{"id":412335,"date":"2025-11-09T15:31:41","date_gmt":"2025-11-09T14:31:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=412335"},"modified":"2025-11-09T15:31:43","modified_gmt":"2025-11-09T14:31:43","slug":"what-the-nuke-bros-can-learn-from-the-navy-and-what-they-cant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=412335","title":{"rendered":"What the nuke bros can learn from the navy \u2014 and what they can\u2019t"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By CFACT Ed<\/a>,\u00a0Rabbi Yechezkel Moskowitz<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Every few weeks, some deep-tech influencer posts on X something like this, \u201cIf the Navy can run hundreds of nuclear reactors safely and cheaply, why can\u2019t the private sector?\u201d Or alternatively, they ask, \u201cWhy can\u2019t the navy run the nuclear private sector?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s a fair question \u2014 and a flawed one. The Navy didn\u2019t make nuclear work because it was simple; it made it work because it was sacred. Admiral Hyman Rickover built a system designed not to fail standardized, centralized, and ruthlessly disciplined. It served its mission perfectly. But what works for warships doesn\u2019t always work for markets. Rickover\u2019s genius was that he eliminated uncertainty. Every submarine and carrier reactor shared the same DNA. Training, design, operations \u2014 all uniform, all accountable to one command. That\u2019s why the Navy\u2019s record is spotless. The Ford-class carrier\u2019s twin A1B reactors can operate for fifty years with only one refueling \u2014 a feat of engineering discipline as much as physics. Rickover\u2019s model worked because the Navy had one job: deterrence and defense. It didn\u2019t need ten competing designs. It needed one that never failed. In other words, in that world, standardization isn\u2019t bureaucracy \u2014 it\u2019s survival.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But the private sector plays a different game. It thrives on iteration, competition, and failure that leads to progress. Rickover\u2019s model worked for the Navy precisely because it removed those variables. He built a monopoly on excellence \u2014 and that was exactly what the Cold War required. But if we apply that same command-and-control philosophy to commercial nuclear, we don\u2019t get innovation \u2014 we get procurement. And when government procurement becomes industrial policy, we end up with a handful of politically protected players instead of a dynamic marketplace. That\u2019s not how you rebuild a nuclear economy. That\u2019s how you stall one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

None of this is to say Rickover was wrong \u2014 only that he was right for his mission. The Navy\u2019s nuclear program exists to guarantee performance under the most extreme conditions imaginable. A free market has a different mission: to discover what works best by letting ideas compete on merit. If the government locks us into one \u201capproved\u201d design or technology class, it isn\u2019t creating stability \u2014 it\u2019s picking winners and losers before the race even starts. That said, the private sector doesn\u2019t need to abandon Rickover\u2019s discipline; it needs to adapt to it with a new set of rules that works for an environment of innovation and progress. The nuclear startup scene needs to learn from his focus on safety, standardization, and lifetime reliability. But also embrace what his world couldn\u2019t: openness, competition, and creative risk. We don\u2019t need forty unproven startups chasing hype, we already have folks calling next-gen nuclear nuke bros and claiming there is an SMR bubble, so some choices are going to be made, and we need to allow a handful of strong contenders to rise or fall based on results, not relationships. No old school nuclear nuke bro start-up should ever be too big to fail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The right framework is a hybrid \u2014 the Navy\u2019s rigor married to the market\u2019s dynamism. Set the boundaries, keep the standards high, and let the best reactors win. The federal government\u2019s role should be to build the field, not pick the team. To get there, we need policy alignment \u2014 the kind seen under the Trump administration, which deserves credit for re-centering nuclear energy as a matter of national strength. By tying energy, security, and industrial policy together and supporting advanced reactor licensing and public-private partnerships through DOE, we are seeing, for the first time in decades, that Washington is treating nuclear not as a regulatory burden but as a strategic asset.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That mindset shift must continue. We need the same clarity that Rickover demanded of his sailors: know the mission, execute it flawlessly, and never confuse caution with cowardice. But the mission today isn\u2019t deterrence \u2014 it\u2019s deployment. As the DOE begins working on accelerating the deployment of advanced reactors, we must standardize where it matters \u2014 fuels, safety protocols, regulatory pathways and supply chains \u2014 and compete where it counts: in design, cost, and performance. If the U.S. wants to lead the second nuclear era, it must allow multiple paths to success under one uncompromising standard of safety and excellence and ensure that merit \u2014 not politics \u2014 is what wins the day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rickover\u2019s Navy proved that nuclear power could be safe, reliable, and enduring. Now it\u2019s up to the private sector to prove it can also be scalable, efficient, affordable, and competitive on the national and international stage Because while in the Navy, one reactor powers the fleet. In an evolving energy market, ever hungry for more power, only competition powers progress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article originally appeared at Real Clear Energy<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Every few weeks, some deep-tech influencer posts on X something like this, \u201cIf the Navy can run hundreds of nuclear reactors safely and cheaply, why can\u2019t the private sector?\u201d Or alternatively, they ask, \u201cWhy can\u2019t the navy run the nuclear private sector?\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":412339,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"Explore how the Navy's nuclear model can inform private sector innovation while emphasizing safety, standardization, and market competition.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691839404,691818507,691824035,691839405,691839403],"class_list":{"0":"post-412335","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-admiral-hyman-rickover","9":"tag-nuclear-energy","10":"tag-nuclear-reactors","11":"tag-rickovers-model","12":"tag-the-navy","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/0AQOez1NMM7uQPwdqjenhefOM2Ph9KLlZ6CIKApGcEetWSiWGzDhrIhyLVImaIL-UCIwN5mPe6c0HDCK9k2olQD8W3KI5gSy3w-sNGMDTpPPSibtJCd-rz4x5i2gAjDqd-1.jpeg?fit=1375%2C878&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1Jgz","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":428331,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=428331","url_meta":{"origin":412335,"position":0},"title":"The microreactor race is on","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/02\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"For the past half century, successive presidential administrations and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission have thwarted the development of advanced reactor designs that might fulfill President Eisenhower\u2019s vision for the \u201cpeaceful uses of atomic energy.