{"id":416849,"date":"2025-12-10T12:29:45","date_gmt":"2025-12-10T11:29:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=416849"},"modified":"2025-12-10T12:29:47","modified_gmt":"2025-12-10T11:29:47","slug":"monitoring-offshore-wind-impacts-needs-to-be-done-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=416849","title":{"rendered":"Monitoring offshore wind impacts needs to be done right"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"Offshore<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By David Wojick<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NOAA recently took comments on a lengthy draft document that they termed \u201cregional monitoring standards for evaluating the effects of fixed-foundation offshore wind development.\u201d A group of experts on the impact of U.S. offshore wind projects blasted it as not just bad but not even being standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The comments are long and technical. Here is their succinct, non-technical summary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAs written, the draft fails to constitute a regulatory standard and does not fulfill NOAA\u2019s obligations under the MMPA, ESA, NEPA, or BOEM-coordinated offshore wind oversight. We respectfully request that NOAA revise the document to include useful, enforceable, and scientifically robust monitoring standards, and reissue it for comment.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These strongly critical comments are from Save Long Beach Island (SLBI) which has a long history of technical criticism of NOAA claims regarding the limited impact of offshore wind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The SLBI comments are here<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The scope of the proposed monitoring standards is very broad, making their quality a very important issue when it comes to the viability of offshore wind. Here is NOAA\u2019s overview:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe monitoring standards focus on the Mid-Atlantic Bight and Southern New England portions of the Northeast U.S. Continental Shelf ecosystem. They\u2019re meant to guide the planning and implementation of monitoring programs. Monitoring programs will evaluate the effects of fixed-foundation offshore wind development on the marine ecosystem including:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 protected species<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 fisheries species<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 hydrodynamics and oceanography<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 socio-economic conditions<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The monitoring standards are based on the best scientific information available to achieve standardization of monitoring methods. Standardizing monitoring across individual wind projects\u2014within and across lease areas\u2014will ensure that data can be compared across all projects and used in ecosystem and socio-economic analyses and models. Information from analyses and models can then be used to inform future marine resource conservation and fishery management decisions.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

See the draft here.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

That these standards are to be \u201cbased on the best scientific information available to achieve standardization of monitoring methods\u201d is part of SLBI\u2019s criticism. But more deeply, their point is that these are not standards, just suggestions. Here is how they put it:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe monitoring standard as drafted relegates almost complete discretion to the developer to decide the content of the monitoring plan, even including the questions to be resolved. This is an inappropriate abrogation of NOAA responsibilities under the MMPA, the ESA, and of the BOEM-managed responsibilities under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. The standards should address the issues that NOAA and BOEM need to resolve through monitoring.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, the lengthy draft is not actually standards, or even guidance. It really just says \u201cDo what you think is appropriate.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The real problem is that NOAA does not want to admit to the issues that need to be resolved. They have systematically ignored these central issues, like stress-induced deadly behavior changes or disruption of fisheries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, you can search the entire document, and the word \u201charassment\u201d does not appear, even though the death rate of the hundreds of thousands of authorized harassments is a central issue. In fact, the word \u201cdeath\u201d only occurs in the repeated requirement that if monitoring kills a protected animal, it has to be documented. The fact that offshore wind kills is ignored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the questions to be asked are left to the project developer, these hard questions will never be asked. As the SLBI comments make clear, the monitoring must be driven by the questions. The present draft does not address the hard questions that offshore wind must face.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This draft monitoring standard must be thoroughly revised to reflect the huge issues with offshore wind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

