{"id":387471,"date":"2025-07-08T09:56:28","date_gmt":"2025-07-08T07:56:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=387471"},"modified":"2025-07-08T09:56:30","modified_gmt":"2025-07-08T07:56:30","slug":"uk-consumption-emissions-update-with-2022-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=387471","title":{"rendered":"UK Consumption Emissions \u2013 Update with 2022\u00a0Data"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Climate Scepticism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Jit<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Still chasing the wrong number, but still pointless chasing the right number.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Back in March, when the heatwave hysteria was just a gleam in the BBC\u2019s eye, I showed some statistics<\/a> on the UK\u2019s Consumption Emissions (capitalised Donald Trump style here to show that it is a variable as well as a name).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you remember, Imported Emissions are difficult to calculate, so the ONS produces them<\/a> at a three-year lag. Thus, in March, all I could show was data up to 2021. Today, I decided to go back to the ONS today to see whether the statistics had been updated for 2022.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well, they had.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

OK, so now we just add another row to the spreadsheet for 2022 and\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hold on a minute, the numbers for 2021 don\u2019t match.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

OK, maybe the previous year has been revised. Let\u2019s just check the numbers for the first year in the series \u2013 1996.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They don\u2019t match, either.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rather bizarrely, the UK\u2019s emissions for almost every year in the series have been revised, mostly up. I say \u201cappear\u201d there because I don\u2019t have a pristine version of the 1996-2021 spreadsheet. I edited it by adding columns of data to the right. There is a finite chance that I did something bad to the raw data somehow. Knowing me, I think this is highly unlikely. But I note it anyway as a possibility. In terms of Consumption Emissions, there is considerable recent variation with the new update; 2016\u2019s value has been revised up by 14%. [The Territorial Emissions for that year have been revised downwards slightly.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The problem here is that we can\u2019t really discuss emissions figures to any purpose if they are going to be subject to revisions of the order of 10% some years after the event.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That said, I\u2019m going to show the new dataset now, but caveat emptor<\/em>, or cave canem<\/em>, or cave<\/em> next year\u2019s revision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, without further ado, here are the UK\u2019s Consumption Emissions and our Territorial Emissions Before Exports, including the wholesale changes in the 2022 update:<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The story is essentially the same as before, with a somewhat rapidly-declining Net Zero-relevant metric (orange line) and a Consumption Emissions metric (i.e our actual emissions) that is hardly declining at all. The gap between the two is inevitably widening. If you put a line (ordinary least squares) through the two datasets, you will predict that we\u2019ll hit Net Zero in 2050, but that our Consumption Emissions in that year will still be 557 Mt CO<\/em>2<\/em><\/sub>e<\/em>. Those emissions would be entirely imported, by definition. [In 2022, Imported Emissions are already well over half of our Consumption Emissions.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What this means is that we will hit our Net Zero target on time, but still be emitting more CO2<\/sub> in 2050 than many people think we are emitting today. We\u2019ll say we\u2019re on 0, but we\u2019ll be on 557 Mt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In fact, somewhat spookily, the orange line reaches Y = 0 when the year = 2050.2. On the present data we hit Net Zero exactly in 2050<\/em>. Coincidence? [We wouldn\u2019t hit Y = 0 on Consumption Emissions until 2130, on a wild extrapolation of this data.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This figure shows our Net Emission Imports (i.e. Imported \u2013 Exported) as far as the latest update. The only way is up.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Conclusion: all the blather about how necessary Net Zero is to save the planet is incoherent for several reasons. Top is that, if the UK reaches Net Zero, the grand total of the world\u2019s emissions will hardly notice. A close second comes the observation that we are just displacing our emissions to other countries, making our triumphant parade to Net Zero a mere accounting trick.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s as if we had pledged to give up keeping slaves, and when we reached the target of Zero Slaves, we all jumped around, slammed trebles, and popped party popping things, etc. Most of the public in that halcyon day would be blissfully unaware that we were still vicariously keeping slaves by importing goods from \u2013 shall we say \u2013 less scrupulous countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My suggestion would be that we need to impress upon our leaders that they are chasing the wrong number in Territorial Emissions Before Exports. But there\u2019s no point pursuing the Consumption Emissions down to Net Zero, either, because success on that metric would result in the destruction of the UK as a functioning country. [I don\u2019t exaggerate.] There\u2019s no way that anyone could pretend otherwise, meaning that recognising Consumption Emissions as the appropriate target for our self-sacrifice would necessitate its abandonment as insane.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Or that\u2019s what happens in a version of reality that I\u2019d like to live in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Back in March, when the heatwave hysteria was just a gleam in the BBC\u2019s eye,\u00a0I showed some statistics\u00a0on the UK\u2019s Consumption Emissions (capitalised Donald Trump style here to show that it is a variable as well as a name).