{"id":412320,"date":"2025-11-09T14:28:11","date_gmt":"2025-11-09T13:28:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=412320"},"modified":"2025-11-09T14:28:13","modified_gmt":"2025-11-09T13:28:13","slug":"the-church-of-climate-loses-its-pulpit-at-cbs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=412320","title":{"rendered":"The Church of Climate Loses Its Pulpit at CBS"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Watts Up With That?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cutting the \u201cclimate desk\u201d wasn\u2019t censorship \u2014 it was a long-overdue correction to years of sanctimony.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Exterior<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The great tragedy of our time, at least to those who dwell in the climate-alarmist press, is not hurricanes, floods, or famine\u2014but a network trimming its propaganda department. When CBS News laid off most of its \u201cclimate crisis\u201d staff, the media class responded as though free speech itself had been outlawed. According to Truthout<\/em>, \u201cCBS News has fired most of its climate crisis production staff\u201d and, in the process, \u201cgutted\u201d its sacred climate desk. <\/a>The story was dressed up as an obituary for truth itself, complete with talk of \u201cbloodbaths\u201d and \u201cnew conservative management\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To anyone outside the activist echo chamber, it looked like a normal corporate reshuffling. CBS\u2019s parent company had merged with Skydance, and the incoming leadership did what executives always do after mergers\u2014trim redundancies, change direction, and try to make the business profitable again. But to those who had mistaken climate coverage for a holy mission, this was blasphemy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the heart of the melodrama was Tracy Wholf, the now-former head of CBS\u2019s climate desk, who had urged colleagues to insert a line into hurricane coverage reading: \u201cThe above-average Atlantic Ocean temperatures, made worse by climate change, helped Melissa rapidly intensify into a category 5 storm.\u201d That suggestion was presented in Truthout<\/em> as \u201caccurate reporting.\u201d In reality, it was speculative editorializing\u2014a sentence of moral certainty grafted onto a story about weather.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This small episode tells a much larger story about what has happened to journalism. A decade or two ago, environmental reporting was about inquiry\u2014asking questions, weighing data, distinguishing between what\u2019s known and what\u2019s conjecture. Today, it\u2019s about ritual. Every storm, drought, or wildfire must include the catechismal line that it was \u201cmade worse by climate change.\u201d It doesn\u2019t matter that the claim is rarely quantifiable and often contested. The purpose isn\u2019t to inform; it\u2019s to reassure the faithful that the narrative still holds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When CBS\u2019s new management decided to end that practice, it didn\u2019t silence science\u2014it disrupted a form of sermonizing. The layoffs weren\u2019t about censoring truth; they were about ending a pattern of prepackaged conclusions masquerading as news. That\u2019s why the reaction has been so ferocious. What the press corps mourns is not a loss of information but a loss of control over the story line.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The irony is that even in its coverage of the hurricane, the \u201cclimate desk\u201d offered little actual evidence. It leaned on an \u201cattribution study\u201d from Imperial College claiming that Hurricane Melissa\u2019s winds were seven percent higher than they would have been without climate change. Seven percent\u2014an estimate derived from a computer model run on assumptions stacked upon assumptions. This kind of statistical acrobatics is then presented as certainty, with phrases like \u201cwe know that warming ocean temperatures are being driven almost exclusively by increasing greenhouse gases.\u201d Such declarations are indistinguishable from theology: the conclusion is predetermined, the variables chosen to affirm belief, and dissent treated as heresy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The truth is that the media\u2019s climate beat has long since ceased to function as journalism. Its purpose became to moralize, to scold, to reinforce the idea that every gust of wind is proof of humanity\u2019s original carbon sin. And when that kind of moral messaging fails to hold an audience\u2014when viewers start tuning out\u2014the newsroom doubles down, convinced that the problem is not with the message but with the unconverted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What CBS seems to have realized, whether intentionally or by accident, is that audiences might prefer news to narrative. Removing a department dedicated to producing climate catechism isn\u2019t \u201cgutting science coverage.\u201d It\u2019s cleaning house. A network that stops treating speculation as revelation has not gone rogue; it\u2019s rediscovering the difference between analysis and advocacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And that\u2019s precisely why the reaction has been so overwrought. When a newsroom dares to treat climate as a subject rather than a religion, the self-appointed guardians of orthodoxy cry \u201ccensorship.