{"id":387471,"date":"2025-07-08T09:56:28","date_gmt":"2025-07-08T07:56:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=387471"},"modified":"2025-07-08T09:56:30","modified_gmt":"2025-07-08T07:56:30","slug":"uk-consumption-emissions-update-with-2022-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=387471","title":{"rendered":"UK Consumption Emissions \u2013 Update with 2022\u00a0Data"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Climate Scepticism<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By\u00a0Jit<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Still chasing the wrong number, but still pointless chasing the right number.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Back in March, when the heatwave hysteria was just a gleam in the BBC\u2019s eye, I showed some statistics<\/a> on the UK\u2019s Consumption Emissions (capitalised Donald Trump style here to show that it is a variable as well as a name).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you remember, Imported Emissions are difficult to calculate, so the ONS produces them<\/a> at a three-year lag. Thus, in March, all I could show was data up to 2021. Today, I decided to go back to the ONS today to see whether the statistics had been updated for 2022.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well, they had.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

OK, so now we just add another row to the spreadsheet for 2022 and\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hold on a minute, the numbers for 2021 don\u2019t match.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

OK, maybe the previous year has been revised. Let\u2019s just check the numbers for the first year in the series \u2013 1996.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They don\u2019t match, either.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rather bizarrely, the UK\u2019s emissions for almost every year in the series have been revised, mostly up. I say \u201cappear\u201d there because I don\u2019t have a pristine version of the 1996-2021 spreadsheet. I edited it by adding columns of data to the right. There is a finite chance that I did something bad to the raw data somehow. Knowing me, I think this is highly unlikely. But I note it anyway as a possibility. In terms of Consumption Emissions, there is considerable recent variation with the new update; 2016\u2019s value has been revised up by 14%. [The Territorial Emissions for that year have been revised downwards slightly.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The problem here is that we can\u2019t really discuss emissions figures to any purpose if they are going to be subject to revisions of the order of 10% some years after the event.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That said, I\u2019m going to show the new dataset now, but caveat emptor<\/em>, or cave canem<\/em>, or cave<\/em> next year\u2019s revision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, without further ado, here are the UK\u2019s Consumption Emissions and our Territorial Emissions Before Exports, including the wholesale changes in the 2022 update:<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The story is essentially the same as before, with a somewhat rapidly-declining Net Zero-relevant metric (orange line) and a Consumption Emissions metric (i.e our actual emissions) that is hardly declining at all. The gap between the two is inevitably widening. If you put a line (ordinary least squares) through the two datasets, you will predict that we\u2019ll hit Net Zero in 2050, but that our Consumption Emissions in that year will still be 557 Mt CO<\/em>2<\/em><\/sub>e<\/em>. Those emissions would be entirely imported, by definition. [In 2022, Imported Emissions are already well over half of our Consumption Emissions.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What this means is that we will hit our Net Zero target on time, but still be emitting more CO2<\/sub> in 2050 than many people think we are emitting today. We\u2019ll say we\u2019re on 0, but we\u2019ll be on 557 Mt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In fact, somewhat spookily, the orange line reaches Y = 0 when the year = 2050.2. On the present data we hit Net Zero exactly in 2050<\/em>. Coincidence? [We wouldn\u2019t hit Y = 0 on Consumption Emissions until 2130, on a wild extrapolation of this data.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This figure shows our Net Emission Imports (i.e. Imported \u2013 Exported) as far as the latest update. The only way is up.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Conclusion: all the blather about how necessary Net Zero is to save the planet is incoherent for several reasons. Top is that, if the UK reaches Net Zero, the grand total of the world\u2019s emissions will hardly notice. A close second comes the observation that we are just displacing our emissions to other countries, making our triumphant parade to Net Zero a mere accounting trick.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s as if we had pledged to give up keeping slaves, and when we reached the target of Zero Slaves, we all jumped around, slammed trebles, and popped party popping things, etc. Most of the public in that halcyon day would be blissfully unaware that we were still vicariously keeping slaves by importing goods from \u2013 shall we say \u2013 less scrupulous countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My suggestion would be that we need to impress upon our leaders that they are chasing the wrong number in Territorial Emissions Before Exports. But there\u2019s no point pursuing the Consumption Emissions down to Net Zero, either, because success on that metric would result in the destruction of the UK as a functioning country. [I don\u2019t exaggerate.] There\u2019s no way that anyone could pretend otherwise, meaning that recognising Consumption Emissions as the appropriate target for our self-sacrifice would necessitate its abandonment as insane.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Or that\u2019s what happens in a version of reality that I\u2019d like to live in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Back in March, when the heatwave hysteria was just a gleam in the BBC\u2019s eye,\u00a0I showed some statistics\u00a0on the UK\u2019s Consumption Emissions (capitalised Donald Trump style here to show that it is a variable as well as a name).