NOAA recently took comments on a lengthy draft document that they termed \u201cregional monitoring standards for evaluating the effects of fixed-foundation offshore wind development.\u201d A group of experts on the impact of U.S. offshore wind projects blasted it as not just bad but not even being standards.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":416853,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"Critics call NOAA's offshore wind monitoring draft inadequate, demanding enforceable standards for ecological and economic impact assessments.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"Revising Offshore Wind Monitoring Standards for Ecological Integrity","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":true,"token":"eyJpbWciOiJodHRwczpcL1wvY2xpbWF0ZS1zY2llbmNlLnByZXNzXC93cC1jb250ZW50XC91cGxvYWRzXC8yMDI1XC8xMlwvQVFNMWx4ZXN5M19XUUt5czBGbmZWRk04WmZPdXh4V1FSUlIySEdzUWtKRlI4WFNOYjU4a0doTEFlMlp1ZlhpYUJicjN0YzBXZU5OY3B4clVFam5JWmdLbEU1LUpTY3kwNzJTSFhJM2ZfR3oxeFBRTHBzQUFKZF9YUVFyaE1HSm4tMTAyNHg2NTguanBlZyIsInR4dCI6Ik1vbml0b3Jpbmcgb2Zmc2hvcmUgd2luZCBpbXBhY3RzIG5lZWRzIHRvIGJlIGRvbmUgcmlnaHQiLCJ0ZW1wbGF0ZSI6ImhpZ2h3YXkiLCJmb250IjoiIiwiYmxvZ19pZCI6MTU1ODEyNDQ5fQ.-dwkaBEvAk_x4vdhDjzMJoNPnSpgfCsr6lpbW2fC7x8MQ"},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691840094,691840093,691833237,691818301,691840092],"class_list":{"0":"post-416849","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-analyses-and-models","9":"tag-monitoring-standards","10":"tag-noaa-national-oceanic-and-atmospheric-administration","11":"tag-offshore-wind","12":"tag-save-long-beach-island-slbi","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQM1lxesy3_WQKys0FnfVFM8ZfOuxxWQRRR2HGsQkJFR8XSNb58kGhLAe2ZufXiaBbr3tc0WeNNcpxrUEjnIZgKlE5-JScy072SHXI3f_Gz1xPQLpsAAJd_XQQrhMGJn.jpeg?fit=1507%2C968&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1Krn","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":359769,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=359769","url_meta":{"origin":416849,"position":0},"title":"My 41 wind-threatens-whales articles track federal deception","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/12\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"A New Years\u2019s retrospective. Many of these 41 CFACT articles were sent to key NOAA whale protection people when published over a period of 2.5 years. All have been carefully ignored, an ongoing deception. Trump has promised action.","rel":"","context":"In \"California offshore wind\"","block_context":{"text":"California offshore wind","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=california-offshore-wind"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0offshore-wind-turbines-calm-water-dense-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0offshore-wind-turbines-calm-water-dense-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0offshore-wind-turbines-calm-water-dense-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0offshore-wind-turbines-calm-water-dense-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0offshore-wind-turbines-calm-water-dense-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365182,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=365182","url_meta":{"origin":416849,"position":1},"title":"Whales and Offshore Wind: Trump Time (Wojick has built a case)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/02\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The all-of-government approach to climate by Podesta-Biden-Harris covers the science agencies too. Climate hype, all the time, as well as nonstop cheerleading toward politically correct, economically incorrect government-enabled energies. It is now time for reversal, including with environmental issues concerning dilute, intermittent, fragile, and invasive wind and solar.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate hype\"","block_context":{"text":"climate hype","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-hype"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0whale-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0whale-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0whale-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0whale-1.jpg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":393330,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=393330","url_meta":{"origin":416849,"position":2},"title":"Offshore wind whale deaths indicated by statistical analysis","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Three environmental groups have formally petitioned NOAA to revoke its prior marine mammal harassment authorizations citing new science that harassment can be deadly. The specific target of the petition is the Empire Wind project, but the grounds given clearly apply to all offshore wind development.","rel":"","context":"In \"Dominion project\"","block_context":{"text":"Dominion