43%)  increase in costs necessary for Climate Act compliance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NYSERDA\u2019s messaging for these results is that costs are going to go up anyway and that the increase in costs due to the Climate Act are small in comparison.  I think that additional costs will add more households to the already unacceptable number living in energy poverty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cap<\/strong>\u2011<\/strong>and<\/strong>\u2011<\/strong>Invest and GHG Regulatory Architecture<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are two aspects of the Climate Act mandate to implement an economy-wide cap-and-invest program<\/a> by January 1, 2024 that must be addressed by the Legislature and Governor Hochul.   I have described<\/a> the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) New York Cap-and-Invest<\/a> (NYCI) regulations in many articles.  Currently DEC has only finalized the Mandatory GHG Emissions Reporting Rule.  There have been no suggestions when the two other necessary regulations will be proposed.  The Cap-and-Invest Rule will define affected sources, binding caps, and allowance allocations.  DEC also needs an auction rule that implements the auction that will be used to distribute allowances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is problematic.  On 3\/31\/25 a group of environmental advocates filed a petition<\/a> pursuant to CPLR Article 78 alleging that DEC<\/a> had failed to comply with the timeframe for NYCI because DEC missed the January 1, 2024 date.  I explained<\/a> that the decision<\/a> on the petition stated: DEC must \u201cpromulgate rules and regulations to ensure compliance with the statewide missed statutory deadlines and ordered DEC to issue final regulations establishing economy-wide greenhouse gas emission (GHG) limits on or before Feb. 6, 2026 or go to the Legislature and get the Climate Act 2030 GHG reduction mandate schedule changed.  On 11\/24\/25 DEC appealed<\/a> the decision.  The State has appealed to the Appellate Division.   This means that the deadline of Feb 6 is suspended until the Appellate Division rules.  Therefore, the State has no risk of being held in contempt and can safely ignore the deadline \u2014 which appears to be what is happening.   However, kicking the can down the road ignores the responsibility to reconsider what is obviously a failed prescription for energy policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The other NYCI issue is the DEC regulations.  The Mandatory GHG Emissions Reporting Rule was finalized December 1, 2025, but is so poorly written that I would not be surprised if it gets litigated.  The auction rule regulation should not be an issue.  However, the Cap-and-Invest Rule includes non-trivial problems that have political consequences.  The rule will set the price trajectory for the costs of an allowance is certain to be controversial.  The biggest DEC NYCI issue is the timing.  When will DEC propose these rules?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PSL 66-P Safety Valve<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is another important issue that must be resolved.  Climate Act proponents constantly state that the mandates are required by law no matter what, but then ignore the other associated law that includes safety valve provisions.  <\/a>New York Public Service Law \u00a7 66-p<\/a> \u201crenewable energy systems\u201d mandates define which generating sources are \u201crenewable\u201d.  Section 66-p (4) \u201cEstablishment of a renewable energy program\u201d states: \u201cThe commission may temporarily suspend or modify the obligations under such program provided that the commission, after conducting a hearing as provided in section twenty of this chapter, makes a finding that the program impedes the provision of safe and adequate electric service; the program is likely to impair existing obligations and agreements; and\/or that there is a significant increase in arrears or service disconnections that the commission determines is related to the program\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unfortunately, the PSC has not yet considered conducting a hearing.  Two petitions have been filed<\/a> calling for such a hearing.  The Coalition for Safe and Reliable Energy filing on 1\/6\/26 made a persuasive argument that there are sufficient observed threats to reliability that a hearing is necessary to ensure safe and adequate service.  On 8\/12\/25 the Independent Intervenors filing argued that there were affordability and reliability issues and that there was an explicit requirement for the hearing because the customers in arrears threshold has been exceeded<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On 1\/28\/26 the Public Service Commission issued a notice<\/a> soliciting comments regarding the Coalition for Safe and Reliable Energy petition<\/a>.  Comments on the Coalition petition are due on 3\/30\/26. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

