{"id":414236,"date":"2025-11-22T13:21:09","date_gmt":"2025-11-22T12:21:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=414236"},"modified":"2025-11-22T13:21:12","modified_gmt":"2025-11-22T12:21:12","slug":"from-1-5c-to-2-5c-the-guardian-moves-the-global-temperature-goalpost-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=414236","title":{"rendered":"From 1.5\u00b0C to 2.5\u00b0C, The Guardian Moves the Global Temperature Goalpost Again"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From ClimateRealism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Anthony Watts<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"A<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

A recent article from The Guardian<\/em>, \u201cCop30: calls for new urgency to talks as studies show global warming may reach 2.5C \u2013 latest updates<\/a>,\u201d by Nina Lakhani and Ajit Niranjan, presents a rolling narrative suggesting that the world is heading toward 2.5\u00b0C of warming and that extreme weather linked to fossil fuels is already causing increased damage. This is highly misleading if not outright false. Historical and present-day data show no increase in severe weather due to climate change having breached the previous target of 1.5\u00b0C of warming.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The<\/em>\u00a0Guardian\u00a0<\/em>says, \u201cextreme weather supercharged by the burning of oil, gas and coal is causing death and destruction in communities across the world,\u201d and that \u201cstudies show global warming may reach 2.5C.\u201d It also frames every flood, drought, storm, and humanitarian crisis as evidence of an accelerating climate emergency tied directly to fossil fuel emissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Observational data tells a more restrained and far less apocalyptic story. NOAA tide-gauge records, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) AR6 report on risk assessment<\/a> both show that while the planet has warmed, the evidence for worsening trends in many extreme weather categories remains weak or regionally mixed. A copy of the table published in that report is shown below, with the highlighted yellow areas showing where climate change has not materialized as worsening events.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Table<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Hurricanes have not experienced a long-term increase in landfalls or intensity in the United States according to NOAA\u2019s historical database<\/a>, and the IPCC AR6 report expresses low confidence<\/em> in any global increase in hurricane frequency. Readers can verify this themselves in \u201cClimate at a Glance \u2013 Hurricanes<\/a><\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Floods, too, show no global increasing trend; the IPCC AR6 report explicitly states low confidence in a global signal for flood frequency or magnitude, contradicting the article\u2019s implication that every major rainfall event is \u201csupercharged.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tide-gauge data show steady, modest sea-level rise of about one to three mm per year<\/a>, a rate that predates the industrial era and is not accelerating into the runaway scenarios often used in media reporting. Climate Realism<\/em> has repeatedly documented these discrepancies<\/a>, such as in its analyses where overstated claims about floods<\/a>, storms<\/a>, and heatwaves<\/a> are systematically compared to real measurements rather than model projections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most notably, The Guardian<\/em> silently moves the goalposts. For years, activists and aligned media insisted that surpassing 1.5\u00b0C would trigger catastrophe\u2014crop failures, explosive storm activity, \u201cunlivable\u201d regions. Yet when the world has briefly touched that temperature anomaly in certain datasets, none of the promised apocalyptic benchmarks materialized<\/a>. The limit was nothing more than a political talking point from the 2015 Paris Climate Conference<\/a>, as described in this Associated Press<\/em> (AP) article: The magic 1.5: What\u2019s behind climate talks\u2019 key elusive goal<\/a>. The AP admitted, \u201cin a way both the 1.5 and 2 degree C thresholds are somewhat arbitrary.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Instead of acknowledging the political nature of the temperature goal posts and the failed predictions of disaster that were supposed to flow from it, Lakhani and Niranjan simply move the goal post, claiming 2.5\u00b0C as the new threshold of climate driven doom, as if simply shifting the goal post to a new supposed tipping point will keep the narrative afloat. This shameless pattern of \u201c<\/em>the world is getting hotter and it is your fault\u201d<\/em><\/a> has been repeated over and over again by the media for years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article also refuses to admit an inconvenient truth: There have been 30 COPS to date, and not one has reduced either global temperatures or carbon dioxide emissions or even slowed their trajectory. <\/em>See the two graphs below:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Graph