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121246920,"featured_media":357056,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[691829997,691836389,691818154,691836388],"class_list":{"0":"post-387471","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"category-uncategorized","8":"tag-carbon-dioxide-co","9":"tag-consumption-emissions","10":"tag-net-zero","11":"tag-uk-greenhouse-gas-emissions","13":"fallback-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/0net-zero-istock-1190148959.jpg?fit=2048%2C1299&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paxLW1-1CNx","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":372324,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=372324","url_meta":{"origin":387471,"position":0},"title":"Hello, is that Net Zero? Sorry, wrong\u00a0number","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"27\/03\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Many apologies, but I couldn\u2019t help noticing that your carbon is leaking.","rel":"","context":"In \"Carbon Briefs\"","block_context":{"text":"Carbon Briefs","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-briefs"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0tdjkzmar.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0tdjkzmar.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0tdjkzmar.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/0tdjkzmar.png?fit=1024%2C576&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307179,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=307179","url_meta":{"origin":387471,"position":1},"title":"The \u2018elephant in the room\u2019 that risks exposing Britain\u2019s net zero agenda","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"11\/03\/2024","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s one of the Government\u2019s proudest boasts. Britain, it claims, has almost\u00a0halved its greenhouse gas emissions\u00a0from 800m tonnes in 1990 to just 417m tonnes in 2022.","rel":"","context":"In \"carbon footprint\"","block_context":{"text":"carbon footprint","link":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?tag=carbon-footprint"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Elephant_in_the_Room-0318665.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Elephant_in_the_Room-0318665.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Elephant_in_the_Room-0318665.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Elephant_in_the_Room-0318665.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/0Elephant_in_the_Room-0318665.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207968,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=207968","url_meta":{"origin":387471,"position":2},"title":"BP Statistical Review \u2013 The Tales Told by Numbers","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"10\/07\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Contributed by Robert Lyman \u00a9 2022. Robert Lyman\u2019s bio can be read\u00a0here. The British Petroleum Statistical Review of World Energy for over seventy years has been the most authoritative source of data available to the general public concerning global energy market trends. The review has changed its focus and contents\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-67.png?fit=959%2C639&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-67.png?fit=959%2C639&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-67.png?fit=959%2C639&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/image-67.png?fit=959%2C639&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247274,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=247274","url_meta":{"origin":387471,"position":3},"title":"Claim: Global food system emissions imperil Paris climate goals","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"13\/03\/2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Phys.org\u00a0pounces on another supposed climate alarm. Once again magical powers are assigned to trace gases with no evidence offered.","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-310.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-310.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-310.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-310.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/image-310.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211005,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=211005","url_meta":{"origin":387471,"position":4},"title":"BBC Is Upset","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"30\/07\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The BBC and the Met Office are upset people aren\u2019t buying their anti-energy propaganda and hysteria based on two hot days last week \u2013 and apparently they are blaming some of the rejection of their propaganda on me. \u201cBBC meteorologist Matt Taylor said he had never experienced anything like it\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0Image-2022-07-29-11-07-32.png?fit=735%2C279&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0Image-2022-07-29-11-07-32.png?fit=735%2C279&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0Image-2022-07-29-11-07-32.png?fit=735%2C279&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/0Image-2022-07-29-11-07-32.png?fit=735%2C279&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202417,"url":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/?p=202417","url_meta":{"origin":387471,"position":5},"title":"100 Companies to Blame For 71% of Global Emissions?","author":"uwe.roland.gross","date":"01\/06\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Paul Homewood This story, though four years old, continues to the rounds. I saw it the other day on a FoE Facebook post: Since 1988, a mere 100 companies have been responsible for 71 percent of the entire world\u2019s industrial greenhouse gas emissions. This data comes from an inaugural\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/0100com.png?fit=1024%2C662&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/0100com.png?fit=1024%2C662&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/0100com.png?fit=1024%2C662&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/climatescience.press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/0100com.png?fit=1024%2C662&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/121246920"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=387471"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387471\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":387480,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387471\/revisions\/387480"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/357056"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=387471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=387471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatescience.press\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=387471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}