{"id":388481,"date":"2025-07-12T14:59:02","date_gmt":"2025-07-12T12:59:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=388481"},"modified":"2025-07-12T14:59:03","modified_gmt":"2025-07-12T12:59:03","slug":"the-true-cost-of-our-energy-delusions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=388481","title":{"rendered":"The true cost of our energy\u00a0delusions"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Paul Homewood<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In its latest <\/em>Fiscal Risks and Sustainability Report<\/em><\/a>, the Office for Budget Responsibility confirms the consequences of nearly two decades of failed energy policy. Not deliberately, of course. The document is written in the passive, data-heavy language of technocratic forecasters. But read carefully, and one thing becomes abundantly clear: Britain has built an energy system that cannot support its economy \u2013 and now the entire fiscal architecture is buckling under the strain.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

For years, the political class convinced itself that energy was a secondary concern. What mattered was hitting targets, making announcements, and aligning with the global climate consensus. Meanwhile, fundamental issues such as intermittency were treated as mere afterthoughts. Affordability became someone else\u2019s problem. And firm, dispatchable energy \u2013 the stuff that actually keeps the economy running \u2013 was quietly sidelined. Even as the cost of living has <\/em>emerged<\/em><\/a> in recent years as the defining political issue \u2013 surpassing climate change, migration, and even the NHS \u2013 Westminster persists.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now the bill has arrived.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The OBR doesn\u2019t shout about it, but the facts are there. Britain\u2019s economic growth is anaemic. Inflation has proven more stubborn than expected. Interest payments on government debt are higher and more volatile than in peer economies. And the government has spent tens of billions responding to crises, with less and less room to manoeuvre each time. You don\u2019t have to squint to see what connects these trends: myopic energy policy has made each one worse.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When the global energy crisis hit in 2022, the UK was uniquely vulnerable. The government was forced to spend \u00a340 billion just to prevent household and business collapse. Not because markets failed, but because Britain had spent the previous decade dismantling its own resilience. It blew up coal-fired power stations. It shuttered gas storage. It blocked domestic production, including banning onshore gas. It let nuclear capacity wither. All while deepening its dependence on low-density, weather-dependent technologies with no serious plan for backup.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The \u00a340 billion spent shielding households and businesses from the energy crisis was the fiscal consequence of a system built on fragility, which left us dangerously exposed to geopolitical shocks such as Russia\u2019s invasion of Ukraine and the resulting spike in gas prices.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

But instead of learning the lesson \u2013 including the need to invest in firm baseload, large-scale storage, and domestic hydrocarbon supply \u2013 the government is entrenching the problem. Miliband\u2019s \u201cclean power by 2030\u201d mission will make the grid more dependent on intermittent generation while deterring investment from vital firm generation capacity. As the respected energy academic Professor Dieter Helm has <\/em>warned<\/em><\/a>, this rushed strategy is likely to drive up system and network costs, forcing consumers to pay more for an energy system that delivers less reliability and security.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The OBR puts the central government cost of Net Zero mitigation at \u00a3803 billion over 25 years \u2013 roughly 0.8% of GDP annually. That may sound a lot, but it\u2019s a cautious figure built on highly uncertain assumptions. It excludes household and private sector costs, which could be ten times as much. It assumes smooth delivery and no overruns. And it\u2019s based in part on data from the Climate Change Committee, which has already revised its own estimates down by 65% \u2013 not because the transition got cheaper, but because the modelling changed.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In short, it\u2019s not that the number is too high but that it\u2019s probably too low. A best-case forecast in a worst-case world.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Britain has pursued an energy model that is physically fragile and economically inefficient \u2013 but politically untouchable. Rightly, that model is now being exposed.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unfortunately, it is about to get a lot worse. Every structural weakness the OBR identifies \u2013 low growth, stubborn inflation, rising debt, persistent deficits \u2013 will be made harder to fix by an energy system that demands ever more subsidy, ever more intervention, and delivers ever less reliability.