{"id":406083,"date":"2025-10-01T18:58:56","date_gmt":"2025-10-01T16:58:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=406083"},"modified":"2025-10-01T18:58:58","modified_gmt":"2025-10-01T16:58:58","slug":"lord-brooke-and-the-malthusian-mind-virus-in-our-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=406083","title":{"rendered":"Lord Brooke and the Malthusian Mind Virus in Our Time"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Tilak\u00b4s Substack<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Tilak Doshi<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"A<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

When Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe rose recently in the House of Lords to speak<\/a> on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, one could not have anticipated the detour his remarks would take. Instead of focusing solely on the grave ethical questions surrounding assisted dying, Lord Brooke turned his attention to population growth and its supposed role in climate change. In words that startled many in attendance and later provoked widespread commentary, he declared:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u2026this century\u2019s growth in the world population from 6.1 billion to 8.2 billion \u2013 a 25% increase in 25 years. Just think what the 2025 numbers would be if abortion had not been legalised or there had not been wide-scale usage and advocacy of contraception. Indeed, the growth of homosexuality throughout society has reduced the number of children that we would have had. Had the churches had their way, we would have had a very much bigger population than we presently have, facing the difficulties we have with climate change.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Some observers were horrified. Nikki da Costa, a former Director of Legislative Affairs at No 10, asked pointedly in a widely viewed and commented upon X post<\/a> whether Lord Brooke was \u201cadvocating for assisted dying as a tool of population control\u201d and noted that it was \u201can extraordinary contribution suggesting human life be actively sacrificed to prevent climate change\u201d. The Spectator\u2019s<\/em> Madeleine Grant was even more scathing<\/a>: \u201cThis was without doubt one of the most surreal speeches I have ever heard in my years covering Parliament,\u201d she wrote, adding that \u201cThis peer\u2019s Assisted Suicide speech was truly bonkers.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet Ms Grant may be mistaken in dismissing the speech as \u201ctruly bonkers\u201d. After all, Lord Brooke\u2019s intervention was not a moment of madness but a faithful expression of a worldview that has haunted the Western imagination for over two centuries. It was Malthus who first planted the seed. The peer\u2019s remarks are best understood as another manifestation of the Malthusian virus \u2013 an intellectual contagion that has never ceased to infect the minds of Western elites.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Ghost of Malthus<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The origin of this intellectual affliction lies with Reverend Thomas Malthus, who at the close of the 18th Century published his famous essay<\/a> predicting that humanity would inevitably outstrip its food supply. Population, he said in his famous formulation, grew geometrically, while food production only arithmetically. Famines, wars and pestilence would be nature\u2019s cruel corrective. History has demonstrated just how wrong he was.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Human ingenuity \u2013 expressed through the agricultural revolutions and petrochemical fertilizers, industrialization, and trade \u2013 continually confounded his dire predictions. Yet Malthus\u2019s grim worldview survived because it offered the powerful a convenient lens: social ills could be explained not by policy failure, but by the simple fact of \u201ctoo many people\u201d. It is yet another example of Brandolini\u2019s Law<\/a> at work: The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The lineage of Malthusian thought is unmistakable. In the 19th Century, Britain\u2019s 1834 Poor Law cut welfare to the indigent on the theory that helping the poor only encouraged them to breed. In the early 20th Century, Malthus\u2019s shadow fell heavily over the eugenics movements in Britain, the United States and Europe, which categorized the poor, disabled and minorities as \u201cunfit\u201d. Nazi Germany gave those ideas their most horrifying expression.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

After the war, eugenics became discredited, but the impulse never disappeared; it re-emerged under the banners of \u201cfamily planning\u201d and \u201cpopulation control\u201d. India\u2019s coercive sterilisations during the Emergency of the 1970s, often carried out with Western aid money, testify to the persistence of this mindset. China\u2019s one-child policy, brutally enforced with forced abortions and sterilizations, is another reminder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the West, Paul Ehrlich\u2019s Population Bomb<\/a><\/em> (1968) thundered warnings that hundreds of millions would starve \u2013 \u201cWe must realise that unless we are extremely lucky, everybody will disappear in a cloud of blue steam in 20 years\u201d \u2013 while the Club of Rome\u2019s Limits to Growth<\/a><\/em> (1972) confidently predicted ecological and economic collapse unless population and resource use were restrained. Both works proved spectacularly wrong. Yet, as is so often the case, bad ideas outlast their refutation. The Malthusian impulse endures precisely because it appeals to the intellectual pretensions of elites. It reassures them that they need to act as philosopher-kings, protecting our \u201cfragile planet\u201d from the growing masses.