{"id":406808,"date":"2025-10-06T09:27:47","date_gmt":"2025-10-06T07:27:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=406808"},"modified":"2025-10-06T09:27:49","modified_gmt":"2025-10-06T07:27:49","slug":"met-office-deletes-huge-chunks-of-historic-temperature-data-after-fabrication-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=406808","title":{"rendered":"Met Office Deletes Huge Chunks of Historic Temperature Data After Fabrication Claims"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"Close-up<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From The Daily Sceptic<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Chris Morrison<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last August, the Daily Sceptic<\/em> drew attention to the UK Met Office inventing temperature data at its fictitious \u2018open\u2019 weather station at Lowestoft. Figures were said to be compiled from \u201cwell-correlated neighbouring stations\u201d, but research by citizen sleuth Ray Sanders found there were no such operations within a 40-mile radius. At the time, the Daily Sceptic <\/em>referred to the matter as a \u201csmoking gun<\/a>\u201d and said that unless the Met Office could finally reveal its workings out, \u201cthe only realistic conclusion to draw is that the data are invented\u201d. No explanation has been provided but in a shock unannounced move<\/a> the Met Office has now withdrawn all the Lowestoft data from its historical record back to when the site closed in 2010. Similar withdrawals of data have also occurred in the stations at Nairm Druim and Paisley.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move casts serious doubt over attempts by the Met Office to estimate temperature trends across many once open but now closed weather stations. Sanders is not inclined to minimise the scale of the problem facing the Met Office. When subject to \u201cproper scrutiny\u201d, the Met Office \u201ccould not substantiate its fabrication of false data and has had to delete them in their entirety\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The practice of inventing temperature data from non-existent stations is not confined to the UK. In the USA, the weather service NOAA has been charged with fabricating data from more than 30% of its reporting sites. Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting averages are given an \u2018E\u2019 for estimate. The addition of the so-called \u2018ghost\u2019 station data means NOAA\u2019s monthly and yearly reports are \u201cnot representative of reality\u201d, states meteorologist Anthony Watts. If such evidence was presented in a court of law it would be thrown out, he adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Temperature measurements and estimates are a highly imprecise science. The dreadful mistake meteorological operations like the Met Office and NOAA make is to leverage their \u2018trusted\u2019 status to promote the political Net Zero fantasy by claiming an accuracy and precision that is simply not available in their rough-and-ready figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The problem with Lowestoft is that the Met Office has been unable to back up its widely promoted \u201cwell-correlated stations\u201d explanation. The four nearby stations to Lowestoft supplied in a Met Office public domain database are all, alas, closed. Sanders dug further and found that the only open well-correlated sites available were Cromer, a Class 4 junk site with possible unnatural errors up to 2\u00b0C at 35 miles distance, and Class 2 Weybourne, 41 miles away. Well-correlated except for the fact they are too far away to provide a monthly estimate for Lowestoft to one tenth of a degree centigrade. For its part, the Met Office refuses to name well-correlated stations for any of its calculations, claiming \u201cit is not retained information\u201d. Sanders has expressed incredulity at this explanation, exclaiming: \u201cWhat, not ever, not even for one day? Hands up anyone who believes that!\u201d Freedom of Information requests to obtain station names have been met with the Met Officer stating that such attempts are \u201cvexatious\u201d and not in the public interest<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It might be suggested that the public interest is not best served by monthly temperature figures for Lowestoft being presented until a few days ago as follows (the two columns on the left after the year and month claim a monthly average based on daily highs and lows):<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Monthly<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