Figure 1. Plot of all U.N. Climate Conferences from 1992 to 2025 with global annual temperature. Base graphic from NOAA, annotation by A. Watts Source: https:\/\/www.ncei.noaa.gov\/access\/monitoring\/climate-at-a-glance\/global\/time-series\/globe\/land_ocean\/tavg\/12\/12\/1980-2024?filter=true&filterType=binomial<\/a><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"Graph
Figure 2. Plot of all U.N. Climate Conferences from 1992 to 2025 with global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. Base graphic from NOAA, annotation by A. Watts Source:https:\/\/gml.noaa.gov\/ccgg\/trends\/<\/a><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

These conferences and the agreements that flow from them are the supposed vehicles for planetary salvation. Based on the data shown above, thus far, they have a perfect record of failure. <\/em>This is okay because there is no real-world evidence that rising CO2 levels or modest increases in temperature pose an existential threat to human prosperity or existence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Temperatures today correlate with natural variability, the long-term recovery from the Little Ice Age, and regional land-surface warming influenced by urban heat-island effects<\/a>\u2014none of which are discussed in The Guardian<\/em> article. Simply convening diplomats to issue increasingly dire communiqu\u00e9s has never altered these underlying drivers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And this points to what The Guardian<\/em> ignores. Weather is not climate<\/a>\u2014one month of rain in Gaza, a drought in Tehran, or a storm in Wales does not constitute a global climate trend. Infrastructure failures, deforestation, population growth in floodplains, and political conflict often explain weather-related damage far better than a mild increase in the made-up metric of global average temperature. The Gaza flooding described in the article stems from war<\/em>; destroyed drainage systems, razed farmland, and shattered housing\u2014not from marginal changes in global average temperature. The same applies to drought vulnerability in Iran, where water mismanagement and over-extraction have been well-documented for decades<\/a>. Yet the authors of The Guardian<\/em>\u2019s article consistently attribute all hardship to climate change, erasing institutional and government policy failures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lakhani and Niranjan also fail to mention the century-long decline in temperature-related deaths<\/a>\u2014as well as decline in deaths from extreme weather<\/a>. Both are a direct result of fossil-fuel-powered resilience\u2014and it ignores the benefits reliable energy brings to developing nations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By stitching together a tapestry of unrelated disasters and labeling them all \u201csupercharged by fossil fuels,\u201d The Guardian<\/em> grossly misleads its readers about what observational data actually show. Moving the catastrophe threshold from 1.5\u00b0C to 2.5\u00b0C without acknowledging the previous failed predictions attached to the former temperature target only underscores how bogus the climate narrative is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

After three decades and 30 COP conferences, global temperatures remain unmoved by policy declarations, yet The Guardian<\/em> continues presenting these conferences as if success at these conferences puts humans in control of a planetary thermostat. Readers deserve reporting grounded in measured evidence and proof, not a never-ending escalation of dramatic claims that shift whenever reality refuses to cooperate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A recent article from The Guardian, \u201cCop30: calls for new urgency to talks as studies show global warming may reach 2.5C \u2013 latest updates,\u201d by Nina Lakhani and Ajit Niranjan, presents a rolling narrative suggesting that the world is heading toward 2.5\u00b0C of warming and that extreme weather linked to fossil fuels is already causing increased damage. This is highly misleading if not outright false. Historical and present-day data show no increase in severe weather due to climate change having breached the previous target of 1.5\u00b0C of warming.