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Graph<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A New Mask: Climate and the Green Tyranny<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Today, the Malthusian virus has donned a green mask. Its logic permeates much of the rhetoric around climate change. Lord Brooke\u2019s speech is a case in point: a peer in the British Parliament, speaking without embarrassment about population reduction \u2013 through abortion, contraception, homosexuality, even assisted dying \u2013 as a tool to combat climate change. His words echoed Jane Goodall\u2019s musings at Davos<\/a> that the world would be better off with a population at the level it was 500 years ago, about half a billion souls. Such sentiments, however shocking when spoken plainly, are widely shared in elite political circles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The historical record shows where this logic leads. During the 1970s, US policymakers under Henry Kissinger\u2019s National Security Study Memorandum 200<\/a>, classified for over a decade, framed population growth in developing countries as a threat to American strategic interests. Aid programs were tied to family planning goals. At the very moment when Indira Gandhi\u2019s government in India was coercing millions of poor men into sterilisation, the flow of international funds for \u201cpopulation programs\u201d continued unabated. In China, the one-child policy, enforced with terror, was applauded by international institutions as enlightened policy. In Africa and South Asia, aggressive campaigns to promote long-acting contraceptives targeted poor women<\/a> with little regard for informed consent. Behind the rhetoric of choice and progress lay the old Malthusian disdain for the fecundity of the poor openly espoused by the Gates Foundation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Today, the same mentality drives what Rupert Darwall aptly terms the \u201cGreen Tyranny<\/a><\/em>\u201d which exposed the roots of the \u201ctotalitarian climate industrial complex\u201d. The World Bank<\/a> and IMF<\/a> insist that poor nations adopt anti-fossil fuel policies as conditions for loans. The wealthy West, which built its prosperity on coal, oil and gas, now denies those very tools to countries still mired in poverty. Instead, they are forced to accept unreliable and costly wind and solar projects, locking billions into energy poverty. This is not compassion; it is carbon colonialism<\/a>. It is Malthus reborn, dressed in the garb of climate virtue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Graph<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Facts Destroy the Myth<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

What makes this obsession with \u201ctoo many people\u201d especially perverse<\/a> is that it bears no relation to the facts. Global fertility rates are falling everywhere. Japan and South Korea are shrinking at alarming rates, with birthrates far below replacement. Europe is greying. Even in India, long the poster child for overpopulation, fertility has dropped sharply and is below replacement levels in many states. The United Nations projects<\/a> that global population will peak around 2080 at just over ten billion and then begin to decline. Demographers now warn not of an exploding population but of collapsing fertility and the economic, social and geopolitical crises it will unleash.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Graph<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Elon Musk has called<\/a> the overpopulation panic \u201cthe most nihilistic lie ever told\u201d and he is right. The true risk to civilisation lies in the opposite direction: declining populations, shrinking workforces, imploding welfare states and the loss of dynamism that comes from youthful societies. The old scare about \u201ctoo many mouths to feed\u201d looks grotesque when confronted with the reality of societies that cannot replace themselves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, the human record of progress<\/a> is undeniable. Over the past two centuries, life expectancy has risen dramatically, literacy has spread across continents, infant mortality has plunged and absolute poverty has fallen to historic lows. Famines that once killed millions have been virtually eliminated and food production has grown faster than population. The Club of Rome\u2019s charts and Ehrlich\u2019s predictions of mass starvation now stand as embarrassing monuments to intellectual hubris. Humanity has flourished, not declined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Julian Simon, the economist who demolished Ehrlich\u2019s alarmism in their famous wager<\/a>, explained why. The ultimate resource<\/a>, Simon argued, is not land, oil, or minerals, but the human mind. Each new person brings the possibility of innovation, invention, and creation. Scarcity is not the enemy but the spur of progress. Human ingenuity multiplies abundance. Simon has been proven right. The prices of raw materials fell, not rose, over time, as technology and free enterprise found substitutes, increased efficiency, and opened new frontiers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Killing the Virus<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Why, then, does the Malthusian virus persist? Why does it resurface in each generation, despite its long record of error? The answer lies in its utility for elites and their useful idiots<\/a> among Left-wing ideologues in tow. It flatters the elite self-image as enlightened custodians of a