All pretence at estimating these figures has now gone with the following now published. Similar cleansing has occurred at Nairm Drium \u00a0and Paisley and previous \u2018open\u2019 claims have been changed to \u2018closed\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Table<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Meanwhile, the Met Office continues to invent data for about 100 non-existent stations<\/a> that are used to provide \u2018location-specific\u2019 long-term average temperature data. Political pressure is mounting for the Met Office to make a full public statement about its temperature gathering operation \u2013 a public statement that addresses the many criticisms of fabrication now widespread on social media. Sanders is clear on the core issue that needs the urgent attention of the Met Office: \u201cHow would any reasonable observer know that the data were not real and simply \u2018made up\u2019 by a Government agency?\u201d He has called for an \u201copen declaration\u201d of likely inaccuracy of existing published data, \u201cto avoid other institutions and researchers using unreliable data and reaching erroneous conclusions\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Erroneous conclusions seem to have been reached by the local council in the Welsh spa town of Llandrindod Wells. A few years ago, it declared a fashionable \u2018climate emergency\u2019 at a time when the Met Office was claiming the local maximum temperatures had\u00a0risen by 1.07\u00b0C<\/a>\u00a0relative to the period 1960 to 1990. How did it know? Last month marked the 50th anniversary of the closing of the weather station at Llandrindod Wells. Precision to within one hundredth of a degree centigrade is the product of a computer model \u2013 the disclosure of the input details of which are said to be not in the public interest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hopefully any much needed explanation will be of a higher standard than that sent recently to Matt Ridley following a recent article in the Telegraph<\/em>. The science journalist had criticised the Met Office\u2019s exaggeration of warm weather and in passing noted that the meteorologist had been \u201cembarrassingly duped by activists<\/a>\u201d. In a post on X, Ridley said the Met Office claimed that he was wrong in saying that it based its wildly unrealistic projection for the UK climate in 2070 on the extreme and implausible computer model scenario known as RCP8.5.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As exhibit 1, Ridley posted the following from the Met Office\u2019s own site.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Infographic<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Time for the Met Office to come clean on using junk computer models as well as invented and exaggerated temperature readings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris Morrison is the<\/em> Daily Sceptic\u2019s Environment Editor. Follow <\/em>him on X<\/em><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Last August, the Daily Sceptic drew attention to the UK Met Office inventing temperature data at its fictitious \u2018open\u2019 weather station at Lowestoft. Figures were said to be compiled from \u201cwell-correlated neighbouring stations\u201d, but research by citizen sleuth Ray Sanders found there were no such operations within a 40-mile radius. At the time, the Daily Sceptic referred to the matter as a \u201csmoking gun\u201d and said that unless the Met Office could finally reveal its workings out, \u201cthe only realistic conclusion to draw is that the data are invented\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":406817,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691838577,691819134,691819743,691838576,691837586,691820425,691820151,691822015],"class_list":{"0":"post-406808","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-climate-emergency-3","9":"tag-climate-alarmism","10":"tag-climate-propaganda","11":"tag-closed-weather-stations","12":"tag-lowestoft","13":"tag-temperature-record","14":"tag-the-science","15":"tag-uk-met-office","17":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/0thermometer.jpeg?fit=1439%2C951&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1HPq","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":398378,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=398378","url_meta":{"origin":406808,"position":0},"title":"Science Shock: \u2018Smoking Gun\u2019 Evidence Emerges That the Met Office is Inventing Temperature Data","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"28\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The UK Met Office has over 100 non-existent weather stations where it estimates temperature data using information from \u201cwell-correlated neighbouring sites\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In \"climate alarmism\"","block_context":{"text":"climate