{"id":395889,"date":"2025-08-18T10:03:08","date_gmt":"2025-08-18T08:03:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=395889"},"modified":"2025-08-18T10:03:10","modified_gmt":"2025-08-18T08:03:10","slug":"activists-run-to-federal-court-to-try-to-ban-official-us-government-report-that-blows-holes-in-settled-climate-science-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=395889","title":{"rendered":"Activists Run to Federal Court to Try to Ban Official US Government Report that Blows Holes in \u2018Settled\u2019 Climate Science Claims"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"An<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From The Daily Sceptic<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Chris Morrison<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Science denying cry-babies in the US have toddled over to the Federal court in Massachusetts to\u00a0seek an injunction<\/a>\u00a0against the recent Department of Energy (DoE) working party report about greenhouse gas emissions. The report\u2019s main finding, produced after examining much of the literature from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), was that computer models offered \u201clittle guidance<\/a>\u201d on how much of the climate responds to warming gases such as carbon dioxide. This observation is regularly ignored in mainstream media, but it is hardly a new opinion. The available data leads to that inevitable conclusion despite all the political nonsense claims of \u2018settled\u2019 science. To go to court to seek to ban the report is a new low in the increasingly desperate attempt to keep the Net Zero fantasy alive using science scares that are increasingly being debunked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not only did the five highly credentialed scientists who wrote the report cast reasonable doubt on the role of climate computer models, they also quoted extensively from data that revealed most extreme weather events were not increasing and sea level rises in North America showed no increasing trend. Attribution claims of human involvement in individual weather events are widely used to spread climate fear, but these were said to be challenged by natural climate variation along with an admission that they were originally designed with \u2018lawfare\u2019 in mind. The authors went out of their way to highlight much of the science and many of the opinions contained in the IPCC assessment reports, but they also publicised areas that were conveniently downplayed such as the recent massive \u2018greening\u2019 of the planet due to higher levels of CO2<\/sub>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In any other branch of science, the idea that civilised discussion and disagreement of matters that have crucial public policy importance should be banned by a lawsuit would be absurd \u2013 childish even.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But then this is not really about the science. The plaintiffs are worried that the report will be used to justify the removal of CO2 <\/sub>from a 2009 endangerment finding. This would inevitably lead to major rollbacks of rules backing the command-and-control Net Zero project. Announcing the lawsuit, the toys were flung out of the pram: \u201cTwo leading science and environment groups are going to court to challenge the Trump administration\u2019s use of a secretively convened group of climate sceptics to prepare a now widely disparaged report in its attempt to undo the Endangerment Findings\u2026 the development of this corrupted report, cloaked in secrecy, and Administrator Zeldin\u2019s [Head of the Environment Protection Agency EPA] use of it to undermine pollution protections, puts the American people in harm\u2019s way and violates federal law\u201d. At one point, the report was described as a \u201csham\u201d and was conducted by \u201cfive known climate deniers\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Needless to say, the two plaintiffs are straight out of Green Blob central casting. The Environmental Defense Fund is a large green activist group and uses \u2018lawfare\u2019 to promote its Net Zero advocacy. Donor filings suggest that in 2023 it received $162.9 million from tax-efficient foundations with notable contributors including the Bezos Earth Fund, Sloan and Valhalla funds. The second plaintiff, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), also accepts foundation money and in the past has received sizeable contributions from the MacArthur, Schmidt and Packard funds. Meanwhile, the UCS frequently adds to the gaiety of the nation, not least when on July 24th it issued an oddly precise warning<\/a> that 169,899,454 people in the United States currently faced extreme weather alerts. In other words, during a typical American summer most of the population might need to top up their sunscreen. This and similar silly scares have led some to suggest the organisation should really be called the Union of Scientists We Should be Concerned About.