supposedly fragile world. It offers simple, moralistic answers to complex problems. And it cloaks their misanthropy in the language of science and virtue. It is not the failures of government planning that are blamed for poverty or environmental stress, but the fertility of the poor and their oppressive weight on the natural world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lord Brooke\u2019s intervention in the House of Lords is telling. A former trade unionist who once spoke for working men and women now parrots the prejudices of aristocrats who always saw the poor as surplus mouths to feed. His remarks illustrate how deeply entrenched the Malthusian mindset is, even among those who should know better. He, like many in the intelligentsia, has imbibed the idea that fewer people equal a better world. In doing so, he betrays not only his own origins but also the fundamental duty of politics: to serve human flourishing, not human diminishment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The antidote is clear. We must expose the long history of failed Malthusian predictions. We must resist policies that treat people as problems to be managed rather than possibilities to be embraced. We must insist that development, energy abundance and human creativity are the true paths to environmental stewardship and prosperity. And above all, we must defend a moral framework that prizes human flourishing. As Alex Epstein argues<\/a>, the goal is not to minimise human impact on an untouched pristine nature, but to maximise human well-being through the intelligent use of resources and good stewardship of the environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Julian Simon\u2019s insight should be our compass. People are the solution, not the problem. More minds mean more ideas. More ideas mean better technologies, richer cultures and deeper prosperity. Human flourishing is not the enemy of nature but the highest expression of it. We are stewards, yes, but also creators. To fear humanity is to deny what makes us unique.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lord Brooke\u2019s words are not just eccentric ramblings. They are a symptom of a deeper sickness that has haunted the Western mind since Malthus. The virus keeps mutating and spinning off new variants \u2013 from famine to climate, from eugenics to green ideology \u2013 but its core remains the same: the belief that humanity is a plague on the Earth. It must be challenged at every turn. Malthus was wrong in 1798, wrong in 1968 and wrong today. The future belongs not to the prophets of doom, but to those who believe in humanity\u2019s creative potential to solve problems and to build a better world. Lord Brooke should be ashamed of himself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article was first published in The Daily Sceptic ( https:\/\/dailysceptic.org\/2025\/09\/29\/lord-brooke-and-the-malthusian-mind-virus-in-our-time\/<\/a> )<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dr Tilak K. Doshi is the <\/em>Daily Sceptic\u2018s Energy Editor. He is an economist, a member of the CO2<\/sub> Coalition and a former contributor to Forbes. Follow him on Substack<\/a> and X<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe rose recently in the House of Lords to\u00a0speak\u00a0on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, one could not have anticipated the detour his remarks would take. Instead of focusing solely on the grave ethical questions surrounding assisted dying, Lord Brooke turned his attention to population growth and its supposed role in climate change. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":406091,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"Explore the Malthusian mindset, as Lord Brooke links assisted dying to climate change, igniting debate on population control and ethics.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"Lord Brooke's Malthusian Views on Climate and Population Growth","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691838466,691818056,691826889,691838217,691828685,691838465,691838464,691838467],"class_list":{"0":"post-406083","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-green-tyranny-2","9":"tag-climate-change","10":"tag-house-of-lords","11":"tag-lord-brooke-of-alverthorpe","12":"tag-neo-malthusianism","13":"tag-paul-ehrlichs-population-bomb-1968","14":"tag-reverend-thomas-malthus","15":"tag-useful-idiots","17":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/AQM0bvOjTxc5ziIDjYhjd9X5via4InhknEa2BUwwsU3nz9A9SC9zlI4Kx9krFPJPAJNf1PkaCNEejWfD3uA2kKiSB3K0K0ZiYAdfFaQYCDR8Re8VGpnEqHOWp5Uc3NKa8QtFjFABAjswLP7RmkkjOwPaw5hVtA.jpeg?fit=1280%2C1280&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1HDJ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":404088,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=404088","url_meta":{"origin":406083,"position":0},"title":"UK Lord Brooke promotes assisted suicide bill to limit population & climate change","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/22\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Labour peer Lord Brooke has offered his pearls of wisdom on the Assisted Dying Bill debate today: \u201c\u2026That\u2019s a minor change compared with this century\u2019s growth in the world population from 6.1 billion to 8.2 billion. A 25% increase in 25 years.