project","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=dominion-project"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQOA4U_gffnvLB3cPoKROQ6q415p5gvCo3j9f9wX9BZp4VXs4ApvyLt_L9efmpA8KZ7Nbzz-0nzhNCYaxucTWTpRcSI-TLTgdUiWPjGVHMxGG564FRi6XX2oanT5ITwthzqIDJRafO0itnez4DXtAdYWBeS2dQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQOA4U_gffnvLB3cPoKROQ6q415p5gvCo3j9f9wX9BZp4VXs4ApvyLt_L9efmpA8KZ7Nbzz-0nzhNCYaxucTWTpRcSI-TLTgdUiWPjGVHMxGG564FRi6XX2oanT5ITwthzqIDJRafO0itnez4DXtAdYWBeS2dQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQOA4U_gffnvLB3cPoKROQ6q415p5gvCo3j9f9wX9BZp4VXs4ApvyLt_L9efmpA8KZ7Nbzz-0nzhNCYaxucTWTpRcSI-TLTgdUiWPjGVHMxGG564FRi6XX2oanT5ITwthzqIDJRafO0itnez4DXtAdYWBeS2dQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQOA4U_gffnvLB3cPoKROQ6q415p5gvCo3j9f9wX9BZp4VXs4ApvyLt_L9efmpA8KZ7Nbzz-0nzhNCYaxucTWTpRcSI-TLTgdUiWPjGVHMxGG564FRi6XX2oanT5ITwthzqIDJRafO0itnez4DXtAdYWBeS2dQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0AQOA4U_gffnvLB3cPoKROQ6q415p5gvCo3j9f9wX9BZp4VXs4ApvyLt_L9efmpA8KZ7Nbzz-0nzhNCYaxucTWTpRcSI-TLTgdUiWPjGVHMxGG564FRi6XX2oanT5ITwthzqIDJRafO0itnez4DXtAdYWBeS2dQ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":361985,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=361985","url_meta":{"origin":416849,"position":3},"title":"NOAA\u2019s \u201cno evidence\u201d that wind kills whales violates the Information Quality Act","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"14\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"NOAA persists in claiming there is no evidence that offshore wind development is causing whale deaths. This is a false claim that is repeated endlessly in the press. There is lots of evidence some of which I have documented over the last two years.","rel":"","context":"In \"Atlantic coast humpback whale\"","block_context":{"text":"Atlantic coast humpback whale","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=atlantic-coast-humpback-whale"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-14-073348.png?fit=1200%2C775&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-14-073348.png?fit=1200%2C775&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-14-073348.png?fit=1200%2C775&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-14-073348.png?fit=1200%2C775&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/0Screenshot-2025-01-14-073348.png?fit=1200%2C775&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363370,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=363370","url_meta":{"origin":416849,"position":4},"title":"Confusion grows over offshore wind controls","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"25\/01\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Bringing offshore wind under control will be a complex process under administrative law, which few people know much about. As a result, there is likely to be a lot of confusion and misunderstanding. Some of this will be seriously funny.","rel":"","context":"In \"Dead whales\"","block_context":{"text":"Dead whales","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=dead-whales"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0offshore-wind-landing-page-copy.webp?fit=1200%2C995&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0offshore-wind-landing-page-copy.webp?fit=1200%2C995&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0offshore-wind-landing-page-copy.webp?fit=1200%2C995&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0offshore-wind-landing-page-copy.webp?fit=1200%2C995&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0offshore-wind-landing-page-copy.webp?fit=1200%2C995&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337271,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=337271","url_meta":{"origin":416849,"position":5},"title":"Offshore wind whale deaths indicated by statistical analysis","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Systematic statistical analysis indicates that offshore wind development has likely been killing lots of whales since it began around 2016. This long-standing conjecture that wind kills whales may be confirmed. Call it forensic statistical epidemiology. The epidemic is the huge number of Northwest Atlantic whale deaths that were first officially\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Dead whales\"","block_context":{"text":"Dead whales","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=dead-whales"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0north_atlantic_right_whale_beached-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0north_atlantic_right_whale_beached-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0north_atlantic_right_whale_beached-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0north_atlantic_right_whale_beached-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0north_atlantic_right_whale_beached-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C676&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416849","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=416849"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416849\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":416855,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416849\/revisions\/416855"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/416853"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=416849"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=416849"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=416849"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}