{"id":419506,"date":"2026-01-02T15:42:12","date_gmt":"2026-01-02T14:42:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=419506"},"modified":"2026-01-02T15:42:14","modified_gmt":"2026-01-02T14:42:14","slug":"high-electricity-prices-are-a-choice-blue-states-make-every-day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=419506","title":{"rendered":"High electricity prices are a choice blue states make every day"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the latest available data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) for October 2025, the national average residential electricity price is 17.98 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh). <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Prices vary significantly by state, ranging from 12.39 cents\/kWh in Louisiana to 39.74 cents\/kWh in Hawaii.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

To assess the “blue vs. red” divide, I classified states based on their 2024 presidential election outcomes (states voting for Kamala Harris as blue\/Democratic-leaning, and those for Donald Trump as red\/Republican-leaning, treating split-vote states like Maine and Nebraska by their overall lean). <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Blue states (e.g., California, New York, Massachusetts) have an average price of 23.60 cents\/kWh, while red states (e.g., Texas, Florida, Ohio) average 15.44 cents\/kWh. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This means blue-state residents pay about 53% more on average than those in red states.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here’s a table of the 10 highest- and lowest-priced states, including their 2024 election lean (blue or red) for context:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rank<\/th>State<\/th>Price (cents\/kWh)<\/th>Political Lean (2024)<\/th><\/tr>
1<\/td>Hawaii<\/td>39.74<\/td>Blue<\/td><\/tr>
2<\/td>California<\/td>33.60<\/td>Blue<\/td><\/tr>
3<\/td>Massachusetts<\/td>31.37<\/td>Blue<\/td><\/tr>
4<\/td>Rhode Island<\/td>31.16<\/td>Blue<\/td><\/tr>
5<\/td>Maine<\/td>29.42<\/td>Blue<\/td><\/tr>
6<\/td>Connecticut<\/td>27.72<\/td>Blue<\/td><\/tr>
7<\/td>New Hampshire<\/td>27.27<\/td>Blue<\/td><\/tr>
8<\/td>New York<\/td>26.95<\/td>Blue<\/td><\/tr>
9<\/td>Alaska<\/td>26.46<\/td>Red<\/td><\/tr>
10<\/td>Vermont<\/td>24.78<\/td>Blue<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Rank<\/th>State<\/th>Price (cents\/kWh)<\/th>Political Lean (2024)<\/th><\/tr>
1<\/td>Louisiana<\/td>12.39<\/td>Red<\/td><\/tr>
2<\/td>Idaho<\/td>12.46<\/td>Red<\/td><\/tr>
3<\/td>North Dakota<\/td>12.82<\/td>Red<\/td><\/tr>
4<\/td>Missouri<\/td>12.95<\/td>Red<\/td><\/tr>
5<\/td>Tennessee<\/td>13.06<\/td>Red<\/td><\/tr>
6<\/td>Nebraska<\/td>13.13<\/td>Red<\/td><\/tr>
7<\/td>Arkansas<\/td>13.26<\/td>Red<\/td><\/tr>
8<\/td>Iowa<\/td>13.48<\/td>Red<\/td><\/tr>
9<\/td>Utah<\/td>13.69<\/td>Red<\/td><\/tr>
10<\/td>Nevada<\/td>13.77<\/td>Red<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>
Electric Power Monthly – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Isaac Orr<\/a> and\u00a0Tom Pyle<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"An
Electricity meters with flying dollar banknotes and high voltage towers outdoors at sunset. Paying bills<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Americans are anxious about their utility bills \u2013 and with good reason. Three quarters of U.S. residents are concerned about their electricity and gas bills rising this year, and 80% feel powerless over how much they are charged for utilities. For nearly two-thirds of U.S. billpayers, simply keeping the lights on has become a growing source of financial stress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those concerns are grounded in reality. U.S. electricity prices rose 27% during the Biden administration and another 11% between January and September 2025. Yet despite a national narrative eager to blame President Trump\u2019s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), the real drivers of high electricity prices are far closer to home.\\<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Electricity affordability is shaped primarily by state policy choices, and states choosing the most expensive path are overwhelmingly blue. So, blue-state residents are experiencing the pain much more than those in red states.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A new report from Always On Energy Research and the Institute for Energy Research finds that 86% of states with electricity prices above the national average voted for Democratic presidential candidates in 2020 and 2024. In contrast, 80% of the 10 states with the lowest electricity prices are reliably red. That\u2019s not a coincidence. Those high prices reflect a consistent pattern of state-level energy policies that dictate emissions reduction targets at the expense of affordability, reliability, and physics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