\u201d Yet no one has been banned from reporting on weather, hurricanes, or environmental trends. The only thing that\u2019s been silenced is the reflexive insistence that every data point confirm the same story.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The deeper issue here isn\u2019t about CBS or even about climate. It\u2019s about the collapse of journalistic humility. Reporters once understood the limits of their knowledge. They knew the difference between evidence and inference, between data and doctrine. Today, many mistake conviction for clarity. The mission is no longer to seek truth but to defend the truth already chosen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If CBS is taking a step back from that mindset, it\u2019s not an act of suppression\u2014it\u2019s a return to sanity. The press can still cover environmental issues, but perhaps now it will have to do so without assuming the conclusions in advance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In that sense, the elimination of the \u201cclimate desk\u201d may be the healthiest newsroom reform we\u2019ve seen in years. For too long, climate journalism has been less about discovery and more about repetition. If this marks a turn back toward skepticism, evidence, and proportion, then CBS hasn\u2019t gutted journalism\u2014it has revived it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

H\/T Mumbles McGuirck<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Cutting the \u201cclimate desk\u201d wasn\u2019t censorship \u2014 it was a long-overdue correction to years of sanctimony.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":412325,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"CBS News' climate desk closure sparks debate, revealing the shift from journalism to narrative control in climate reporting.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"CBS News Reshuffles: Ending Climate Report Propaganda","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691820739,691836661,691823027,691818056,691819743,691839402],"class_list":{"0":"post-412320","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-cbs-news","9":"tag-censorship-and-non-stop-propaganda","10":"tag-church-of-climate","11":"tag-climate-change","12":"tag-climate-propaganda","13":"tag-climate-alarmist-press","15":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQM8svW5uoxVbrwVR8OYgha3Qa_C0v899RCvCdKLfcvLYughuSRvpn7jjvNh1aYoM-NJ_S6uJbLRWW5yZAUCz-XxCwZ2V_ldyc5hOJm0OL2XUWgwS7ZIKLdOD1sHXeTE_l5RMq5qGIYHFfyTNWR8gJICqYhUJA.jpeg?fit=1280%2C1280&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1Jgk","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":289372,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=289372","url_meta":{"origin":412320,"position":0},"title":"WHO To Declare Climate Emergency? – In The Tank\u00a0#425","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/11\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Heartland Institute's Donald Kendal, Jim Lakely, Justin Haskins, and Chris Talgo present episode 425 of the In The Tank Podcast. With the global climate conference, COP28, starting this week, global warming rhetoric is being ramped up into high gear. Last week, over 200 medical journals called on the World\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Screenshot-2023-11-30-183523.png?fit=963%2C558&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Screenshot-2023-11-30-183523.png?fit=963%2C558&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Screenshot-2023-11-30-183523.png?fit=963%2C558&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0Screenshot-2023-11-30-183523.png?fit=963%2C558&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298418,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=298418","url_meta":{"origin":412320,"position":1},"title":"New deniers eh? One third of UK teenagers think climate change is deliberately exaggerated","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"25\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"YouTube criticised for amplifying lies about the climate with disinformation videos watched by young people","rel":"","context":"In \"Censorship\"","block_context":{"text":"Censorship","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=censorship"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sutherland-Invasion-Body-Snatchers-1978-Solofilm-1.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sutherland-Invasion-Body-Snatchers-1978-Solofilm-1.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sutherland-Invasion-Body-Snatchers-1978-Solofilm-1.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sutherland-Invasion-Body-Snatchers-1978-Solofilm-1.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sutherland-Invasion-Body-Snatchers-1978-Solofilm-1.webp?fit=1200%2C630&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277286,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=277286","url_meta":{"origin":412320,"position":2},"title":"The Epistemological Crisis: A Misguided Dive into Supposed Climate Denial and the Danger of Constructed Narratives","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/09\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The epistemological crisis occurring is one of a failing expertocracy forcing its viewpoints and worldviews through an onslaught of propaganda and censorship on a populace that can see the contradictions and flaws in those viewpoints.","rel":"","context":"In \"Censorship\"","block_context":{"text":"Censorship","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=censorship"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-156.