{"id":419555,"date":"2026-01-02T20:33:57","date_gmt":"2026-01-02T19:33:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=419555"},"modified":"2026-01-02T22:56:48","modified_gmt":"2026-01-02T21:56:48","slug":"six-impossible-climate-things-to-believe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=419555","title":{"rendered":"Six Impossible Climate Things to\u00a0Believe"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"Image<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Javier Vin\u00f3s: Seis cosas imposibles de creer<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Javier Vin\u00f3s, a Spanish scientist (PhD in molecular neurobiology turned independent climate researcher), author of books like Climate of the Past, Present and Future and Solving the Climate Puzzle, and president of the Asociaci\u00f3n de Realistas Clim\u00e1ticos, published an opinion piece titled “Seis cosas imposibles de creer” (Six Impossible Things to Believe) on December 23, 2025, in Libertad Digital.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Echoing the White Queen’s boast in Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass of believing “as many as six impossible things before breakfast,” Vin\u00f3s argues that European and Spanish authorities are asking citizens to believe six implausible claims about climate change and the energy transition.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

From Science Matters<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Ron Clutz<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A
Image created with ChatGPT.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Javier Vin\u00f3s provides the list in his yearend Clintel post Six Impossible Things to Believe. <\/strong><\/a> Excerpts in italics with my bolds and added images.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Like Alice\u2019s White Queen, European and Spanish authorities
<\/strong>want us to believe six impossible things about
climate change and the energy transition.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Alice Through the Looking-Glass,<\/strong> a character by Lewis Carroll says, \u201cOne can\u2019t believe impossible things,\u201d to which the White Queen replies,<\/strong> \u201cWhen I was your age, I sometimes believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"An<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Like Alice\u2019s White Queen, European and Spanish authorities want us to believe six impossible things<\/strong> about climate change and the energy transition, before and after breakfast. These six impossible things to believe \u2014 and yet many people,<\/strong> like the White Queen, do believe them<\/strong> \u2014 are as follows:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The first is believing that humans<\/strong> have<\/strong> \u2014 or could have in the near future \u2014 some degree of control<\/strong> over the climate and the weather,<\/strong> and<\/strong> that through our actions we can reduce the frequency and intensity<\/strong> of hurricanes, floods, droughts, or sea-level rise. Anyone who believes this is capable of believing anything.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"A<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The second is believing that the climate,<\/strong>\u00a0in its extraordinary complexity with hundreds \u2014 perhaps thousands \u2014 of variables,\u00a0is controlled by just one: changes in the concentration of greenhouse gases.<\/strong>\u00a0The theory and models that propose this are based on a good understanding of the properties of CO\u2082, but a\u00a0poor understanding of the other climatic variables.<\/strong>\u00a0And the fact that\u00a0no solid evidence<\/strong>\u00a0for this theory has emerged, despite decades of intensive searching, makes it very difficult to believe.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The third is believing that an energy transition is taking place or will take place<\/strong>. There are no examples of energy transitions.\u00a0We use more biomass, coal, oil, natural gas, and uranium<\/strong>\u00a0than at any other time in history, and we are simply adding the so-called renewable energies, which are installed, maintained, and replaced thanks to hydrocarbon fuels.\u00a0Our energy use is growing faster than our capacity to install renewable energy.<\/strong>\u00a0The transition is a myth, and anyone who claims to believe in it is either lying or poorly informed.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Graph<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The fourth is believing that the use of hydrocarbon fuels is going to be abandoned.<\/strong>\u00a0At the recent climate conference in Brazil, a group of countries, including Spain, pushed for the agreement to include a roadmap for abandoning those fuels. They were forced to back down, and hydrocarbon fuels are not even mentioned in the final agreement. Eighty-three governments supported that roadmap, but together they represent only 13.6% of the world\u2019s population. The remaining 86.4% shows no intention of abandoning\u00a0the source from which the human species obtains 85% of its external energy.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

It is impossible to believe that such an abandonment will take place<\/strong>\u00a0because, 33 years after the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and 10 years after the Paris Agreement, support among nations for abandoning hydrocarbon fuels has decreased rather than increased.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Wind<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The fifth is believing that a reduction in global CO\u2082 emissions will occur.<\/strong>\u00a0These emissions are\u00a0linked to human development and population growth<\/strong>. Many regions of the planet remain underdeveloped, and the world\u2019s population will continue to grow in the coming decades.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Graph<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Since the first climate conference<\/strong> in Berlin in 1995, where strict emission-reduction commitments were adopted \u2014 but only for \u201cdeveloped\u201d nations \u2014 global CO\u2082 emissions have increased by 70%.<\/strong> These 30 years should be enough to convince anyone that they are not going to stop rising.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Fantasy<\/em><\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\"Graph<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The sixth is believing that energy can be decarbonized.<\/strong>\u00a0Only 23% of the EU\u2019s final energy consumption is electricity, and only 70% of that electricity comes from carbon-free sources. One third of it comes from nuclear energy, which Spain rejects and which was installed in the last century. So far this century, the EU has managed to decarbonize less than 10% of the energy it uses. Most of the planet is not even trying.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Infographic<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

