{"id":414549,"date":"2025-11-24T15:02:51","date_gmt":"2025-11-24T14:02:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=414549"},"modified":"2025-11-24T15:02:53","modified_gmt":"2025-11-24T14:02:53","slug":"un-climate-summit-ends-in-failure-at-every-level","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=414549","title":{"rendered":"UN climate summit ends in failure at every level"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Craig Rucker<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Climate campaigners are flying home from Brazil in deep dejection following one of their worst failures ever to exploit a UN climate summit to advance their agendas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not only did climate radicals fail to get COP30 to agree to eliminate fossil fuels, every mention of fossil fuels and 1.5-degree climate targets was stricken from the COP\u2019s\u00a0\u201cGlobal Mutir\u00e3o\u201d outcome document<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

All the fig leaf campaigners came away with was a call to triple funding for climate \u201cadaptation\u201d and increase funding for \u201closs and damage.\u201d Adaptation is UN-speak for a nation\u2019s ability to cope with the impacts of the impending disasters projected by climate computer simulations (that have failed to materialize in reality). Loss and damage is UN-speak for compensation for bad weather experienced by poor nations (that is not caused by you).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, even the inclusion of these funding calls represents failure. The COP30 outcome<\/a> contains no concrete mechanisms to raise and distribute adaptation and loss and damage funds, nor does it contain enforcement mechanisms, revealing these as empty gestures. Similarly the promised \u201croadmap\u201d for combating deforestation failed to materialize.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read the COP30 outcome text at CFACT.org.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Members of team climate are wringing their hand and gnashing their teeth in anguish.<\/p>\n\n\n\n