{"id":406278,"date":"2025-10-02T18:39:42","date_gmt":"2025-10-02T16:39:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=406278"},"modified":"2025-10-02T18:39:44","modified_gmt":"2025-10-02T16:39:44","slug":"medias-psyop-against-climate-scientists-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=406278","title":{"rendered":"Media\u2019s Psyop Against Climate Scientists"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"Portraits<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CO2 Coalition<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Vijay Jayaraj<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A coordinated offensive unfolded with precision September 2 against five scientists questioning the popular media\u2019s most sacred bogeyman \u2013 the hypothesis that human-induced emissions of carbon dioxide threaten to overheat the planet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The scientists attacked had written a report published in July by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), \u201cA Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Delivering virtually identical narratives, proclaiming that 85 \u201cclimate experts\u201d had discreditedthe DOE report, were CBS<\/a>, NPR<\/a>, ABC<\/a>, CNN<\/a>, The New York Times<\/a>, Los Angeles Times<\/a>, Reuters<\/a> and others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Language in the news reporting was nearly indistinguishable, and the focus identical: a number (\u201c85\u201d or \u201cdozens\u201d), a designated group (\u201cscientists\u201d or \u201cexperts\u201d) and a verdict (\u201cflawed,\u201d \u201clacks merit,\u201d \u201cfull of errors\u201d). This is not the natural variance of independent newsrooms pursuing a story. This is the result of a shared press release, a common source or a backroom agreement to push a common story line.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was a master class in singing the same tune that would make any propaganda ministry proud \u2013 a calibrated flash mob of climate-fear messaging in an explicitly partisan tone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fooling the Public<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The first volley of the assault was a classic ad hominem attack. The authors of the DOE report, five of the world\u2019s most distinguished and academically rigorous researchers of climate issues, were immediately branded as the \u201cTrump Team<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is a deliberately dishonest tactic. The authors \u2013 Drs. John Christy, Judith Curry, Steven Koonin, Ross McKitrick, and Roy Spencer \u2013 are not political operatives. They are scientists with decades of experience and hundreds of peer-reviewed publications.

Dr. Koonin served as Undersecretary for Science<\/a> in the Department of Energy under President Obama, a fact conveniently omitted from most of the media\u2019s hit pieces. Drs. Christy and Spencer are world-renowned for developing the first global temperature dataset from satellites, for which they received NASA\u2019s Medal for Exceptional Scientific Achievement<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

No mention that Ross McKitrick is a Canadian academic<\/a> with no political ties. No mention that Judith Curry stepped away from academia partly because of the politicization of climate research and previously had been much sought after for her research<\/a> into hurricane intensity.

Most critically, the authors themselves have stated that there was no oversight or compulsion from anyone in any government department during the creation of their report. They say they crafted the report independently<\/a>, with no interference from Energy Secretary Chris Wright. But the media gloss over that. Instead, the scientists are derided as the \u201cTrump team.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In stark contrast to the vilified DOE authors, the 85 individuals who signed the critical letter were anointed as \u201cclimate experts\u201d and \u201cleading scientists.\u201d Yet, the list of signers<\/a> is padded with individuals whose specializations are, to put it generously, tangential to the core issues of climate science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The strategy is clear: assemble a gaggle of academics, label them \u201cclimate experts\u201d and use the sheer number to create an illusion of overwhelming scientific consensus against the DOE report.

Sell Lies, Instill Fear With a \u2018Black Mirror\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Adding to the theater, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) has announced a panel to review the DOE report. But here\u2019s the twist: The panel is headed not by a climate scientist, but by a biologist. Out of the panel\u2019s members,\u00a0only a few have\u00a0<\/a>direct expertise in atmospheric science. Yet the announcement was trumpeted as if the nation\u2019s top climate experts were mobilized.

Predicting catastrophe is a media business model. NPR\u00a0warned<\/a>\u00a0of \u201cirreversible\u201d sea-level rise in 2023, ignoring tide gauge records that show\u00a0no acceleration<\/a>\u00a0beyond historical norms. News outlets regularly report on \u201cunprecedented\u201d floods, yet data indicate\u00a0no uptick in floods<\/a>\u00a0due to climate change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If everybody believed climate impacts were manageable, the case for sweeping carbon taxes, bans on fossil fuels and subsidies for wind and solar energy would collapse. That\u2019s why the DOE report \u2013 noting forecasting uncertainty, adaptation possibilities and economic trade-offs \u2013 is so threatening. It undermines a narrative of an \u201cexistential\u201d threat or imminent collapse. So, the media did not debate the five scientists; they sought to destroy them and their report. Not with data, but with labels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is a psyops initiative like depicted in the Netflix dystopian series \u201cBlack Mirror.\u201d The media outlets are not mirrors reflecting reality; they are black screens projecting a manufactured one. They have become instruments of a political agenda, sacrificing journalistic integrity to enforce a specific viewpoint on climate change. They operate not as individual watchdogs but as a wolf pack. They decide what you should think and seek to broadcast it in unison until you do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This commentary was first published by Daily Caller<\/a> on September 22, 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Vijay Jayaraj<\/a> is a Science and Research Associate at the CO\u2082 Coalition<\/a>, Fairfax, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor\u2019s in engineering from Anna University, India.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

