{"id":413759,"date":"2025-11-18T12:53:07","date_gmt":"2025-11-18T11:53:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=413759"},"modified":"2025-11-18T12:53:10","modified_gmt":"2025-11-18T11:53:10","slug":"paris-climate-accords-demise-james-hansen-was-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=413759","title":{"rendered":"Paris Climate Accord\u2019s Demise\u2014James Hansen was Right"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robert L. Bradley, Jr.<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Paris Climate Agreement<\/a> turns ten this month. But COP21\u2019s outcome \u2014 in which 195 countries pledged to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to achieve a global temperature outcome \u2014 is in serious peril. COP30, now in session, finds almost all signatories out of compliance with their \u201cnationally determined contributions.\u201d Major emitters such as the United States and Russia are not participating in the annual meeting either. How much longer can \u201cNet Zero\u201d and like UN global aspirations continue?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Specifically, only one of the 40 major reporting groups (accounting for 85% of global emissions) is on track, and most of the rest have not even submitted a target. \u201cThis lack of progress is deeply concerning,\u201d Climate Action Tracker reported<\/a>, citing a need to \u201cstep up mitigation efforts and avoid weakening targets by relying on offsets and sinks\u2026.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. is rated \u201ccritically insufficient,\u201d<\/a> joining Russia, Saudi Arabia, Argentina, and six others. Canada, China, India, Argentina, and three others are \u201chighly insufficient<\/a>,\u201d and the trend is negative for virtually all countries with growing economies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Little Surprise<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Like the Kyoto Protocol of 1997<\/a>, the Paris Climate Accords were destined for failure. James Hansen, the father of the global warming alarm with his 1988 Congressional testimony<\/a>, predicted as much. The 2015 agreement, he said<\/a> at the time, is \u201ca fraud really, a fake.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

It\u2019s just bullshit for them to say: \u2018We\u2019ll have a 2\u00b0C warming target and then try to do a little better every five years.\u2019 It\u2019s just worthless words. There is no action, just promises. As long as fossil fuels appear to be the cheapest fuels out there, they will be continued to be burned.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

What was a photo-op, in retrospect, was negated by superior, consumer-chosen, taxpayer-neutral energies. Should this be surprising?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cClean\u201d Energy Focus?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

At COP30, \u201cclean\u201d energy is in, and emissions targets are out. James Hansen has offered a realistic opinion<\/a> here as well: \u201cSuggesting that renewables will let us phase rapidly off fossil fuels in the United States, China, India, or the world as a whole is almost the equivalent of believing in the Easter Bunny and Tooth Fairy.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China is the new role model with \u201cclean\u201d energy, from renewables to vehicle electrification. But why emulate a centrally planned economy that loses money at the expense of its citizens? China depends on fossil fuels for 87% of its energy usage, in any case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At best, China is \u201cgreenwashing\u201d its coal boom. Coal, after all, the world\u2019s leading source of electrical generation, is powering<\/a> China\u2019s drive to \u2018clean\u2019 energy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Politics<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Climate activism starts and ends with politics, which introduces government failure<\/em> in the quest to address alleged market failure. Hansen had some choice words<\/a> here, too.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Big Green consists of several \u201cenvironmental\u201d organizations, including Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), each with $100+M budgets, each springing from high-minded useful beginnings, each with more high-priced lawyers than you can shake a stick at. EDF \u2026was chief architect of the disastrous Kyoto lemon. NRDC proudly claims credit for Obama\u2019s EPA strategy and foolishly allows it to migrate to Paris.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Compare this to the Grassroots Green movement blocking wind, solar, and battery projects (1,126 and counting<\/a>) that create blight and lower property values. Will ecologists belatedly stand up against industrial wind, solar, and batteries \u2014 and the Climate Industrial Complex writ large?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is past time to get realistic and repeal the Paris Agreement and Net Zero. The path forward under any climate scenario is adaptation,<\/em> where the best energies and societal wealth anticipate, ameliorate, and recover from weather extremes. The last word belongs to Alex Epstein, who stated in The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels<\/em>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The popular climate discussion \u2026 looks at man as a destructive force for climate livability \u2026 because we use fossil fuels. In fact, the truth is the exact opposite; we don\u2019t take a safe climate and make it dangerous; we take a dangerous climate and make it safe. High-energy civilization, not climate, is the driver of climate livability.