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, activist \u2018fact checkers\u2019 continue to mobilise to find fault in the DoE\u2019s climate report and the proposal by the EPA to rescind the 2009 gas endangerment findings. Last week it emerged that the Blob-funded Carbon Brief operation was \u2018fact checking<\/a>\u2019, and now it appears Associated Press (AP) is engaged in a similar project. AP has written to the scientists quoted in the DoE report and is asking 10 questions \u201cto get a broad sense of the documents\u2019 scientific accuracy\u201d. Noble work of course, but curiously not undertaken when other major reports from bodies such as the IPCC are published. The project is being headed by AP\u2019s Seth Borenstein who has spent over a decade reporting on every climate scare imaginable<\/a>. He is no stranger to the weird world of mainstream fact checking. In 2018 he helped write a rely to Scott Pruitt, then head of the EPA,  that ran as follows<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

PRUITT: Do we really know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100, in the year 2018? That\u2019s somewhat fairly arrogant for us to think we know exactly what it should be in 2100.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

THE FACTS: What he calls arrogant is established science. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says if fossil fuel emissions continue on the current trajectory, temperatures by the end of the century will be around 6.5 degrees warmer than now (3.7\u00b0C).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Note how Borenstein dismissed a reasonable opinion from Pruitt by stating another opinion that the Earth will warm by nearly 4\u00b0C in 80 years. His opinion, increasingly seen as fanciful agitprop, is said to be \u201cestablished science\u201d. It might be argued that the only arrogance on show was in the headline which ran \u2013 \u201cAP FACT CHECK: Climate science undercuts EPA chief\u2019s view\u201d. On a wider front, AP describes its fact checking service as \u2013 \u201cNo spin. No agenda. Just journalism that respects your intelligence\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For its part, AP received \u00a38 million<\/a> from tax-efficient foundations in 2022 to hire 20 journalists to help run a climate desk. Funders included the Hewlett, Rockefeller and Walton foundations. The standalone desk \u201cwill enhance the global understanding of climate change and its impact across the world\u201d, promised AP. \u201cUnbiased, fact-based journalism has never been more important or imperilled\u201d, chipped in Larry Kramer, President of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. \u201cAP retains complete editorial control of all content\u201d, explained the AP press release announcing the large cash injection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Dr Roger Pielke Jr, whose work is quoted extensively in the DoE report, has been sent a questionnaire by the Borenstein operation. He notes that the last two questions ask him to assess what grade on a scale A to F he would give to the reports assuming they were handed in as an undergraduate assignment. Activist stupidity got the answer it deserved: \u201cThese are absolutely ridiculous questions<\/a> and suggest that your goal here is not journalism but team sport\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

US Department of Energy: A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the US Climate<\/em><\/a>. Authors \u2013 John Christy Ph.D, Judith Curry Ph.D, Steven Koonin Ph.D, Ross McKitrick Ph.D, Roy Spencer Ph.D.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris Morrison is the<\/em> Daily Sceptic\u2019s Environment Editor<\/em>. Follow him on X<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Science denying cry-babies in the US have toddled over to the Federal court in Massachusetts to\u00a0seek an injunction\u00a0against the recent Department of Energy (DoE) working party report about greenhouse gas emissions. The report\u2019s main finding, produced after examining much of the literature from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), was that computer models offered \u201clittle guidance\u201d on how much of the climate responds to warming gases such as carbon dioxide. This observation is regularly ignored in mainstream media, but it is hardly a new opinion. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":395892,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"Explore the controversy behind the DOE report challenging climate model claims and the lawsuit seeking to ban it. Delve into the science debate.