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The political class has spent years ignoring this reality. The OBR, to its credit, cannot. Its spreadsheets may be bloodless, but the message is unmistakable: Britain is in trouble and energy policy is a primary reason why.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The question now isn\u2019t whether the model has failed. It has. The question is whether anyone in power is prepared to admit it and build something better before the next crisis makes that impossible.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Maurice Cousins<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In its latest\u00a0Fiscal Risks and Sustainability Report, the Office for Budget Responsibility confirms the consequences of nearly two decades of failed energy policy. Not deliberately, of course. The document is written in the passive, data-heavy language of technocratic forecasters. But read carefully, and one thing becomes abundantly clear: Britain has built an energy system that cannot support its economy \u2013 and now the entire fiscal architecture is buckling under the strain.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":388485,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691836550,691818056,691819142,691836547,691836549,691836548],"class_list":["post-388481","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-britains-economic","tag-climate-change","tag-energy-policy","tag-fiscal-risks-and-sustainability-report","tag-global-climate-consensus","tag-office-for-budget-responsibility","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/OIG3-48.jpeg?fit=1024%2C1024&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1D3P","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":430355,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=430355","url_meta":{"origin":388481,"position":0},"title":"Another \u00a3150 Billion For Net\u00a0Zero\u2013OBR","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/10\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Office for Budget Responsibility has published its latest Economic & Fiscal Outlook, following the Chancellor\u2019s Spring Statement this week. The Outlook contains details on the Government\u2019s tax and spending plans for the next five years.","rel":"","context":"In \"decarbonisation\"","block_context":{"text":"decarbonisation","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=decarbonisation"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Another-150-Billion-For-Net-Zero%E2%80%93OBR1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Another-150-Billion-For-Net-Zero%E2%80%93OBR1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Another-150-Billion-For-Net-Zero%E2%80%93OBR1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/0-Another-150-Billion-For-Net-Zero%E2%80%93OBR1.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":416251,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=416251","url_meta":{"origin":388481,"position":1},"title":"Billions in green subsidies to be added to household bills","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"12\/06\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Households face paying billions more in energy bills to fund green subsidy costs that were not outlined in Rachel Reeves\u2019s Budget last week.","rel":"","context":"In \"Department of Energy & Climate Change\"","block_context":{"text":"Department of Energy & Climate Change","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=department-of-energy-climate-change"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMPXgiNY_kVJqhtm9XJTEZazw7aiOEWXisgqFBvDBFXd1vye-xyILENIpYyKDaEjdzN6ypnGH2htm81hFjDmf4AKicOjSDmX1t7tC3QJhvSNOBwBu_ovzYtWChD15y3.jpeg?fit=1200%2C697&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMPXgiNY_kVJqhtm9XJTEZazw7aiOEWXisgqFBvDBFXd1vye-xyILENIpYyKDaEjdzN6ypnGH2htm81hFjDmf4AKicOjSDmX1t7tC3QJhvSNOBwBu_ovzYtWChD15y3.jpeg?fit=1200%2C697&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMPXgiNY_kVJqhtm9XJTEZazw7aiOEWXisgqFBvDBFXd1vye-xyILENIpYyKDaEjdzN6ypnGH2htm81hFjDmf4AKicOjSDmX1t7tC3QJhvSNOBwBu_ovzYtWChD15y3.jpeg?fit=1200%2C697&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMPXgiNY_kVJqhtm9XJTEZazw7aiOEWXisgqFBvDBFXd1vye-xyILENIpYyKDaEjdzN6ypnGH2htm81hFjDmf4AKicOjSDmX1t7tC3QJhvSNOBwBu_ovzYtWChD15y3.jpeg?fit=1200%2C697&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AQMPXgiNY_kVJqhtm9XJTEZazw7aiOEWXisgqFBvDBFXd1vye-xyILENIpYyKDaEjdzN6ypnGH2htm81hFjDmf4AKicOjSDmX1t7tC3QJhvSNOBwBu_ovzYtWChD15y3.jpeg?fit=1200%2C697&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":449192,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=449192","url_meta":{"origin":388481,"position":2},"title":"Miliband\u2019s New Net Zero EV Targets Are Not Credible, Warn Carmakers","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/08\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The debate is less \u201cEVs versus no EVs\u201d and more: how quickly the transition can realistically happen, and who absorbs the cost\u2014manufacturers, consumers, or government support programs.","rel":"","context":"In \"Automotive industry\"","block_context":{"text":"Automotive industry","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=automotive-industry"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/00-ChatGPT-Milibands-New-Net-Zero-EV-Targets-Are-Not-Credible-Warn-Carmakers.