What\u2019s New!<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

CO2 <\/sub>Coalition recently filed two Endangerment Finding Comments to EPA:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CO2<\/sub> Coalition Comment #1 on EPA Endangerment Finding<\/a><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

CO2<\/sub> Coalition Comment #2 on EPA Endangerment Finding<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Endangerment Finding comment period has now ended.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The entire House of Cards of rules and regulations enacted to solve the nonexistent climate crisis are built on this one ruling and it will come tumbling down when it is overturned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A coordinated offensive unfolded with precision September 2 against five scientists questioning the popular media\u2019s most sacred bogeyman \u2013 the hypothesis that human-induced emissions of carbon dioxide threaten to overheat the planet.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":406282,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"Explore the media's coordinated attack on five scientists challenging climate change narratives, revealing a troubling narrative in climate reporting.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"Media Bias Against Climate Scientists: A Coordinated Attack","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691829997,691838280,691838499,691837617,691822741],"class_list":{"0":"post-406278","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-carbon-dioxide-co","9":"tag-climate-fear-messaging","10":"tag-doe-authors","11":"tag-national-academies-of-sciences","12":"tag-u-s-department-of-energy-doe","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQNbnnLIcdMHEF3rfzqz5iFwusXYT2U3cQTkALZg8DN6Cz9TAFbTORInKT5WaZ7A7UOOi6oip7zHiZQ1igkEpZuMASOOkKAXMC1cd3aYQSW3OPr8VoN4uFE2cRD-UEnZ.jpeg?fit=1460%2C1065&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1HGS","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":404837,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=404837","url_meta":{"origin":406278,"position":0},"title":"Media\u2019s psyop against climate scientists","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"25\/09\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A coordinated offensive unfolded with precision September 2 against five scientists questioning the popular media\u2019s most sacred bogeyman -- the hypothesis that human-induced emissions of carbon dioxide threaten to overheat the planet.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMEDctjhGxZP9_BpaxpzRhDXscEigNqk4WjKVjPN1_8WUhXHgn8lDmcjDpFqM4r3EijMdZbBq3vgiisGN1R7QGQWHsncLg2IqfzLwNkssSnCkACK7C3o3hUkk2mouVbbpHe7dVhH9l04TgSNkSCQkev0kEe9Q-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMEDctjhGxZP9_BpaxpzRhDXscEigNqk4WjKVjPN1_8WUhXHgn8lDmcjDpFqM4r3EijMdZbBq3vgiisGN1R7QGQWHsncLg2IqfzLwNkssSnCkACK7C3o3hUkk2mouVbbpHe7dVhH9l04TgSNkSCQkev0kEe9Q-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMEDctjhGxZP9_BpaxpzRhDXscEigNqk4WjKVjPN1_8WUhXHgn8lDmcjDpFqM4r3EijMdZbBq3vgiisGN1R7QGQWHsncLg2IqfzLwNkssSnCkACK7C3o3hUkk2mouVbbpHe7dVhH9l04TgSNkSCQkev0kEe9Q-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMEDctjhGxZP9_BpaxpzRhDXscEigNqk4WjKVjPN1_8WUhXHgn8lDmcjDpFqM4r3EijMdZbBq3vgiisGN1R7QGQWHsncLg2IqfzLwNkssSnCkACK7C3o3hUkk2mouVbbpHe7dVhH9l04TgSNkSCQkev0kEe9Q-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AQMEDctjhGxZP9_BpaxpzRhDXscEigNqk4WjKVjPN1_8WUhXHgn8lDmcjDpFqM4r3EijMdZbBq3vgiisGN1R7QGQWHsncLg2IqfzLwNkssSnCkACK7C3o3hUkk2mouVbbpHe7dVhH9l04TgSNkSCQkev0kEe9Q-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323585,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=323585","url_meta":{"origin":406278,"position":1},"title":"New Scientific Evidence That CO2 Emissions Can\u2019t Warm Atmosphere Because it is \u201cSaturated\u201d Published in Peer-Reviewed Journal","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"26\/04\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Further scientific evidence has emerged to suggest that the Earth\u2019s atmosphere is \u2018saturated\u2019 with carbon dioxide, meaning that at higher levels the \u2018greenhouse\u2019 gas will not cause temperatures to rise. A group of Polish scientists led by Dr. Jan Kubicki have published three papers recently, and according to the science\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Carbon dioxide\"","block_context":{"text":"Carbon dioxide","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/075062-space-Earth-Sun-stars.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/075062-space-Earth-Sun-stars.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/075062-space-Earth-Sun-stars.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/075062-space-Earth-Sun-stars.