{"id":413145,"date":"2025-11-13T18:34:26","date_gmt":"2025-11-13T17:34:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=413145"},"modified":"2025-11-13T18:34:29","modified_gmt":"2025-11-13T17:34:29","slug":"the-curious-case-of-the-missing-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=413145","title":{"rendered":"The Curious Case of the Missing Data"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ivor Williams<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I shall end with two unanswered questions. The reason for that lies in a story with eight decimal places of recondite mystery and scarcely believable deductions. One last glimpse of reality: the mean temperature of the world at the moment (early November) is hovering around 14 deg C, which is never used because it does not convey a sufficient element of danger in the global warming message. Fourteen degrees Celsius or fifty-seven Fahrenheit are not messages of imminent doom. Either one is the annual mean temperature of Bordeaux, San Francisco or Canberra.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Therefore the Wise Ones have decided that any global temperature given to the masses must always be shown as a difference from the mean of the half-century 1850-1900, which, they say, is representative of our world in smoke-free pre-industrial times. That period also happens to be towards the end of the Little Ice Age, which, the Met Office<\/a> says, had \u2018particularly cold intervals beginning in about 1650, 1770 and 1850.\u2019 Cold spell beginning in 1850? Interesting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus it was that on 10 January this year the Met Office<\/a> told us that \u2018The global average temperature for 2024 was 1.53\u00b10.08\u00b0C above the 1850-1900 global average,\u2019 This  is an extraordinarily accurate figure but the World Meteorological Organisation<\/a> has much the same: \u2018The global average surface temperature [in 2024] was 1.55 \u00b0C \u2026 \u00b1\u202f0.13 \u00b0C \u2026 above the 1850-1900 average, according to WMO\u2019s consolidated analysis.\u2019 Ignore the scarcely believable accuracy of those second decimal places, there\u2019s worse to come.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The obvious question is: Why were those fifty years chosen as the fundamental reference period? The answer is easily found: \u2018Global-scale observations from the instrumental era began in the mid-19th century for temperature,\u2019 says the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in their Fifth Assessment Report<\/a> (Section B, page 4.) An associated IPCC Special Report<\/a> (FAQ1.2 para 4) explains that \u2018The reference period 1850\u20131900 \u2026 is the earliest period with near-global observations and is \u2026 used as an approximation of pre-industrial temperature.\u2019 Note the categoric statements that sufficient data is available in that nineteenth century fifty-year period to calculate the global<\/em> mean temperatures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 1850, may I remind you, Dickens was writing David Copperfield, California was admitted to the Union as the 31st state and vast areas of the earth were still unexplored. 1900 brought the Boxer Rebellion (China), the Boer War (South Africa) and the Galveston hurricane (USA). There were still quite large areas awaiting intrepid explorers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I was curious about how in olden times those global temperatures were actually measured, but after a painstaking search of websites and yet again proving that AI-derived information can be both wrong and misleading, I turned in despair to the Met Office enquiry desk. Their reply was long and very detailed. No actual data, but several clues as to where to search. Very interesting clues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The IPCC report above claiming \u2018global-scale observations\u2019 is obviously true, because the World Meteorological Organisation has a comprehensive graph<\/a> showing six different global mean temperature measurements of the difference from the 1850-1900 period. But a link \u2018Get the data\u2019 on the same page leads to the following curious table of the Met Office anomalies:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1850  -0.1797
1851  -0.0592<\/p>\n\n\n\n

then every year to<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1899  0.0128
1900  0.1218<\/p>\n\n\n\n

then every year to<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2023  1.4539
2024  1.5361<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is even more accurate Met Office data from the past, this time anomalies relative to the 1961-1990 period but this time totally unbelievable, all from HadCRUT5.1.0.0,<\/a> Summary Series, Global, CSV file, Annual.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1850  -0.42648312
1851  -0.2635183<\/p>\n\n\n\n

then every year to<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1899  -0.34430692
1900  -0.2301605<\/p>\n\n\n\n

then every year to<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2024  1.1690052<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dig further and monthly<\/em> values are produced. You can\u2019t help being suspicious of even two decimal places, let alone eight. I dug deeper. I found graphs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They show northern and southern hemispheres separately, with both station count and coverage percentage. They are from a paper: Hemispheric and large-scale <\/em>land surface air temperature<\/em><\/a> variations: An extensive revision and an update to 2010<\/em>, P.D. Jones et al. Page 48, line 1120. They show the number of recording stations and the hemisphere percentage covered from 1850 to 2010.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Very similar pictures are also shown in Land Surface Air Temperature Variations Across the Globe Updated to 2019: <\/em>The CRUTEM5 Data Set<\/em><\/a>, T J Osborn et al, para 5.1 fig 6, and Hemispheric Surface Air Temperature<\/em><\/a> \u2026 to 1993<\/em>, P D Jones 1993, page 1797.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Graph<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