GHG Emission Accounting<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is another issue in the local news.  In early February the Governor said<\/a> that she is specifically interested in reconsidering the methodology by which the state tallies its emissions, explaining that New York\u2019s unique 20-year metric puts the state at a disadvantage over other states that use a 100-year methodology to count their emissions. At the time the Climate Act was written<\/a> it incorporated unique emissions accounting requirements that inflate the emission totals by increasing the effect of methane pollution. In my opinion, this irrational obsession<\/a> with methane is misguided because in the atmosphere, methane has less of an effect than CO2 on global warming.  In the 2023 Budget Season this change to the accounting methodology<\/a> was proposed because it would reduce total GHG emissions and that would lower costs when NYCI starts.  It did not go forward because of intense blowback from climate activists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I have previously noted<\/a> that decisions about the future of the Climate Act must be addressed.  The ideologues who fervently supported the promulgation of the Climate Act also zealously reject the possibility that changes are needed.  However, reality can no longer be ignored.  For example, David Wojick recently described<\/a> his report \u201cSevere Climate Act impacts threaten New York State<\/a>\u201d that provides additional support explaining why action is needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are significant Climate Act issues that must be addressed.  Most targets are behind schedule, and the increased costs of the Climate Act will exacerbate the existing energy affordability crisis.  DEC needs to respond to the New York Cap-and-Invest (NYCI) economy wide emission reduction initiative requirements and will have to eventually respond to the litigation.  PSC must address safety valve provisions of PSL 66-P. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unfortunately, to be resolved all these Climate Act issues require political accountability.  The Climate Act has always been about political pandering to specific constituencies under the guise of saving the planet.  Therefore, I expect that all the inconvenient issues described will be ignored until after the election in hopes that the electorate will not catch on that the reliability of the state\u2019s energy system is at risk and the energy system cost crisis will be aggravated by the Climate Act  for political gain.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

New York GHG emissions<\/a> are less than one half of one percent of global emissions and global emissions have been increasing on average by more than one half of one percent per year since 1990.  Implementing the Climate Act will have no effect on global warming and the purported co-benefits are illusory<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

I doubt that the Legislature or Governor will act on these issues this year as they try to balance the preferences of those who deny reality by demanding no changes to the Climate Act and the rest of society who cannot afford more energy costs. It is time for the rest of us to demand that the PSC conduct a hearing to consider suspending or modifying the obligations of the Climate Act by submitting comments on the Coalition petition. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article is based on a post<\/a> on my blog.  I have provided links to the Slide Deck<\/a> for my briefing and a link to the documentation<\/a> if you want more details,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Roger Caiazza blogs on New York energy and environmental issues at Pragmatic Environmentalist of New York<\/a>.  This represents his opinion and not the opinion of any of his previous employers or any other company with which he has been associated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Climate Act established a New York \u201cNet Zero\u201d target (85% reduction in GHG emissions and 15% offset of emissions) by 2050.\u00a0 Among its interim 2030 targets is a reduction target of 40% less GHG emissions and a 70% renewable energy electricity mandate.