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"Court Battle Over DOE Report Challenges Climate Change Narrative","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691830288,691829997,691818056,691818153,691822002,691821642,691818154,691837223],"class_list":{"0":"post-395889","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-associated-press","9":"tag-carbon-dioxide-co","10":"tag-climate-change","11":"tag-climate-models","12":"tag-green-blob","13":"tag-ipcc-intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change","14":"tag-net-zero","15":"tag-us-department-of-energy-doe","17":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0Untitled-design-10.jpg?fit=1280%2C720&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1EZj","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":427421,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=427421","url_meta":{"origin":395889,"position":0},"title":"Clearing up some misconceptions about the DoE report","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"22\/02\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Last year I had the privilege of working with a small team (me, Judy Curry, John Christy, Steve Koonin and Roy Spencer) on a\u00a0draft report\u00a0for U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright on the topic of climate change impacts on the United States. After its release two environmental groups sued the Department\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"2009 Endangerment Finding (EF)\"","block_context":{"text":"2009 Endangerment Finding (EF)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=2009-endangerment-finding-ef"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNbnnLIcdMHEF3rfzqz5iFwusXYT2U3cQTkALZg8DN6Cz9TAFbTORInKT5WaZ7A7UOOi6oip7zHiZQ1igkEpZuMASOOkKAXMC1cd3aYQSW3OPr8VoN4uFE2cRD-UEnZ.jpeg?fit=1200%2C875&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNbnnLIcdMHEF3rfzqz5iFwusXYT2U3cQTkALZg8DN6Cz9TAFbTORInKT5WaZ7A7UOOi6oip7zHiZQ1igkEpZuMASOOkKAXMC1cd3aYQSW3OPr8VoN4uFE2cRD-UEnZ.jpeg?fit=1200%2C875&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNbnnLIcdMHEF3rfzqz5iFwusXYT2U3cQTkALZg8DN6Cz9TAFbTORInKT5WaZ7A7UOOi6oip7zHiZQ1igkEpZuMASOOkKAXMC1cd3aYQSW3OPr8VoN4uFE2cRD-UEnZ.jpeg?fit=1200%2C875&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNbnnLIcdMHEF3rfzqz5iFwusXYT2U3cQTkALZg8DN6Cz9TAFbTORInKT5WaZ7A7UOOi6oip7zHiZQ1igkEpZuMASOOkKAXMC1cd3aYQSW3OPr8VoN4uFE2cRD-UEnZ.jpeg?fit=1200%2C875&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AQNbnnLIcdMHEF3rfzqz5iFwusXYT2U3cQTkALZg8DN6Cz9TAFbTORInKT5WaZ7A7UOOi6oip7zHiZQ1igkEpZuMASOOkKAXMC1cd3aYQSW3OPr8VoN4uFE2cRD-UEnZ.jpeg?fit=1200%2C875&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":402599,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=402599","url_meta":{"origin":395889,"position":1},"title":"Attack on DOE Climate Report is a comedy of criticism","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"16\/09\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The DOE science report saying the impact of CO2 on climate is exaggerated was quickly followed by a\u00a0massive alarmist report.\u00a0The alarmist report\u00a0claimed to refute the DOE report, and the press dutifully reported it doing that.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0AQNbnnLIcdMHEF3rfzqz5iFwusXYT2U3cQTkALZg8DN6Cz9TAFbTORInKT5WaZ7A7UOOi6oip7zHiZQ1igkEpZuMASOOkKAXMC1cd3aYQSW3OPr8VoN4uFE2cRD-UEnZ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C875&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0AQNbnnLIcdMHEF3rfzqz5iFwusXYT2U3cQTkALZg8DN6Cz9TAFbTORInKT5WaZ7A7UOOi6oip7zHiZQ1igkEpZuMASOOkKAXMC1cd3aYQSW3OPr8VoN4uFE2cRD-UEnZ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C875&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0AQNbnnLIcdMHEF3rfzqz5iFwusXYT2U3cQTkALZg8DN6Cz9TAFbTORInKT5WaZ7A7UOOi6oip7zHiZQ1igkEpZuMASOOkKAXMC1cd3aYQSW3OPr8VoN4uFE2cRD-UEnZ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C875&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0AQNbnnLIcdMHEF3rfzqz5iFwusXYT2U3cQTkALZg8DN6Cz9TAFbTORInKT5WaZ7A7UOOi6oip7zHiZQ1igkEpZuMASOOkKAXMC1cd3aYQSW3OPr8VoN4uFE2cRD-UEnZ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C875&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/0AQNbnnLIcdMHEF3rfzqz5iFwusXYT2U3cQTkALZg8DN6Cz9TAFbTORInKT5WaZ7A7UOOi6oip7zHiZQ1igkEpZuMASOOkKAXMC1cd3aYQSW3OPr8VoN4uFE2cRD-UEnZ-1.jpeg?fit=1200%2C875&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252646,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=252646","url_meta":{"origin":395889,"position":2},"title":"Think We Can Model the Climate? Clouds Get in the Way!","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/04\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"IPCC forecasters overstate warming because they still somehow really don\u2019t understand clouds at all.","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/00Cumulus_Clouds_Over_Jamaica.