\"Graph<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Approximate readings from the above graphs:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1850
Northern hemisphere coverage          7%
Southern hemisphere coverage         0-1%<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1900
Northern hemisphere coverage          23%
Southern hemisphere coverage         6%<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Surely not? There must be a mistake somewhere. But there\u2019s nothing like a graph in scientific peer-reviewed papers for providing clear and unequivocal information. If you still think this just cannot be true, then look further at the American Meteorological Society<\/a> map of station density 1861-1890 (Section 5 of Journal), or a classic Bartholomew<\/a> map of world reporting stations in 1899.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The information supplied by the Met Office led me to a meandering pathway of scientific papers covering thirty-odd years of intensive research into the problem of accurately measuring global mean temperatures from 1850 onwards. The path seems to have ended in a swirling fog.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those graphs show that even by 1900 only about 15% of the earth had recording stations. And the 1850 data is apparently extracted from only around 4%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How can world temperatures be measured that accurately with such an impossibly small amount of data \u2013 almost nothing from the oceans and most of the rest from North America and Western Europe?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It wouldn\u2019t really matter except for someone having decided that current global mean temperatures should always be shown to the worried world as anomalies compared with the 1850-1900 data, which is itself possibly a cooler climatic period. The intention must be to demonstrate clearly that there is no doubt that we are indeed warming up dangerously, and if we don\u2019t do something about it soon it will be too late and don\u2019t say we didn\u2019t warn you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But, and this is one huge \u2018but\u2019, how can the 1850 mean global temperature be recorded, for instance, as -0.1797 deg C less than the mean of 1850-1900, when it seems that reporting stations covered only about 4% of the earth at that time? And why to a totally unrealistic ten-thousandth of a degree?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I did warn you this would end with two unanswered questions, and here they are, both about that fifty-year 1850-1900 period:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where can we consult the actual original global data?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How were those incredibly accurate anomaly figures calculated?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I shall end with two unanswered questions. The reason for that lies in a story with eight decimal places of recondite mystery and scarcely believable deductions. One last glimpse of reality: the mean temperature of the world at the moment (early November) is hovering around 14 deg C, which is never used because it does not convey a sufficient element of danger in the global warming message. Fourteen degrees Celsius or fifty-seven Fahrenheit are not messages of imminent doom. Either one is the annual mean temperature of Bordeaux, San Francisco or Canberra.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":413151,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"Explore the enigma of global temperature data from 1850-1900 and the implications of its accuracy in climate change discussions.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"Unraveling the Global Temperature Mystery: 1850-1900 Data","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":true,"token":"eyJpbWciOiJodHRwczpcL1wvY2xpbWF0ZS1zY2llbmNlLnByZXNzXC93cC1jb250ZW50XC91cGxvYWRzXC8yMDI1XC8xMVwvQVFNU0FGMk41U3RLYkdDLW5mbjRvT2dpRzVpem5uQzlfcWxrdnp5a1dXNFoxa3AxaHo1Z05uZG5VU2MxeWlXY3M2VnBudGZndWxEaER4b0JTN1dUa3hWWFpKdWVPSGk2aGkwSkxvdkF5MzktMmlOT0hSY3lwZHh4LWdBU3JoRS0xMDI0eDcwOC5qcGVnIiwidHh0IjoiVGhlIEN1cmlvdXMgQ2FzZSBvZiB0aGUgTWlzc2luZyBEYXRhIiwidGVtcGxhdGUiOiJoaWdod2F5IiwiZm9udCI6IiIsImJsb2dfaWQiOjE1NTgxMjQ0OX0.H6hVOx0Lv-T_adfLNsQWzc9bix2Z4wLCdO2GabXUxfEMQ"},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691818087,691820922,691839650,691819281,691818808,691830582],"class_list":{"0":"post-413145","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-global-warming","9":"tag-intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change-ipcc","10":"tag-land-surface-air-temperature","11":"tag-little-ice-age","12":"tag-met-office","13":"tag-world-meteorological-organisation-wmo","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQMSAF2N5StKbGC-nfn4oOgiG5iznnC9_qlkvzykWW4Z1kp1hz5gNndnUSc1yiWcs6VpntfgulDhDxoBS7WTkxVXZJueOHi6hi0JLovAy39-2iNOHRcypdxx-gASrhE.jpeg?fit=1442%2C997&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1JtD","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":296043,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=296043","url_meta":{"origin":413145,"position":0},"title":"Climate Fraud In New\u00a0Zealand","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"16\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"NIWA, New Zealand\u2019s National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, lied to their citizens","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate Fraud\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate Fraud","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-fraud"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Gisborne-New-Zealand-in-Summer-Wallpaper.