alarmism","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-alarmism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQMwlcpv9XRp3PnMb9DiWsYZCNfNMCYP4ITyBMTU3crq6zWkYkcJ2kDurh9YwVWKcYbhV_OBEt5zOVtPivtG4j03pSfBygiyo0aoprIoM7Gm5snid6WWbbI6Q2Q9iB_DItD_vWFWBApMtAwHJbCdjoj_ntTXtw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQMwlcpv9XRp3PnMb9DiWsYZCNfNMCYP4ITyBMTU3crq6zWkYkcJ2kDurh9YwVWKcYbhV_OBEt5zOVtPivtG4j03pSfBygiyo0aoprIoM7Gm5snid6WWbbI6Q2Q9iB_DItD_vWFWBApMtAwHJbCdjoj_ntTXtw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQMwlcpv9XRp3PnMb9DiWsYZCNfNMCYP4ITyBMTU3crq6zWkYkcJ2kDurh9YwVWKcYbhV_OBEt5zOVtPivtG4j03pSfBygiyo0aoprIoM7Gm5snid6WWbbI6Q2Q9iB_DItD_vWFWBApMtAwHJbCdjoj_ntTXtw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQMwlcpv9XRp3PnMb9DiWsYZCNfNMCYP4ITyBMTU3crq6zWkYkcJ2kDurh9YwVWKcYbhV_OBEt5zOVtPivtG4j03pSfBygiyo0aoprIoM7Gm5snid6WWbbI6Q2Q9iB_DItD_vWFWBApMtAwHJbCdjoj_ntTXtw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQMwlcpv9XRp3PnMb9DiWsYZCNfNMCYP4ITyBMTU3crq6zWkYkcJ2kDurh9YwVWKcYbhV_OBEt5zOVtPivtG4j03pSfBygiyo0aoprIoM7Gm5snid6WWbbI6Q2Q9iB_DItD_vWFWBApMtAwHJbCdjoj_ntTXtw.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":413614,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=413614","url_meta":{"origin":406808,"position":1},"title":"EXCLUSIVE: New Freedom of Information Request and the UK Met Office has to Rewrite its Temperature Explanations Again","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"17\/11\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The UK Met Office\u2019s excuses for its invented temperature data from non-existent stations get more fanciful by the day. Explanation after explanation fails to live up to rigorous examination, with statutory Freedom of Information (FOI) requests leading to frequent rewriting and new things to believe before breakfast. Data from non-existent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"\u2018highest evah\u2019\"","block_context":{"text":"\u2018highest evah\u2019","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=highest-evah"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQMyKuEVG1feRGKQEKpYoJfXesuwS-EKaAxt5VVsdmyykWTxjqjVTSt7V-LjovB_oq8mHgyyAA5KcbiH3iSR2goxAk0hTmb8IKUTR_zLmXt_bYfxT1cgXAyuIytL1Dgv.jpeg?fit=1200%2C857&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQMyKuEVG1feRGKQEKpYoJfXesuwS-EKaAxt5VVsdmyykWTxjqjVTSt7V-LjovB_oq8mHgyyAA5KcbiH3iSR2goxAk0hTmb8IKUTR_zLmXt_bYfxT1cgXAyuIytL1Dgv.jpeg?fit=1200%2C857&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQMyKuEVG1feRGKQEKpYoJfXesuwS-EKaAxt5VVsdmyykWTxjqjVTSt7V-LjovB_oq8mHgyyAA5KcbiH3iSR2goxAk0hTmb8IKUTR_zLmXt_bYfxT1cgXAyuIytL1Dgv.jpeg?fit=1200%2C857&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQMyKuEVG1feRGKQEKpYoJfXesuwS-EKaAxt5VVsdmyykWTxjqjVTSt7V-LjovB_oq8mHgyyAA5KcbiH3iSR2goxAk0hTmb8IKUTR_zLmXt_bYfxT1cgXAyuIytL1Dgv.jpeg?fit=1200%2C857&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/AQMyKuEVG1feRGKQEKpYoJfXesuwS-EKaAxt5VVsdmyykWTxjqjVTSt7V-LjovB_oq8mHgyyAA5KcbiH3iSR2goxAk0hTmb8IKUTR_zLmXt_bYfxT1cgXAyuIytL1Dgv.jpeg?fit=1200%2C857&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":388918,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=388918","url_meta":{"origin":406808,"position":2},"title":"Simple FOI Requests for Data Said to Back Non-existent Temperature Stations Refused on \u201cVexatious\u201d Grounds by UK Met Office","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"15\/07\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The UK Met Office recently declared an average daily maximum temperature of 22.3\u00b0C for June 2025 at Lowestoft: Monkton Avenue. But there is no weather station at Lowestoft and hasn\u2019t been since 2010. Over the last 15 years, the temperature measurements published in the Met Office\u2019s Historic Station Database have\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Freedom of Information (FOI)\"","block_context":{"text":"Freedom of Information (FOI)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=freedom-of-information-foi"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/0ddddd.jpg?fit=1200%2C769&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/0ddddd.jpg?fit=1200%2C769&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/0ddddd.jpg?fit=1200%2C769&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/0ddddd.jpg?fit=1200%2C769&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/0ddddd.jpg?fit=1200%2C769&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":398206,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=398206","url_meta":{"origin":406808,"position":3},"title":"Hottest Summer? Met Office Take The\u00a0Piss!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The United Kingdom has \"almost certainly\" had its hottest summer on record, according to provisional statistics from the Met Office.","rel":"","context":"In \"case of the fictitious site at Lowestoft\"","block_context":{"text":"case of the fictitious site at Lowestoft","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=case-of-the-fictitious-site-at-lowestoft"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/OIG-2023-08-09T120430.902-1.