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":414248,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"Explore how media narratives misrepresent climate data and the misleading claims surrounding extreme weather and global temperature goals.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"Debunking The Guardian's Alarmism on Climate Crisis and Warming","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":true,"token":"eyJpbWciOiJodHRwczpcL1wvY2xpbWF0ZS1zY2llbmNlLnByZXNzXC93cC1jb250ZW50XC91cGxvYWRzXC8yMDI1XC8xMVwvMEFRT3hpQXN5OGMtQk1mVkJZdHowNTB2cTRJaGNEYnpWQVhqU2hMbEZLSFBsUHdVS3hXOWlSb0RIRkphRkRPeEdNRWlDek9UMmt5TEptaEJTeGRZM2NucGpNZE1xQnBkdlhVczhJbkI5OHNXeUJlaDNxMDdNMkJXSEp3bGliNXVILTEtMTAyNHg1OTMuanBlZyIsInR4dCI6IkZyb20gMS41XHUwMGIwQyB0byAyLjVcdTAwYjBDLCBUaGUgR3VhcmRpYW4gTW92ZXMgdGhlIEdsb2JhbCBUZW1wZXJhdHVyZSBHb2FscG9zdCBBZ2FpbiIsInRlbXBsYXRlIjoiaGlnaHdheSIsImZvbnQiOiIiLCJibG9nX2lkIjoxNTU4MTI0NDl9.k4d3ZXbB-nsvirn3KfMoJBmazqiw5sqMD6InBMWEJYUMQ"},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691839767,691829997,691818514,691818087,691820922,691818262],"class_list":{"0":"post-414236","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-30-cop-conferences","9":"tag-carbon-dioxide-co","10":"tag-extreme-weather","11":"tag-global-warming","12":"tag-intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change-ipcc","13":"tag-the-guardian","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQOxiAsy8c-BMfVBYtz050vq4IhcDbzVAXjShLlFKHPlPwUKxW9iRoDHFJaFDOxGMEiCzOT2kyLJmhBSxdY3cnpjMdMqBpdvXUs8InB98sWyBeh3q07M2BWHJwlib5uH-1.jpeg?fit=2520%2C1460&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1JLe","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":249423,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=249423","url_meta":{"origin":414236,"position":0},"title":"Media Regurgitates IPCC\u2019s \u2018Final Warning\u2019 on Climate Change \u2013 Without Realizing We\u2019ve Already Passed 1.5\u00b0C","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published the\u00a0final part of its sixth assessment report\u00a0(AR6) on Monday, March 20. Predictably, the media rushed to repeat the claims made in the report with their own scary, woefully overwrought, headlines.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1036.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1036.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1036.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-1036.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":411179,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=411179","url_meta":{"origin":414236,"position":1},"title":"The Guardian and Guterres Are Wrong: Science Shows No Climate \u2018Tipping Points\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/11\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A recent article in\u00a0The Guardian, \u201cChange course now: humanity has missed 1.5C climate target, says UN head,\u201d claims that the planet is in grave danger of passing climate \u201ctipping points,\u201d as it is now inevitable that 1.5\u00b0C warming will be breached. Although 1.5\u2103 of warming may be locked in if\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"1.5\u00b0C warming\"","block_context":{"text":"1.5\u00b0C warming","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=1-5c-warming"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-01-150444.png?fit=1200%2C763&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-01-150444.png?fit=1200%2C763&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-01-150444.png?fit=1200%2C763&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-01-150444.png?fit=1200%2C763&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/00Screenshot-2025-11-01-150444.png?fit=1200%2C763&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292040,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=292040","url_meta":{"origin":414236,"position":2},"title":"Reason is Right, There is No \u2018Climate Cliff\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"20\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The threshold value was first developed by a panel of advisors who had no data to show that 1.5\u00b0 warming would be catastrophic, and the language used by the media has only become more extreme since then.","rel":"","context":"In \"1.5\u00b0C warming\"","block_context":{"text":"1.5\u00b0C warming","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=1-5c-warming"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0106607.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0106607.