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/00-ChatGPT-Milibands-New-Net-Zero-EV-Targets-Are-Not-Credible-Warn-Carmakers.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/00-ChatGPT-Milibands-New-Net-Zero-EV-Targets-Are-Not-Credible-Warn-Carmakers.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/00-ChatGPT-Milibands-New-Net-Zero-EV-Targets-Are-Not-Credible-Warn-Carmakers.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/00-ChatGPT-Milibands-New-Net-Zero-EV-Targets-Are-Not-Credible-Warn-Carmakers.png?fit=1200%2C800&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":446712,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=446712","url_meta":{"origin":388481,"position":3},"title":"Net Zero Blitz Risks Exporting Britain\u2019s Greatest Industrial Asset, North Sea Experts Warn","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"05\/27\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The North Sea-focused industry survey warning that UK government policy under Energy Secretary Ed Miliband is accelerating capital flight and skills drain from Britain's mature oil and gas basin.","rel":"","context":"In \"\"managed transition\"\"","block_context":{"text":"\"managed transition\"","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=managed-transition"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0-Net-Zero-Blitz-Risks-Exporting-Britains-Greatest-Industrial-Asset-North-Sea-Experts-Warn.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0-Net-Zero-Blitz-Risks-Exporting-Britains-Greatest-Industrial-Asset-North-Sea-Experts-Warn.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0-Net-Zero-Blitz-Risks-Exporting-Britains-Greatest-Industrial-Asset-North-Sea-Experts-Warn.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0-Net-Zero-Blitz-Risks-Exporting-Britains-Greatest-Industrial-Asset-North-Sea-Experts-Warn.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0-Net-Zero-Blitz-Risks-Exporting-Britains-Greatest-Industrial-Asset-North-Sea-Experts-Warn.jpg?fit=1168%2C784&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":439033,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=439033","url_meta":{"origin":388481,"position":4},"title":"For Minnesota, Climate Obsession Is Just Another Fiscal Disaster","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"04\/12\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Minnesota law sets ambitious greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets relative to 2005 levels: 30% by 2025, 50% by 2030, and carbon neutrality by 2050. The 2023 climate package and updated 2026 Climate Action Framework outline hundreds of actions across sectors like electricity, transportation, agriculture, and buildings.","rel":"","context":"In \"\u201cClimate change superfund\u201d\"","block_context":{"text":"\u201cClimate change superfund\u201d","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=climate-change-superfund"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-For-Minnesota-Climate-Obsession-Is-Just-Another-Fiscal-Disaster.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-For-Minnesota-Climate-Obsession-Is-Just-Another-Fiscal-Disaster.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-For-Minnesota-Climate-Obsession-Is-Just-Another-Fiscal-Disaster.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/0-For-Minnesota-Climate-Obsession-Is-Just-Another-Fiscal-Disaster.jpg?fit=784%2C1168&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245137,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=245137","url_meta":{"origin":388481,"position":5},"title":"Energy providers to UK government: more handouts for \u201agreen\u2018 projects please","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"02\/23\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"An interesting (?) concept from renewables promoters here, partly to boost \u2018innovative\u2019 (generally expensive) technologies. We\u2019re supposed to believe that bigger subsidies, or \u2018fiscal incentives\u2019, will lead to lower bills.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-673.png?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-673.png?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-673.png?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-673.png?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image-673.png?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/388481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=388481"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/388481\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":388486,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/388481\/revisions\/388486"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/388485"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=388481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=388481"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=388481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}