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":426154,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691823454,691841383,691818128,691818463,691818154,691818867,691829254],"class_list":{"0":"post-426145","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-act","9":"tag-department-of-public-service-dps","10":"tag-energy","11":"tag-ghg-emissions","12":"tag-net-zero","13":"tag-new-york","14":"tag-new-york-independent-system-operator-nyiso","16":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/00AQOlQDvL4uu5p_oOka3qjeO-3CvfPJ-rChkJwg9qk-xmOvAqVtre5pA6ZpDGA_jhuPzLUjrGxZv-LxSwtvxsu1FXSzD0exy_TDjXMpWmHH7Q12OZ3nB4J3OrTpzimxN9-1.jpeg?fit=1506%2C752&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1MRj","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":411725,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=411725","url_meta":{"origin":426145,"position":0},"title":"NY Politicians Face Climate Act Consequences","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/11\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"There has been a new development for New York\u2019s Climate Leadership & Community Protection Act (Climate Act) net-zero plan. On Oct. 24, 2025, the New York Supreme Court issued a decision and order in a case pitting environmental organizations against the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQPUqJ2BPYmaGqwSShpVng-Y6DsMzqHe9L0-Uud2RerLLnhuZ0QhmbpJKcCrRXURNvMZWK107l8FRCtqa5eZuki6Nc637dOEVxsxdYbJwwFHDm2fpAvvPPne6QnD0Uw-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQPUqJ2BPYmaGqwSShpVng-Y6DsMzqHe9L0-Uud2RerLLnhuZ0QhmbpJKcCrRXURNvMZWK107l8FRCtqa5eZuki6Nc637dOEVxsxdYbJwwFHDm2fpAvvPPne6QnD0Uw-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQPUqJ2BPYmaGqwSShpVng-Y6DsMzqHe9L0-Uud2RerLLnhuZ0QhmbpJKcCrRXURNvMZWK107l8FRCtqa5eZuki6Nc637dOEVxsxdYbJwwFHDm2fpAvvPPne6QnD0Uw-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQPUqJ2BPYmaGqwSShpVng-Y6DsMzqHe9L0-Uud2RerLLnhuZ0QhmbpJKcCrRXURNvMZWK107l8FRCtqa5eZuki6Nc637dOEVxsxdYbJwwFHDm2fpAvvPPne6QnD0Uw-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQPUqJ2BPYmaGqwSShpVng-Y6DsMzqHe9L0-Uud2RerLLnhuZ0QhmbpJKcCrRXURNvMZWK107l8FRCtqa5eZuki6Nc637dOEVxsxdYbJwwFHDm2fpAvvPPne6QnD0Uw-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C597&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248853,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=248853","url_meta":{"origin":426145,"position":1},"title":"NY Climate Act Cap and Invest Plan Going Off the Rails","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"21\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"One of my pragmatic interests is market-based pollution control programs that are a key component of net-zero transition plans everywhere.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-843.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-843.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-843.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-843.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-843.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":417431,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=417431","url_meta":{"origin":426145,"position":2},"title":"New York Must Reconsider the Climate Act","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"16\/12\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"At the December 1, 2025, State Energy Planning (SEP) Board meeting\u00a0there were presentations that gave overwhelming evidence that implementing the Climate Act as presently written will be unaffordable and the 2030 CLCPA 40% emission reduction target and 70% renewable energy in the electric system mandate will not be achieved.\u00a0","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Leadership & Community Protection Act (Climate Act)\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Leadership & Community Protection Act (Climate Act)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-leadership-community-protection-act-climate-act"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQOJ1Q8LHIbeIVPp_8QJp1ONwHJBJL71-EfXOwmWEFqwqaSs_4oR3KtG60CmARaAylIJZcnbLyIdKCvC13C4j3xlhN-apvilW_OZs0il69aKOkbFr99pXzoheGip-Gwo-1.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQOJ1Q8LHIbeIVPp_8QJp1ONwHJBJL71-EfXOwmWEFqwqaSs_4oR3KtG60CmARaAylIJZcnbLyIdKCvC13C4j3xlhN-apvilW_OZs0il69aKOkbFr99pXzoheGip-Gwo-1.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQOJ1Q8LHIbeIVPp_8QJp1ONwHJBJL71-EfXOwmWEFqwqaSs_4oR3KtG60CmARaAylIJZcnbLyIdKCvC13C4j3xlhN-apvilW_OZs0il69aKOkbFr99pXzoheGip-Gwo-1.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQOJ1Q8LHIbeIVPp_8QJp1ONwHJBJL71-EfXOwmWEFqwqaSs_4oR3KtG60CmARaAylIJZcnbLyIdKCvC13C4j3xlhN-apvilW_OZs0il69aKOkbFr99pXzoheGip-Gwo-1.