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-156.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-156.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-156.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/image-156.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":419710,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=419710","url_meta":{"origin":412320,"position":3},"title":"Welcome To 2026: Europe Laying Groundwork for Climate Science Censorship!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/01\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"EU overreach amid failing climate policies, accusing leaders of using censorship to silence opposition rather than address economic fallout (e.g., high energy costs, farmer protests). As of January 2026, climate disinformation is not explicitly classified as a DSA systemic risk. Enforcement focuses on illegal content, elections, and general misinformation; no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"authoritarian control\"","block_context":{"text":"authoritarian control","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=authoritarian-control"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQMxNoFHNtCdqWunHZ_FYOb0lwSCV_IbhyAG2s63Q2nNP9zi_gyZji0ZzZCRRfEQz_x1uV3LlnmNLEUFF27CDBdcrGuz1xGUpVTF8xsnu1NDP5hwEnn0lLcvT7b48sI8-1.jpeg?fit=1175%2C925&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQMxNoFHNtCdqWunHZ_FYOb0lwSCV_IbhyAG2s63Q2nNP9zi_gyZji0ZzZCRRfEQz_x1uV3LlnmNLEUFF27CDBdcrGuz1xGUpVTF8xsnu1NDP5hwEnn0lLcvT7b48sI8-1.jpeg?fit=1175%2C925&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQMxNoFHNtCdqWunHZ_FYOb0lwSCV_IbhyAG2s63Q2nNP9zi_gyZji0ZzZCRRfEQz_x1uV3LlnmNLEUFF27CDBdcrGuz1xGUpVTF8xsnu1NDP5hwEnn0lLcvT7b48sI8-1.jpeg?fit=1175%2C925&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQMxNoFHNtCdqWunHZ_FYOb0lwSCV_IbhyAG2s63Q2nNP9zi_gyZji0ZzZCRRfEQz_x1uV3LlnmNLEUFF27CDBdcrGuz1xGUpVTF8xsnu1NDP5hwEnn0lLcvT7b48sI8-1.jpeg?fit=1175%2C925&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/0AQMxNoFHNtCdqWunHZ_FYOb0lwSCV_IbhyAG2s63Q2nNP9zi_gyZji0ZzZCRRfEQz_x1uV3LlnmNLEUFF27CDBdcrGuz1xGUpVTF8xsnu1NDP5hwEnn0lLcvT7b48sI8-1.jpeg?fit=1175%2C925&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":430335,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=430335","url_meta":{"origin":412320,"position":4},"title":"Good News, CBS News Is Dialing Back the Climate Alarm, Media Matters Complains","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/03\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"In the recent Media Matters piece \u201cCBS\u2019 leadership in broadcast news climate coverage is chipping away under Bari Weiss,\u201d the authors lament what they describe as a dramatic decline in climate coverage at CBS News. This shift is long overdue. CBS News appears to be recalibrating away from climate alarmism\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"\u201cScience-based\u201d\"","block_context":{"text":"\u201cScience-based\u201d","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=science-based"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Good-News-CBS-News-Is-Dialing-Back-the-Climate-Alarm-Media-Matters-Complains.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Good-News-CBS-News-Is-Dialing-Back-the-Climate-Alarm-Media-Matters-Complains.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Good-News-CBS-News-Is-Dialing-Back-the-Climate-Alarm-Media-Matters-Complains.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Good-News-CBS-News-Is-Dialing-Back-the-Climate-Alarm-Media-Matters-Complains.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219600,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=219600","url_meta":{"origin":412320,"position":5},"title":"\u201ctruth and community\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"18\/09\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Apparently, Facebook censorship and fake fact checking isn\u2019t enough to make some people happy.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-935.png?fit=748%2C565&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-935.png?fit=748%2C565&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-935.png?fit=748%2C565&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/image-935.png?fit=748%2C565&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/412320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=412320"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/412320\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":412327,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/412320\/revisions\/412327"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/412325"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=412320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=412320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=412320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}