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0106607.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0106607.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/0106607.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":421288,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=421288","url_meta":{"origin":414236,"position":3},"title":"No, CBS News, Recent Temperatures Didn\u2019t Surpass a \u2018Critical Climate Mark\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"14\/01\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"CBS News recently published a story \u201c2025 was so hot it pushed Earth past critical climate change mark, scientists say,\u201d from the Associated Press (CBS\/AP), claiming that a recent temperature \u201cblip\u201d has pushed the planet past the Paris Agreement\u2019s 1.5\u00b0C threshold, implying that catastrophic consequences are now unfolding or inevitable.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Associated Press (CBS\/AP)\"","block_context":{"text":"Associated Press (CBS\/AP)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=associated-press-cbs-ap"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/image-226.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":258735,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=258735","url_meta":{"origin":414236,"position":4},"title":"\u20181.5\u00b0C Temperature Disaster\u2019 Story Makes its Annual Media Appearance","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"There was something vaguely familiar about the BBC\u2019s Matt McGrath\u00a0reporting\u00a0that our \u201coverheating\u201d world was set to break the 1.5\u00b0C threshold within the next five years, meaning average global temperatures would be 1.5\u00b0C warmer than they were in the second half of the 19th Century.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Global_Warming-1-e1522083188777.jpg?fit=1200%2C516&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Global_Warming-1-e1522083188777.jpg?fit=1200%2C516&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Global_Warming-1-e1522083188777.jpg?fit=1200%2C516&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Global_Warming-1-e1522083188777.jpg?fit=1200%2C516&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/0Global_Warming-1-e1522083188777.jpg?fit=1200%2C516&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":422975,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=422975","url_meta":{"origin":414236,"position":5},"title":"Wrong, Mainstream Media, A Brief 1.4\u00b0C Global Temperature Spike Isn\u2019t Evidence of \u2018Climate Doom\u2019","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/01\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Several media outlets including National Public Radio (NPR) and Politico recently published stories lamenting \u201cwarnings\u201d from climate scientists about the current state of global temperature. Politico published \u201cGlobal warming reaches 1.4C after third-hottest year on record,\u201d by Zia Weise, while NPR posted \u201cScientists call another near-record hot year a \u2018warning\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/AQPxogAc74LLoka44Y6LJz3BPU2ouMFh-dH4ydcFErjU4kQ2chiV3AO0nXqbm3NF_67-nalaa22WnmC8U0GcM8sldmhQHJX-BxSmKaMk9Rrtypp2UIx2lZAQcvhes72V.jpeg?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/AQPxogAc74LLoka44Y6LJz3BPU2ouMFh-dH4ydcFErjU4kQ2chiV3AO0nXqbm3NF_67-nalaa22WnmC8U0GcM8sldmhQHJX-BxSmKaMk9Rrtypp2UIx2lZAQcvhes72V.jpeg?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/AQPxogAc74LLoka44Y6LJz3BPU2ouMFh-dH4ydcFErjU4kQ2chiV3AO0nXqbm3NF_67-nalaa22WnmC8U0GcM8sldmhQHJX-BxSmKaMk9Rrtypp2UIx2lZAQcvhes72V.jpeg?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/AQPxogAc74LLoka44Y6LJz3BPU2ouMFh-dH4ydcFErjU4kQ2chiV3AO0nXqbm3NF_67-nalaa22WnmC8U0GcM8sldmhQHJX-BxSmKaMk9Rrtypp2UIx2lZAQcvhes72V.jpeg?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/AQPxogAc74LLoka44Y6LJz3BPU2ouMFh-dH4ydcFErjU4kQ2chiV3AO0nXqbm3NF_67-nalaa22WnmC8U0GcM8sldmhQHJX-BxSmKaMk9Rrtypp2UIx2lZAQcvhes72V.jpeg?fit=1200%2C661&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/414236","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=414236"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/414236\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":414250,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/414236\/revisions\/414250"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/414248"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=414236"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=414236"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=414236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}