{"id":399283,"date":"2025-09-01T19:27:34","date_gmt":"2025-09-01T17:27:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=399283"},"modified":"2025-09-01T19:27:35","modified_gmt":"2025-09-01T17:27:35","slug":"sixty-years-of-temperature-averages-declared-at-uk-met-office-station-with-only-eight-years-of-actual-observations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=399283","title":{"rendered":"Sixty Years of Temperature Averages Declared at UK Met Office Station With Only EIGHT YEARS of Actual Observations"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From The Daily Sceptic<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Chris Morrison<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Four<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The UK Met Office takes great pride in its public-domain historic station database<\/a> where 37 selected sites provide average temperature data going back many decades. One of the chosen few is Valley, although it is better known as the Class 3 RAF Valley station on Anglesey. Curiously its \u2018historic\u2019 data stretches back to 1930, but this is 11 years before it became an operational military base. But on the separate location temperature database<\/a>, check out the nearby station of Cwmystradllyn which is recorded to have opened in 1974<\/a> and stopped taking manual measurements after just eight years. Yet at this site, monthly averages are claimed back to 1961 and continue to this day. Here the Valley fabrication pales into insignificance compared to around 50 years of imaginary data at Cwmystradllyn. Yes, citizen sleuth Ray Sanders is on the case again, digging deep into Met Office and public archives to reveal further horror stories<\/a> about the State meteorologist\u2019s temperature collection methods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This all matters since the compilation of long-term temperature averages over at least 30 years is a core component of the study of changes in climate. It is heavy weaponry in the hands of activist bodies such as the Met Office, which leverages its scientific reputation to promote the Net Zero fantasy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here is the archival evidence<\/a> that Valley only started recording temperature data in June 1941.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

So where did ten years of data back to 1930 come from \u2013 data shown to this day in the historic record under the same co-ordinates as RAF Valley? Again, sleuth Sanders came up with the answer, having found in another archive that the information was compiled six miles away at Salt-Holyhead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Met Office knew where the data arose, but for some reason it has failed to correct its historic data. The public and the wider scientific community are left uninformed on the matter. \u201cIf this type of completely incorrect attribution is going unnoticed, what confidence can the UK public have in any of this below being correct?\u201d Sanders asks. \u201cAlmost certainly none at all,\u201d he offers as a reply. This, of course, is the problem that the Met Office now faces. Its highly political role in using its data to promote climate psychosis in the interest of the Net Zero fantasy is leading to increased concern about the underlying figures. As a result, \u2018extreme\u2019 recordings from its mostly junk, unnatural, heat-ravaged locations are becoming something of a national joke. In a recent interview with your correspondent on Talk, Julia Hartley-Brewer ended up calling it an \u201cextraordinary scandal\u201d. Subsequently posted on YouTube, it collected around 800 comments, few if any praising the Met Office for its help in saving the planet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n