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate change\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/00Screenshot-2025-09-22-160721.png?fit=1200%2C603&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/00Screenshot-2025-09-22-160721.png?fit=1200%2C603&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/00Screenshot-2025-09-22-160721.png?fit=1200%2C603&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/00Screenshot-2025-09-22-160721.png?fit=1200%2C603&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/00Screenshot-2025-09-22-160721.png?fit=1200%2C603&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285543,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=285543","url_meta":{"origin":406083,"position":1},"title":"Forbes: Climate Policy Hurts the Poor More than Climate Change","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/28\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Africa\u2019s poor will be hardest hit not by \u2018climate change\u2019 but by the policies pushed by the West\u2019s green lobby. African forests and drinking water will diminish further. From Watts Up With That? Essay by Eric Worrall Have we all just entered a parallel universe where mainstream media publishes articles\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Africa\"","block_context":{"text":"Africa","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=africa"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0egyptian-farming.jpg?fit=1200%2C687&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0egyptian-farming.jpg?fit=1200%2C687&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0egyptian-farming.jpg?fit=1200%2C687&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0egyptian-farming.jpg?fit=1200%2C687&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0egyptian-farming.jpg?fit=1200%2C687&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223653,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=223653","url_meta":{"origin":406083,"position":2},"title":"British House of Lords: \u201cCovid was a crisis, the climate is a crisis. We can learn some very important messages around the communications\u201d","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/13\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"What was that saying again? \u201cFool me once\u2026\u201d","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-589.png?fit=800%2C400&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-589.png?fit=800%2C400&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-589.png?fit=800%2C400&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/image-589.png?fit=800%2C400&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223639,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=223639","url_meta":{"origin":406083,"position":3},"title":"Use Covid lessons to curb climate change, Lords tell government","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/13\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Government must \u2018lead\u2019 on home insulation, diet and travel reports BBC News \u2013 because\u2026net zero. Lives must in effect be micro-managed in the supposed climate crisis.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00road-map-of-United-kingdom.webp?fit=795%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00road-map-of-United-kingdom.webp?fit=795%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00road-map-of-United-kingdom.webp?fit=795%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/00road-map-of-United-kingdom.webp?fit=795%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":424639,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=424639","url_meta":{"origin":406083,"position":4},"title":"Climate \u2018Overshoot\u2019? Let\u2019s Go!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/04\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cCO2\/climate optimism\u00a0is merited, not more recalibration by falsified merchants of doom.\u201d","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0-Climate-Overshoot-1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0-Climate-Overshoot-1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0-Climate-Overshoot-1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/0-Climate-Overshoot-1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289124,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=289124","url_meta":{"origin":406083,"position":5},"title":"Lord Frost calls for Bank of England climate role to go","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/29\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"From Net Zero Watch The former chief Brexit negotiator Lord Frost has welcomed a Parliamentary report that called for the Bank of England to lose its remit to fight climate change. The report, from the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee, was published on Monday, and noted that numerous witnesses\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Bank of England\"","block_context":{"text":"Bank of England","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=bank-of-england"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0NZW_Frost.png?fit=1200%2C632&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0NZW_Frost.png?fit=1200%2C632&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0NZW_Frost.png?fit=1200%2C632&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0NZW_Frost.png?fit=1200%2C632&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/0NZW_Frost.png?fit=1200%2C632&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406083","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=406083"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406083\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":406097,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406083\/revisions\/406097"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/406091"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=406083"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=406083"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=406083"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}