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/075062-space-Earth-Sun-stars.jpg?fit=1200%2C750&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":424923,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=424923","url_meta":{"origin":406278,"position":2},"title":"Virginia Has No Reason to Rejoin RGGI","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/02\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"In announcing plans to have Virginia reinstitute a carbon tax, Virginia Governor\u00a0Abigail Spanberger\u00a0makes no mention of global warming \u2013 the bogeyman usually called upon by supporters of such levies. That may be because the apocalyptic narrative that industrial emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) threaten to overheat the planet has become\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0AQMSC3bZplY11tAmcrZEDtO0NKwOt3QlJnh7OxqzCM1s_ySFIxtWnsJFNMbp7XvWMTt1ljVpV3iQPQ4dTmCV80GYEZdupYA7fWTk7NlkVIHnFOmFWoI0exRMFPF_v9k-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0AQMSC3bZplY11tAmcrZEDtO0NKwOt3QlJnh7OxqzCM1s_ySFIxtWnsJFNMbp7XvWMTt1ljVpV3iQPQ4dTmCV80GYEZdupYA7fWTk7NlkVIHnFOmFWoI0exRMFPF_v9k-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0AQMSC3bZplY11tAmcrZEDtO0NKwOt3QlJnh7OxqzCM1s_ySFIxtWnsJFNMbp7XvWMTt1ljVpV3iQPQ4dTmCV80GYEZdupYA7fWTk7NlkVIHnFOmFWoI0exRMFPF_v9k-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0AQMSC3bZplY11tAmcrZEDtO0NKwOt3QlJnh7OxqzCM1s_ySFIxtWnsJFNMbp7XvWMTt1ljVpV3iQPQ4dTmCV80GYEZdupYA7fWTk7NlkVIHnFOmFWoI0exRMFPF_v9k-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0AQMSC3bZplY11tAmcrZEDtO0NKwOt3QlJnh7OxqzCM1s_ySFIxtWnsJFNMbp7XvWMTt1ljVpV3iQPQ4dTmCV80GYEZdupYA7fWTk7NlkVIHnFOmFWoI0exRMFPF_v9k-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C599&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358601,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=358601","url_meta":{"origin":406278,"position":3},"title":"Science Shock: CO2 is Good for the Planet, Peer-Reviewed Studies Suggest","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"25\/12\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Dramatic evidence has been published in a number of recent science papers that carbon dioxide levels are already\u00a0\u2018saturated\u2019, meaning little or no further warming is to be expected, and rising CO2\u00a0levels are all beneficial.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0Screenshot-2024-12-23-202651.jpeg?fit=1200%2C707&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0Screenshot-2024-12-23-202651.jpeg?fit=1200%2C707&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0Screenshot-2024-12-23-202651.jpeg?fit=1200%2C707&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0Screenshot-2024-12-23-202651.jpeg?fit=1200%2C707&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0Screenshot-2024-12-23-202651.jpeg?fit=1200%2C707&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330234,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=330234","url_meta":{"origin":406278,"position":4},"title":"Biggest Threat: AI or Climate? Both\u00a0Together!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/05\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The biggest hazard to humanity is when climate change arguments are paired with AI.","rel":"","context":"In \"AI (artificial intelligence)\"","block_context":{"text":"AI (artificial intelligence)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=ai-artificial-intelligence-2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0AI_shutterstock_1722492775-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0AI_shutterstock_1722492775-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0AI_shutterstock_1722492775-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0AI_shutterstock_1722492775-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/0AI_shutterstock_1722492775-scaled-1.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":178477,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=178477","url_meta":{"origin":406278,"position":5},"title":"The Sun\u2019s Influence on Climate \u2013 Why the Evidence Is Ignored by the IPCC","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"17\/12\/2021","format":false,"excerpt":"NASA: spaceplace.nasa.gov By Dr John Happs I\u2019m often asked:\u201cWhy do so many people still believe that we are facing a climate crisis?\u201d And: \u201cWhy is so much money being spent on reducing carbon dioxide emissions when many other factors control climate change?\u201d My answers to these questions rest with the\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/009.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/009.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/009.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=406278"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406278\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":406284,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406278\/revisions\/406284"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/406282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=406278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=406278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=406278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}