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Originally posted at the Institute for Energy Research<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Paris Climate Agreement turns ten this month. But COP21\u2019s outcome \u2014 in which 195 countries pledged to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to achieve a global temperature outcome \u2014 is in serious peril. COP30, now in session, finds almost all signatories out of compliance with their \u201cnationally determined contributions.\u201d Major emitters such as the United States and Russia are not participating in the annual meeting either. How much longer can \u201cNet Zero\u201d and like UN global aspirations continue?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":413761,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"Explore the serious challenges facing the Paris Climate Agreement as compliance dwindles and major emitters fall behind on their commitments.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"The Paris Climate Agreement: A Decade of Unfulfilled Promises","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":true,"token":"eyJpbWciOiJodHRwczpcL1wvY2xpbWF0ZS1zY2llbmNlLnByZXNzXC93cC1jb250ZW50XC91cGxvYWRzXC8yMDI1XC8xMVwvMEFRTngxRnlScUNGVUhTT2dFY0R2UXFHN2VQT0pId3I2Yl9hYVFDNE1uQjRKdXhITXdQYm1lSWJmUnk0NTVFeVk3OW5ScmxsdGlqck9felpsLTNfZUJUYy1FRTYxYXBxRnFvemZBcHJDa2pvRzd2ekNHQ2ExeWRFQlJjVGwzWHV4LTEwMjR4Njg0LmpwZWciLCJ0eHQiOiJQYXJpcyBDbGltYXRlIEFjY29yZFx1MjAxOXMgRGVtaXNlXHUyMDE0SmFtZXMgSGFuc2VuIHdhcyBSaWdodCIsInRlbXBsYXRlIjoiaGlnaHdheSIsImZvbnQiOiIiLCJibG9nX2lkIjoxNTU4MTI0NDl9.PKbpcgnNkqBKPS1qcOiC0V4vHxTiynK41YA7rX1R4hMMQ"},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691839721,691839722,691821007,691818087,691818154,691821042,691839720],"class_list":{"0":"post-413759","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-clean-energy-2","9":"tag-greenwashing-2","10":"tag-dr-james-hansen","11":"tag-global-warming","12":"tag-net-zero","13":"tag-paris-climate-agreement","14":"tag-taxpayer-neutral-energies","16":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQNx1FyRqCFUHSOgEcDvQqG7ePOJHwr6b_aaQC4MnB4JuxHMwPbmeIbfRy455EyY79nRrlltijrO_zZl-3_eBTc-EE61apqFqozfAprCkjoG7vzCGCa1ydEBRcTl3Xux.jpeg?fit=1532%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1JDx","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":414016,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=414016","url_meta":{"origin":413759,"position":0},"title":"Paris Agreement: Dead at Ten (James Hansen was right)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/20\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"COP30, a CO2-fest of sorts, is failing. Major emitters have not shown up. Virtually all nations and regions are in serious noncompliance with their Paris Agreement goals according to Climate Tracker, and the gap is widening. The new pitch is less about emissions as about the fantasy of cheap wind\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQOV1Ly_K6eqvIzDNauSgjSgzLJNmQSFah47CxlkRa7BXNUyW5gTuT0eCKMDeTlD5BkevoY7UzeabJGEBRjbqq4IXWIyezPeVI9K7tlmxHQkYg1Wa7etac7uyJrxeYwa-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C891&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQOV1Ly_K6eqvIzDNauSgjSgzLJNmQSFah47CxlkRa7BXNUyW5gTuT0eCKMDeTlD5BkevoY7UzeabJGEBRjbqq4IXWIyezPeVI9K7tlmxHQkYg1Wa7etac7uyJrxeYwa-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C891&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQOV1Ly_K6eqvIzDNauSgjSgzLJNmQSFah47CxlkRa7BXNUyW5gTuT0eCKMDeTlD5BkevoY7UzeabJGEBRjbqq4IXWIyezPeVI9K7tlmxHQkYg1Wa7etac7uyJrxeYwa-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C891&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQOV1Ly_K6eqvIzDNauSgjSgzLJNmQSFah47CxlkRa7BXNUyW5gTuT0eCKMDeTlD5BkevoY7UzeabJGEBRjbqq4IXWIyezPeVI9K7tlmxHQkYg1Wa7etac7uyJrxeYwa-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C891&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQOV1Ly_K6eqvIzDNauSgjSgzLJNmQSFah47CxlkRa7BXNUyW5gTuT0eCKMDeTlD5BkevoY7UzeabJGEBRjbqq4IXWIyezPeVI9K7tlmxHQkYg1Wa7etac7uyJrxeYwa-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C891&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":430215,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=430215","url_meta":{"origin":413759,"position":1},"title":"Trump Rejects Global Climate Bureaucracy: U.S. Withdraws from UNFCCC to Prioritize Sovereignty","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/09\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"In early January 2026, President Trump signed a presidential memorandum directing the withdrawal of the United States from the UNFCCC (the foundational 1992 treaty on climate change), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and over 60 other international organizations and agreements deemed contrary to U.S. interests. This followed a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"\u201cconsensus\u201d science\"","block_context":{"text":"\u201cconsensus\u201d science","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=consensus-science-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Trump-Rejects-Global-Climate-Bureaucracy-U.S.