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/OIG-2023-08-09T120430.902-1.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/OIG-2023-08-09T120430.902-1.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/OIG-2023-08-09T120430.902-1.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":436445,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=436445","url_meta":{"origin":406808,"position":4},"title":"The Scandal of the Scottish Met Office Station Still Providing Temperature Figures Six Decades After it Closed","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/04\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Another shocking example of decades-long invented temperature figures at non-existent UK Met Office measuring stations has come to light. The Lephinmore \u2018station\u2019 was situated in the upper reaches of the Firth of Clyde, and according to the \u201clocation-specific long-term averages\u201d Met Office database it can supply monthly temperature readings along\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"CIMO Class 4 \u2018junk\u2019 station\"","block_context":{"text":"CIMO Class 4 \u2018junk\u2019 station","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=cimo-class-4-junk-station"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQPctQKaSH-E0rf-g9XF4XLGomR90evI5uFhBj2fqw_UIKbNXHK7OWd95wrku01hjTyf9S39RSfbwvrcepxmYJmeVplz4xKO4kEcMLp6lVYaX3YrrMRdRv2MhXEJSmefU3MIKK3qPKhPYNlFgqXqa462uLGp.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQPctQKaSH-E0rf-g9XF4XLGomR90evI5uFhBj2fqw_UIKbNXHK7OWd95wrku01hjTyf9S39RSfbwvrcepxmYJmeVplz4xKO4kEcMLp6lVYaX3YrrMRdRv2MhXEJSmefU3MIKK3qPKhPYNlFgqXqa462uLGp.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQPctQKaSH-E0rf-g9XF4XLGomR90evI5uFhBj2fqw_UIKbNXHK7OWd95wrku01hjTyf9S39RSfbwvrcepxmYJmeVplz4xKO4kEcMLp6lVYaX3YrrMRdRv2MhXEJSmefU3MIKK3qPKhPYNlFgqXqa462uLGp.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQPctQKaSH-E0rf-g9XF4XLGomR90evI5uFhBj2fqw_UIKbNXHK7OWd95wrku01hjTyf9S39RSfbwvrcepxmYJmeVplz4xKO4kEcMLp6lVYaX3YrrMRdRv2MhXEJSmefU3MIKK3qPKhPYNlFgqXqa462uLGp.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AQPctQKaSH-E0rf-g9XF4XLGomR90evI5uFhBj2fqw_UIKbNXHK7OWd95wrku01hjTyf9S39RSfbwvrcepxmYJmeVplz4xKO4kEcMLp6lVYaX3YrrMRdRv2MhXEJSmefU3MIKK3qPKhPYNlFgqXqa462uLGp.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":417951,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=417951","url_meta":{"origin":406808,"position":5},"title":"Government Minister Steps in to Defend Met Office as Fake Temperature Scandal Escalates","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"20\/12\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In a couple of weeks\u2019 time, the Met Office is likely to announce another \u2018hottest year evah\u2019 in the UK. The message will be broadcast faithfully by trusted messengers in mainstream media, keen to prop up the fading Net Zero fantasy, but greeted with howls of derision across social media.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Dodgy Data\"","block_context":{"text":"Dodgy Data","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=dodgy-data"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQO3DbFShcg_vM36S6IYmfwPqhgHmWauA0H8g5dp4U5fYAyrYhXRQsMdLK40xbvGRoRSN3yIwAJTQNUM6HwVIF_idtaHGORP1YjcJTIcm0DvsJ-qzlTXV8hwFv8-1lw-Isig5mkVnOYsltzhnwNJv1UoMS-Z.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQO3DbFShcg_vM36S6IYmfwPqhgHmWauA0H8g5dp4U5fYAyrYhXRQsMdLK40xbvGRoRSN3yIwAJTQNUM6HwVIF_idtaHGORP1YjcJTIcm0DvsJ-qzlTXV8hwFv8-1lw-Isig5mkVnOYsltzhnwNJv1UoMS-Z.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQO3DbFShcg_vM36S6IYmfwPqhgHmWauA0H8g5dp4U5fYAyrYhXRQsMdLK40xbvGRoRSN3yIwAJTQNUM6HwVIF_idtaHGORP1YjcJTIcm0DvsJ-qzlTXV8hwFv8-1lw-Isig5mkVnOYsltzhnwNJv1UoMS-Z.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQO3DbFShcg_vM36S6IYmfwPqhgHmWauA0H8g5dp4U5fYAyrYhXRQsMdLK40xbvGRoRSN3yIwAJTQNUM6HwVIF_idtaHGORP1YjcJTIcm0DvsJ-qzlTXV8hwFv8-1lw-Isig5mkVnOYsltzhnwNJv1UoMS-Z.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQO3DbFShcg_vM36S6IYmfwPqhgHmWauA0H8g5dp4U5fYAyrYhXRQsMdLK40xbvGRoRSN3yIwAJTQNUM6HwVIF_idtaHGORP1YjcJTIcm0DvsJ-qzlTXV8hwFv8-1lw-Isig5mkVnOYsltzhnwNJv1UoMS-Z.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=406808"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406808\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":406819,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406808\/revisions\/406819"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/406817"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=406808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=406808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=406808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}