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Gisborne-New-Zealand-in-Summer-Wallpaper.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Gisborne-New-Zealand-in-Summer-Wallpaper.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Gisborne-New-Zealand-in-Summer-Wallpaper.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0Gisborne-New-Zealand-in-Summer-Wallpaper.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240924,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=240924","url_meta":{"origin":413145,"position":1},"title":"AP falsely \u2018fact checks\u2019 Milloy\u2019s 13 million-view tweet about 8 years of no warming","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"21\/01\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The AP willfully lied about my tweet because 13 million Twitter users saw the truth.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-952.png?fit=1000%2C667&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-952.png?fit=1000%2C667&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-952.png?fit=1000%2C667&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/image-952.png?fit=1000%2C667&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297787,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=297787","url_meta":{"origin":413145,"position":2},"title":"Flying Falsehoods and the Value of Numbers","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"21\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it;\u00a0so that when Men come to be undeceived, it is too late.\u2019 That was Jonathan Swift in 1710. You do wonder whether he might be referring to the more lurid descriptions of the\u00a0Great Storm\u00a0of 1703, which is still the by far the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"climate propaganda\"","block_context":{"text":"climate propaganda","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-propaganda"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0bhc0985.jpeg?fit=1200%2C680&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0bhc0985.jpeg?fit=1200%2C680&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0bhc0985.jpeg?fit=1200%2C680&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0bhc0985.jpeg?fit=1200%2C680&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0bhc0985.jpeg?fit=1200%2C680&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218333,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=218333","url_meta":{"origin":413145,"position":3},"title":"Second Place Winner WUWT Student Essay Contest","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/09\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The second-place winner is a young student in Tennessee.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-553.png?fit=1024%2C500&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-553.png?fit=1024%2C500&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-553.png?fit=1024%2C500&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-553.png?fit=1024%2C500&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237167,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=237167","url_meta":{"origin":413145,"position":4},"title":"Questions Remain Over Met Office Claim That 2022 Was the U.K.\u2019s Hottest Year on Record","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/01\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"As we shall see, the Met Office increases in surface measurements would appear to owe something to increasing urban heat corruption, as well as some curious sitings of measuring devises.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2022-12-30-at-02.21.37.jpeg?fit=1200%2C588&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2022-12-30-at-02.21.37.jpeg?fit=1200%2C588&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2022-12-30-at-02.21.37.jpeg?fit=1200%2C588&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2022-12-30-at-02.21.37.jpeg?fit=1200%2C588&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/0Screenshot-2022-12-30-at-02.21.37.jpeg?fit=1200%2C588&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261795,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=261795","url_meta":{"origin":413145,"position":5},"title":"\u201cThe uncomfortable reality of life on Earth after we breach 0.1\u00b0C\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/06\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"THIS time next year, you may be living in the same house, driving the same car and doing the same job. But in one fundamental way, life on Earth could have shifted irrevocably. Spiking worldwide temperatures, boosted by a transition to an El Ni\u00f1o climate pattern, could make 2024 the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0clouds_20050201.webp?fit=1200%2C563&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0clouds_20050201.webp?fit=1200%2C563&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0clouds_20050201.webp?fit=1200%2C563&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0clouds_20050201.webp?fit=1200%2C563&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0clouds_20050201.webp?fit=1200%2C563&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/413145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=413145"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/413145\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":413153,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/413145\/revisions\/413153"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/413151"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=413145"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=413145"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=413145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}