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQOJ1Q8LHIbeIVPp_8QJp1ONwHJBJL71-EfXOwmWEFqwqaSs_4oR3KtG60CmARaAylIJZcnbLyIdKCvC13C4j3xlhN-apvilW_OZs0il69aKOkbFr99pXzoheGip-Gwo-1.png?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221851,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=221851","url_meta":{"origin":426145,"position":3},"title":"New York Zero Emission Vehicle\u00a0Mandate","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/10\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Climate Act establishes a \u201cNet Zero\u201d target (85% reduction and 15% offset of emissions) by 2050.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-82.png?fit=940%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-82.png?fit=940%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-82.png?fit=940%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-82.png?fit=940%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282556,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282556","url_meta":{"origin":426145,"position":4},"title":"The Solution to Extreme Weather Issues is not to Reduce GHG Emissions","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"From Watts Up With That? Roger Caiazza As a meteorologist I find it frustrating that every extreme weather event is considered a reflection of \u201ca \u201cnew normal\u201d due to the effects of climate change\u201d.\u00a0 As a pragmatic environmentalist, it is even more frustrating when a report comes out criticizing New\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Act\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Act","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-act"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/005b79134f32628c6d7c97414143695da.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/005b79134f32628c6d7c97414143695da.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/005b79134f32628c6d7c97414143695da.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/005b79134f32628c6d7c97414143695da.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/005b79134f32628c6d7c97414143695da.jpeg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":413563,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=413563","url_meta":{"origin":426145,"position":5},"title":"New York At the Green Energy Wall — What Is the Exit Strategy?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"17\/11\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"When New York passed its utopian Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act back in 2019, it set mandatory targets for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from the state\u2019s energy consumption. But none of the mandates were scheduled to take effect prior to 2030. The earliest mandates were: 70% of electricity\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"$42 billion per year\"","block_context":{"text":"$42 billion per year","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=42-billion-per-year"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQMetzDdI3XmBgpHxmS-EAYNW5lIHVTcZwZHeG7x44SA6BomvA1_41CStkXorXV6iaTy6f9KfafT4jjd-neHsijX6S5XF4_3u1EPWy938E698mxd1iO0y84W6m5JYQz-dNj8U_nvAxiXv6F0_yQcm5RFgHTsEg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQMetzDdI3XmBgpHxmS-EAYNW5lIHVTcZwZHeG7x44SA6BomvA1_41CStkXorXV6iaTy6f9KfafT4jjd-neHsijX6S5XF4_3u1EPWy938E698mxd1iO0y84W6m5JYQz-dNj8U_nvAxiXv6F0_yQcm5RFgHTsEg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQMetzDdI3XmBgpHxmS-EAYNW5lIHVTcZwZHeG7x44SA6BomvA1_41CStkXorXV6iaTy6f9KfafT4jjd-neHsijX6S5XF4_3u1EPWy938E698mxd1iO0y84W6m5JYQz-dNj8U_nvAxiXv6F0_yQcm5RFgHTsEg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQMetzDdI3XmBgpHxmS-EAYNW5lIHVTcZwZHeG7x44SA6BomvA1_41CStkXorXV6iaTy6f9KfafT4jjd-neHsijX6S5XF4_3u1EPWy938E698mxd1iO0y84W6m5JYQz-dNj8U_nvAxiXv6F0_yQcm5RFgHTsEg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQMetzDdI3XmBgpHxmS-EAYNW5lIHVTcZwZHeG7x44SA6BomvA1_41CStkXorXV6iaTy6f9KfafT4jjd-neHsijX6S5XF4_3u1EPWy938E698mxd1iO0y84W6m5JYQz-dNj8U_nvAxiXv6F0_yQcm5RFgHTsEg.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/426145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=426145"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/426145\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":426156,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/426145\/revisions\/426156"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/426154"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=426145"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=426145"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=426145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}