{"id":392619,"date":"2025-08-03T13:54:18","date_gmt":"2025-08-03T11:54:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=392619"},"modified":"2025-08-03T13:54:30","modified_gmt":"2025-08-03T11:54:30","slug":"the-future-of-nuclear-might-be-small","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=392619","title":{"rendered":"The future of nuclear might be small"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From CFACT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Duggan Flanakin<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

As the news gets around that two Chinese companies have developed commercially viable miniature nuclear-powered batteries with potential to operate for up to a century to power everything from pacemakers to remote sensors to multiple uses in outer space, other companies from China to the U.S. to Vietnam are taking a long look at small modular reactors and even microreactors \u2013 all of which can be mass produced to dramatically cut costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The BV100, developed by Betavolt, is powered by a Nickel-63 isotope and can presumably be operated for up to 50 years without maintenance, while Northwest Normal University\u2019s Carbon-14 powered nuclear batter has a potential lifespan of 100 years. These batteries generate electricity through the natural decay of radioactive isotopes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Chinese are not alone in the nuclear battery field, as U.S.-based City Labs has created tritium-powered batteries that last 20 years and the UK\u2019s Arkenlight is developing batteries from radioactive waste. Two other U.S.-based companies \u2013 Kronos Advanced Technologies and Yasheng Group \u2013 have formed a partnership targeting nuclear battery research as part of the U.S. effort to prevent China from achieving technological dominance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ironically, the world\u2019s first nuclear batteries were developed in the United States during the 1950s \u2013 but the irrational anti-nuclear movement that raised havoc about radiation safety and presumed limited practical applications shut down promising research for sixty years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That same fear \u2013 and the resulting labyrinth of regulations created by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission \u2013 had stymied nearly all of President Eisenhower\u2019s desired \u201cpeaceful uses\u201d of atomic energy until the arrival of artificial intelligence, cryptocurrencies, data centers, and other high users of electricity made it obvious that nuclear was the \u201ccleanest\u201d energy capable of satisfying the hunger of these emerging industries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Taxpayer.net complains that the nuclear energy industry has received significant subsidies from federal taxpayers that amounted to a massive waste of money \u2013 and in a sense they are right. They point to the fact that, from 1948 to 2020, $117 billion (in 2020 dollars) was allocated for developing nuclear energy \u2013 though most of that was prior to the Three Mile Island incident that did not cost a single human life or a single injury.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They also bemoan the fact that Washington does not get royalties from uranium mining on federal lands \u2013 which they deem as a subsidy \u2013 and the fact that monies placed into the Nuclear Decommissioning Reserve by nuclear plant operators are not taxed. The 1957 Price-Anderson Act still limits the nuclear energy industry\u2019s liability in the event of a nuclear accident \u2013 which to date has been rare as hen\u2019s teeth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The reality, however, is that regulation alone has been sufficient to thwart U.S. nuclear energy development until very recently. Even New York Governor Kathy Hochul agrees that \u201cthe barriers are in Washington. The length of time \u201310 years, a decade \u2013 of regulatory bureaucracy and red tape that must be gotten through is a reason why it fails and people don\u2019t even try.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not surprisingly, though, Politico<\/em> blamed the industry, claiming that incentives and permitting reforms (that are cutting that 10-year time frame down to 18 months or even less) do not change the basic economics. While the three new nuclear plants built in the 21st<\/sup> century have all had huge cost overruns, none benefited from permitting reforms or new incentives. Indeed, naysayers like Stanford\u2019s Mark Jacobson still believe that \u201cnew nuclear \u2026 is a nonstarter.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Energy Secretary Chris Wright says that large nuclear plants are more expensive largely because they must be built on-site, whereas small modular reactors (SMRs) can be mass produced in a factory; smaller microreactors are even more mobile and can be deployed in emergencies or at remote sites with moderate power needs. These smaller reactors are perfect for data centers, military bases, and other facilities needing uninterrupted power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite the simplified regulatory regime (which may soon see even more radical changes), Wright says \u201cthis slow-moving, bureaucratic central government\u201d is still a bottleneck. By contrast, Gov. Mike Dunleavy touts Alaska\u2019s 2022 legislation to foster \u201cmicronuclear technology [which] has a potential role to play in providing low-cost, reliable power for communities, remote villages, and resource development projects\u201d in a state where delivering cheap energy is always a challenge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While several companies, and even the Tennessee Vallery Authority, have entered the SMR field in recent years, until this year, the only nations \u2013 Russia and China \u2013 that had built SMRs have centralized governments to help projects secure financing and decide which SMR fuel types and coolants to use. SMR- and microreactor-specific regulations have yet to be finalized in the U.S. But the times, they are a\u2019changing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, Radiant Industries, Inc., has raised $225 million in preparation for testing its 1.2-MW Kaleidos microreactor in 2026. This portable reactor uses helium gas rather than water as a coolant, simplifying its logistics and making it easier to generate power in remote areas. Not only can Kaleidos be transported by air, land, or sea, its passive safety architecture enables it to continue to operate safely even if some systems fail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Radiant and Westinghouse (for its 5-MW eVinci microreactor) both reached conditional agreements with the Department of Energy to conduct initial reactor tests at the DOME facility at Idaho National Laboratory. The DOME testing, says the DOE, will assist in meeting \u201cthe nation\u2019s demand for more abundant, affordable, and reliable power.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Berkeley-based startup Deep Fission has partnered with Australia\u2019s Endeavour Energy to bury mass-produced SMRs underground to power data centers more efficiently. The partners plan to generate 2 GW of subterranean nuclear power for the tech industry, one of several that is driving up electricity demand in the U.S. and worldwide. Their biggest hurdle to date is the lack of a regulatory framework specific to SMRs \u2013 but the new 18-month timeframe for the NRC to approve or reject SMRs will hopefully expedite their march toward their projected deployment date in 2029.