States have the exclusive power to decide which resources supply their grids under the Federal Power Act. Governors, legislatures, and public utility commissions \u2013 not the White House \u2013 decide whether to impose renewable portfolio standards (RPS), enforce Net-Zero mandates, or prematurely retire reliable power plants. Those decisions directly determine how much families and businesses pay for electricity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Today, 28 states enforce an RPS, requiring a certain percentage of retail electricity sales to come from renewable sources, and 16 states have 100% clean energy standards (CES) or carbon-free mandates. Many of these policies compel utilities to overbuild intermittent generation, such as wind and solar, thereby requiring significant investments in transmission, grid-scale storage, and backup generation to maintain reliability. The result is a higher total system cost, which is passed onto ratepayers in the form of higher electricity rates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Consider that the U.S. average electricity price between January 2025 and August 2025 was 13.54 cents per kilowatt-hour. Each of the five most expensive states mandates 100% of their electricity come from renewable or carbon-free sources in the coming decades. Eight of the 10 states with the lowest electricity prices voted for the Republican presidential candidate in 2020 and 2024, and seven of the 10 don\u2019t have renewable or carbon-free mandates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

New York is a prime blue state example, where electricity prices were 58% higher than the national average during the same period. The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) found that New York experienced the second-fastest increase in electricity prices nationwide, with residential customers suffering a 36% increase between 2019 and 2024. PPI points to \u201cthe immense capital investment required to transform the grid and specific policy choices that increase the cost of energy production,\u201d as well as the closure of the Indian Point nuclear plant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s clear that Governor Kathy Hochul knows exactly which policy choices are driving up electricity costs \u2014 because she\u2019s scrambling to roll them back. Ms. Hochul has delayed implementation of the state\u2019s cap-and-tax mandates under the 2019 Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA), which includes a substantial renewable energy mandate requiring 70% renewable energy by 2030 and 100% carbon-free energy by 2040.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The state\u2019s Department of Environmental Conservation defended the delay, arguing in court that the regulations would impose \u201cextraordinary and damaging costs upon New Yorkers.\u201d Ms. Hochul has approved two major natural gas pipelines and delayed implementation of the state\u2019s ban on gas stoves in new buildings \u2013 a tacit admission that reliability and affordability still matter in New York.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California, however, remains committed to the most expensive path in the country with the fastest rate increase, now double the national average. For years, Governor Gavin Newsom and the California legislature have imposed on ratepayers a carbon-emissions reduction mandate, renewable mandates, solar cost-shifting through net metering, nuclear reactor closures, and EV charging subsidies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For all of his climate-friendly posturing, Mr. Newsom signed a bill to ramp up oil drilling in Kern County, and his Energy Commission has delayed its plan to penalize refinery profits for five years. These reversals underscore a central truth: ideology will take a back seat to cost and reliability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There\u2019s a silver lining, however. While states can choose to raise electricity costs for their residents through bad policies, they can also choose to lower costs through good policies. For instance, Florida is the second-largest electricity producer in the country, behind only Texas. Residents require air conditioning for its hot, humid summers and heating in its mild winters. However, Florida delivers electricity at prices 2% below the U.S. average\u2014mainly because it generates 75% of its power from imported natural gas. It has avoided aggressive climate mandates and delivers below-average electricity prices despite frequent hurricanes that require ongoing investment in the grid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Louisiana and Kentucky have also invested in wise policies. Louisiana posted the third-lowest electricity rates in the U.S. in 2025, and Kentucky had the lowest rates east of the Mississippi River. Nearly three-quarters of Louisiana\u2019s electricity is generated from natural gas, leveraging its abundant natural gas production and robust pipeline network. Kentucky, similarly, leverages its coal resources to generate 67% of the state\u2019s electricity, with another 26% by natural gas. Neither has pursued aggressive carbon emissions reduction or renewable energy mandates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pinning the blame on the federal government and President Trump, as Democrats have been eager to do, ignores the vital role that states play in delivering affordable, reliable electricity. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright recognizes the same, stating on Fox News that \u201cElectricity prices have risen very fast in blue states with restrictive renewable portfolio standards.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Department of Energy and President Trump can set the tone, but they don\u2019t dictate the composition of state grids or the bills consumers receive each month. Those decisions rest squarely with governors, legislators, and regulators. Ultimately, it\u2019s up to the states to prioritize reliable, affordable, dispatchable generation and drive down electricity prices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

High electricity rates aren\u2019t an unavoidable consequence of modern life or federal policy. They are the predictable outcome of state-level choices that ignore reliability, undervalue dispatchable generation, and impose rigid mandates regardless of cost. Americans deserve leaders who recognize that keeping the lights on at a modest price isn\u2019t optional. The states keeping electricity affordable today offer a roadmap for those willing to learn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article originally appeared at\u00a0Real Clear Energy<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\n