These six things are impossible to believe, but if we refuse to believe even just one of them, the entire climate and energy strategy<\/strong> of the European Union and the Spanish government is revealed as a tragic farce.<\/strong> Based on these impossibilities, our national and European governments have committed themselves to a transition whose consequences we are already suffering:<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2666\u00a0more expensive energy,<\/em>
\u2666\u00a0declining industrial production and competitiveness,<\/em>
\u2666\u00a0increased risk to the power grid,<\/em>
\u2666\u00a0environmental policies with tragic consequences,<\/em>
\u2666\u00a0greater indebtedness, and, ultimately,<\/em>
\u2666\u00a0an accelerated decline of Europe relative to the rest of the world.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"A<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Here is a summary of the six impossible things he lists (translated and paraphrased from the original Spanish article):<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Believe that climate change is an emergency
    Despite decades of warnings, extreme weather events and climate-related impacts have not worsened as predicted. Data shows no clear upward trend in disasters or deaths when adjusted for population and exposure.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Believe that renewable energies (wind and solar) are cheaper than fossil fuels
    Intermittent renewables require massive backups, grid reinforcements, and subsidies, making the overall system costlier. True levelized costs, including reliability, favor dispatchable sources.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Believe that electric vehicles are more environmentally friendly
    Accounting for mining, battery production, electricity generation (often coal-based in many grids), and disposal, EVs have a higher lifecycle environmental footprint than efficient internal combustion engines in many cases.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Believe that hydrocarbon fuels will be abandoned
    Despite 33 years since the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and 10 years since the Paris Agreement, global support for phasing out oil, gas, and coal has decreased, not increased. Demand continues to rise, especially in developing nations.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. Believe that the energy transition will reduce energy poverty
    Policies driving up energy prices (via subsidies for renewables and restrictions on fossils) are exacerbating energy poverty in Europe, forcing households to choose between heating and eating.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  6. Believe that these policies will significantly affect the climate
    Even if fully implemented, unilateral actions by Europe and Spain would have negligible impact on global temperatures, as emissions growth is driven by Asia and developing countries. The effect is symbolically tiny compared to natural variability.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Vin\u00f3s concludes that these “impossible” beliefs underpin costly policies that deliver little climatic benefit while imposing economic and social harm. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    He advocates for realistic, evidence-based approaches over alarmism and ideological transitions.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    This piece aligns with Vin\u00f3s’s broader skeptical stance on mainstream climate orthodoxy, emphasizing natural variability (e.g., solar influences, meridional heat transport) over CO\u2082 dominance. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    His views are popular in realist\/skeptic circles but controversial in consensus climate science.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Javier Vin\u00f3s, a Spanish scientist (PhD in molecular neurobiology turned independent climate researcher), author of books like Climate of the Past, Present and Future and Solving the Climate Puzzle, and president of the Asociaci\u00f3n de Realistas Clim\u00e1ticos, published an opinion piece titled “Seis cosas imposibles de creer” (Six Impossible Things to Believe) on December 23, 2025, in Libertad Digital. Echoing the White Queen’s boast in Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass of believing “as many as six impossible things before breakfast,” Vin\u00f3s argues that European and Spanish authorities are asking citizens to believe six implausible claims about climate change and the energy transition.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":419580,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"Descubre las seis cosas imposibles que debemos creer sobre el cambio clim\u00e1tico y la transici\u00f3n energ\u00e9tica seg\u00fan Javier Vin\u00f3s, un investigador clim\u00e1tico espa\u00f1ol.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"Seis Creencias Imposibles sobre el Cambio Clim\u00e1tico","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":true,"token":"eyJpbWciOiJodHRwczpcL1wvaTAud3AuY29tXC9jbGltYXRlLXNjaWVuY2UucHJlc3NcL3dwLWNvbnRlbnRcL3VwbG9hZHNcLzIwMjZcLzAxXC8wQVFQWXlFR1lPdEtZTHIwWGliU3p1ZUViRFZ5NEMwYngwcXlGaXo4S0VkV3pCVDlZaXpwLXFSMDdOYk9McExnckF4NXdZSnVieXpneWQzdVhDb191ejE2Z0NxRENTQ1JkZUxoR0V6R0wwWVV0c1hFR3doT1BLSVFnYnBlWUFSNUEtMS5qcGVnP2ZpdD03MjMlMkMzMDUmc3NsPTEiLCJ0eHQiOiJTaXggSW1wb3NzaWJsZSBDbGltYXRlIFRoaW5ncyB0b1x1MDBhMEJlbGlldmUiLCJ0ZW1wbGF0ZSI6ImhpZ2h3YXkiLCJmb250IjoiIiwiYmxvZ19pZCI6MTU1ODEyNDQ5fQ.MzKpq8W6TOvMjGV4vwEMgBfdClvOV00wJjowZLrKiP8MQ"},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691829997,691818056,691821977,691818618,691819094,691838194,691818473],"class_list":{"0":"post-419555","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-carbon-dioxide-co","9":"tag-climate-change","10":"tag-electric-vehicles-evs","11":"tag-energy-transition","12":"tag-renewable-green-energy","13":"tag-un-framework-convention-on-climate-change-fccc","14":"tag-weather","16":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQPYyEGYOtKYLr0XibSzueEbDVy4C0bx0qyFiz8KEdWzBT9Yizp-qR07NbOLpLgrAx5wYJubyzgyd3uXCo_uz16gCqDCSCRdeLhGEzGL0YUtsXEGwhOPKIQgbpeYAR5A-1.jpeg?fit=1813%2C764&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1L91","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":313414,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=313414","url_meta":{"origin":419555,"position":0},"title":"Hunga Tonga Volcano is \u201cMost Likely\u201d Cause of Recent Warm Temperatures","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/03\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The climate events of 2022-24 have been \u201ctruly extraordinary\u201d, notes Dr. Javier Vin\u00f3s writing in Dr. Judith Curry\u2019s\u00a0online blog. The rare convergence of a number of events \u201cthat may not be repeated for hundreds or even thousands of years\u201d represents a \u201cunique learning opportunity\u201d for climatologists.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0121222_cg_-tonga-hunga-volcano_feat.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0121222_cg_-tonga-hunga-volcano_feat.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0121222_cg_-tonga-hunga-volcano_feat.