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":357056,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691829997,691836389,691818154,691836388],"class_list":["post-387471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-carbon-dioxide-co","tag-consumption-emissions","tag-net-zero","tag-uk-greenhouse-gas-emissions","fallback-thumbnail"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0net-zero-istock-1190148959.jpg?fit=2048%2C1299&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1CNx","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":372324,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=372324","url_meta":{"origin":387471,"position":0},"title":"Hello, is that Net Zero? Sorry, wrong\u00a0number","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/27\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Many apologies, but I couldn\u2019t help noticing that your carbon is leaking.","rel":"","context":"In \"Carbon Briefs\"","block_context":{"text":"Carbon Briefs","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-briefs"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0tdjkzmar.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0tdjkzmar.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0tdjkzmar.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0tdjkzmar.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307179,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=307179","url_meta":{"origin":387471,"position":1},"title":"The \u2018elephant in the room\u2019 that risks exposing Britain\u2019s net zero agenda","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/11\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s one of the Government\u2019s proudest boasts. Britain, it claims, has almost\u00a0halved its greenhouse gas emissions\u00a0from 800m tonnes in 1990 to just 417m tonnes in 2022.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon footprint\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon footprint","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-footprint"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Elephant_in_the_Room-0318665.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Elephant_in_the_Room-0318665.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Elephant_in_the_Room-0318665.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Elephant_in_the_Room-0318665.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Elephant_in_the_Room-0318665.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247274,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=247274","url_meta":{"origin":387471,"position":2},"title":"Claim: Global food system emissions imperil Paris climate goals","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"03\/13\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Phys.org\u00a0pounces on another supposed climate alarm. Once again magical powers are assigned to trace gases with no evidence offered.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-310.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-310.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-310.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-310.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-310.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264362,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=264362","url_meta":{"origin":387471,"position":3},"title":"Record Renewables Growth Fails To Cut Global Fossil Fuel Share","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"06\/28\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Record increases in solar and wind installations in 2022 failed to cut into the massive 82% share of fossil fuels in global energy consumption amid turbulent energy markets and energy security concerns, the annual Statistical Review of World Energy showed on Monday.","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0f3b0dbf159a2eca87073737d01ed4120.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0f3b0dbf159a2eca87073737d01ed4120.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0f3b0dbf159a2eca87073737d01ed4120.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0f3b0dbf159a2eca87073737d01ed4120.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/0f3b0dbf159a2eca87073737d01ed4120.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":401966,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=401966","url_meta":{"origin":387471,"position":4},"title":"An exchange with\u00a0ChatGPT","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"09\/13\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Having looked at the latest EDGAR report yesterday, it occurred to me that it might be amusing to engage with ChatGPT about why, given its tiny share of emissions, it was widely seen as important that the UK made further cuts. The ensuing exchange was surprisingly interesting \u2013 see below.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon dioxide (CO\u2082)","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-dioxide-co%e2%82%82"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-12.-Juni-2025-09_57_17.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-12.-Juni-2025-09_57_17.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-12.-Juni-2025-09_57_17.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ChatGPT-Image-12.-Juni-2025-09_57_17.png?fit=800%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283255,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=283255","url_meta":{"origin":387471,"position":5},"title":"Global fossil fuel use and CO2 emissions to rise through 2050, US EIA\u00a0projects","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/14\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Energy security concerns hasten a transition from fossil fuels in some countries, although they drive increased fossil fuel consumption in others. From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT By Paul Homewood The US EIA have just published their latest International Energy Outlook: In our International Energy Outlook 2023 (IEO2023),\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"CO2\"","block_context":{"text":"CO2","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=co2"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0fossilfueldr.jpg?fit=1200%2C591&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0fossilfueldr.jpg?fit=1200%2C591&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0fossilfueldr.jpg?fit=1200%2C591&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0fossilfueldr.jpg?fit=1200%2C591&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/0fossilfueldr.jpg?fit=1200%2C591&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=387471"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387471\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":387480,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387471\/revisions\/387480"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/357056"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=387471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=387471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=387471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}