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The race is also on for introducing nuclear energy to Southeast Asia, led by the Philippines and Indonesia. Meanwhile, Vietnam, which was planning to build a traditional nuclear power plant by 2030, has been advised by its policy advisor Thuy Le to focus instead on SMRs \u2013 or even microreactors \u2013 to safely and realistically integrate nuclear energy into their power grid. These much smaller units can be used in coastal, densely populated areas and are far simpler and cheaper to build and maintain \u2013 and they minimize risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most of all, the success of SMRs and microreactors \u2013 and even nuclear batteries \u2013 might convince even the timidest among us that nuclear energy is truly a gift to humanity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article originally appeared at Real Clear Energy<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As the news gets around that two Chinese companies have developed commercially viable miniature nuclear-powered batteries with potential to operate for up to a century to power everything from pacemakers to remote sensors to multiple uses in outer space, other companies from China to the U.S. to Vietnam are taking a long look at small modular reactors and even microreactors \u2013 all of which can be mass produced to dramatically cut costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":392624,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"Explore the future of nuclear power with innovative small modular reactors and batteries, transforming energy production for various industries.","jetpack_seo_html_title":"Revolutionizing Energy: The Future of Miniature Nuclear Power","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691836977,691836976,691833758,691818507,691822517],"class_list":{"0":"post-392619","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-betavolt","9":"tag-bv100","10":"tag-energy-secretary-chris-wright","11":"tag-nuclear-energy","12":"tag-small-modular-reactors-smrs","14":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AQMsBQT1PEqFIicmfSlR-V_ARnCFb7BoFnlh0QXI41iwymMLhs5Je5khvHx49TRHeH1tZHW_cfN6FZ1Ldcu3cG_f9NE3BxnDIqAYc2bFxUD2xX5WqYBHwaKrz0ch_o0k8QXJb2tYrPM9SkWHMWvQszttfnbE1g.jpeg?fit=1280%2C1280&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1E8z","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":243024,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=243024","url_meta":{"origin":392619,"position":0},"title":"U.S. approves first small modular nuclear reactor","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/02\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The reactors are rated to produce up to 300 megawatts of 24\/7, clean, reliable electricity.\u00a0","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-110.png?fit=1200%2C918&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-110.png?fit=1200%2C918&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-110.png?fit=1200%2C918&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-110.png?fit=1200%2C918&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-110.png?fit=1200%2C918&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245401,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=245401","url_meta":{"origin":392619,"position":1},"title":"USA Leads Charge On Small Modular Reactors With NuScale Design Ready For Construction","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"24\/02\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced\u00a0the first-ever certification Friday of a small modular reactor design, a big step in the process of developing a new generation of new and more flexible nuclear reactors.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-752.png?fit=1032%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-752.png?fit=1032%2C720&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-752.png?fit=1032%2C720&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-752.png?fit=1032%2C720&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242611,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=242611","url_meta":{"origin":392619,"position":2},"title":"SMR Gold Rush: Smart Money Backing Small Modular Nuclear Reactors","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/02\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Europe\u2019s energy crisis is all down to its delusional reliance upon intermittent wind and solar, which is why the smart money is backing nuclear power, at any scale, including Small Modular Reactors.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-14.png?fit=1200%2C810&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-14.png?fit=1200%2C810&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-14.png?fit=1200%2C810&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-14.png?fit=1200%2C810&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-14.png?fit=1200%2C810&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290990,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=290990","url_meta":{"origin":392619,"position":3},"title":"More SMR Woes: Oklo-Air Force Cancellation","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/12\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Another small modular nuclear reactor (SMR) has seen a major contract in jeopardy, casting more doubt on the prospects for the highly-touted future of small modular nuclear reactors. The online news service\u00a0Alaska Beacon reports\u00a0that the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) has\u00a0revoked an August Air Force preliminary decision\u00a0to install an experimental Oklo\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Eielson Air Force\"","block_context":{"text":"Eielson Air Force","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=eielson-air-force"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00smr.jpg?fit=1200%2C906&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00smr.jpg?fit=1200%2C906&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00smr.jpg?fit=1200%2C906&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00smr.jpg?fit=1200%2C906&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/00smr.jpg?fit=1200%2C906&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281638,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=281638","url_meta":{"origin":392619,"position":4},"title":"Six companies chosen for UK nuclear tech\u00a0contest","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/10\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"From Tallbloke's Talkshop October 2, 2023 by\u00a0oldbrew There\u2019s a yawning gap of a decade or so between the end of UK coal-fired power stations\u00a0in late 2024\u00a0and the hoped-for arrival of its potential replacement, new SMR nuclear power.\u2013 \u2013 \u2013 Six companies have been selected to advance in the Small Modular\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Great British Nuclear\"","block_context":{"text":"Great British Nuclear","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=great-british-nuclear"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0Small-modular-reactors.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295143,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=295143","url_meta":{"origin":392619,"position":5},"title":"Nuclear revival needs a new regulatory framework","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"15\/01\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Bad as the regulatory time frame is for large nuclear facilities, it is even worse (though technically the same) for companies desiring to bring new-design small modular reactors (SMRs) and micro SMRs to market.","rel":"","context":"In \"France\"","block_context":{"text":"France","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=france"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0small-modular-reactors-foto-IAEA-1.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0small-modular-reactors-foto-IAEA-1.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0small-modular-reactors-foto-IAEA-1.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0small-modular-reactors-foto-IAEA-1.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/0small-modular-reactors-foto-IAEA-1.png?fit=1140%2C640&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392619","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=392619"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392619\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":392627,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392619\/revisions\/392627"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/392624"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=392619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=392619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=392619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}