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0121222_cg_-tonga-hunga-volcano_feat.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0121222_cg_-tonga-hunga-volcano_feat.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357864,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=357864","url_meta":{"origin":419555,"position":1},"title":"Ocean Temperatures and Climate Hysteria: A Lesson in Perspective","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"22\/12\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"For the past two years, headlines, policy statements, and social media feeds have been flooded with dire warnings about rising ocean temperatures. Every uptick in the graphs was treated as irrefutable proof of humanity\u2019s march toward ecological collapse. The news cycle offered little room for nuance, and as usual, the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Hysteria\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Hysteria","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-hysteria"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/02721813.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/02721813.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/02721813.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/02721813.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/02721813.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339440,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=339440","url_meta":{"origin":419555,"position":2},"title":"Pubpeer Comment on our recent paper by the anonymous \u201cPhoma destructiva\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/08\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"An anonymous reviewer has written a critique of our recent paper \u201cCarbon Dioxide and a Warming Climate are not problems,\u201d published online May 29, 2024, in The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. In the introduction to his critique, Phoma destructiva writes: \u201cthe authors and their cited sources likely underestimated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO2)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO2)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01394756389000-global-warming.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01394756389000-global-warming.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01394756389000-global-warming.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01394756389000-global-warming.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01394756389000-global-warming.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/01394756389000-global-warming.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339757,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=339757","url_meta":{"origin":419555,"position":3},"title":"Phoma destructiva\u2019s 2nd Comment on Pubpeer","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"16\/08\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"If you truly believe all modern warming is anthropogenic, as the IPCC does, fine, but it is not consistent with the data we present in our paper, nor is it consistent with your sources.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO2)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO2)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0global-warming-illustration-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C438&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0global-warming-illustration-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C438&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0global-warming-illustration-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C438&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0global-warming-illustration-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C438&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/0global-warming-illustration-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C438&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282466,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=282466","url_meta":{"origin":419555,"position":4},"title":"Marcel Crok Speaks in the Danish Parliament","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"08\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"From Watts Up With That? By Andy May Clintel\u2019s Marcel Crok gave the Keynote Lecture at the Climate Realism conference:\u00a0The Climate Emergency is Canceled. The conference was in Copenhagen, Denmark in their beautiful Parliament building. His presentation is in English (Marcel\u2019s English is very good) and his presentation can be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"CMIP6 climate models\"","block_context":{"text":"CMIP6 climate models","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=cmip6-climate-models"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-08-153426.png?fit=1168%2C899&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-08-153426.png?fit=1168%2C899&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-08-153426.png?fit=1168%2C899&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-08-153426.png?fit=1168%2C899&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Screenshot-2023-10-08-153426.png?fit=1168%2C899&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287335,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=287335","url_meta":{"origin":419555,"position":5},"title":"\u201cThe Earth Is Warming, but Is CO2 the Cause?\u201d (\u2018Ouch\u2019 for climate alarmism)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/11\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Are computerized climate simulations a sufficient basis for attributing observed warming to human CO2? With the current level of knowledge, it seems impossible to determine how much of the temperature increase is due to emissions of CO2. From \u00a0Master Resource By Robert Bradley Jr. \u201cBy now, it\u2019s some people\u2019s job,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"1.5\u00b0C warming\"","block_context":{"text":"1.5\u00b0C warming","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=1-5c-warming"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-268.png?fit=1200%2C743&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-268.png?fit=1200%2C743&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-268.png?fit=1200%2C743&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-268.png?fit=1200%2C743&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/image-268.png?fit=1200%2C743&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/419555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=419555"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/419555\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":419584,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/419555\/revisions\/419584"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/419580"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=419555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=419555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=419555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}