-Withdraws-from-UNFCCC-to-Prioritize-Sovereignty1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Trump-Rejects-Global-Climate-Bureaucracy-U.S.-Withdraws-from-UNFCCC-to-Prioritize-Sovereignty1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Trump-Rejects-Global-Climate-Bureaucracy-U.S.-Withdraws-from-UNFCCC-to-Prioritize-Sovereignty1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Trump-Rejects-Global-Climate-Bureaucracy-U.S.-Withdraws-from-UNFCCC-to-Prioritize-Sovereignty1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":424513,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=424513","url_meta":{"origin":413759,"position":2},"title":"Celebrating Paris Climate Agreement at Ten? (postmodernism in action)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/03\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c[The Paris agreement]\u00a0is a fraud really, a fake. It\u2019s just bullshit for them to say: \u2018We\u2019ll have a 2C warming target\u00a0and then try to do a little better every five years.\u2019 It\u2019s just worthless words\u2026. As long as fossil fuels appear to be the cheapest fuels out there, they will\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQOeLeO00pi3gZSdBUw2-vBFxLvw8xSsmmRdQXCFKn1FdtP_5H__a5n4XU6OJZVNrr18TO962s6Snpy-z5B8xg0StP1tgYc3CyAoyfHrMhOtgZ96uChUiThcA66FoxnI.jpeg?fit=1200%2C891&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQOeLeO00pi3gZSdBUw2-vBFxLvw8xSsmmRdQXCFKn1FdtP_5H__a5n4XU6OJZVNrr18TO962s6Snpy-z5B8xg0StP1tgYc3CyAoyfHrMhOtgZ96uChUiThcA66FoxnI.jpeg?fit=1200%2C891&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQOeLeO00pi3gZSdBUw2-vBFxLvw8xSsmmRdQXCFKn1FdtP_5H__a5n4XU6OJZVNrr18TO962s6Snpy-z5B8xg0StP1tgYc3CyAoyfHrMhOtgZ96uChUiThcA66FoxnI.jpeg?fit=1200%2C891&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQOeLeO00pi3gZSdBUw2-vBFxLvw8xSsmmRdQXCFKn1FdtP_5H__a5n4XU6OJZVNrr18TO962s6Snpy-z5B8xg0StP1tgYc3CyAoyfHrMhOtgZ96uChUiThcA66FoxnI.jpeg?fit=1200%2C891&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQOeLeO00pi3gZSdBUw2-vBFxLvw8xSsmmRdQXCFKn1FdtP_5H__a5n4XU6OJZVNrr18TO962s6Snpy-z5B8xg0StP1tgYc3CyAoyfHrMhOtgZ96uChUiThcA66FoxnI.jpeg?fit=1200%2C891&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221054,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=221054","url_meta":{"origin":413759,"position":3},"title":"James Hansen\u2019s Latest (climate alarmism, energy realism continues)","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/28\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Unsettled climate science, unsettled climate scientist.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1339.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1339.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1339.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-1339.png?fit=1024%2C512&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286651,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=286651","url_meta":{"origin":413759,"position":4},"title":"James Hansen Hots it Up Even Higher","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/05\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"According to a new\u00a0paper\u00a0in\u00a0Oxford Open Climate Change, the strategies humanity must pursue to reduce climate change will have to include more than reducing greenhouse gases. This new paper comes from the \u201cfather of global warming\u201d James Hansen. From Watts Up With That? New\u00a0paper from the \u201cfather of global warming\u201d argues\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Aerosols\"","block_context":{"text":"Aerosols","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=aerosols"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/OIG-2023-07-29T140658.612.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/OIG-2023-07-29T140658.612.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/OIG-2023-07-29T140658.612.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/OIG-2023-07-29T140658.612.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263587,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=263587","url_meta":{"origin":413759,"position":5},"title":"Wrong Again: James Hansen 1988 Senate Testimony Edition","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/23\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NASA scientist James Hansen launched climate idiocy on June 23, 1988 with his famous Senate testimony. This review of it 35 years later indicates that Hansen\u2019s testimony was largely just hot air, which no doubt contributed to the legendary stuffiness of the Senate hearing room that day.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0014014819_0.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0014014819_0.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0014014819_0.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0014014819_0.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0014014819_0.jpg?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/413759","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=413759"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/413759\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":413763,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/413759\/revisions\/413763"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/413761"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=413759"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=413759"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=413759"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}