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"Department of Energy\"","block_context":{"text":"Department of Energy","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=department-of-energy"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Micro-nuclear-reactor.jpg?fit=1200%2C1149&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Micro-nuclear-reactor.jpg?fit=1200%2C1149&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Micro-nuclear-reactor.jpg?fit=1200%2C1149&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Micro-nuclear-reactor.jpg?fit=1200%2C1149&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0Micro-nuclear-reactor.jpg?fit=1200%2C1149&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365329,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=365329","url_meta":{"origin":412335,"position":1},"title":"Existing stockpiles of SUNF contain 270 years of electricity demand in the US","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"07\/02\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A \u201cfast reactor\u201d is a type of nuclear reactor that uses fast neutrons to sustain a chain reaction, while a \u201cbreeder reactor\u201d is a specific design of fast reactor that produces more fissile fuel (like plutonium) than it consumes, meaning it \u201cbreeds\u201d new fuel.","rel":"","context":"In \"Fast Reactors\"","block_context":{"text":"Fast Reactors","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=fast-reactors"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0bn800reactor-beloyarsk.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0bn800reactor-beloyarsk.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0bn800reactor-beloyarsk.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0bn800reactor-beloyarsk.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/0bn800reactor-beloyarsk.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347031,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=347031","url_meta":{"origin":412335,"position":2},"title":"A \u201cNew Nuclear Posture\u201d for the US is vital in a Hungry World.","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"16\/10\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Affordable, reliable, continuous, and emissions free electricity would benefit billions on this planet.","rel":"","context":"In \"Department of Energy\u2019s (DOE)\"","block_context":{"text":"Department of Energy\u2019s (DOE)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=department-of-energys-doe"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0wp7844501.webp?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0wp7844501.webp?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0wp7844501.webp?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0wp7844501.webp?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/0wp7844501.webp?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352138,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=352138","url_meta":{"origin":412335,"position":3},"title":"Reopening Palisades power plant shores up Michigan\u2019s electricity security","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"23\/11\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Nuclear power as a means of energy production has in recent decades become a taboo topic in the minds of many Americans. Despite having developed into the world\u2019s cleanest method of generating electricity, western nations continue to abandon and decommission nuclear power plants in favor of less reliable and more\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Lake Michigan\"","block_context":{"text":"Lake Michigan","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=lake-michigan"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/00wp7844501.webp?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/00wp7844501.webp?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/00wp7844501.webp?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/00wp7844501.webp?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/00wp7844501.webp?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336144,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=336144","url_meta":{"origin":412335,"position":4},"title":"The U.S. Navy proves nuclear is better","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/07\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBad Boys\u201d Isaac Orr and Mitch Rolling, both formerly of the Minnesota-based Center for the American Experiment, just posted an article contending that, in the long run, nuclear energy is cheaper (and better) than wind or solar (though not as cheap as coal or natural gas) despite high up-front capital\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Net zero\"","block_context":{"text":"Net zero","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=net-zero"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0-U.S.-Navy-proves-nuclear-is-better.jpeg?fit=1200%2C772&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0-U.S.-Navy-proves-nuclear-is-better.jpeg?fit=1200%2C772&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0-U.S.-Navy-proves-nuclear-is-better.jpeg?fit=1200%2C772&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0-U.S.-Navy-proves-nuclear-is-better.jpeg?fit=1200%2C772&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/0-U.S.-Navy-proves-nuclear-is-better.jpeg?fit=1200%2C772&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":386624,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=386624","url_meta":{"origin":412335,"position":5},"title":"The Trump administration advocates for nuclear power","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/07\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"While we have seen rapid acceptance and advancement of nuclear power in the United States just over the last year or so, the recent executive orders issued by President Trump have added a strong endorsement of nuclear power.","rel":"","context":"In \"Linear No-Threshold (LNT) model\"","block_context":{"text":"Linear No-Threshold (LNT) model","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=linear-no-threshold-lnt-model"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-26.-Mai-2025-10_48_02.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-26.-Mai-2025-10_48_02.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-26.-Mai-2025-10_48_02.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/ChatGPT-Image-26.-Mai-2025-10_48_02.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/412335","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=412335"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/412335\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":412341,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/412335\/revisions\/412341"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/412339"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=412335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=412335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=412335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}