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/00Cumulus_Clouds_Over_Jamaica.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/00Cumulus_Clouds_Over_Jamaica.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/00Cumulus_Clouds_Over_Jamaica.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/00Cumulus_Clouds_Over_Jamaica.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283364,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=283364","url_meta":{"origin":395889,"position":3},"title":"IPCC Global Warming Reports Underestimated Role of Sun in Warming:\u00a0Study","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"15\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"IPCC reports based on failed computer climate models underestimated the role of the Sun in global warming. From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT By Paul Homewood Reports on global warming issued by the United Nations\u2019 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) underestimate the role of the Sun in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Center for Environmental Research and Earth Science (CERES)\"","block_context":{"text":"Center for Environmental Research and Earth Science (CERES)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=center-for-environmental-research-and-earth-science-ceres"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0shutterstock_21401530.jpg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0shutterstock_21401530.jpg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0shutterstock_21401530.jpg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0shutterstock_21401530.jpg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0shutterstock_21401530.jpg?fit=1200%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376840,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=376840","url_meta":{"origin":395889,"position":4},"title":"Time to Defund Climate Models?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/04\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Trump administration is cutting funding for climate research across all federal departments\u2026. Maybe it\u2019s time for NASA to stick to space exploration, NOAA to stick to weather forecasting, and for the climate models to be shut down.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0CMIP5-90-models-global-Tsfc-vs-obs-thru-2013-1536x1382-1.png?fit=1200%2C1080&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0CMIP5-90-models-global-Tsfc-vs-obs-thru-2013-1536x1382-1.png?fit=1200%2C1080&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0CMIP5-90-models-global-Tsfc-vs-obs-thru-2013-1536x1382-1.png?fit=1200%2C1080&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0CMIP5-90-models-global-Tsfc-vs-obs-thru-2013-1536x1382-1.png?fit=1200%2C1080&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/0CMIP5-90-models-global-Tsfc-vs-obs-thru-2013-1536x1382-1.png?fit=1200%2C1080&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":436128,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=436128","url_meta":{"origin":395889,"position":5},"title":"Another IPCC ‘Dog Ate My Homework’ Excuse: Argo Ocean Heat Claims Laid to Rest","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/04\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Climate data and modeling remain contested on sensitivity, feedback, and attribution details- not the basic greenhouse effect itself. Ongoing scrutiny, better observations, and transparent methods serve science better than any narrative of settled dogma or perpetual hoax.","rel":"","context":"In \"Climate models\"","block_context":{"text":"Climate models","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-models"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-Another-IPCC-Dog-Ate-My-Homework-Excuse-Argo-Ocean-Heat-Claims-Laid-to-Rest1.jpg?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-Another-IPCC-Dog-Ate-My-Homework-Excuse-Argo-Ocean-Heat-Claims-Laid-to-Rest1.jpg?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-Another-IPCC-Dog-Ate-My-Homework-Excuse-Argo-Ocean-Heat-Claims-Laid-to-Rest1.jpg?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-Another-IPCC-Dog-Ate-My-Homework-Excuse-Argo-Ocean-Heat-Claims-Laid-to-Rest1.jpg?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=395889"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395889\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":395894,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395889\/revisions\/395894"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/395892"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=395889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=395889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=395889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}